Sociological Theory from Dialogic Democracy

Elisabeth Torras-Gómez, Mengna Guo, Mimar Ramis

Abstract


Despite the long dialogical tradition both in Eastern and Western societies, in recent years the social dialogical turn is more and more evident in many domains of life. Citizens increasingly demand to have a saying in the seeking of solutions for their problematics, and advocate for a more democratic approach to science that fosters the inclusion of all voices and enhances the agency of citizens in social transformation. Therefore, global scientific research is progressively more oriented towards co-creation as a means to ensure social impact. In this context, social theory can provide the theoretical foundations to better address the societal challenges of concern, as well as the mechanisms to properly design research oriented to produce social impact, such as communicative methodology, and to monitor and evaluate such impact. Social theory would then serve its ultimate goal: to contribute to the improvement of societies. Sociology was born as part of the democracies to provide citizens with elements of analysis that would make it possible for them to make their decisions with the prior evidence of the consequences of each option. After a process of democratization, we return to the original sense, but now in a more democratic situation.

Keywords


Dialogic democracy; communicative methodology; social impact; co-creation; citizenship

Full Text:

PDF

References


Aiello, E., & Joanpere, M. (2014). Social Creation. A New Concept for Social Sciences and Humanities. International and Multidisciplinary Journal of Social Sciences, 3(3), 297–313. doi: 10.4471/rimcis.2014.41

Anonymous (2009). Shang Shu - Book of Documents (L. Shengli, ed.; M. Ping, trans.). Beijing: Zhonghua Book Company.

Bonney, R., Phillips, T. B., Ballard, H. L., & Enck, J. W. (2016). Can citizen science enhance public understanding of science? Public Understanding of Science, 25(1), 2–16. doi: 10.1177/0963662515607406

Burawoy, M. (2014). Precarious Engagements: Combat in the Realm of Public Sociology Guest Editor: Michael Burawoy. Current Sociology. La Sociologie Contemporaine, 62(2).

Chrisinger, B. W., & King, A. C. (2018). Stress experiences in neighborhood and social environments (SENSE): a pilot study to integrate the quantified self with citizen science to improve the built environment and health. International Journal of Health Geographics, 17(1), 17. doi: 10.1186/s12942-018-0140-1

Chrisinger, B. W., Ramos, A., Shaykis, F., Martinez, T., Banchoff, A. W., Winter, S. J., & King, A. C. (2018). Leveraging Citizen Science for Healthier Food Environments: A Pilot Study to Evaluate Corner Stores in Camden, New Jersey. Frontiers in Public Health, 6, 89. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2018.00089

Confucius, C. (2019). The Analects of Confucius. Books on Demand.

Consultations (2019, November 25). Retrieved November 25, 2019, from European Commission - European Commission website: https://ec.europa.eu/info/consultations/

Flecha, R. (2000). Sharing Words: Theory and Practice of Dialogic Learning. New York: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.

Giddens, A., Beck, U., & Lash, S. (1994). Reflexive modernization: Politics, tradition and aesthetics in the modern social order. Stanford University Press.

Gómez, A., Padrós, M., Ríos, O., Mara, L.-C., & Pukepuke, T. (2019). Reaching Social Impact Through Communicative Methodology. Researching With Rather Than on Vulnerable Populations: The Roma Case. Frontiers in Education, 4, 9. doi: 10.3389/feduc.2019.00009

Gu, Y. (2017). Ri Zhi Lu (R. Zheng, Ed.). Retrieved from 古诗文网 (Ancient Poetry Network) website https://so.gushiwen.org/

Habermas, J. (1987). Teoría de la acción comunicativa. Vol. I-II. Madrid: Taurus.

Merton, R.K. (1968). Social Theory and Social Structure. Free Press.

Miller-Rushing, A., Primack, R., & Bonney, R. (2012). The history of public participation in ecological research. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 10(6), 285–290. doi: 10.1890/110278

Needham, J., & Ling, W. (1956). Science and Civilisation in China, vol. 1: Introductory Orientations (Vol. 1). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Sen, A. (2005). The Argumentative Indian: Writings on Indian Culture, History and Identity. London, Penguin Books.

Shen, Q., & Shun, K. L. (2008). Confucian Ethics in Retrospect and Prospect. Council for Research in Values & Philosophy

Shen, S., & Qian, Z. (2019). 本体诠释学视角下的西方《尚书》英译研究. 湖南师范大学教育科学学报 (A Study of English Translations of Shang Shu in the West from the Perspective of Ontological Hermeneutics. Journal of Social Science of Hunan Normal University), 97–107. doi: 10.19503/j.cnki.1000-2529.2019.05.012

Soler-Gallart, M. (2017). Achieving Social Impact: Sociology in the Public Sphere. Springer.

Solidus Consortium. (2015-2018). SOLIDUS: Solidarity in European societies: empowerment, social justice and citizenship. Horizon 2020. Horizon 2020. European Commission.

Sordé, T., & Ojala, M. (2010). Actos comunicativos dialógicos y actos comunicativos de poder en la investigación. Revista Signos, 4(2), 377-391. doi: 10.4067/S0718-09342010000400008

Tan, S. (2012). 论春秋战国时期的百家争鸣. 兰台世界 . (Hundred Schools of Thought in the Spring and Autumn Period and Warring States Period. Lantai World), 30, 67–68. doi: 10.16565/j.cnki.1006-7744.2012.30.031

Valls, R., & Padrós, M. (2011). Using Dialogic Research to Overcome Poverty: From principles to action. European Journal of Education. doi: 10.1111/j.1465-3435.2011.01473.x

van den Besselaar, P., Flecha, R., & Radauer, A. (2018). Monitoring the Impact of EU Framework Programmes. doi: 10.2777/518781

Weber, M. (2004). The Vocation Lectures. Hackett Publishing.

WORKALO Consortium. (2001-2004). WORKALO. The creation of New occupational patterns for cultural minorities. The Gypsy case. European Commission FP5.

Wright, E. O. (2011). Real Utopias. Contexts, 10(2), 36–42. doi: 10.1177/1536504211408884

Zhang, S. (2009). 稷下学宫的办学理念及其当代意义. 湖南师范大学教育科学学报 (Idea of Ji Xia Xue Gong and Its Contemporary Significance. Journal of Educational Science of Hunan Normal University), 8(5).

Zhao, Z., & Chen, X. (2019). 试探稷下学宫的特点和性质. 文史杂志 (On the Characteristics and Nature of the Palace of Study. Journal of Literature and History), 6.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17583/rimcis.2019.4919

Article Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Metrics powered by PLOS ALM




Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.



RIMCIS - International and Multidisciplinary Journal of Social Sciences | ISSN: 2014-3680

Legal Deposit: B.34291-2012 | https://rimcis.hipatiapress.com | rimcis@hipatiapress.com