Pedagogical Response to the Needs of Preschool Children in a Disadvantaged Situation
Keywords:
Type:
TextAbstract
The aim of this article is to analyse the pedagogical response of Croatian ECEC teachers to the needs of preschool children in a disadvantaged situation. The quality of pedagogical practise to prevent unfavourable developmental trajectories in children in a disadvantaged situation, particularly in the Croatian system, is poorly researched. A vignette describing an imaginary child in a disadvantaged situation was used and 35 preschool teachers from 15 ECEC institutions described in writing in an online application how they would support the child in his or her development. The qualitative thematic analysis was conducted according to the five components of the strengths-based approach (relationships, empowerment, collaboration, strengths and focus on change). This approach assumes that through reciprocal relationships between children, parents and teachers, previously agreed goals are achieved and personal resources, motivation and belief in the possibility of achieving sustainable change are unleashed. The results show that ECEC teachers are predominantly oriented towards individual components of the strengths-based approach (quality of relationships, focus on children's strengths), while the implementation of the entire strengths-based approach in its entirety is lacking. It is emphasised that the strengths-based approach needs to be more strongly affirmed in Croatian ECEC system so that its principles are recognisable in the pedagogical practise of all ECEC teachers.
Downloads
References
Antulić Majcen, S., & Drvodelić, M. (2022). Quality Pedagogical Practice in Early Childhood Education Institutions Relating to Children at Risk of Social Exclusion. Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal, 12(3), 81-101. https://doi.org/10.26529/cepsj.1086
Google Scholar CrossrefArchambault, J., Côté, D., & Raynault, M. F. (2020). Early Childhood Education and Care Access for Children from Disadvantaged Backgrounds: Using a Framework to Guide Intervention. Early Childhood Education Journal, 48, 345–352. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-019-01002-x
Google Scholar CrossrefBalladares, J., & Kankaraš, M. (2020). Attendance in early childhood education and care programmes and academic proficiencies at age 15 (OECD Education Working Papers No. 214). OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/19939019
Google Scholar CrossrefBartolo, P. A., Kyriazopoulou, M., Björck-Åkesson, E. & Giné, C. (2021). An adapted ecosystem model for inclusive early childhood education: a qualitative cross European study”. International Journal of School & Educational Psychology, 9(1), 3-15. https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5413-2947
Google Scholar CrossrefBlack, J. M., & Hoeft, F. (2015). Utilizing biopsychosocial and strengths-based approaches within the field of child health: What we know and where we can grow”. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 147, 13–20. https://doi.org/10.1002/cad.20089
Google Scholar CrossrefBouillet, D., Antulić Majcen, S. (2022). Potential for preventing the risk of social exclusion of children in Early Childhood Education and Care in Croatia. Journal of Pedagogy, 13(2), 5-27. https://doi.org/10.2478/jped-2022-0006
Google Scholar CrossrefBozic, N. (2013). Developing a strength-based approach to educational psychology practice: A multiple case study. Educational and Child Psychology, 30(4): 18-29. https://doi.org/10.53841/bpsecp.2013.30.4.18
Google Scholar CrossrefBroski, J. A., & Dunn, W. (2018). Fostering insights: A strengths-based theory of parental transformation. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 27(4), 1275-1286. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-017-0964-5
Google Scholar CrossrefDobrotić, I., Družić Ljubotina, O., Kletečki Radović, M., & Buković, N. (2021). A deep-dive into the European Child Guarantee in Croatia: Literature Review. UNICEF’s Office for Croatia. https://www.unicef.org/eca/reports/deep-dive-european-child-guarantee-croatia
Google Scholar CrossrefDownes, P., & Gilligan, A. L. (2007). Beyond educational disadvantage # eds.). Institute of Public Administration.
Google Scholar CrossrefDriessen, G. (2020). The evidence for the effectiveness of family- and center-based early childhood education programs. International Journal of Pedagogy, Innovation and New Technologies, 7(1): 106-115. 10.5604/01.3001.0014.4466
Google Scholar CrossrefEpstein, M. H., Rudolph, S., & Epstein, A. A. (2000). Using strength-based assessment in transition planning. Teaching Exceptional Children 32(6), 50-54. https://doi.org/10.1177/004005990003200607
Google Scholar CrossrefEuropean Commission (2014). Proposal for key principles of a Quality Framework for Early Childhood Education and Care: Report of the Working Group on Early Childhood Education and Care under the auspices of the European Commission, Directorate-General for Education and Culture. https://www.earlychildhoodworkforce.org/node/214
Google Scholar CrossrefEuropean Commission/EACEA/Eurydice (2020). Equity in school education in Europe: Structures, policies and student performance: Eurydice report. Publications Office of the European Union. https://www.eurydice.hr/cms_files/2022/11/1669809645_equity-in-school-education-in-europe-report.pdf
Google Scholar CrossrefEuropean Union. (2019). Council Recommendation on High-Quality ECEC Systems. Official Journal of the European Union (2019/C 189/02). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32019H0605%2801%29
Google Scholar CrossrefFenton, A. (2013). Using a Strengths Approach to Early Childhood Teacher Preparation in Child Protection Using Work-Integrated Education. Asia-Pacific Journal of Cooperative Education, 14(3), 157-169. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1113722
Google Scholar CrossrefFenton, A., Walsh, K., Wong, S. and & Cumming, T. (2015). Using strengths-based approaches in early years practice and research. International Journal of Early Childhood, 47(1), 27-52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13158-014-0115-8
Google Scholar CrossrefFlecha, R. (2022). THE DIALOGIC SOCIETY: The sociology scientists and citizens like and use. Hipatia Press Association. https://hipatiapress.com/index/en/2022/12/04/the-dialogic-society-2/
Google Scholar CrossrefFleming, B., & Harford, J. (2021). The DEIS programme as a policy aimed at combating educational disadvantage: fit for purpose? Irish Educational Studies, 42 (3) https://doi.org/10.1080/03323315.2021.1964568.
Google Scholar CrossrefFruhauf, C. A., Yancura, L. A., Greenwood‐Junkermeier, H., Riggs, N. R., Fox, A. L., Mendoza, A. N., & Ooki, N. (2020). The importance of family‐focused and strengths‐based approaches to interventions for grandfamilies. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 12(4), 478-491. https://doi.org/10.1111/jftr.12395
Google Scholar CrossrefGalloway, R., Reynolds, B., & Williamson, J. (2020). Strengths-Based Teaching and Learning Approaches for Children: Perceptions and Practices. Journal of Pedagogical Research, 4(1), 31-45. 10.33902/JPR.2020058178
Google Scholar CrossrefGardner, M., & Toope, D. (2011). A social justice perspective on strengths-based approaches: Exploring educators' perspectives and practices. Canadian Journal of Education, 34(3), 86-102. https://www.jstor.org/stable/canajeducrevucan.34.3.86
Google Scholar CrossrefGeens, N., & Vandenbroeck, M. (2013). Early childhood education and care as a space for social support in urban contexts of diversity. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 21(3), 407-419. 10.1080/1350293X.2013.814361
Google Scholar CrossrefHammond, W., & Zimmerman, R. (2012). A strengths-based perspective. A report for resiliency initiatives. Resiliency Initiatives. https://www.esd.ca/Programs/Resiliency/Documents/RSL_STRENGTH_BASED_PERSPECTIVE.pdf
Google Scholar CrossrefHeyne, L. A., and Anderson, L. S. (2012). Theories that support strengths-based practice in therapeutic recreation. Therapeutic Recreation Journal, 46(2), 106. https://js.sagamorepub.com/index.php/trj/article/view/2674
Google Scholar CrossrefHopps-Wallis, K., Fenton, A., & S. Dockett, S. (2016). Focusing on Strengths as Children Start School: What does it mean in practice?. Australasian Journal of Early Childhood, 41(2), 103–111. https://doi.org/10.1177/183693911604100214
Google Scholar CrossrefKalke, T., Glanton, A., & Cristalli, M. (2007). Positive behavioral interventions and supports: using strength-based approaches to enhance the culture of care in residential and day treatment education environments. Child Welfare, 86(5), 151-74. PMID: 18422053.
Google Scholar CrossrefKovan, N., Mishra, S., Susman-Stillman, A., Piescher, K.N., LaLiberte, T. (2014). Differences in the early care and education needs of young children involved in child protection. Children and Youth Services Review, 46, 139–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2014.07.017
Google Scholar CrossrefLeBuffe, P. A., & Shapiro, V. B. (2004). Lending ‘Strength’ to the Assessment of Preschool Social-Emotional Health. The California School Psychologist, 9(1), 51-61. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03340907
Google Scholar CrossrefMatković, T., Visser, M., Stropnik, N., & Williams, C. (2020). A Study on Financing and Governance of Pre-primary Education. UNICEF's Office for Croatia.
Google Scholar CrossrefMenand, V., Clément, M. È., & April, J. (2021). Early Childhood Educator’s Intention to Provide Support in the Context of Parental Violence: The Contribution of the Theory of Planned Behavior. Journal of Early Childhood Teacher Education, 42(2), 162-181. https://doi.org/10.1080/10901027.2021.1918295
Google Scholar CrossrefMessiou, K. (2017). Research in the field of inclusive education: time for a rethink?” International Journal of Inclusive Education, 21(2), 146-159. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2016.1223184
Google Scholar CrossrefMotiejunaite, A. (2021). Access and quality of early childhood education and care in Europe: an overview of policies and current situation. IUL Research: Open Journal of IUL University 2 (4). https://iulresearch.iuline.it.
Google Scholar CrossrefNacionalna razvojna strategija do 2030. godine. [The Croatian National Development Strategy 2030]. 2021. Official Gazette 13. https://narodne-novine.nn.hr/clanci/sluzbeni/2021_02_13_230.html
Google Scholar CrossrefNacionalni kurikulum ranog i predškolskog odgoja i obrazovanja [National Curriculum for Early Childhood Education and Care]. 2015. Official Gazette 5.
Google Scholar CrossrefOberklaid, F., Baird, G., Blair, M., Melhuish, E., Hall, D. (2013). Children’s health and development: approaches to early identification and intervention. Archives of Disease in Childhood, 98, 1008–1011. 10.1136/archdischild-2013-304091
Google Scholar CrossrefPeleman, B., Vandenbroeck, M., & Van Avermaet, P. (2020). Early learning opportunities for children at risk of social exclusion. Opening the black box of preschool practice. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 28(1), 21–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/1350293X.2020.1707360
Google Scholar CrossrefPölkki, P. L., Vornanen, R. H. (2016). Role and Success of Finnish Early Childhood Education and Care in Supporting Child Welfare Clients: Perspectives from Parents and Professionals. Early Childhood Education Journal, 44, 581–594. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-015-0746-x
Google Scholar CrossrefPulla, V. (2017). Strengths-based approach in social work: A distinct ethical advantage. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, 3(2), 97-114. https://www.ijicc.net/images/Vol_3_iss_2_nov_2017/Pulla_2017.pdf
Google Scholar CrossrefRaat, H., Wijtzes, A., Jaddoe, V. W., Moll, H. A., Hofman, A., & Mackenbach, J. P. (2011). The health impact of social disadvantage in early childhood: the Generation R study. Early Human Development, 87, 729–733. 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2011.08.022
Google Scholar CrossrefSchober, P. S., & Spiess C. K. (2013). Early Childhood Education Activities and Care Arrangements of Disadvantaged Children in Germany. Child Indicators Research, 6, 709–735. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12187-013-9191-9
Google Scholar CrossrefSchratz, M., Schwarz, J.F., Eckart, E., & Ammann, M. (2013). Beyond the Reach of Teaching: Vignette Research of Learning as Experience. Conference presentation, European Educational Research Association 2013, Creativity and Innovation in Educational Research.
Google Scholar CrossrefSimmons, C. A., Shapiro, V. B., Accomazzo, S., & Manthey, T. J. (2016). Strengths-Based Social Work: A Meta-Theory to Guide Social Work Research and Practice. In N. Coady, & P. Lehmann (Eds.), Theoretical Perspectives for Direct Social Work Practice, 3rd edition (131-154). Springer Publishing Company.
Google Scholar CrossrefSiraj-Blatchford, I. (2004). Educational disadvantage in the early years: How do we overcome it? Some lessons from research. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 12(2) 5–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/13502930485209391
Google Scholar CrossrefSonnenschein, S., & Sawyer, B. E. (2018). Academic Socialization of Young Black and Latino Children: Building on Family Strengths. Springer Publishing Company.
Google Scholar CrossrefSukkar, H., Dunst, C. J., Kirkby, J. (2018). Family systems and family-centred practices in early childhood intervention. In H. Sukkar, C. J. Dunst, C. J.,Kirkby (Ed.), Early Childhood Intervention: Working with Families of Young Children with Special Needs (3-14). Routledge Taylor & Francis Group. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2016-54579-001
Google Scholar CrossrefTankersley, D., Brajković, S. Handžar, S., Rimkiene, R., Sabaliauskiene, R., Trikić, Z., & Vonta, T. (2012). Teorija u praksi, priručnik za profesionalni razvoj učitelja razredne nastave [Theory in practice, a handbook for the professional development of primary school teachers]. Pučko otvoreno učilište Korak po korak [Public open university Step by Step].
Google Scholar CrossrefTayler, C., Cloney, D., & Niklas, F. (2015). A Bird in the Hand: Understanding the Trajectories of Development of Young Children and the Need for Action to Improve Outcomes. Australasian Journal of Early Childhood, 40(3), 51-60. https://doi.org/10.1177/183693911504000308
Google Scholar CrossrefThomson, D., Cantrell, E., Guerra, G., Gooze, R : & Tout, K. (2020). Conceptualizing and Measuring Access to Early Care and Education. OPRE Report #2020-106. Office of Planning, Research, and Evaluation, Administration for Children and Families, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. https://www.acf.hhs.gov/opre/report/conceptualizing-and-measuring-access-early-care-and-education
Google Scholar CrossrefToros, K., & Falch-Eriksen, A. (2021). Strengths-based practice in child welfare: A systematic literature review. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 30(6), 1586-1598. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-021-01947-x
Google Scholar CrossrefWalsh, D., McCartney, G., Smith, M., & Armour, G. (2019). Relationship between childhood socioeconomic position and adverse childhood experiences (ACEs): a systematic review. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 73(12), 1087-1093. https://jech.bmj.com/content/73/12/1087
Google Scholar CrossrefWalsh, T., & Canavan, J. (2014). Strengths-based Practice in Child Welfare. Child Care in Practice, 20(1), 1-6. 10.1080/13575279.2014.881053
Google Scholar CrossrefWest, A., Blome, A., & Lewis, J. (2020). What characteristics of funding, provision and regulation are associated with effective social investment in ECEC in England, France and Germany?. Journal of Social Policy, 49(4), 681-704. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047279419000631.
Google Scholar CrossrefPublished
Almetric
Dimensions
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Dejana Bouillet
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All articles are published under Creative Commons copyright (CC BY). Authors hold the copyright and retain publishing rights without restrictions, but authors allow anyone to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute, and/or copy articles as the original source is cited.
