Interactive Groups: Fostering Collaborative Interactions in an Additional Language in a Multilingual Context
Keywords:
Abstract
Research has shown that participating in collaborative interactions is essential both for language learning and for effective access to school content, which is even more important in multilingual contexts where a large proportion of students are in schools where the language of instruction is different from the language of the home context. However, research still needs to analyse further educational actions that succeed in generating collaborative interactions under these circumstances. This exploratory study analyses an educational action called Interactive Groups in a multilingual context in which Basque is the language of instruction and is the L2 for most pupils. Using the Communicative Methodology, twenty-one Interactive Groups were video recorded and analysed qualitatively and quantitatively. Two interviews were conducted with teachers, one with a volunteer, seven with students, and two focus groups with students. The results show that collaborative interactions in the target language prevail in these Interactive Groups, which is achieved because both the adult and the students generate a collective scaffolding that (a) encourages focusing on the academic task, (b) neutralises disruptive behaviours and (c) activates solidarity among students to overcome learning difficulties. The educational implications of the results are discussed.
Downloads
References
Alexander, R. (2018). Developing dialogic teaching: Genesis, process, trial. Research Papers in Education, 33(5), 561-598. https://doi.org/10.1080/02671522.2018.1481140
Google Scholar CrossrefAubert, A., Molina, S., Shubert, T., & Vidu, A. (2017). Learning and inclusivity via Interactive Groups in early childhood education and care in the Hope school, Spain. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 13, 90-103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2017.03.002
Google Scholar CrossrefBall, J. (2010). Enhancing learning of children from diverse language backgrounds: Mother tongue-based bilingual or multilingual education in early childhood and early primary school years. Early Childhood Development Intercultural Partnerships, University of Victoria.
Google Scholar CrossrefBasque Government, Government of Navarre and Public office of the Basque language (2016). VI. Inkesta Soziolinguistikoa. Euskararen eremu osoa. [6th Sociolinguistic Survey. The whole territory of the Basque language]. Basque Government, Government of Navarre and Public office of the Basque language. https://bit.ly/3g46DP3
Google Scholar CrossrefBasque Government (2018). Euskararen adierazle sistema. Urtekaria 2018 (= Basque Indicator System. Yearbook 2018). Basque Government. https://bit.ly/3wN0ywV
Google Scholar CrossrefChomsky, N. (1986). Knowledge of language: Its nature, origin and use. Praeger.
Google Scholar CrossrefCouncil of Europe (1992). European Charter for Regional or Minority Languages. Council of Europe. https://bit.ly/3i6slnU
Google Scholar CrossrefDarvin, R., & Norton, B. (2015). Identity and a model of investment in applied linguistics. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 35, 36–56. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190514000191
Google Scholar CrossrefDenzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.). (2011). The Sage handbook of qualitative research. Sage.
Google Scholar CrossrefDíez-Palomar, J., & Cabré, J. (2015). Using dialogic talk to teach mathematics: the case of interactive groups. ZDM Mathematics Education, 47(7), 1299-1312. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-015-0728-x
Google Scholar CrossrefDouglas Fir Group. (2016). A transdisciplinary framework for SLA in a multilingual world. The Modern Language Journal, 100 (S1), 19-47. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12301
Google Scholar CrossrefElosua, P., & De Boeck, P. (2020). Educational assessment issues in linguistically diverse contexts: a case study using a generalised linear mixed model. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 33(3), 305-318. https://doi.org/10.1080/07908318.2019.1662432
Google Scholar CrossrefEuropean Commission. (2013). Ethics. https://bit.ly/31O8wLZ
Google Scholar CrossrefEuropean Parliament & European Council. (2016). Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation). https://bit.ly/3dVWypK
Google Scholar CrossrefFernandez Dobao, A. (2012). Collaborative writing tasks in the L2 classroom: Comparing group, pair, and individual work. Journal of second language writing, 21(1), 40-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2011.12.002
Google Scholar CrossrefFlecha, R. (2000). Sharing words: Theory and practice of dialogic learning. Rowman & Littlefield.
Google Scholar CrossrefFlecha, R., & Soler, M. (2013). Turning difficulties into possibilities: Engaging Roma families and students in school through dialogic learning. Cambridge Journal of Education, 43(4), 451-465. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2013.819068
Google Scholar CrossrefFlecha, R. (2015). Successful educational actions for inclusion and social cohesion in Europe. Springer.
Google Scholar CrossrefFreire, P. (1972). Pedagogy of the Oppressed. 1968. Herder.
Google Scholar CrossrefGarcía-Carrión, R., & J. Díez-Palomar. (2015). Learning Communities: Pathways for Educational Success and Social Transformation through Interactive Groups in Mathematics. European Educational Research Journal, 14(2), 151-166. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474904115571793
Google Scholar CrossrefGarcía-Carrión, R., López de Aguileta, G., Padrós, M., & Ramis-Salas, M. (2020). Implications for social impact of dialogic teaching and learning. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 140. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00140
Google Scholar CrossrefGiner, E. (2019). Amistades creadoras. [= Creative Friendship]. Hipatia Press.
Google Scholar CrossrefGómez, A., Padrós, M., Ríos, O., Mara, L. C., & Pukepuke, T. (2019). Reaching social impact through communicative methodology. Researching with rather than on vulnerable populations: the Roma case. Frontiers in Education, 19. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2019.00009
Google Scholar CrossrefHabermas, J. (1981). Theory of communicative action. Beacon Press.
Google Scholar CrossrefHawkins, M. R., & Mori, J. (2018). Considering ‘trans-’perspectives in language theories and practices. Applied Linguistics, 39(1), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amx056
Google Scholar CrossrefISEI-IVEI, Basque Government. (2018). Ebaluazio diagnostikoa 2017: Txosten exekutiboa [Diagnostic assessment 2017: Executive report]. Basque Government. https://bit.ly/2Rcq2EY
Google Scholar CrossrefKim, Y., & McDonough, K. (2008). The effect of interlocutor proficiency on the collaborative dialogue between Korean as a second language learners. Language teaching research, 12(2), 211-234. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168807086288
Google Scholar CrossrefLaScotte, D. & Tarone, E. (2019). Heteroglossia and Constructed Dialogue in SLA. The Modern Language Journal, 103, 95-112. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12533
Google Scholar CrossrefLeón-Jiménez, S., Villarejo-Carballido, B., López de Aguileta, G., & Puigvert, L. (2020). Propelling Children's Empathy and Friendship. Sustainability, 12, 7288. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12187288 S.
Google Scholar CrossrefLearning Communities (2022). CdA en el Mundo. https://bit.ly/3uxk81B
Google Scholar CrossrefLoewen, S., & Sato, M. (2018). Interaction and instructed second language acquisition. Language Teaching, 51, 285–329. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444818000125
Google Scholar CrossrefMackey, A., Fell, E., de Jesus, F., Hall, A., & Ku, Y. Y. (2022). Social justice in applied linguistics: Making space for new approaches and new voices. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 42, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190522000071
Google Scholar CrossrefSantiago-Garabieta, M., García-Carrión, R., Zubiri-Esnaola, H., & López de Aguileta, G. (2021). Inclusion of L2 (Basque) learners in Dialogic Literary Gatherings in a linguistically diverse context. Language Teaching Research, 1362168821994142. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168821994142
Google Scholar CrossrefSantiago-Garabieta, M., Zubiri-Esnaola, H., García-Carrión, R., & Gairal-Casadó, R. (2023). Inclusivity, friendship and language learning: boosting collaboration in interactive groups. Educational Research, 65(2), 189-203. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131881.2023.2189433
Google Scholar CrossrefSoler, M., & Flecha, R. (2010). Desde los actos de habla de Austin a los actos comunicativos: Perspectivas desde Searle, Habermas y CREA. Revista signos, 43, 363-375.
Google Scholar CrossrefSordé Martí, T., Flecha, R., Rodríguez, J. A., & Bosch, J. L. C. (2020). Qualitative inquiry: A key element for assessing the social impact of research. Qualitative Inquiry, 26(8-9), 948-954. https://doi.org/10.1177/10778004209381
Google Scholar CrossrefStorch, N. (2002). Patterns of interaction in ESL pair work. Language Learning, 52, 119–158. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9922.00179
Google Scholar CrossrefUnited Nations (1989). Convention on the Rights of the Child. United Nations. https://bit.ly/3wKnhK4
Google Scholar CrossrefUnited Nations (2015). Sustainable Development Goals. Quality Education. United Nations. https://bit.ly/3POChQN
Google Scholar CrossrefUNESCO (2021). Inclusion in early childhood care and education: Brief on inclusion in education. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000379502
Google Scholar CrossrefValero, D., Redondo-Sama, G. & Elboj, C. (2018). Interactive groups for immigrant students: a factor for success in the path of immigrant students. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 22(7), 787-802. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2017.1408712
Google Scholar CrossrefValls, R., & L. Kyriakides. (2013). The Power of Interactive Groups: How Diversity of Adults Volunteering in Classroom Groups Can Promote Inclusion and Success for Children of Vulnerable Minority Ethnic Populations. Cambridge Journal of Education 43(1), 17-33. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2012.749213.
Google Scholar CrossrefVygotsky, L.S. (1980). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
Google Scholar CrossrefWalter, S., & Benson, C. (2012). Language policy and medium of instruction in formal education. The Cambridge handbook of language policy, 278-300. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511979026.017
Google Scholar CrossrefWatanabe, Y., & Swain, M. (2007). Effects of proficiency differences and patterns of pair interaction on second language learning: Collaborative dialogue between adult ESL learners. Language Teaching Research, 11, 121–142. https://doi.org/10.1177/136216880607074599
Google Scholar CrossrefZalbide, M., & Cenoz, J. (2008). Bilingual education in the Basque Autonomous Community: Achievements and challenges. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 21(1), 5-20. https://doi.org/10.2167/lcc339.0
Google Scholar CrossrefZubiri-Esnaola, H., Vidu, A., Rios-Gonzalez, O., & Morla-Folch, T. (2020). Inclusivity, participation and collaboration: Learning in interactive groups. Educational Research, 62(2), 162-180. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131881.2020.1755605
Google Scholar CrossrefPublished
Metrics
Almetric
Dimensions
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Leire Ugalde; Rocío García-Carrión; Nahia Intxausti-Intxausti; Harkaitz Zubiri-Esnaola

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All articles are published under Creative Commons copyright (CC BY). Authors hold the copyright and retain publishing rights without restrictions, but authors allow anyone to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute, and/or copy articles as the original source is cited.