Participación Social: Una Buena Vida Después de la Jubilación en Rusia
Palabras clave:
Descargas
Tipo:
TextoResumen
Las actividades sociales en las que participan los adultos mayores son importantes para la política social sobre el envejecimiento en Rusia. Este estudio examina, desde una perspectiva eudaimónica, la participación de los adultos mayores en tres proyectos sociales rusos que incluyen actividades de voluntariado, modelaje de moda y artesanías tradicionales. Se aplicaron métodos cualitativos y cuantitativos para analizar 934 encuestas completadas en línea. A pesar de las diferencias en los tipos de actividades, los resultados mostraron que la satisfacción por cumplir las motivaciones de participación de los adultos mayores y los beneficios obtenidos de dicha participación llevaron a mejoras en sus percepciones sobre la vida después de la jubilación. Según los participantes, indicadores adicionales, como la sensación de ser necesitados, el sentimiento de felicidad y la autoevaluación de la salud, también mejoraron. Sin embargo, la organización de actividades sociales requiere flexibilidad para satisfacer las necesidades e intereses heterogéneos de las personas mayores, de acuerdo con los cambios en su situación personal o en el entorno externo. Para lograr una sensación de bienestar en la vejez, estas actividades deben satisfacer las motivaciones internas para participar y cubrir las necesidades esenciales de relación, competencia y autonomía.
Descargas
Citas
Åberg, E., Kukkonen, I., & Sarpila, O. (2020). From double to triple standards of ageing. Perceptions of physical appearance at the intersections of age, gender and class. Journal of Aging Studies, 55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaging.2020.100876
Google Scholar CrossrefAdams, K., Leibbrandt, S., & Moon, H. (2011). A critical review of the literature on social and leisure activity and wellbeing in later life. Ageing and Society, 31(4), 683–712. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X10001091
Google Scholar CrossrefAmagasa, S., Fukushima, N., Kikuchi, H., Oka, K., Takamiya, T., Odagiri, Y., & Inoue, S. (2017). Types of social participation and psychological distress in Japanese older adults: A five-year cohort study. PLoS ONE, 12(4). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0175392
Google Scholar CrossrefAnderson, N. D., Damianakis, T., Kröger, E., Wagner, L. M., Dawson, D. R., Binns, M. A., Bernstein, S., Caspi, E., Cook, S. L., & The BRAVO Team. (2014). The Benefits Associated With Volunteering Among Seniors: A Critical Review and Recommendations for Future Research. Psychological Bulletin, 140(6), 1505–1533. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0037610
Google Scholar CrossrefBarret, D. B. (1993). Art Programming for Older Adults: What’s out There? Studies in Art Education, 34(3), 133–140. https://doi.org/10.2307/1320618
Google Scholar CrossrefBoerio, P., Garavaglia, E., & Gaia, A. (2023). Active ageing in Europe: are changes in social capital associated with engagement, initiation and maintenance of activity in later life? Ageing and Society, 43(5), 1122–1140. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X21001021
Google Scholar CrossrefBowling, A. (2006). Lay perceptions of successful ageing: Findings from a national survey of middle aged and older adults in Britain. European Journal of Ageing, 3(3), 123–136. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10433-006-0032-2
Google Scholar CrossrefBowling, A. (2008). Enhancing later life: How older people perceive active ageing? Aging and Mental Health, 12(3), 293–301. https://doi.org/10.1080/13607860802120979
Google Scholar CrossrefBraun, V., & Clarke, V. (2022). Conceptual and Design Thinking for Thematic Analysis. Qualitative Psychology, 9(1), 3–26. https://doi.org/10.1037/qup0000196
Google Scholar CrossrefCadmus, E. O., Adebusoye, L. A., & Owoaje, E. T. (2021). Attitude towards ageing and perceived health status of community-dwelling older persons in a low resource setting: a rural-urban comparison. BMC Geriatrics, 21(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-021-02394-5
Google Scholar CrossrefCajayon, S. B., Macabasag, R. L. A., Limchanco, N., Umali, V. O., Blas, E. N., Angulo, M. S., Breguera, C. J. A., de Guzman, N. A., Malapi, S. N., & Quibote, E. E. (2017). “I feel like I’m drawing strength from it”: Lived Experiences of Filipino Elderly Participating in Craft-Making. The Qualitative Report, 22(10), 2742–2754. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2017.3000
Google Scholar CrossrefChu, J. T., & Koo, M. (2023). Life Satisfaction and Self-Esteem in Older Adults Engaging in Formal Volunteering: A Cross-Sectional Study in Taiwan. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(6). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20064934
Google Scholar CrossrefDeci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “What” and “Why” of Goal Pursuits: Human Needs and the Self-determination of Behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01
Google Scholar CrossrefFarinosi, M. (2023). Deconstructing the stigma of ageing: The rise of the mature female influencers. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 26(3), 313–335. https://doi.org/10.1177/13675494221102188
Google Scholar CrossrefFoster, L., & Walker, A. (2015). Active and Successful Aging: A European Policy Perspective. The Gerontologist, 55(1), 83–90. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnu028
Google Scholar CrossrefGagliardi, C., Pillemer, K., Gambella, E., Piccinini, F., & Fabbietti, P. (2020). Benefits for Older People Engaged in Environmental Volunteering and Socializing Activities in City Parks: Preliminary Results of a Rrogram in Italy. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(11), 3772. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17113772
Google Scholar CrossrefGao, M., Sa, Z., Li, Y., Zhang, W., Tian, D., Zhang, S., & Gu, L. (2018). Does social participation reduce the risk of functional disability among older adults in China? A survival analysis using the 2005-2011 waves of the CLHLS data. BMC Geriatrics, 18(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-018-0903-3
Google Scholar CrossrefGendron, T. L., Welleford, E. A., Inker, J., & White, J. T. (2016). The Language of Ageism: Why We Need to Use Words Carefully. The Gerontologist, 56(6), 997–1006. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnv066
Google Scholar CrossrefGoulding, A. (2018). The Role of Cultural Engagement in Older People’s Lives. Cultural Sociology, 12(4), 518–539. https://doi.org/10.1177/1749975518754461
Google Scholar CrossrefGovernment of Russia. (2016). Стратегия действий в интересах граждан старшего поколения в Российской Федерации до 2025 года [the Action Strategy for the Benefit of Older Citizens in the Russian Federation until 2025] (164-r). https://mintrud.gov.ru/ministry/programms/37/2
Google Scholar CrossrefHandy, F., & Cnaan, R. A. (2007). The role of social anxiety in volunteering. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 18(1), 41–58. https://doi.org/10.1002/nml.170
Google Scholar CrossrefHoffman, D. H. (1978). Arts programming for the elderly. Educational Gerontology, 3(1), 17–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/0360127780030103
Google Scholar CrossrefJones, R., & Reynolds, F. (2019). The contribution of charity shop volunteering to a positive experience of ageing. Journal of Occupational Science, 26(4), 524–536. https://doi.org/10.1080/14427591.2019.1592697
Google Scholar CrossrefKelly, M. E., Duff, H., Kelly, S., McHugh Power, J. E., Brennan, S., Lawlor, B. A., & Loughrey, D. G. (2017). The impact of social activities, social networks, social support and social relationships on the cognitive functioning of healthy older adults: a systematic review. Systematic Reviews, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-017-0632-2
Google Scholar CrossrefKienko, T. S. (Ed.). (2021). Лучшие социальные практики расширения прав и возможностей пожилых людей (empowerment-технология) в городах и селах Ростовской области [Best social practices for the empowerment of older persons (empowerment-technology) in cities and villages of the Rostov region]. Фонд науки и образования. https://hub.sfedu.ru/storage/1/1294017/400aa354-3f54-4ec3-a102-fec829e5b0b9/
Google Scholar CrossrefKienko, T. S., Pevnaya, M. V., & Ptitsyna, N. A. (2022). Practices of self-organization and social activity of older Russians as empowerment technologies. Vestnik of Lobachevsky State University of Nizhni Novgorod. Series: Social Sciences, 1, 89–98. https://doi.org/10.52452/18115942_2022_1_89
Google Scholar CrossrefKim, D. (2017). The effects of a combined physical activity, recreation, and art and craft program on ADL, cognition, and depression in the elderly. Journal of Physical Therapy Science, 29, 744–747. https://doi.org/10.1589/jpts.29.744
Google Scholar CrossrefLemon, B. W., Bengtson, V. L., & Peterson, J. A. (1972). An Exploration of the Activity Theory of Aging: Activity Types and Life Satisfaction among In-Movers to a Retirement Community. Journal of Gerontology, 27(4), 511–523. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronj/27.4.511
Google Scholar CrossrefLevine, H. A. (1952). Community Programs for the Elderly. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 279(1), 164–170. https://doi.org/10.1177/000271625227900121
Google Scholar CrossrefLiddle, J. L. M., Parkinson, L., & Sibbritt, D. W. (2013). Purpose and pleasure in late life: Conceptualising older women’s participation in art and craft activities. Journal of Aging Studies, 27(4), 330–338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaging.2013.08.002
Google Scholar CrossrefLord, J., & Hutchison, P. (1993). The Process of Empowerment: Implications for Theory and Practice. Canadian Journal of Community Mental Health, 12(1), 5–22. https://doi.org/10.7870/cjcmh-1993-0001
Google Scholar CrossrefLum, T. Y., & Lightfoot, E. (2005). The Effects of Volunteering on the Physical and Mental Health of Older People. Research on Aging, 27(1), 31–55. https://doi.org/10.1177/0164027504271349
Google Scholar CrossrefMartynova, L. (2023a). The Concept of Active Longevity in Russia’s Policy on Aging. Journal of Aging and Social Policy. https://doi.org/10.1080/08959420.2023.2265768
Google Scholar CrossrefMartynova, L. (2023b). The Moscow Longevity project: possibilities to improve senior well-being and paths for further research. International Journal of Care and Caring, 7(1), 192–197. https://doi.org/10.1332/239788221X16698111615346
Google Scholar CrossrefMiceli, S., Maniscalco, L., & Matranga, D. (2019). Social networks and social activities promote cognitive functioning in both concurrent and prospective time: evidence from the SHARE survey. European Journal of Ageing, 16, 145–154. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10433-018-0486-z
Google Scholar CrossrefOvcharova, L. N., Morozova, M. A., Sidorenko, A. V., Sinjavskaja, O. V., & Chervjakova, A. A. (2020). Концепция политики активного долголетия: научно-методологический доклад НИУ ВШЭ к XXI Апрельской международной научной конференции по проблемам развития экономики и общества [Concept of the active longevity policy: Scientific and methodological report by the National Research University Higher School of Economics to the XXI April International Academic Conference on Economic and Social Development]. https://doi.org/10.17323/978-5-7598-2173-1
Google Scholar CrossrefParfenova, O. A. (2020). Engaging Older People in Volunteering and Civic Activities As a Tool to Overcome Social Exclusion. Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes, 4, 119–135. https://doi.org/10.14515/monitoring.2020.4.1580
Google Scholar CrossrefPocock, T., Woodward, A., Wiles, J., Raphael, D., & Smith, M. (2023). Diverse approaches to conceptualising positive ageing: A scoping review. Kōtuitui: New Zealand Journal of Social Sciences Online, 18(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/1177083X.2022.2090968
Google Scholar CrossrefRobinson, K., Kennedy, N., & Harmon, D. (2012). Happiness: A Review of Evidence Relevant to Occupational Science. Journal of Occupational Science, 19(2), 150–164. https://doi.org/10.1080/14427591.2011.634780
Google Scholar CrossrefRouder, J., Saucier, O., Kinder, R., & Jans, M. (2021). What to Do With All Those Open-Ended Responses? Data Visualization Techniques for Survey Researchers. Survey Practice, 14(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.29115/sp-2021-0008
Google Scholar CrossrefRyan, R. M., Huta, V., & Deci, E. L. (2008). Living well: A self-determination theory perspective on eudaimonia. Journal of Happiness Studies, 9(1), 139–170. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-006-9023-4
Google Scholar CrossrefSaldaña, J. (2013). The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers (Second). SAGE. www.sagepublications.com
Google Scholar CrossrefShirahada, K., & Wilson, A. (2022). Well-being creation by senior volunteers in a service provider context. Journal of Service Theory and Practice, 33(7), 28–51. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSTP-07-2022-0137
Google Scholar CrossrefTaghian, M., Polonsky, M. J., & D’Souza, C. (2019). Volunteering in Retirement and Its Impact on Seniors Subjective Quality of Life Through Personal Outlook: A Study of Older Australians. Voluntas, 30(5), 1133–1147. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-019-00167-8
Google Scholar CrossrefWaterman, A. S. (1993). Two Conceptions of Happiness: Contrasts of Personal Expressiveness (Eudaimonia) and Hedonic Enjoyment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64(4), 678–691. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.64.4.678
Google Scholar CrossrefWon, S., & Kim, H. (2020). Social participation, health-related behavior, and depression of older adults living alone in Korea. Asian Social Work and Policy Review, 14(1), 61–71. https://doi.org/10.1111/aswp.12193
Google Scholar CrossrefWorld Health Organization. (2002). Active Ageing: A Policy Framework. https://iris.who.int/handle/10665/67215
Google Scholar CrossrefYu, L., Li, H., He, W., Wang, F. K., & Jiao, S. (2020). A meta-analysis to explore privacy cognition and information disclosure of internet users. International Journal of Information Management, 51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.09.011
Google Scholar CrossrefDescargas
Publicado
Metrics
Almetric
Dimensions
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2025 Liliya Martynova, Jiby Mathew Puthenparambil

Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.
Todos los artículos se publican bajo copyright Creative Commons (CC BY). Los autores poseen los derechos de autor y conservan los derechos de publicación sin restricciones, pero los autores permiten que cualquiera descargue, reutilice, reimprima, modifique, distribuya y/o copie los artículos siempre que se cite la fuente original.