Interpretation of pV graphics

Authors

https://doi.org/10.17583/redimat.11406

Keywords:


Downloads

Number of words in the article:

5088

Abstract

Thermodynamic processes are often presented in so called P-V diagrams and the processes are often isobaric, isochoric, isothermal, and adiabatic. The purpose of the qualitative research reported here was to explore students’ reasoning and interpretation of P-V diagrams that were presented by the help of GeoGebra. The research group had 15 students and the control group had 12 students. The control group were not given any dynamical explanation of the PV diagrams but were taught with static images in the same text book as the research group. The thermodynamics in Physics 1 at the Swedish gymnasium level is normally done within 2 weeks.  We allocated 3 weeks and 10 hours for the thermodynamics to be taught and then gave all 27 students a short test. At the end of the Physics 1 course, we also gave a test with two questions from the thermodynamics. It seems that the students who were given the opportunity to dynamically change the content of the PV diagram benefit more from the teaching compared to the control group.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Arzarello, F., Olivero, F., Domingo, P. & Ornella, R. (2002). A cognitive analysis of dragging practices in Cabri environments. Zentralblatt für mathematic. 34 (3), 66 – 72. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02655708

Google Scholar Crossref

Breidenbach, D., Hawks, J., Nichols, D. & Dubinsky, E. (1992). Development of the process conception of function. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 23(4), 247–285. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02309532

Google Scholar Crossref

Elby, A. (2000). What students’ learning of representations tells us about constructivism. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 19(4, 4th quarter, 2000), 481–502. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0732-3123(01)00054-2

Google Scholar Crossref

Falcade, R., Laborde, C., & Mariotti, M. (2007). Approaching functions: Cabri tools as instruments of semiotic mediation. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 66(3), 317- 333. https://doi:10.1007/S10649-006-9072-Y

Google Scholar Crossref

Friel, S. N., Curcio, F. R. & Bright, G.W. (2001). Making sense of graphs: Critical factors influencing comprehension and instructional implications. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 32(2), 124–158. https://doi.org/10.2307/749671

Google Scholar Crossref

González, G., & Herbst, P. G. (2009). Students’ conceptions of congruency through the use of dynamic geometry software. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 14, 153-182. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-009-9152-z

Google Scholar Crossref

Janvier, C. (1987) (Ed.). Problems of representation in the teaching and learning of mathematics. Lawrence Erlbaum.

Google Scholar Crossref

Laborde, C, Kynigos, C., Hollebrands, K., & Strässer, R. (2006).Teaching and learning geometry with technology. In A. Gutiérrez & P. Boero (Eds.), Handbook of Research on the Psychology of Mathematics Education: Past, Present and Future, (275–304). Sense Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789087901127_011

Google Scholar Crossref

Leinhardt, G., Zaslavsky, O., & Stein, M. M. (1990). Functions, graphs, and graphing: Tasks, learning and teaching. Review of Educational Research, 60(1), 1–64. http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/00346543060001

Google Scholar Crossref

Leung, A. (2003). Dynamic Geometry and The Theory of Variation. International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, 3, 197-204.

Google Scholar Crossref

Lingefjärd, T & Farahani, D. (2017). The Elusive Slope. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education. Open Access. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10763-017-9811-9

Google Scholar Crossref

Marrades, R., & Gutiérrez, Á. (2000). Proofs produced by secondary school students learning geometry in a dynamic computer environment. Educational studies in mathematics, 44, 87-125.

Google Scholar Crossref

Marton, F. & Booth, S. (1997). Learning and Awareness. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Google Scholar Crossref

Moreno-Armella, L., Hegedus, S. J., & Kaput, J. J. (2008). From static to dynamic mathematics: historical and representational perspectives. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 68 (2), 99-111. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-008-9116-6

Google Scholar Crossref

Pea, R. D. (1985). Beyond amplification: Using the computer to reorganize mental functioning. Educational Psychologist, 20(4), 167–182. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep2004_2

Google Scholar Crossref

Pea, R. D. (1987). Cognitive technologies in mathematics education. In A. H. Schoenfeld (Ed.), Cognitive science and mathematics education (pp. 89–122). Erlbaum.

Google Scholar Crossref

Sfard, A. (1992). Operational origins of mathematical objects and the quandary of reification—The case of function. In E. Dubinsky & G. Harel (Eds.), The concept of function: Aspects of epistemology and pedagogy (pp. 59–84). Mathematical Association of America.

Google Scholar Crossref

Trigueros, M., & Martínez-Planell, R. (2010). Geometrical representations in the learning of two-variable functions. Educational studies in mathematics, 73, 3-19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-009-9201-5

Google Scholar Crossref

Zbiek, R. M., Heid, M. K., Blume, G.W., and Dick, T. P. (2007). Research on technology in mathematics education, A perspective of constructs. F. K. Lester (Ed.), Second Handbook of Research on Mathematics Teaching and Learning (pp. 1169-1207). Information Age.

Google Scholar Crossref

Downloads

Published

2023-06-24

Almetric

Dimensions

Issue

Section

Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)