Student Interest and Engagement in Middle School Physical Education: Examining the Role of Needs Supportive Teaching
Keywords:
Downloads
Abstract
This study examines the complexities of the social learning environment in middle school physical education. Specifically, we investigate the independent and interactive predictive effects of situational interest and needs supportive teaching on students’ personal interest and class engagement. Middle school students (N = 388) in compulsory physical education courses completed questionnaires on situational interest, needs supportive teaching, personal interest, and behavioral and emotional engagement. Results from structural equation modeling tests revealed independent predictive effects of situational interest and needs supportive teaching on personal interest, and behavioral and emotional engagement. There was also an interactive effect between situational interest and needs supportive teaching on personal interest. This association was conditional on a minimum level of needs support in the social learning environment. To date, the conceptualization of situational interest has focused on student – activity interactions; however, our findings highlight the importance of social learning environment on student – activity interactions.
Downloads
References
Bauer, D. J., & Curran, P. J. (2005). Probing interactions in fixed and multilevel regression: Inferential and graphical techniques. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 40, 373–400.
Google Scholar CrossrefChen, A., & Darst, P. W. (2001). Situational interest in physical education: A function of learning task design. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 72, 150–164.
Google Scholar CrossrefChen, A., & Darst, P. W. (2002). Individual and situational interest: The role of gender and skill. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 27, 250–269.
Google Scholar CrossrefChen, A., Darst, P. W., & Pangrazi, R. P. (1999). What constitutes situational interest? Validating a construct in physical education. Measurement in Physical Education & Exercise Science, 3, 157–180.
Google Scholar CrossrefChen, A., & Ennis, C. D. (2009). Motivation and achievement in physical education. In K. Wentzel & A. Wigfield (Eds.), Handbook of motivation at school (pp. 553–574). New York, NY: Routledge.
Google Scholar CrossrefChen, A., & Wang, J. (2017). The role of interest in physical education: A review of research evidence. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 36, 313–322.
Google Scholar CrossrefCiani, K., Ferguson, Y., Bergin, D., & Hilpert, J. (2010). Motivational influences on school-prompted interest. Educational Psychology, 30, 377–393.
Google Scholar CrossrefDeci, E. L. (1992). The relation of interest to the motivation of behavior: A self-determination theory perspective. In K.A. Renninger, S. Hidi, & A. Krapp (Eds.), The role of interest in learning and development (pp. 43–70). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Google Scholar CrossrefDeci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 227–268.
Google Scholar CrossrefDing, H., Sun, H., & Chen, A. (2013). Impact of expectancy-value and situational interest motivation specificity on physical education outcomes. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 32, 253–269.
Google Scholar CrossrefEnders, C. K. (2010). Applied missing data analysis. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
Google Scholar CrossrefEnnis, C. D. (2015). Knowledge, transfer, and innovation in physical literacy curricula. Journal of Sport and Health Science, 4, 119–124.
Google Scholar CrossrefGarn, A. C., Cothran, D. J., & Jenkins, J. M. (2011). A qualitative analysis of individual interest in middle school physical education: perspectives of early-adolescents. Physical Education & Sport Pedagogy, 16, 223-236.
Google Scholar CrossrefHidi, S., & Renninger, K. A. (2006). The four-phase model of interest development. Educational Psychologist, 41, 111–127.
Google Scholar CrossrefHu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equations Modeling, 6, 1–55.
Google Scholar CrossrefHuang, C., & Gao, Z. (2013). Associations between students’ situational interest, mastery experiences, and physical activity levels in an interactive dance game. Psychology, Health, & Medicine, 18, 233–241.
Google Scholar CrossrefJohnson, P. O., & Neyman, J. (1936). Tests of certain linear hypotheses and their application to some educational problems. Statistical Research Memoirs, 1, 57–93.
Google Scholar CrossrefKlein, A., & Moosbrugger, H. (2000). Maximum likelihood estimation of latent interaction effects with the LMS method. Psychometrika, 65, 457–474.
Google Scholar CrossrefKline, R. B. (2016). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (4th ed.). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
Google Scholar CrossrefLittle, T. D. (2013). Longitudinal structural equation modeling. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
Google Scholar CrossrefLittle, T. D., Bovaird, J. A., & Widaman, K. F. (2006). On the merits of orthogonalizing powered and product terms: Implications for modeling interactions among latent variables. Structural Equation Modeling, 13, 497–519.
Google Scholar CrossrefMarsh, H. W., Hau, K., & Grayson, D. (2005). Goodness of fit in structural equation models. In A. Maydeu-Olivares & J. J. McArdle (Eds.), Contemporary psychometrics: A festschrift for Roderick P. McDonald. (pp. 275-340). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Google Scholar CrossrefMarsh, H. W., Morin, A. J. S., Parker, P. D., & Kuar, G. (2014). Exploratory structural equation modeling: An integration of the best features of exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 10, 85–110.
Google Scholar CrossrefMercier, K., Donnovan, C., Gibbone, A., & Rozga, K. (2017). Three-year study of students’ attitudes toward physical education: Grades 4–8. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 88, 307–315.
Google Scholar CrossrefMitchell, M. (1993). Situational interest: Its multifaceted structure in the secondary school mathematics classroom. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 424–436.
Google Scholar CrossrefMuthén, L. K. & Muthén, B. O. (2015). Mplus user guide (7th ed.). Los Angeles: Muthén & Muthén.
Google Scholar CrossrefNtoumanis, N. (2001). A self-determination approach to the understanding of motivation in physical education. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 71, 225–242.
Google Scholar CrossrefNtoumanis, N., & Standage, M. (2009). Motivation in physical education classes: A self-determination theory perspective. Theory and Research in Education, 7, 194–202.
Google Scholar CrossrefOlson, A. L., Gaffney, C.A., Lee, P. W., & Starr, P. (2008). Changing adolescent health behaviors: The Health Teens Counseling approach. American Journal of Preventative Medicine, 35, S359–S364.
Google Scholar CrossrefReeve, J. (2006). Teachers as facilitators: What autonomy‐supportive teachers do and why their students benefit. The Elementary School Journal, 106, 225–236.
Google Scholar CrossrefRenninger, K. A., & Hidi, S. (2016). The power of interest for motivation and learning. New York, NY: Routledge.
Google Scholar CrossrefRotgans, J. I., & Schmidt, H. G. (2011). The role of teachers in facilitating situational interest in an active-learning classroom. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27, 37–42.
Google Scholar CrossrefRyan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2007). Active human nature: Self-determination theory and the promotion and maintenance of sport, exercise, and health. In M.S. Hagger & N.L.D. Chatzisarantis (Eds.), Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in exercise and sport (pp. 1–20). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
Google Scholar CrossrefSchraw, G., Flowerday, T., & Lehman, S. (2001). Increasing situational interest in the classroom. Educational Psychology Review, 13, 211–224.
Google Scholar CrossrefShen, B., Chen, A., & Guan, J. (2007). Using achievement goals and interest to predict learning in physical education. Journal of Experimental Education, 75, 89–108.
Google Scholar CrossrefShen, B., Chen, A., Scrabis, K. A., & Tolley, H. (2003). Gender and interest-based motivation in learning dance. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 22, 396–409.
Google Scholar CrossrefShen, B., McCaughtry, N., Martin, J., Fahlman, M., & Garn, A. C. (2012). Urban high-school girls’ sense of relatedness and their engagement in physical education. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 31, 231–245.
Google Scholar CrossrefSkinner, E., Furrer, C., Marchand, G., & Kindermann, T. (2008). Engagement and disaffection in the classroom: Part of a larger motivational dynamic? Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 765–781.
Google Scholar CrossrefSkinner, E., Kindermann, T., & Furrer, C., (2009). A motivational perspective on engagement and disaffection: Conceptualization and assessment of children’s behavioral and emotional participation in academic activities in the classroom. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 69, 493–525.
Google Scholar CrossrefSpiller, S. A., Fitzsimons, G. J., Lynch, J. G., & McCelland, G. H. (2013). Spotlights, floodlights, and the magic number zero: Simple effects tests in moderated regression. Journal of Marketing Research, 50, 277–288.
Google Scholar CrossrefStandage, M., Duda, J. L., & Ntoumanis, N. (2005). A test of self‐determination theory in school physical education. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 75, 411–433.
Google Scholar CrossrefTaylor, I. M., & Ntoumanis, N. (2007). Teacher motivational strategies and student self-determination in physical education. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99, 747–760.
Google Scholar CrossrefTrautwein, U., Ludtke, O., Marsh, H. W., Koller, O., & Baumert, J. (2006). Tracking, grading, and student motivation: Using group composition and status to predict self-concept and interest in ninth-grade mathematics. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 788–806.
Google Scholar CrossrefTsai, Y., Kunter, M., Ludtke, O., Trautwein, U., & Ryan, R. M. (2008). What makes lessons interesting? The role of situational and individual factors in three school subjects. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 460–472.
Google Scholar CrossrefZhu, X., Chen, A., Ennis, C., Sun, H., Hopple, C., Bonello, M., & ... Kim, S. (2009). Situational interest, cognitive engagement, and achievement in physical education. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 34, 221–229.
Google Scholar CrossrefDownloads
Published
Almetric
Dimensions
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
All articles are published under Creative Commons copyright (CC BY). Authors hold the copyright and retain publishing rights without restrictions, but authors allow anyone to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute, and/or copy articles as the original source is cited.
