Applying Theory to Practice: Putting Deleuze to Work
https://doi.org/10.4471/rise.2013.27
Keywords:
Downloads
Abstract
Abstract
The work of Deleuze and his associates has been widely discussed, and there is a burgeoning literature on the implications for the education system, specifically.
Deleuzian writing is deliberately unconventional, but the work of Bourdieu in particular can help to explain the difficulties of his writing in terms of possible residual effects of a particular social context - the elite French university system of the 1960s and 1970s. The allusive writing that results might need to be rationally reconstructed before it can be grasped and applied to new situations. The importance of the social and intellectual contexts of readers also arises when Deleuzian work is ‘put to work’ to understand areas such as current education systems in the UK and USA.
Problems of ‘application’ in specific examples relating to UK and US pedagogy are discussed. Deleuzian work is effective in dereifying existing systems, but it also offers a particularly congenial cultural politics.
Some general paradoxes in linking theory to practice emerge through the work of Rancière on cultural or philosophical autonomy and heteronomy.
Keywords: Bourdieu, educational politics, Deleuze, habitus, pedagogy.
Downloads
References
Alliez, É. (2006). AntiOedipus—Thirty Years On (Between Arts and Politics). In M. Fuglsang & B. Meier Sørensen (Eds.) Deleuze and the Social (pp. 151—68). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Google Scholar CrossrefBadiou, A. (2000). Deleuze. The Clamor of Being. Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press.
Google Scholar CrossrefBogue, R. (2008). Search, Swim and See: Deleuze’s Apprenticeship in Signs and Pedagogy of Images. In I. Semetsky (Ed.) Nomadic Education: Variations on a Theme by Deleuze and Guattari. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Google Scholar CrossrefBourdieu, P. (1986). Distinction: a social critique of the judgement of taste. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Google Scholar CrossrefBourdieu, P. (1993). Sociology in Question. London: Sage Publications. Bourdieu, P. (2000). Pascalian Meditations. Cambridge: Polity Press. Bourdieu, P. & Passeron, J – C. (1990). Reproduction in Education,
Google Scholar CrossrefSociety and Culture. (2nd ed.). London: Sage Publications. Bourdieu, P., Passeron, J – C., & Saint Martin, M. (1994). Academic
Google Scholar CrossrefDiscourse. Cambridge: Polity.
Google Scholar CrossrefBuchanan, I. (2006). Practical Deleuzism and Postmodern Space. In M.
Google Scholar CrossrefFuglsang & B. Meier Sørensen (Eds.) Deleuze and the Social (pp.
Google Scholar Crossref—50). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. DeLanda, M. (1991). War in the Age of Intelligent Machines. New
Google Scholar CrossrefYork: Swerve Editions.
Google Scholar CrossrefDeLanda, M. (1999). Deleuze and the OpenEnded Becoming of the
Google Scholar CrossrefWorld. Manuel DeLanda Annotated Bibliography. Retrieved
Google Scholar Crossreffrom http://www.cddc.vt.edu/host/delanda/pages/becoming.htm. DeLanda, M. (2002). Intensive Science and Virtual Philosophy.
Google Scholar CrossrefLondon: Continuum.
Google Scholar CrossrefDeLanda, M. (2006). A New Philosophy of Society. Assemblage Theory
Google Scholar Crossrefand Social Complexity. London: Continuum.
Google Scholar CrossrefDeLanda, M. (2007). The Philosophy of Gilles Deleuze. Retrieved from
Google Scholar Crossrefhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zqisvKSuA70.
Google Scholar CrossrefDeleuze, G. (1988). Spinoza Practical Philosophy. San Francisco: City Lights Books.
Google Scholar CrossrefRISE International Journal of Sociology of Education 2 (2) 165
Google Scholar CrossrefDeleuze, G. (1989). Cinema 2: The Time Image. London: The Athlone Press.
Google Scholar CrossrefDeleuze, G. (1990). The Logic of Sense. New York: Columbia University Press.
Google Scholar CrossrefDeleuze, G. (1992) Cinema 1: The Movement Image, London: The Athlone Press.
Google Scholar CrossrefDeleuze, G. (1995). Negotiations. New York: Columbia University Press.
Google Scholar CrossrefDeleuze, G. (2004). Difference and Repetition. London: Continuum Publishing Group.
Google Scholar CrossrefDeleuze, G. & Guattari, F. (1984). AntiOedipus. Capitalism and Schizophrenia. London: The Athlone Press.
Google Scholar CrossrefDeleuze, G. & Guattari, F. (1994). What is Philosophy? London: Verso Books.
Google Scholar CrossrefDeleuze, G. & Guattari, F. (2004). A Thousand Plateaus. London: Continuum.
Google Scholar CrossrefDeleuze, G. & Parnet, C. (1987). Dialogues. London: The Athlone Press.
Google Scholar CrossrefFoucault, M. (1970). Theatricum Philosophicum. Critique, 282, 885 908.
Google Scholar CrossrefGale, K. (2010). An Inquiry In To The Ethical Nature of a Deleuzian Creative Educational Practice. Qualitative Inquiry, 16(5), 303 –08. doi: 10.1177/1077800409358869
Google Scholar CrossrefGoulimari, F. (1999). A Minoritarian Femism? Things to do with Deleuze and Guattari. Hypatia, 14(2), 97—120. doi: 10.1111/j.15272001.1999.tb01241.x
Google Scholar CrossrefGuattari, F. (1995). Chaosmosis: an ethicoaesthetic paradigm. Power Publications: Sydney.
Google Scholar CrossrefGuattari, F. & Rolnik, S. (2008). Molecular Revolution in Brazil. New York: Semiotext(e).
Google Scholar CrossrefHodgson, N. & Standish, P. (2009). Uses and misuses of post structuralism in educational research. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 32(3), 30926.
Google Scholar CrossrefLotringer, S. & Marrazi, C. (Eds.) (1980). Autonomia: PostPolitical Politics. New York: Semiotext(e).
Google Scholar CrossrefHarris Deleuze and education
Google Scholar CrossrefMassumi, B. (1992). A User’s guide to Capitalism and Schizophrenia. Deviations from Deleuze and Guattari. Cambridge, Mass: Swerve Editions.
Google Scholar CrossrefOlsen, L. (2009). Movement and Experimentation in Young Children’s Learning: Deleuze and Guattari in early childhood education. London: Routledge.
Google Scholar CrossrefRancière, J. (2002). The aesthetic revolution and its outcomes: emplotments of autonomy and heteronomy. New Left Review, 14, 133—51.
Google Scholar CrossrefSemetsky, I. (2006). Deleuze, Education and Becoming. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Google Scholar CrossrefSemetsky, I. (2009). Deleuze as a Philosopher of Education: Affective Knowledge/Effective Learning. The European Legacy, 14 (4), 44356. doi: 10.1080/10848770902999534
Google Scholar CrossrefSociology Research Group in Cultural and Education Studies in Cultural and Education Studies (Eds.) (1980). Melbourne Working Papers 1980. University of Melbourne.
Google Scholar CrossrefSt Pierre, E. (2004). Deleuzian Concepts for Education: The subject undone. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 36(3), 28396. doi: 10.1111/j.14695812.2004.00068.x
Google Scholar CrossrefWeick, K (1988). Educational Organizations as LooselyCoupled Systems. In Westoby, A. (Ed.) Culture and Power in Educational Organizations (pp. 56—73). Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
Google Scholar CrossrefŽižek, S. (2004). Organs Without Bodies. London: Routledge. Zourabichvili, F. (2000). The Eye of Montage: Dziga Vertov and
Google Scholar CrossrefBergsonian Materialism. In Flaxman, G. (Ed.). The Brain is the Screen; Deleuze and the philosophy of cinema (pp. 141—52). London: University of Minnesota Press.
Google Scholar CrossrefDownloads
Published
Almetric
Dimensions
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
All articles are published under Creative Commons copyright (CC BY). Authors hold the copyright and retain publishing rights without restrictions, but authors allow anyone to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute, and/or copy articles as the original source is cited.