The Dialogic Turn: Dialogue or Violence?

Authors

  • Lidia Puigvert University of Barcelona

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4471/rimcis.2012.04

Keywords:

dialogic turn, dialogic feminism, democracy, social sciences, dialogue

Abstract

Individuals and social groups are increasingly using dialogue to take decisions, perform actions and solve conflicts in diverse social relationships, from international policies or globalization processes to personal friendships, labor relations or the intimacy of bedroom. When they do not use dialogue, they use violence or imposition: there are only two ways to proceed. The increase of dialogue does not imply that there is no violence in human and social relationships, obviously there is; but this phenomenon confirms that there exist many dialogic interactions and procedures in society which shed light to the process of radicalization of democracy, and thus need to be further analyzed from the social sciences. This article does so; it discusses the “dialogic turn” in the social sciences and illustrates it with the case of feminist theory and practice. Whereas in the past feminism had been a movement for few academic women often speaking for “others”, current dialogic feminism brings into egalitarian dialogue the voices of very diverse women who reach agreements regarding vision and action.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Lidia Puigvert, University of Barcelona

Sección de Teoría Sociológica y Metodología de las Ciencias Sociales. Facultad de Económicas.

References

Althusser, L. (1992). L’avenir dure longtemps. Paris: Stock.

Althusser, L.; Balibar, E. (1983). Reading Capital, London: Verso.

Beck, U.; Beck-Gernsheim,E. (1995). The normal chaos of love. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Beck, U.; Giddens, A.; Lash, S. (1994). Reflexive modernization. Politics, Tradition and Aesthetics in the Modern Social Order. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

Beck-Gernsheim, E.; Butler, J.; Puigvert, L. (2003). Women and social transformation. Lahnam, MD : Rowman & Littlefield.

Burawoy, M. (2005). For Public Sociology. American Sociological Review, v 70, 4-28.

Chomsky, N. (1968). Language and mind. Enlarged edition. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Inc.

Cooper, D.; Faye, J.P.; Faye, M.O; Foucault, M.; Zecca, M. (1977). Dialogue sur l'enfermement et la répression psychiatrique. Change, v 32-33, 76-110.

De Botton, L., Puigvert, L., & Sánchez A. M. (2005). The inclusion of other women: Breaking the silence through dialogic learning. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.

Elster, J. (Ed). (1998). Deliberative democracy. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.

Eribon, D. (1991). Michael Foucault. Cambridge, MA : Harvard University Press.

Flecha, R. ; Gomez, J. ; author (2003). Contemporary Sociological Theory. Lanham, MD : Rowman & Littlefield.

Fung, A. ; Wright, E.O. (2003). Deepening democracy. Intitutional innovations in empowered participatory governance (Real Utopias Project). London : Verso.

Habermas, J. (1994). The past as future. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.

Habermas, J. 1987. The Theory of Communicative Action: Volume II. Lifeworld and System: A critique of functionalist reasoning. Boston: Beacon Press.

Searle, J. ; Soler, M. (2004). Lenguaje y ciencias sociales. Barcelona: Hipatia.

Touraine, A. (2007). A new paradigm to understand today’s world. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Touraine, A., Wieviorka, M., Flecha, R. 2004. Conocimiento e identidad. Voces de grupos culturales en la investigación social Barcelona: El Roure.

Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in Society: Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Wright, E. (2010). Envisioning Real Utopias. London: Verso.

Downloads

Published

2012-07-30

How to Cite

Puigvert, L. (2012). The Dialogic Turn: Dialogue or Violence?. International and Multidisciplinary Journal of Social Sciences, 1(1), 78–96. https://doi.org/10.4471/rimcis.2012.04

Issue

Section

Articles