Side Effects of Technological Practices on 21st-century Skills of Gifted Students
Keywords:
Abstract
Part of the research has focused on developing new technologies that contribute to fostering 21st-century skills in gifted students. However, some authors warn that the improper use of these technologies may lead to generations of passive users rather than critical thinkers, creators, and problem solvers for society. The objective of this study is to analyze the side effects of technological practices on the development of 21st-century skills in gifted students. To this end, a systematic review of articles published between 2010 and 2025 was conducted, following the PRISMA declaration guidelines. The final selection consisted of 40 articles, whose risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane RoB 2 tool for randomized controlled trials and the ROBINS-I tool for non-randomized studies. Findings indicate that, although the use of new technologies has enormous potential for developing 21st-century skills in gifted students, the current education system may be fostering a lack of motivation for deep learning and creative production, ultimately leading to the misuse of these tools.
Downloads
References
Abdurrahman, A., Nurulsari, N., Maulina, H., & Ariyani, F. (2019). Design and validation of inquiry-based STEM learning strategy as a powerful alternative solution to facilitate gift students facing 21st century challenging. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 7(1), 33-56. https://doi.org/10.17478/jegys.513308
Google Scholar CrossrefAboud, Y. (2021). Challenges to gifted education in the Covid-19 pandemic about online learning in Saudi Arabia from the perspective of gifted students and parents. Journal of Gifted Education and Creativity, 8(1), 11-21.
Google Scholar CrossrefAbu Owda, M. F., Abu Mousa, A. H., Shakfa, M. D., & Al-Hidabi, D. A. (2023). The Impact of Teaching Artificial Intelligence Concepts and Tools in Improving Creative Thinking Skills Among Talented Students. In Technological Sustainability and Business Competitive Advantage (pp. 267-279). Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-35525-7_16
Google Scholar CrossrefAlAli, R., Wardat, Y., Saleh, S., & Alshraifin, N. (2024). Evaluation of STEM-Aligned Teaching Practices for Gifted Mathematics Teachers. European Journal of STEM Education, 9(1), 8. https://doi.org/10.20897/ejsteme/14625
Google Scholar CrossrefAli, H., & Alrayes, A. (2019). The role of technology in gifted and talented education: A review of descriptive and empirical research. KnE Social Sciences, 26-38. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v3i24.5165
Google Scholar CrossrefAlshehri, A. H. A. (2022). Impact of online learning on gifted students. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 10(4), 849-867. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijemst.2641
Google Scholar CrossrefAlshehri, A., & Hamoud, A. (2024). Technology Use in Gifted and Talent Education in Saudi Arabia: Students’ View of its Use and its Impact on their Learning Potential. King Khalid University Journal of Educational Sciences, 11(1).
Google Scholar CrossrefAl–Zoubi, S. M., & Rahman, M. S. B. A. (2015). Talented students' satisfaction with the performance of the gifted centers. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 4(1), 1-20. http://dx.doi.org/10.17478/JEGYS.2016114754
Google Scholar CrossrefAnisimova, T. I., Latipova, L. N., Sergeeva, A. B., Sharafeeva, L. R., & Shatunova, O. V. (2017). Formation of teachers’ readiness to work with technically gifted children. Modern Journal of Language Teaching Methods, 7(9), 143-150. https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202110103008
Google Scholar CrossrefAyık, Z., & Gül, M. D. (2025). The Impact of Teachers' Technological Self-Efficacy on Gifted Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge: A Case Study. Asya Studies, 9(31), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.31455/asya.1619664
Google Scholar CrossrefBabaoglu, G., & Güven Yildirim, E. (2023). The Effect on Gifted Students' 21st Century Skills of Supporting Science Teaching with LEGO® Education® BricQ Motion Essential and Student Opinions on This Instruction. Science Insights Education Frontiers, 15(2), 2305-2324.https://doi.org/10.15354/sief.23.or216
Google Scholar CrossrefBrink, H. (2023). Gifted students’ needs in technology education. In The 40th International Pupils’ Attitudes Towards Technology Conference Proceedings 2023 (Vol. 1, No. October). https://doi.org/10.24377/PATT40.2023
Google Scholar CrossrefÇakır, Ç. Ş., Çakır, M., Damar, A., & Yılmaz, D. E. (2021). Özel Yetenekli Öğrencilerin Kodlama Hakkındaki Görüşlerinin Belirlenmesi. Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi Türk Dünyası Uygulama ve Araştırma Merkezi Eğitim Dergisi, 6(2), 151-179.
Google Scholar CrossrefCastillejos López, B. (2022). Inteligencia artificial y entornos personales de aprendizaje: atentos al uso adecuado de los recursos tecnológicos de los estudiantes universitarios. Educación, 31(60), 9-24. https://dx.doi.org/10.18800/educacion.202201.001
Google Scholar CrossrefChoi, K., & Lee, S. (2015). The Influence of Students’ Perception of Tutor’s roles on Deep Learning, Achievement, and Course Evaluation in Online Gifted Education Program. Journal of Gifted/Talented Education. The Korean Society for the Gifted. ,25(6), 857-879. https://doi.org/10.9722/jgte.2015.25.6.857
Google Scholar CrossrefCochrane Collaboration. (2017). Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care Review Group (EPOC) Data Collection Checklist. The Cochrane Collaboration
Google Scholar CrossrefCoxon, S. V. (2012). The malleability of spatial ability under treatment of a FIRST LEGO league-based robotics simulation. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 35(3), 291-316.https://doi.org/10.1177/0162353212451788
Google Scholar CrossrefDominguez-Vergara, J., Santa-Cruz-Espinoza, H., Chávez-Ventura, G., & Ybañez-Carranza, J. (2023). The moral disconnection as a mediator between aggressiveness and cyberbullying in schoolchildren. International Journal of Sociology of Education, 12(1), 1-24. http://dx.doi.org/10.17583/rise.10786
Google Scholar CrossrefFabio, R. A., Croce, A., & Calabrese, C. (2022). Critical Thinking in Ethical and Neutral Settings in Gifted Children and Non-Gifted Children. Children (Basel, Switzerland), 10(1), 74. https://doi.org/10.3390/children10010074
Google Scholar CrossrefGarcía-Perales, R., & Almeida, L. (2019). An enrichment program for students with high intellectual ability: Positive effects on school adaptation. [Programa de enriquecimiento para alumnado con alta capacidad: Efectos positivos para el currículum]. Comunicar, 60, 39-48. https://doi.org/10.3916/C60-2019-04
Google Scholar CrossrefGarrett, L., & Moltzen, R. (2011). Writing Because I Want to, Not Because I Have to: Young Gifted Writers' Perspectives on the Factors that" Matter" in Developing Expertise. English Teaching: Practice and Critique, 10(1), 165-180. https://hdl.handle.net/10289/5629
Google Scholar CrossrefGómez-León, M. I. (2022). Desarrollo de la empatía a través de la Inteligencia Artificial Socioemocional. Papeles del Psicólogo, 43(3), 218-224. https://doi.org/10.23923/pap.psicol.2996
Google Scholar CrossrefGómez-León, M.I (2024). ¿Tramposo e injusto? entonces, es humano. Robots sociales educativos y ética sintética. Revista Tecnología, Ciencia Y Educación. (27), 167–186. https://doi.org/10.51302/tce.2024.18841
Google Scholar CrossrefGómez-León, M.I. (2025). Robótica e Inteligencia artificial en el desarrollo de la Alta Capacidad. ANDULI, Revista Andaluza De Ciencias Sociales, (27), 133–151. https://doi.org/10.12795/anduli.2025.i27.06
Google Scholar CrossrefGonzález-Cabrera, J., Tourón, J., Machimbarrena, J. M., Gutiérrez-Ortega, M., Álvarez-Bardón, A., & Garaigordobil, M. (2019). Cyberbullying in gifted students: Prevalence and psychological well-being in a Spanish sample. International journal of environmental research and public health, 16(12), 2173. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16122173
Google Scholar CrossrefGörgülü, D., & Törün, E. (2025). A case study on the perception of artificial intelligence by gifted students in Turkey. Journal of Digital Educational Technology, 5(1), ep2502. https://doi.org/10.30935/jdet/15809
Google Scholar CrossrefGotlieb, R., Hyde, E., Immordino‐Yang, M. H., & Kaufman, S. B. (2016). Cultivating the social–emotional imagination in gifted education: insights from educational neuroscience. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1377(1), 22-31. https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.13165
Google Scholar CrossrefGuthrie, K. H. (2019). Nothing is ever easy”: Parent perceptions of intensity in their gifted adolescent children. The Qualitative Report, 24(8), 2080-2101. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2019.3598
Google Scholar CrossrefHaselager, P., & Mecacci, G. (2020). Superethics instead of superintelligence: know thyself, and apply science accordingly. AJOB neuroscience, 11(2), 113-119. https://doi.org/10.1080/21507740.2020.1740353
Google Scholar CrossrefHew, K. F., & Cheung, W. S. (2013). Use of Web 2.0 technologies in K-12 and higher education: The search for evidence-based practice. Educational research review, 9, 47-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2012.08.001
Google Scholar CrossrefHinterplattner, S., Skogø, J., & Sabitzer, B. (2019, October). Beyond the Game: Exploring Winning Strategies With Gifted Students. In ECGBL 2019 13th European Conference on Game-Based Learning (Vol. 325). Academic Conferences and publishing limited. https://doi.org/10.34190/GBL.19.116
Google Scholar CrossrefHinterplattner, S., Wolfensberger, M., & Lavicza, Z. (2022). Honors students’ experiences and coping strategies for waiting time in secondary school and at university. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 45(1), 84-107. https://doi.org/10.1177/01623532211063945
Google Scholar CrossrefIsmail, S. A. A., Alghawi, M. A., & AlSuwaidi, K. A. (2022). Gifted education in United Arab Emirates: Analyses from a learning-resource perspective, Cogent Education, 9(1), 1-20. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2022.2034247
Google Scholar CrossrefJamali, U. A. Y. (2019). Fostering creativity using robotics among gifted primary school students. Gifted and Talented International, 34(1-2), 71-78. https://doi.org/10.1080/15332276.2020.1711545
Google Scholar CrossrefKazemi, A., & Sayyadi, A. (2014). Effect of University Entrance Exam on Gifted High School Students’ Motivation Scrutinized: An Iranian Perspective. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature, 3(5), 150-165. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.3n.5p.150
Google Scholar CrossrefKim, K.H., & Coxon, S.V. (2016). Fostering Creativity Using Robotics among Students in Stem Fields to Reverse the Creativity Crisis. In: Demetrikopoulos, M.K., Pecore, J.L. (eds) Interplay of Creativity and Giftedness in Science. Advances in Creativity and Giftedness. Sense Publishers, Rotterdam. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-163-2_19
Google Scholar CrossrefKocaman, B. (2023). The effect of coding education on analytical thinking of gifted students. International Journal of Educational Methodology, 9(1), 95-106. https://doi.org/10.12973/ijem.9.1.95
Google Scholar CrossrefKontostavlou, E. Z., & Drigas, A. S. (2019). The Use of Information and Communications Technology (ICT) in Gifted Students. International Journal Recent Contributions Engineering, Science & IT, 7(2), 60-67. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijes.v7i2.10815
Google Scholar CrossrefKulegel, S., & Topsakal, U. U. (2021). Investigating Perceptions and Skills of Gifted Students in STEM Education. World Journal of Education, 11(3), 39-46. https://doi.org/10.5430/wje.v11n3p39
Google Scholar CrossrefKunt, K., & Tortop, H. S. (2017). Examination of science and technology teachers’ attitude and opinions related giftedness and gifted education in Turkey. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 5(1), 37-54.
Google Scholar CrossrefLee, H. J., Kim, H., & Byun, H. (2015). Are high achievers successful in collaborative learning? An explorative study of college students’ learning approaches in team project-based learning. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 54(5), 418-427. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2015.1105754
Google Scholar CrossrefLee, J., & Kim, J. B. (2015, August 31). The Survey of Gifted Students’ Scientific Integrity and Perception of Scientific Misconduct in R&E Program. Journal of Gifted/Talented Education. The Korean Society for the Gifted. https://doi.org/10.9722/jgte.2015.25.4.565
Google Scholar CrossrefLee, J., Kim, J. B., & Isozaki, T. (2017). A comparative study on scientific misconduct between Korean and Japanese science gifted students. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(7), 3519-3538.https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00742a
Google Scholar CrossrefLee, V. R., Pope, D., Miles, S., & Zárate, R. C. (2024). Cheating in the age of generative AI: A high school survey study of cheating behaviors before and after the release of ChatGPT. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 7, 100253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100253
Google Scholar CrossrefMaker, C. J. (2020). Identifying exceptional talent in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics: Increasing diversity and assessing creative problem-solving. Journal of Advanced Academics, 31(3), 161-210. https://doi.org/10.1177/1932202X20918203
Google Scholar CrossrefManuel, D., & Freiman, V. (2017). Differentiating instruction using a virtual environment: A study of mathematical problem posing among gifted and talented learners. Global Education Review, 4(1).
Google Scholar CrossrefMatheis, S., Kronborg, L., Schmitt, M., & Preckel, F. (2017). Threat or challenge? Teacher beliefs about gifted students and their relationship to teacher motivation. Gifted and Talented International, 32(2), 134–160. https://doi.org/10.1080/15332276.2018.1537685
Google Scholar CrossrefMiedijensky, S. (2018). Learning environment for the gifted—What do outstanding teachers of the gifted think? Gifted Education International, 34(3), 222-244. https://doi.org/10.1177/026142941775420
Google Scholar CrossrefMorduchowicz, R. (2023). La inteligencia artificial ¿Necesitamos una nueva educación? UNESCO. Recuperado de: https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000386262.locale=es
Google Scholar CrossrefMullet, D. R., Kettler, T., & Sabatini, A. (2018). Gifted students’ conceptions of their high school STEM education. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 41(1), 60-92. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162353217745156
Google Scholar CrossrefMun, R. U., Ezzani, M. D., & Lee, L. E. (2020). Culturally relevant leadership in gifted education: A systematic literature review. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 43(2), 108-142. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162353220912009
Google Scholar CrossrefOpoku, M. P., Belbase, S., Nketsia, W., Side, A. S., Were, D., & Gemeda, F. T. (2025). Comparative study of teachers’ attitudes, self-efficacy and job satisfaction when teaching gifted students in Ethiopia and Kenya. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057925.2025.2452467
Google Scholar CrossrefOECD. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2019). OECD skills strategy 2019: Skills to shape a better future. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264313835-en
Google Scholar CrossrefOrganización para la Cooperación y el Desarrollo Económicos [OCDE] (2024). Panorama de la educación 2024: Indicadores de la OCDE. OECD Publishing. https://hdl.handle.net/11162/265008
Google Scholar CrossrefÖztüre Yavuz, G., Akçapınar, G., Çıralı Sarıca, H., & Koçak Usluel, Y. (2024). Investigating features that play a role in predicting gifted student engagement using machine learning: Video log and self-report data. Education and Information Technologies, 1-27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12490-9
Google Scholar CrossrefPage, M. J., Moher, D., & McKenzie, J. E. (2022). Introduction to PRISMA 2020 and implications for research synthesis methodologists. Research synthesis methods, 13(2), 156-163. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1535
Google Scholar CrossrefPotts, J. A. (2019). Profoundly gifted students’ perceptions of virtual classrooms. Gifted child quarterly, 63(1), 58-80. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986218801075
Google Scholar CrossrefRan, H., Kim, N. J., & Secada, W. G. (2022). A meta‐analysis on the effects of technology's functions and roles on students' mathematics achievement in K‐12 classrooms. Journal of computer assisted learning, 38(1), 258-284. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12611
Google Scholar CrossrefRenzulli, J. S. (2020). The catch-a-wave theory of adaptability: Core competencies for developing gifted behaviors in the second machine age of technology. International Journal for Talent Development and Creativity, 8(1), 79-95. https://doi.org/10.7202/1076749ar
Google Scholar CrossrefRoutledge. Zhai, X., Chu, X., Chai, C. S., Jong, M. S. Y., Istenic, A., Spector, M., ... & Li, Y. (2021). A Review of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Education from 2010 to 2020. Complexity, 2021(1), 8812542. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/8812542
Google Scholar CrossrefSalazar Tornel, M., Bermejo García, R., & Ferrando, M. (2022). Análisis de una prueba para medir la creatividad matemática. Revista de estudios e investigación en psicología y educación, 9(1), 76-96. https://doi.org/10.17979/reipe.2022.9.1.8812
Google Scholar CrossrefSandri, P., Zanetti, A., & Bennardi, I. (2023). Studenti plusdotati e didattica inclusiva a distanza: un’indagine esplorativa= Gifted Students and Inclusive Distance Learning: an Exploratory Survey. FORM@ RE, 23(2), 189-208.
Google Scholar CrossrefSarıca, H. Ç., Yavuz, G. Ö., y Usluel, YK (2024). Gifted students' emotions and teacher interactions in robotics lessons: a digital storytelling workshop. In EDULEARN24 (pp. 4334-4340). IATED. https://doi.org/10.21125/edulearn.2024.1083
Google Scholar CrossrefSastre-Riba, S., & Pascual-Sufrate, M. T. (2013). Alta capacidad intelectual, resolución de problemas y creatividad. Revista de neurología, 56(1), 67-76. https://doi.org/10.33588/rn.56S01.2013025
Google Scholar CrossrefShmatko, N., & Volkova, G. (2020). Bridging the skill gap in robotics: Global and national environment. Sage Open, 10(3), 2158244020958736. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244020958736 Siegle, D. (2017). Technology: The dark side of using technology. Gifted Child Today, 40(4), 232-235. https://doi.org/10.1177/1076217517723678
Google Scholar CrossrefSiegle, D. (2017). Technology: The dark side of using technology. Gifted Child Today, 40(4), 232-235. https://doi.org/10.1177/1076217517723678
Google Scholar CrossrefSiegle, D. (2023). A role for ChatGPT and AI in gifted education. Gifted Child Today, 46(3), 211-219. https://doi.org/10.1177/10762175231168443
Google Scholar CrossrefSteenbergen-Hu, S., Olszewski-Kubilius, P., & Calvert, E. (2020). The effectiveness of current interventions to reverse the underachievement of gifted students: Findings of a meta-analysis and systematic review. Gifted Child Quarterly, 64(2), 132–165. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986220908601
Google Scholar CrossrefSternberg, R. J. (2024). Do Not Worry That Generative AI May Compromise Human Creativity or Intelligence in the Future: It Already Has. Journal of Intelligence, 12(7), 69. https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence12070069
Google Scholar CrossrefSternberg, R. J., & Soleimani Dashtaki, A. (2024). Transformational wisdom. Possibility Studies & Society, 27538699241301927. https://doi.org/10.1177/27538699241301927
Google Scholar CrossrefSterne, JA, Hernán, MA, Reeves, BC, Savović, J., Berkman, ND, Viswanathan, M., Henry, D., Altman, DG, Ansari, MT, Boutron, I., Carpenter, JR, Chan, AW, Churchill, R., Deeks, JJ, Hróbjartsson, A., Kirkham, J., Jüni, P., Loke, YK, Pigott, TD, Ramsay, CR, … Higgins, JP (2016). ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions. BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 355, i4919.https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i4919
Google Scholar CrossrefSterne, JAC, Savović, J., Page, MJ, Elbers, RG, Blencowe, NS, Boutron, I., Cates, CJ, Cheng, HY, Corbett, MS, Eldridge, SM, Emberson, JR, Hernán, MA, Hopewell, S., Hróbjartsson, A., Junqueira, D.R., Jüni, P., Kirkham, JJ, Lasserson, T., Li, T., McAleenan, A., … Higgins, JPT (2019). RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomized trials. BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 366, l4898.https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.l4898
Google Scholar CrossrefSzymanski, A., Paganelli, A., & Tassell, J. (2022). 3D Printing in the mathematics classroom: Results from a pilot study with advanced middle school students. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 51(2), 169-191. https://doi.org/10.1177/00472395221114815
Google Scholar CrossrefTofel-Grehl, C., Feldon, D. F., & Callahan, C. M. (2018). Impacts of learning standards and testing on gifted learners in STEM schools: A multilevel analytic induction. Roeper Review, 40(2), 130-138. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783193.2018.1434714
Google Scholar CrossrefTosunoğlu, E. (2021). Digital-based practices in teaching specially gifted students: Examining the trends in research made in the last 10 years. Instructional Technology and Lifelong Learning, 2(1), 53-74. https://doi.org/10.52911/itall.869692
Google Scholar CrossrefTrillo-Luque, M. d. C., Vilches-Vilela, M. J., Quintero-Ordoñez, B., Fuentes-Gómez, F., & Dauder, M. S. (2020). Learning of English as a foreign language and gifted and talented students: The role of ICT in educational innovation. In M. E. Gómez-Parra & C. A. Huertas Abril (Eds.), Handbook of research on bilingual and intercultural education (pp. 251–280). Information Science Reference/IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-2588-3.ch011
Google Scholar CrossrefTusyanah, T., Sakitri, W., Rahmawati Indira, F., Ismiyati, I., & Suryanto, E. . (2023). The Role of Online Collaborative Learning (OCL) in Interpersonal Communication and Cognitive Performance. International Journal of Sociology of Education, 12(1), 25–48. https://doi.org/10.17583/rise.10800
Google Scholar CrossrefUnited Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization [UNESCO] (2021). Recuperar la educación en 2021: La educación en un mundo post-COVID-19. https://en.unesco.org/news/recovering-education-2021-education-post-covid-19-world
Google Scholar CrossrefVanTassel-Baska, J. (2022). The curriculum planning and instruction standard in gifted education: From idea to reality. In NAGC Pre-K–Grade 12 Gifted Education Programming Standards (pp. 128-151).
Google Scholar CrossrefWolfgang, C., & Snyderman, D. (2022). An analysis of the impact of school closings on gifted services: Recommendations for meeting gifted students’ needs in a post-COVID-19 world. Gifted Education International, 38(1), 53-73. https://doi.org/10.1177/02614294211054262
Google Scholar CrossrefYavuz, G. Ö., & Usluel, Y. K. (2024). Innovative practices in robotics education: awareness of emotion and social emotional skills development in gifted students. In EDULEARN24 Proceedings (pp. 4300-4305). IATED. https://doi.org/10.21125/edulearn.2024.1078
Google Scholar CrossrefYıldırım, P., Alan, B., & Yıldız, S. (2024). The Impact of Innovative Technological Practices for Gifted Children's Education on Support Classroom Teachers' Attitudes and Opinions towards Technology Use. Journal of Theoretical Educational Science, 17(4), 849-872. https://doi.org/10.30831/akukeg.1477823
Google Scholar CrossrefYun, E., & Park, Y. (2013, April 30). The Survey of Academic Integrity of the Student in Mentorship Program at a Science Gifted Institute Attached to University. Journal of Gifted/Talented Education. The Korean Society for the Gifted. https://doi.org/10.9722/jgte.2013.23.2.275
Google Scholar CrossrefZbainos, D., & Beloyianni, V. (2018). Creative ideation and motivated strategies for learning of academically talented students in Greek secondary school. Gifted and Talented International, 33(1-2), 3-14. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15332276.2018.1547620
Google Scholar CrossrefZhai, X., Chu, X., Chai, C. S., Jong, M. S. Y., Istenic, A., Spector, M., ... & Li, Y. (2021). A Review of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Education from 2010 to 2020. Complexity, 2021(1), 8812542. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/8812542
Google Scholar CrossrefZhao, Y. (2017). What works may hurt: Side effects in education. Journal of Educational Change, 18(1), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-016-9294-4
Google Scholar CrossrefPublished
Metrics
Almetric
Dimensions
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 María Isabel Gómez-León

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All articles are published under Creative Commons copyright (CC BY). Authors hold the copyright and retain publishing rights without restrictions, but authors allow anyone to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute, and/or copy articles as the original source is cited.