Neurocognitive Evidence for Different Problem-Solving Processes between Engineering and Liberal Arts Students
https://doi.org/10.17583/ijep.2020.3940
Keywords:
Downloads
Abstract
Differences exist between engineering and liberal arts students because of their educational backgrounds. Therefore, they solve problems differently. This study examined the brain activation of these two groups of students when they responded to 12 questions of verbal, numerical, or spatial intelligence. A total of 25 engineering and 25 liberal arts students in Taiwan participated in the experiment. The results were as follows. (i) During verbal intelligence tasks, differences between the two groups were observed in the information flows of verbal message comprehension and contextual familiarity detection in the problem-identifying phase, whereas no significant differences were found in the resolution-reaching phase. (ii) During numerical intelligence tasks, differences between the two groups were observed in the information flows of mental calculation and message comprehensionin the problem-identifying phase and those of verbal perception and analogical reasoning in the resolution-reaching phase. (iii) During spatial intelligence tasks, differences between the two groups were observed in the information flows of spatial relation integration and spatial context memory retrieval in the problem-identifying phase and those ofspatial attentionand contextual relation integration in the resolution-reaching phase.
Downloads
References
Aichelburg, C., Urbanski, M., de Schotten, M. T., Humbert, F., Levy, R., & Volle, E. (2016). Morphometry of left frontal and temporal poles predicts analogical reasoning abilities. Cerebral Cortex, 26, 915-932.
Google Scholar CrossrefAnsari, D. (2007). Does the parietal cortex distinguish between "10", "ten," and ten dots? Neuron, 53(2), 165-167.
Google Scholar CrossrefApps, M. A. J., Rushworth, M. F. S., & Chang, S. W. C. (2016). The anterior cingulate gyrus and social cognition: Tracking the motivation of others. Neuron, 90(4), 692-707.
Google Scholar CrossrefArsalidou, M., & Taylor, M. J. (2011). Is 2 + 2 = 4? Meta-analyses of brain areas needed for numbers and calculations. Neuroimage, 54(3), 2382-2393.
Google Scholar CrossrefAttridge, N., & Inglis, M. (2013). Advanced mathematical study and the development of conditional reasoning skills. PLoS One, 8(7): e69399.
Google Scholar CrossrefBanich, M. T., & Compton, R. J. (2018). Cognitive neuroscience (4th ed.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar CrossrefBarbey, A. K., Colom, R., Solomon, J., Krueger, F., Forbes, C., & Grafman, J. (2012). An integrative architecture for general intelligence and executive function revealed by lesion mapping. Brain: A Journal of Neurology, 135, 1154-1164.
Google Scholar CrossrefBarbey, A. K., & Sloman, S.A. (2007). Base-rate respect: From ecological rationality to dual processes. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 30, 241-254.
Google Scholar CrossrefBarnett, L., & Seth, A. K. (2014). The MVGC multivariate Granger causality toolbox: A new approach to Granger-causal inference. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 223, 50-68, 2014.
Google Scholar CrossrefBasagni, B., Luzzatti, C., Navarrete, E., Caputo, M., Scrocco, G., Damora, A., Giunchi, L., Gemignani, P., Caiazzo, A., Gambini, M. G., Avesani, R., Mancuso, M., Trojano, L., & De Tanti, A. (2017). VRT (verbal reasoning test): A new test for assessment of verbal reasoning. Test realisation and Italian normative data from a multicentric study. Neurological Science, 38(4), 643-650.
Google Scholar CrossrefBastos, A. M., & Schoffelen, J.-M. (2016). A tutorial review of functional connectivity analysis methods and their interpretation pitfalls. Frontiers in System Neuroscience, 9(Pt 2), article 175.
Google Scholar CrossrefBishop, S. J., Fossella, J., Croucher, C. J., & Duncan, J. (2008). COMT val158met genotype affects neural mechanisms supporting fluid intelligence. Cerebral Cortex, 18(9), 2132-2140.
Google Scholar CrossrefBoccia, M., Piccardi, L., Palermo, L., Nori, R., & Palmiero, M. (2015). Where do bright ideas occur in our brain? Meta-analytic evidence from neuroimaging studies of domain-specific creativity. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, Article 1195.
Google Scholar CrossrefBordoloi, L. M., & Winebrake, J. J. (2015). Bringing the liberal arts to engineering education. The Chronicle of Higher Education, April 27. Retrieved from: https://www.chronicle.com/article/Bringing-the-Liberal-Arts-to/229671.
Google Scholar CrossrefBressler, S. L., & Seth, A. K. (2011). Wiener–Granger Causality: A well established methodology. NeuoImage, 58(2), 323-329.
Google Scholar CrossrefBunge, S. A., Burrows, B., & Wagner, A. D. (2004). Prefrontal and hippocampal contributions to visual associative recognition: Interactions between cognitive control and episodic retrieval. Brain and Cognition, 56(2), 141-152.
Google Scholar CrossrefBurgess, N. (2008). Spatial cognition and the brain. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1124, 77-97.
Google Scholar CrossrefCarter, P. J., & Russell, K. A. (2008). Test and assess your IQ: Numeric, verbal, and spatial aptitude tests. London, UK: Kogan Page.
Google Scholar CrossrefChen, C.-M., & Lin, Y.-J. (2016). Effects of different text display types on reading comprehension, sustained attention and cognitive load in mobile reading contexts. Interactive Learning Environments, 24(3), 553-571.
Google Scholar CrossrefCohen Kadoshsend, R., Soskic, S., Iuculano, T., Kanai, R., & Walsh, V. (2010). Modulating neuronal activity produces specific and long-lasting changes in numeric competence. Current Biology, 20(22), 2016-2020.
Google Scholar CrossrefCorbetta, M., & Shulman, G. L. (2002). Control of goal-directed and stimulus driven attention in the brain. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 3(3), 201-215.
Google Scholar CrossrefDeary, I. J., Penke, L., & Johnson, W. (2010). The neuroscience of human intelligence differences. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 11, 201-211.
Google Scholar CrossrefDelorme, A., & Makeig, S. (2004). EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 134, 9-21.
Google Scholar CrossrefDelorme, A., Palmer, J., Onton, J., Oostenveld, R., & Makeig, S. (2012). Independent EEG sources are dipolar. PLoS ONE, 7(2), e30135.
Google Scholar CrossrefDennis, T. A., & Solomon, B. (2010). Frontal EEG and emotion regulation: Electrocortical activity in response to emotional film clips is associated with reduced mood Induction and attention interference effects. Biological Psychology, 85(3), 456-464.
Google Scholar CrossrefDing, M., Bressler, S. L., Yang, W., & Liang, H. (2000). Short-window spectral analysis of cortical event-related potentials by adaptive multivariate autoregressive modeling: Data preprocessing, model validation, and variability assessment. Biological Cybernetics, 83(1), 35-45.
Google Scholar CrossrefDominguez, M. G., Martin-Gutierrez, J., Gonzalez, C. R., & Corredeaguas, C. M. M. (2012). Methodologies and tools to improve spatial ability. Procedia: Social and Behavioral Sciences, 51, 736-744.
Google Scholar CrossrefDunca, J., Seitz, R. J., Kolodny, J., Bor, D., Herzog, H., Ahmed, A., Newell, F. N., & Emslie, H. (2000). A neural basis for general intelligence. Science, 289(5478), 457-460.
Google Scholar CrossrefFriston, K. J., Bastos, A. M., Oswal, A., van Wijk, B., Richter, C., & Litvak, V. (2014). Granger causality revisited. NeuroImage, 101, 796-808.
Google Scholar CrossrefGallup, G. G. J., & Platek, S. M. (2002). Cognitive empathy presupposes self-awareness: Evidence from phylogeny, ontogeny, neuropsychology and mental illness. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 25(1), 36-37.
Google Scholar CrossrefGläscher, J., Rudrauf, D., Colom, R., Paul, L. K., Tranel, D., Damasio, H., & Adolphs, R. (2010). Distributed neural system for general intelligence revealed by lesion mapping. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS), 107(10), 4705-4709.
Google Scholar CrossrefGranger, C. W. J. (1969). Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods. Econometrica, 37, 424-438.
Google Scholar CrossrefHan, J., Cao, B., Cao, Y., Gao, H., & Li, F. (2016). The role of right frontal brain regions in integration of spatial relation. Neuropsychologia, 86, 29-37.
Google Scholar CrossrefIvanitskii, A. M., Portnova, G. V., Martynova, O. V., Maiorova, L. A., & Fedina, O. N., & Petrushevskii, A. G. (2015). Brain mapping in verbal and spatial thinking. Neuroscience and Behavioral Physiology, 45(2), 146-153.
Google Scholar CrossrefJenkins, W. K. (2014). Today’s engineering education is a liberal arts education of the future. Proceedings of the IEEE, 102(9), 1306-1309.
Google Scholar CrossrefJirout, J. J., & Newcombe, N. S. (2015). Building blocks for developing spatial skills: evidence from a large, representative U.S. sample. Psychological Science, 26(3), 302-310.
Google Scholar CrossrefJung, R. E., & Haier, R. J. (2007). The Parieto-Frontal Integration Theory (P-FIT) of intelligence: Converging neuroimaging evidence. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 30(2), 135-187.
Google Scholar CrossrefJung, T.-P., Makeig, S., Mckeown, M. J., Bell, A. J., Lee, T.-W., & Sejnowski, T. J. (2001). Imaging brain dynamics using independent component analysis. Proceedings of the IEEE, 89(7), 1107-1122.
Google Scholar CrossrefKanjliaa, S., Lanea, C, Feigensona, L., & Bedny, M. (2016). Absence of visual experience modifies the neural basis of numeric thinking. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS), 113(40), 11172-11177.
Google Scholar CrossrefLiang, C., Lin, C.-T., Yao, S.-N., Chang, W.-S., Liu, Y.-C., & Chen, S.-A. (2017). Visual attention and association: An electroencephalography study in expert designers. Design Studies, 48, 76-95.
Google Scholar CrossrefLin, C.-T., Chuang, C.-H., Kerick, S., Mullen, T., Jung, T.-P., Ko, L.-W., Chen, S.-A., King, J.-T., & McDowell, K. (2016). Mind-wandering tends to occur under low perceptual demands during driving. Scientific Reports, 6, article 20353.
Google Scholar CrossrefLiu, Y.-C., Chang, C.-C., Yang, Y.-H., & Liang, C. (2018). Spontaneous analogising caused by text stimuli in design thinking: Differences between higher- and lower-creativity groups. Cognitive Neurodynamics. DOI: 10.1007/s11571-017-9454-0.
Google Scholar CrossrefMalhotra, P., Coulthard, E. J., & Husain, M. (2009). Role of right posterior parietal cortex in maintaining attention to spatial locations over time. Brain, 132(3), 645-660.
Google Scholar CrossrefMiller, E. K., & Cohen, J. D. (2001). An integrative theory of prefrontal cortex function. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 24, 167-202.
Google Scholar CrossrefMiller, E. K., & Phelps, E. A. (2010). Current opinion in neurobiology: Cognitive neuroscience 2010. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 20(2), 141-142.
Google Scholar CrossrefNation, P. (2015). Principles guiding vocabulary learning through extensive reading. Reading in a Foreign Language, 27(1), 136-145.
Google Scholar CrossrefNeumann, Y. (1983). Differences between engineering and liberal arts: A discriminant analysis of students’ work values. Journal of Experimental Education, 52(1), 41-46.
Google Scholar CrossrefOakhill, J., Yuill, N., & Garnham, A. (2011). The differential relations between verbal, numerical and spatial working memory abilities and children’s reading comprehension. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 4(1), 83-106.
Google Scholar CrossrefPaul, E. J., Larsen, R. J., Nikolaidis, A., Ward, N., Hillman, C. H., Cohen, N. J., Kramer, A. F., & Barbey, A. K. (2016). Dissociable brain biomarkers of fluid intelligence. NeuroImage, 137, 201-211.
Google Scholar CrossrefSakurai, Y., Hamada, K., Tsugawa, N., & Sugimoto, I. (2015). Ventral simultanagnosia and prosopagnosia for unfamiliar faces due to a right posterior superior temporal sulcus and angular gyrus lesion. Neurocase, 22(1), 122-129.
Google Scholar CrossrefShelton, C. (2016). Students who developed logical reasoning skills reported improved confidence in drug dose calculation: Feedback from remedial maths classes. Nurse Education Today, 41, 6-11.
Google Scholar CrossrefSlotnick, S. D., Moo, L. R., Segal, J. B., & Hart, J. Jr. (2003). Distinct prefrontal cortex activity associated with item memory and source memory for visual shapes. Cognitive Brain Research, 17(1), 75-82.
Google Scholar CrossrefSpearman, C. (1904). General intelligence: Objectively determined and measured. American Journal of Psychology, 15(2), 201-293.
Google Scholar CrossrefTakeuchi, H., Taki, Y., Sassa, Y., Hashizume, H., Sekiguchi, A., Fukushima, A., & Kawashima, R. (2011). Working memory training using mental calculation impacts regional gray matter of the frontal and parietal regions. PLoS One, 6(8), e23175.
Google Scholar CrossrefWang, H. E., Bénar, C. G., Quilichini, P. P., Friston, K. J., Jirsa, V. K., & Bernard, C. (2014). A systematic framework for functional connectivity measures. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 8, article 405.
Google Scholar CrossrefWisniewski, I., Wendling, A. S., Manning, L., & Steinhoff, B. J. (2012). Visuo-spatial memory tests in right temporal lobe epilepsy foci: Clinical validity. Epilepsy & Behavior, 23(3), 254-260.
Google Scholar CrossrefYao, S.-N., Lin, C.-T., King, J.-T., Liu, Y.-C., & Liang, C. (2017). Learning in the visual association of novice and expert designers. Cognitive Systems Research, 43, 76-88.
Google Scholar CrossrefDownloads
Published
Almetric
Dimensions
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
All articles are published under Creative Commons copyright (CC BY). Authors hold the copyright and retain publishing rights without restrictions, but authors allow anyone to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute, and/or copy articles as the original source is cited.