Promoting Student Agency through Writing Projects: The Role of Classroom Interaction, Autonomy from the Teacher, and Control over one's own Performance

Authors

https://doi.org/10.17583/rise.14664

Keywords:


Abstract

The concept of agency has gain increasing importance in educational research given that it refers to the capacity of students to make decisions and influence their own learning based on the resources and opportunities available to them. In our diverse classrooms, to promote agency is key as it allows each student to progress according to his or her own pace and abilities. This qualitative research, a classroom design experiment, analyzes how learning projects can favor the development of agency. To do so, writing projects were applied, in three educational establishments, to 16-17 years old students. Then, six focus groups were conducted to gain an insight about students' perspective on their learning experience. A content analysis of the transcripts was carried out and three mechanisms favoring agency were identified: (1) greater interaction among classroom members (increased student protagonism), (2) greater student control over their own performance, and (3) greater autonomy with respect to the teacher.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Akker, J., Gravemeijer, K., McKenney, S., & Nieveen, N. (2006). Introducing educational design research. In Educational Design Research (pp. 3-7). Routledge.

Google Scholar Crossref

Alfredo, R., Echeverria, V., Jin, Y., Yan, L., Swiecki, Z., Gašević, D., & Martinez-Maldonado, R. (2024). Human-centred learning analytics and AI in education: A systematic literature review. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 100215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100215

Google Scholar Crossref

Andueza, A. & Aguilera, N. (2018). Enseñar y aprender la coherencia textual: una propuesta didáctica a partir de la teoría de Michel Charolles. Didáctica. Lengua y Literatura, 30, 23-40. https://doi.org/10.5209/DIDA.61952

Google Scholar Crossref

Andueza, A. (2019). “Assessing Academic Writing: the construction and validation of an instrument to assess specific writing skills though an integrated task”. RELIEVE, 25(2), art. 5. doi: http://doi.org/10.7203/relieve.25.2.11163.

Google Scholar Crossref

Andueza, A. (2021). Estrategias didácticas para promover el conocimiento metacognitivo: una propuesta para analizar el género discursivo miniensayo. Lenguaje y Textos, (53), 31–39. https://doi.org/10.4995/lyt.2021.15611

Google Scholar Crossref

Ausubel, D. (2000). Adquisición y retención de conocimientos: Una perspectiva cognitiva (G. Sánchez Barberán, Trad.). Paidós.

Google Scholar Crossref

Bajtín, M. (2008). Estética de la creación verbal. (T. Bubnova, Trad.). Siglo XXI. (Trabajo original publicado en 1979).

Google Scholar Crossref

Bandura, A. (1997). Self efficacy: the exercise of control. W.H. Freeman and Company.

Google Scholar Crossref

Bandura, A. (2001). Social Cognitive Theory: An Agentic Perspective. Annual review of psychology, 52 ,1–26.

Google Scholar Crossref

Bell, S. (2010). Project-Based Learning for the 21st Century: Skills for the Future. The Clearing House, 83, 39–43. https://www.jstor.org/stable/20697896

Google Scholar Crossref

Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (1987). The psychology of written Composition. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Google Scholar Crossref

Castelló, M., Bañales, G., & Vega, N. (2011). Leer múltiples documentos para escribir textos académicos en la universidad: o cómo aprender a leer y escribir en el lenguaje de las disciplinas. Pro-Posições, Campinas, 22(1), 97-114. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-73072011000100009

Google Scholar Crossref

Cobb, P., & Gravemeijer, K. (2008). Experimenting to Support and Understand Learning Processes. In A.E. Kelly, R.A. Lesh, & J.Y. Baek (Eds.), Handbook of Design Research Methods in Education (pp. 68-95). Routledge.

Google Scholar Crossref

Code, J. (2020). Agency for learning: Intention, motivation, self-efficacy and self-regulation. In Frontiers in education (Vol. 5, p. 19). Frontiers Media SA. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2020.00019

Google Scholar Crossref

Concha, S., & Espinosa, M. J. (2022). “Es como tu vida, pero en escritura”: experiencias de escritura libre en comunidad. Pensamiento educativo, 59(2), 1-15.

Google Scholar Crossref

https://doi.org/10.7764/PEL.59.2.2022.3

Google Scholar Crossref

Dyson, A. H. (2020). “This isn’t my real writing”: The fate of children’s agency in too-tight curricula. Theory Into Practice, 59(2), 119-127. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2019.1702390

Google Scholar Crossref

Graham, S., Gillespie, A., & McKeown, D. (2013). Writing: importance, development, and instruction. Reading & Writing, 26, 1-15. DOI:10.1007/s11145-012-9395-2

Google Scholar Crossref

Harris, K. R., Santangelo, T., & Graham, S. (2010). Metacognition and strategies instruction in writing. In H. Salatas & W. Schneider (Eds.), Metacognition, strategy use, and instruction (pp. 226-256). The Gilford Press.

Google Scholar Crossref

Hatano, G., & Wertsch, J. V. (2001). Sociocultural approaches to cognitive development: The constitutions of culture in Mind. Human Development, 44(2-3), 77-83. https://doi. org/10.1159/000057047

Google Scholar Crossref

Krippendorff, K. (2018). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Sage publications.

Google Scholar Crossref

Kundu, A. (2020). The power of student agency: looking beyond Girt to close the opportunity Gap. Teacher College Press.

Google Scholar Crossref

Lassonde, C. & Richards, J.C. (2013). Best practices in teaching planning for writing. In S. Graham, C.A. MacArthur, & J. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Best practices in writing instruction (2nd ed.) (pp. 193-214). Guilford Press.

Google Scholar Crossref

Mameli, C., Grazia, V., & Molinari, L. (2021). The emotional faces of student agency. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 77, 101352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2021.101352

Google Scholar Crossref

Mameli, C., Grazia, V., & Molinari, L. (2023). Student agency: Theoretical elaborations and implications for research and practice. International Journal of Educational Research, 122, 102258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2023.102258

Google Scholar Crossref

Manyukhina, Y., & Wyse, D. (2018). Learner agency and the curriculum: a critical realist perspective. The Curriculum Journal, 30(3), 223–243. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585176.2019.1599973

Google Scholar Crossref

McArthur, C. A., & Philippakos, Z. A. (2013). Self-regulated strategy instruction in developmental writing: A design research project. Community College Review, 41(2), 176-195.

Google Scholar Crossref

Mercer, N., & Dawer, L. (2011). Thinking together. School of Education, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, viewed, 20(06).

Google Scholar Crossref

Mercer, S. (2011). Understanding learner agency as a complex dynamic system. System, 39, 427-436. DOI:10.1111/modl.12536

Google Scholar Crossref

Mutoni Griffiths, C.; Murdock-Perriera, L. Eberhardt, J. (2022) “Can you tell me more about this?”: Agentic written feedback, teacher expectations, and student learning. Contemporary Educational Psychology 73 pp.1-19 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2022.102145

Google Scholar Crossref

Navarro, F. (2019). Aportes para una didáctica de la escritura académica basada en géneros discursivos. DELTA: Documentação de Estudos em Lingüística Teórica e Aplicada, 35(2), 1-32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1678-460X2019350201

Google Scholar Crossref

Olivier, J., du Toit-Brits, C., Bunt, B. J., & Dhakulkar, A. (2022). Contextualised open educational practices: Towards student agency and self-directed learning (p. 292). AOSIS.

Google Scholar Crossref

Prior, P. (2006). A sociocultural theory of writing. In C. McArthur, H. Graham & J. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Handbook of writing research (pp. 54-66). The Guildford.

Google Scholar Crossref

Reiff, M. J., & Bawarshi, A. (2011). Tracing discursive resources: How students use prior genre knowledge to negotiate new writing contexts in first-year composition. Written Communication, 28(3), 312-337. https://doi.org/10.1177/074108831141018

Google Scholar Crossref

Stenalt, M. H., & Lassesen, B. (2022). Does student agency benefit student learning? A systematic review of higher education research. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 47(5), 653-669. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2021.1967874

Google Scholar Crossref

Strandford S.A. (2024) Fostering student agency and motivation: co-creation of a rubric for self-evaluation in an ungraded course. Front. Educ. 8:1213444. doi: 10.3389/feduc.2023.1213444

Google Scholar Crossref

Vaughn, M. (2021). Student Agency in the Classroom: Honoring the student Voice in the curriculum. Teachers College Press.

Google Scholar Crossref

Vaughn, M., Gee Jang, B., Sotirovska, V., & Cooper-Novack, G. (2020a). Student Agency in Literacy: A Systematic Review of the Literature. Reading Psychology, 41(7), 712–734. https://doi.org/10.1080/02702711.2020.1783142

Google Scholar Crossref

Vaughn, M., Premo, J., Sotirovska, V. V., & Erickson, D. (2020b). Evaluating agency in literacy using the student agency profile. The Reading Teacher, 73(4), 427-441. https://doi.org/10.1002/trtr.1853

Google Scholar Crossref

Walker, D. (2006). Toward productive design studies. In J. Akker, K. Gravemeijer, S. McKenney & N. Nieveen (Eds.), Educational Design Research (pp.8-14). Routledge.

Google Scholar Crossref

Webb, P. (2019). Dialogic thinking together towards abstract reasoning. In The Routledge International Handbook of Research on Dialogic Education (pp. 570-580). Routledge.

Google Scholar Crossref

Zacarian, D., & Silverstone, M. (2020). Teaching to empower: Taking action to foster student agency, self-confidence, and collaboration. ASCD.

Google Scholar Crossref

Zima, B. (2021). Mindsets and Skill Sets for Learning: A Framework for Building Student Agency. Marzano Resources.

Google Scholar Crossref

Zimmerman, B. J. (2012). Goal setting: A key proactive source of academic self-regulation. In D. H. Schunk & B. J. Zimmerman (Eds.), Motivation and self-regulated learning: Theory, research, and applications (pp. 267–295). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.

Google Scholar Crossref

Published

2024-10-25

Almetric

Dimensions

How to Cite

Andueza Correa, A. (2024). Promoting Student Agency through Writing Projects: The Role of Classroom Interaction, Autonomy from the Teacher, and Control over one’s own Performance. International Journal of Sociology of Education, 13(3), 157–175. https://doi.org/10.17583/rise.14664

Issue

Section

Articles