Practices and Outcomes of Communicative Language Teaching in Higher Secondary Schools in Rural Bangladesh
Keywords:
Downloads
Abstract
This paper aims to provide insights into the challenges of Communicative Language Teaching (CLT) practice at higher secondary level in Bangladeshi rural settings. Employing qualitative approach, in-depth interviews were conducted with 24 rural English language teachers to explore the problems they face in CLT implementation. The interview data were scrutinized using thematic analysis. Three major themes emerge from the analysis which are: (i) pedagogical factors; (ii) contextual factors; and (iii) personal factors that obstruct CLT implementation to reach at its expected outcome. The paper reveals the gap between the objectives of the present ELT curriculum and teachers’ practices. The teachers are optimistic with CLT approach for improving students’ English skill, but they need viable support to overcome the factors working as the barriers of its proper implementation. Based on the teachers’ suggestion, the study recommends the aligning of curriculum and test format, and also the training and logistic support for the teachers to overcome the issues surrounding the CLT implementation in the rural context of Bangladesh.
Downloads
References
Alam, M. (2015). Comparative Acceptability of GTM and CLT to the Teachers of Rural Secondary High Schools in Bangladesh. Global Journal of Human-Social Science Research, 15(4), 1-8.
Google Scholar CrossrefAmin, M. A. (2017). Charting the river: A case study of English language teaching in Bangladesh. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). The University of Canterbury, New Zealand.
Google Scholar CrossrefAl Amin, M., & Greenwood, J. (2018). The examination system in Bangladesh and its impact: on curriculum, students, teachers and society. Language Testing in Asia, 8(1), 1-18. doi:10.1186/s40468-018-0060-9
Google Scholar CrossrefAnsarey, D. (2012). Communicative Language Teaching in EFL Contexts: Teachers Attitude and Perception in Bangladesh. ASA University Review, 6(1), 61-78.
Google Scholar CrossrefAronson, J. (1995). A Pragmatic View of Thematic Analysis. The Qualitative Report, 2(1), 1-3.
Google Scholar CrossrefBernard, H. (2000). Social Research Methods. London: Sage Publications.
Google Scholar CrossrefBoyatzis, R. E. (1998). Transforming qualitative information: Thematic analysis and code development. London: Sage Publications.
Google Scholar CrossrefBraun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101.
Google Scholar CrossrefBrown, H. D. (2001). Teaching by principles: An Interactive approach to language pedagogy. New York: Addison Wesley Longman, Inc.
Google Scholar CrossrefChoudhury, R. K. (2010). Appropriateness and relevancy of communicative language teaching (CLT) for Bangladesh: A perspective from Bangladeshi rural secondary school English teachers. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Teachers College, Columbia University, US.
Google Scholar CrossrefChomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
Google Scholar CrossrefCreswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2017). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
Google Scholar CrossrefCreswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Google Scholar CrossrefDenscombe, M. (2007). The good research guide for small-scale research projects. Berkshire: Open University Press.
Google Scholar CrossrefDenzin, N. K. (1994). The art and politics of interpretation. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 500-515). Thousand Oaks, CA, US: Sage Publications, Inc.
Google Scholar CrossrefDornyei, Z. (2007). Research methods in applied linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar CrossrefGray, D. (2004). Doing research in the real world. Los Angeles: Sage.
Google Scholar CrossrefHamid, M. O., & Erling, E. J. (2016). English-in-education policy and planning in Bangladesh: A critical examination. In English language education policy in Asia (pp. 25-48). Springer, Cham. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-22464-0_2
Google Scholar CrossrefHammond, M., & Wellington, J. (2013). Research methods: The key concepts. London: Routledge.
Google Scholar CrossrefHassan, M. K. (2013). Teachers’ and students’ perceived difficulties in implementing communicative language teaching in Bangladesh: a critical study. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). The Open University, UK.
Google Scholar CrossrefHolliday, A. (1996). Developing a sociological imagination: expanding ethnography in international English language education. Applied Linguistics, 17 (2), 234-255. doi:10.1093/applin/17.2.234
Google Scholar CrossrefHuang, Q. (2017). A Study on the Roles of Teachers in CLT Classrooms by Metaphor Analysis. Canadian Social Science, 13(6), 62-71. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.3968/9674
Google Scholar CrossrefHuang, S. H. (2011). On the applicability of communicative language teaching (CLT) pedagogy in rural Taiwan. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Indiana University, US.
Google Scholar CrossrefHymes, D. (1972). On Communicative Competence. In J. B. Pride and J. Holmes (Eds.), Sociolinguistics, pp. 269-293. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Google Scholar CrossrefIslam, F. (2016). Effectiveness of communicative language teaching at primary level in Bangladesh. (Unpublished M.A. Thesis). BRAC University, Bangladesh.
Google Scholar CrossrefIslam, M. R. (2016). Investigation into teachers’ practice in relation to curriculum implementation in ELT in Bangladesh. (Unpublished M. Phil thesis). De Montfort University, UK.
Google Scholar CrossrefJeffrey, B., & Troman, G. (2004). Time for ethnography. British educational research journal, 30(4), 535-548.
Google Scholar Crossrefdoi:10.1080/0141192042000237220
Google Scholar CrossrefKarim, A., Mohamed, A. R., Rahman, M. M., & Haque, M. H. (2017). Teachers’ dilemma bog down CLT in EFL contexts: A discussion on EFL teachers’ beliefs and sources. IOSR Journal of Humanities And Social Science, 22(4), 112-120. doi:10.9790/0837-220405112120
Google Scholar CrossrefMaxwell, J. A. (2013). Qualitative research design: An interactive approach (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Google Scholar CrossrefMcGrath, I. (2002). Material Evaluation and Design for Language Teaching. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Google Scholar CrossrefNguyen, T. N. M. (2016). The cultural appropriateness of communicative language teaching: a case study of the EFL program implementation at a Vietnamese tertiary institution. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Western Sydney University, Australia.
Google Scholar CrossrefNur, S., & Islam, M. A. (2018). The (Dis) Connection between Secondary English Education Assessment Policy and Practice: Insights from Bangladesh. International Journal of English Language Education, 6(1), 100-132. doi:10.5296/ijele.v6i1.12946
Google Scholar CrossrefPatton, M.Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Google Scholar CrossrefRahman, A. (2018). Emerging Factors of Communicative Language Teaching (CLT) and its Application in Indonesian English As a Foreign Language (EFL) Classrooms. Langkawi: Journal of The Association for Arabic and English, 3(2), 169-174.
Google Scholar CrossrefRahman, M. S. (2015). Implementing CLT at Higher Secondary Level in Bangladesh: A Review of Change Management. Journal of Education and Practice, 6(2), 93-102.
Google Scholar CrossrefRahman, M. M., Singh, M. K. M., & Pandian, A. (2018). Exploring ESL Teacher Beliefs and Classroom Practices of CLT: A Case Study. International Journal of Instruction, 11(1), 295-310. doi:10.12973/iji.2018.11121a
Google Scholar CrossrefGoogle Scholar Crossref
Rahman, M. M., Pandian, A., & Kaur, M. (2018). Factors Affecting Teachers’ Implementation of Communicative Language Teaching Curriculum in Secondary Schools in Bangladesh. The Qualitative Report, 23(5), 1104-1126.
Google Scholar CrossrefRahman, M. S., & Karim, S. S. (2015). Problems of CLT in Bangladesh: Ways to improve. International Journal of Education Learning and Development, 3(3), 75-87.
Google Scholar CrossrefRichards, J. C. (2001). Program factors in effective foreign and second language teaching. Journal of Southeast Asian Education, 2(2), 373–412.
Google Scholar CrossrefRichards, J. C., & Rodgers, T. S. (2014). Approaches and methods in language teaching. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge university press.
Google Scholar CrossrefRoy, S. (2016). Challenges to Implementing Communicative Language Teaching (CLT) in Bangladesh. Language in India, 16(3), 218-235.
Google Scholar CrossrefSarab, M. R. A., Monfared, A., & Safarzadeh, M. M. (2016). Secondary EFL School Teachers' Perceptions of CLT Principles and Practices: An Exploratory Survey. Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research, 4(3), 109-130.
Google Scholar CrossrefSavignon, S. J. (2007). Beyond communicative language teaching: What’s ahead? Journal of Pragmatics 39(1), 207-220. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2006.09.004
Google Scholar CrossrefSmith, J. (1995). Semi-structured interviewing and qualitative analysis. In J. Smith, R. Harre, and L. Langenhove, Rethinking methods in psychology (pp. 9-26). London: Sage Publications.
Google Scholar CrossrefStirling, J. A. (2001). Thematic networks: an analytic tool for qualitative research. Qualitative Research, 1(3), 385-405. doi:10.1177/146879410100100307
Google Scholar CrossrefTrisha, B. J., Akter, M. S., Yusufi, I. N., & Munna, A. S. (2018). Dissonance between Syllabus and Testing: Reason of Weak Efficiency in English at SSC Level. Current Educational Research, 1(1), 1-5.
Google Scholar CrossrefWiddowson, H. G. (1978). Teaching Language as Communication. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar CrossrefDownloads
Published
Metrics
Almetric
Dimensions
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
All articles are published under Creative Commons copyright (CC BY). Authors hold the copyright and retain publishing rights without restrictions, but authors allow anyone to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute, and/or copy articles as the original source is cited.
