Personality Shadows: Dark Triad Traits and Academic Major Choices Among Greek University -Students
Keywords:
Number of words in the article:
TextAbstract
This study examined the link between academic majors and Dark Triad personality traits in 2,387 Greek university students. Utilizing Bifactor Exploratory Structural Equation Modeling, we identified a general dark factor (D-factor) and three specific traits. Latent Profile Analysis revealed four personality clusters: self-centric personalities, ambitious manipulators, tactful manipulators, and omni-dark personalities. Self-centric personalities exhibited low D-factor levels but high narcissism, typically choosing majors like Humanities, Law, and Social Sciences that spotlight personal success. Tactful manipulators, with moderate Machiavellianism and narcissism but low psychopathy, opted for majors in Humanities, Law, Social Sciences, Economics, and Information Sciences, suitable for roles demanding influence and leadership. Ambitious manipulators displayed high Machiavellianism and narcissism with lower psychopathy, favoring competitive fields like Maths, Natural/Technological Sciences, and Health/Life Sciences, which offer opportunities for personal advancement and leadership. Omni-dark personalities scored high across all Dark Triad traits, gravitating towards majors linked with power and competitive hierarchies. The study also found a higher prevalence of omni-dark personalities among males, suggesting potential biological, social, and cultural influences. These insights inform potential interventions to support students in their educational and developmental paths.
Downloads
References
Bader, M., Hartung, J., Hilbig, B. E., Zettler, I., Moshagen, M., & Wilhelm, O. (2021). Themes of the dark core of personality. Psychological Assessment, 33(6), 511-525.
Google Scholar CrossrefBuckels, E. E., Jones, D. N., & Paulhus, D. L. (2013). Behavioral confirmation of everyday sadism. Psychological Science, 24, 2201-2209.
Google Scholar CrossrefByrne, B.M. (2013). Structural Equation Modeling with Mplus: Basic Concepts, Applications and Programming. Routledge.
Google Scholar CrossrefCannon, M., Vedel, A., & Jonason, P. K. (2020). The dark and not so humble: School-type effects on the Dark Triad traits and intellectual humility. Personality and Individual Differences, 163.
Google Scholar CrossrefChen, F. F. (2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 14, 464–504.
Google Scholar CrossrefCosta, P. T. J., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Revised NEO personality inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO five-factor inventory (NEO-FFI): Professional manual. Psychological Assessment Resources.
Google Scholar CrossrefDueber, D. (2018). Bifactor Indices Calculator: Bifactor Indices Calculator (Version 0.2.0). https://cran.r-project.org/package=BifactorIndicesCalculator
Google Scholar CrossrefEagly, A. H., & Wood, W. (2013). The nature–nurture debates: 25 years of challenges in understanding the psychology of gender. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8(3), 340-357.
Google Scholar CrossrefElegido, J. M. (2009). Business education and erosion of character. African Journal of Business Ethics, 4, 16–24.
Google Scholar CrossrefFerguson, S. L., & Hull, D. M. (2018). Personality profiles: Using latent profile analysis to model personality typologies. Personality and Individual Differences, 122, 177-183.
Google Scholar CrossrefFiske, S. T., Gilbert, D. T., & Lindzey, G. (Eds.). (2010). Handbook of Social Psychology, Volume 2 (Vol. 2). John Wiley & Sons.
Google Scholar CrossrefFurnham, A., Richards, S. C., & Paulhus, D. L. (2013). The Dark Triad of personality: A 10 year review. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 7(3), 199-216.
Google Scholar CrossrefGarcia, D., Adrianson, L., Archer, T., & Rosenberg, P. (2015). The dark side of the affective profiles:differences and similarities in psychopathy, Machiavellianism, and Narcissism. Sage Open, 5(4).
Google Scholar CrossrefGottfredson, L. S., & Richards, J. M., Jr. (1999). The meaning and measurement of environments in Holland’s theory. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 55(1), 57–73.
Google Scholar CrossrefGruda, D., McCleskey, J., & Khoury, I. (2023). Cause we are living in a Machiavellian world, and I am a Machiavellian major: Machiavellianism and academic major choice. Personality and Individual Differences, 205, 112096.
Google Scholar CrossrefHofmann, R., Rozgonjuk, D., Soto, C. J., Ostendorf, F., & Mõttus, R. (2023). There are a million ways to be a woman and a million ways to be a man: Gender differences across personality nuances and nations [Preprint]. PsyArXiv.
Google Scholar CrossrefHofstede, G. (2011). Dimensionalizing cultures: The Hofstede model in context. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, 2(1).
Google Scholar CrossrefHyde, J., Grieve, R., Norris, K., & Kemp, N. (2020). The dark side of emotional intelligence: the role of gender and the Dark Triad in emotional manipulation at work. Australian Journal of Psychology, 72(4), 307-317.
Google Scholar CrossrefJonason, P. K., Slomski, S., & Partyka, J. (2012). The Dark Triad at work: How toxic employees get their way. Personality and Individual Differences, 52(3), 449-453.
Google Scholar CrossrefJonason, P. K., Tosi, M., Silva, S., Antunes, R., & Brito-Costa, S. (2022). An initial comparison of the psychometric properties of the Dark Triad Dirty Dozen in Spanish and Portuguese. Psychological Test Adaptation and Development, 3(1), 125-133.
Google Scholar CrossrefJones, D. N., & Paulhus, D. L. (2014). Introducing the Short Dark Triad (SD3). Assessment, 21(1), 28–41.
Google Scholar CrossrefKimmel, M. S. (2018). Privilege: A reader. Routledge.
Google Scholar CrossrefKokkinos, C. M., & Antoniadou, N. (2024). Understanding Academic Dishonesty in University
Google Scholar CrossrefSettings: The Interplay of Dark Triad Traits and Moral Disengagement. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 185 (5), 309-322.
Google Scholar CrossrefKokkinos, C. M., Antoniadou, N., & Voulgaridou, I. (2024). Majors unleashed: unravelling students’ personality profiles across academic disciplines. Current Psychology, 1-11. Advance Online Publication.
Google Scholar CrossrefKokkinos, C.M., Tsouloupas, C.N. & Voulgaridou, I. (2023). General Mental Health and Subjective Well-Being Among University Students: The Moderating Role of Personal Cultural Orientations. Human Arenas, 6, 776–793. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42087-021-00253-8
Google Scholar CrossrefKokkinos, C. M., & Voulgaridou, I. (2024). Emotional intelligence across the personality spectrum: A study of university students' personality profiles. Personality and Individual Differences, 222, 112574.
Google Scholar CrossrefKöse, A. G., & Ekren, B. (2020). An investigation of the differences in the dark triad and the big five personality traits across majors. Kalem Eğitim ve İnsan Bilimleri Dergisi, 10(2), 465-484.
Google Scholar CrossrefLitten, V., Roberts, L. D., Ladyshewsky, R. K., Castell, E., & Kane, R. (2018). The influence of academic discipline on empathy and psychopathic personality traits in undergraduate students. Personality and Individual Differences, 123, 145–150.
Google Scholar CrossrefLeBreton, J. M., Shiverdecker, L. K., & Grimaldi, E. M. (2018). The dark triad and workplace behavior. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 5, 387-414.
Google Scholar CrossrefLynam, D. R., & Widiger, T. A. (2001). Using the five-factor model to represent the DSM-IV personality disorders: An expert consensus approach. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 110, 401-412.
Google Scholar CrossrefMcLarnon, M. J., & Tarraf, R. C. (2021). Getting to the core: How “(dis) honest” is the core of the Dark Triad? Personality and Individual Differences, 171, Article 110545.
Google Scholar CrossrefMiller, J. D., Lynam, D. R., Siedor, L., Crowe, M., & Campbell, W. K. (2018). Consensual lay profiles of narcissism and their connection to the Five-Factor Narcissism Inventory. Psychological Assessment, 30(1), 10-18.
Google Scholar CrossrefMoshagen, M., Hilbig, B. E., & Zettler, I. (2018). The dark core of personality. Psychological Review. 125(5), 656–688.
Google Scholar CrossrefMoshagen, M., & Musch, J. (2014). Sample size requirements of the robust weighted least squares estimator for confirmatory factor analysis with ordinal data. Methodology: European Journal of Research Methods for the Behavioral and Social Sciences, 10, 60 –70.
Google Scholar CrossrefMuthén, B., & Muthén, L. (2017). Mplus. In Handbook of item response theory (pp. 507-518). Chapman and Hall/CRC.
Google Scholar CrossrefO'Boyle, E. H., Forsyth, D. R., Banks, G. C., Story, P. A., & White, C. D. (2015). A meta‐analytic test of redundancy and relative importance of the dark triad and five‐factor model of personality. Journal of Personality, 83(6), 644-664.
Google Scholar CrossrefPatrick, C. J., Fowles, D. C., & Krueger, R. F. (2009). Triarchic conceptualization of psychopathy: Developmental origins of disinhibition, boldness, and meanness. Development and Psychopathology, 21(3), 913-938.
Google Scholar CrossrefPaulhus, D. L., & Jones, D. N. (2015). Measures of dark personalities. In G. J. Boyle, D. H. Saklofske, & G. Matthews (Eds.), Measures of Personality and Social Psychological Constructs (pp. 562-594). Academic Press. ISBN 9780123869159.
Google Scholar CrossrefPaulhus, D. L., & Williams, K. M. (2002). The dark triad of personality: Narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy. Journal of Research in Personality, 36, 556-563.
Google Scholar CrossrefPechorro, P., Rodrigues, R., Bonfá-Araujo, B., DeLisi, M., & Simões, M. R. (2024). Measuring the dark core of personality in Portugal: A psychometric examination of D. Deviant Behavior, 45(12), 1729-1742.
Google Scholar CrossrefPersson, B. N., Kajonius, P. J., & Garcia, D. (2019). Revisiting the structure of the Short Dark Triad. Assessment, 26(1), 3-16.
Google Scholar CrossrefSmits, I. A., Timmerman, M. E., Barelds, D. P., & Meijer, R. R. (2014). The Dutch symptom checklist-90-revised. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 31, 236–271.
Google Scholar CrossrefVedel, A. (2016). Big Five personality group differences across academic majors: A systematic review. Personality & Individual Differences, 92, 1–10.
Google Scholar CrossrefVedel, A., & Thomsen, D. K. (2017). The Dark Triad across academic majors. Personality and Individual Differences, 116, 86-91.
Google Scholar CrossrefWilson, M. S., & McCarthy, K. (2011). Greed is good? Student disciplinary choice and self- reported psychopathy. Personality and Individual Differences, 51, 873-876.
Google Scholar CrossrefWiltshire, J., Bourdage, J. S., & Lee, K. (2014). Honesty-humility and perceptions of organizational politics in predicting workplace outcomes. Journal of Business and Psychology, 29, 235-251
Google Scholar CrossrefPublished
Metrics
Almetric
Dimensions
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Constantinos M. Kokkinos, Ioanna Voulgaridou, Costas N. Tsouloupas
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All articles are published under Creative Commons copyright (CC BY). Authors hold the copyright and retain publishing rights without restrictions, but authors allow anyone to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute, and/or copy articles as the original source is cited.
