Work-Family Conflicts: Assessing a South African Sample of Urban Employees
Keywords:
Downloads
Abstract
The article explores the scope and impact of employees’ work responsibilities on the family life and vice-versa. It describes the coping styles adopted by a sample of urban employees and the efficacies of these styles. A semi-structured questionnaire and in-depth interviews were the means of collecting data from 48 respondents who were either dual career couples or single parents. The findings reveal that virtually all the respondents experience serious work-family conflicts, especially with managing their time, domestic chores, and stress. The challenge is for the employer, the employee, trade unions and partners to support each other to alleviate work-family conflicts. The findings are important given the focus of South African government on emancipating and empowering women through legislation and the setting up of national women. The contributions of women would be undermined, if family-work conflicts such as identified here were not addressed.
Downloads
References
Bailyn, L. (1992). Issues of work and family in different national context: How the United State, Britain and Sweden respond. Human Resource Management, 31(3), 201-208.
Google Scholar CrossrefBasic Conditions of Employment Act (1995)
Google Scholar CrossrefBlair, S. L. (1993). Employment, family and perceptions of marital quality among husbands and wives. Journal of Family Issues, 14, 189-212.
Google Scholar CrossrefBosch, A., de Bruin, G., Kgaladi, B., & de Bruin K. (2012). Life role salience among black African dual-career couples in the South African context. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 23(14), 2835-2853.
Google Scholar CrossrefBoult, B. E., & Cunningham, P. W. (1991). Black teenage pregnancy in Port Elizabeth. Occasional Paper no. 26. Institute of Planning and Research, University of Port Elizabeth.
Google Scholar CrossrefBurley, K. A. (1995). Family variables as mediators of the relationship between work-family conflict and marital adjustment among dual-career men and women. The Journal of Social Psychology, 135(5), 483-497.
Google Scholar CrossrefCharkhabi, M., Sartori, R. & Ceschi, A. (2016). Work–family conflict based on strain: The most hazardous type of conflict in Iranian hospital nurses. SA Journal of Industrial Psychology/SA Tydskrif vir Bedryfsielkunde, 42(1), 1264. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/sajip.v42i1.1264
Google Scholar CrossrefChatman, J. (1991). Matching people and organizations: Selection and socialization in public accounting firms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36, 459-484.
Google Scholar CrossrefGoogle Scholar Crossref
Ferreira, A., & Pieterse, H., (1994). Volledig Vrou. 1st Edition. Human & Rosseau (Pty) BPK.
Google Scholar CrossrefGerstel, N., & Clawson, D. (2001). Union’s responses to family concern. Work & Family, 48(2), 277.
Google Scholar CrossrefGoogins, B. K., & Gonyea, J. G. (1992). Linking the worlds of work and family: Beyond the productivity tap. Human Resource Management, 31(3), 209-206.
Google Scholar CrossrefGreenhaus, J. H., & Beutell, N. J. (1995). Sources of conflict between work and family roles. Academy Management Review, 10, 76-88.
Google Scholar CrossrefHatum, U., & Ozlen O. (2001). Interaction between the business and family lives of women entrepreneurs in Turkey. Journal of Business Ethics, 31, 95-106.
Google Scholar CrossrefIyiola, O., Osibanjo, O., Oyewunmi, A. E., Kehinde, O. J., & Igbinoba, E. (2015). Code blue: Stress among nurses in a teaching hospital and its effects on healthcare delivery. The Social Sciences, 11(7), 1312-1317.
Google Scholar CrossrefGoogle Scholar Crossref
Labour Relations Act 1995
Google Scholar CrossrefLauer, R. (1998). Social Problems and the quality of life. McGraw-Hill Companies Inc.
Google Scholar CrossrefLee, C., & Duxbury, L. (1988). Employed parents’ support from partners, employers and friends. Journal of Social Psychology, 138(3), 303.
Google Scholar CrossrefLior O., & Liron L. (2017). Work-family conflict/enrichment: The role of personal resources. International Journal of Manpower, 38(8), 1102-1113. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJM-06-2014-0135.
Google Scholar CrossrefLobel, S. A. (1992). Integrating work and family life. Human Resource Management, 31(3), 209-226.
Google Scholar CrossrefMarshall, N. L., & Barnett, R. C. (1993). Work-family strains among two-earner couples. Journal of Community Psychology, 21, 64-78.
Google Scholar CrossrefMaslach, C., & Jackson, S. (1981). The measurement of experienced burnout. Journal of Occupational Behaviour, 2, 99-113. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/job.4030020205
Google Scholar CrossrefOyewunmi, A. E., Oyewunmi, O. A., Iyiola, O., & Ojo, A. Y. (2015). Mental health and the Nigerian workplace: Fallacies, facts and the way forward. International Journal of Psychology and Counselling, 7(7), 106-111.
Google Scholar CrossrefPleck, J. H. (1989). Family supportive employer policies and men’s perspective. Family and Consumer Sciences Research Journal. National Research Council, Washington, D.C.
Google Scholar CrossrefPopenoe, D., Cunningham, P., & Boult, B. E. (1997). Sociology (1st South African ed.). Cape Town, South Africa: Prentice Hall.
Google Scholar CrossrefGoogle Scholar Crossref
Shellenbarger, S. (1992). Lessons from the workplace: How corporate policies and attitudes lag behind workers changing needs. Human Resource Management, 31(3), 157-169.
Google Scholar CrossrefSouth African Commercial Catering and Allied Workers Union (1991). Sharing the load, the struggle for gender equality, parental rights and childcare.
Google Scholar CrossrefTrue Love, October 2000, 48-50.
Google Scholar CrossrefWork-life Report (1999)
Google Scholar CrossrefZakaria, N., & Ismail, Z. (2018). The consequences of work-family conflict and the importance of social supports to reduce work-family conflict among employees. Malaysian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 2(2), 25 - 30. Retrieved from http://msocialsciences.com/index.php/mjssh/article/view/41
Google Scholar CrossrefDownloads
Published
Almetric
Dimensions
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
All articles are published under Creative Commons copyright (CC BY). Authors hold the copyright and retain publishing rights without restrictions, but authors allow anyone to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute, and/or copy articles as the original source is cited.
