Evaluation of “Ready for First Certificate of English”: Microstructural Approach
Keywords:
Downloads
Abstract
Despite much research done on language learning textbooks, there still exist several questions unanswered about what these textbooks’ contents are about. This study is thus an attempt to investigate the 15 reading passages of Ready for First Certificate of English (FCE) in the light of schema theory. In doing so, the microstructural approach to schema theory was taken into the account which led to the classification of 8617 schema tokens into the three main categories of syntactic, semantic, and parasyntactic domains. Running the chi-square test revealed that the domains differ significantly from each other regarding both their types (X2= 2869.9, p< 0.05) and tokens (X2= 1704, p< 0.05) which lent support to their psychological reality. In addition, the descriptive analysis of the schemata demonstrated that reading passages are heavily outweighed by semantic types (80.7%), whereas syntactic ad parasyntactic types were only about 6% and 12.4 % respectively. The pedagogical implication of the study is discussed and further suggestions are put forward.
Downloads
References
Altman, G. T. M., Garnham, A., & Dennis, Y. (1992). Avoiding the garden path: Eye movement in context. Journal of Memory and Language, 31, 685-712.
Google Scholar CrossrefBartlett, F. C. (1932). Remembering: A study in experimental and social psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar CrossrefBreen, M. (1989). The evaluation cycle for language learning tasks. In P. Rea-Dickins and K. Germaine (Eds), Evaluation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar CrossrefChastain, K. (1971). The development of modern language skills: Theory to practice (pp. 376-384). Philadelphia. The Center for Curriculum Development, Inc.
Google Scholar CrossrefDaftarifard, P., & Birjandi, P. (2015). Lower Intermediate Readers and Their Use of Cognitive and Metacognitive Strategies. Sino-US English Teaching, 12(10), 757-761.
Google Scholar CrossrefDocherty, C. (2015). Revising the use of English component in FCE and CAE. Researchers Notes, 62, 15-20.
Google Scholar CrossrefFlesch, R. (1948). A new readability yardstick. Journal of Applied Psychology, 32, 221-233.
Google Scholar CrossrefGeranpayeh, A. (2007). Using structural equation modelling to facilitate the revision of high stakes testing: The case of CAE. Researchers Notes, 30, 8-12.
Google Scholar CrossrefGharbavi, A., & Mousavi, S. A. (2012). A content analysis of textbooks: Investigating gender
Google Scholar Crossrefbias as a social prominence in Iranian high school English textbooks. English Linguistics
Google Scholar CrossrefResearch, 1(1), 42-49.
Google Scholar CrossrefHakemulder, F. (2006). A third culture: The empirical study of literature, culture, and the arts. In: K. Brown, (2nd Eds.) Encyclopedia of language and linguistics, (pp. 274-280). Oxford: Elsevier.
Google Scholar CrossrefHead, H. (1920). Studies in neurology. London: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar CrossrefHowden, D., & Metha, S. (2015). Stakeholder consultation: Review of FCE and CAE. Researchers Notes, 62, 6-8.
Google Scholar CrossrefHutchinson, T. & Waters, A. (1987). English for specific purposes: A learning-centred approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar CrossrefKhalifa, H., & Weir, C. J. (2009). Examining reading: Research and practice in assessing second language reading. Cambridge: UCLESlCambridge University Press.
Google Scholar CrossrefKhodadady, E. (1997). Schemata theory and multiple choice item tests measuring reading comprehension. Unpublished PhD thesis. The University of Western Australia.
Google Scholar CrossrefKhodadady, E. (2004). Schema-based cloze multiple choice item tests: Measures of reduced redundancy and language proficiency. ESP specialist, 25(2), 221-243.
Google Scholar CrossrefKhodadady, E. (2008). Schema-based textual analysis of domain-controlled authentic texts. Iranian Journal of Language Studies (IJLS), 2(4), 431-448.
Google Scholar CrossrefKhodadady, E. (2009). Objective-based achievement testing in the context of schema theory. Iranian Journal of Language Studies (IJLS), 3(1), 1-30.
Google Scholar CrossrefKhodadady, E. (2001). Schema: A theory of translation. In Training Translators and Interpreters in the New Millennium, Portsmouth 17th March 2001 Conference Proceedings (pp. 107-123).
Google Scholar CrossrefKhodadady, E. (2013). Research principles and methods and statistics in applied linguistics. Mashhad: Hamsayeh Aftab.
Google Scholar CrossrefKhodadady, E., & Herriman, M. (2000). Schemata theory and selected response item tests: From theory to practice. In A. J. Kunnan (Ed). Fairness and validation on language assessment (pp. 201-222). Cambridge: CUP.
Google Scholar CrossrefKhodadady, E., & Khosravani, H. (2014). Ideology in the BBC and press TV’s coverage of Syria unrest: A schema-based approach. Review of Journalism and Mass communication, 2(1), 47-67.
Google Scholar CrossrefKhodadady, E., & Lagzian, M. (2013). Textual analysis of an English dentistry textbook and its Persian translation: A schema-based approach. Journal of Studies in Social Sciences, 2(1), 81-104.
Google Scholar CrossrefKhodadady, E., Pishghadam, R., & Fakhr, M. (2010). The relationship among reading comprehension ability, grammar, and vocabulary knowledge: An experimental and schema-based approach. Iranian EFL Journal, 6, 7-49.
Google Scholar CrossrefKhojasteh, L., & Reinders, H. (2013). How textbooks (and learners) get it wrong: A corpus study of modal auxiliary verbs. Applied Research on English Language, 2(1), 33-44.
Google Scholar CrossrefKhodadady, E., Shirmohammadi, S., & Talebi, F. (2011). Brainstorming and Its Effect on Critical Thinking and Speaking. The Iranian EFL Journal, 19, 51.
Google Scholar CrossrefKinciad, j. P., Fishburne, R.P., Jr., Rogers, R. L., & Chissom, B. S. (1975). Derivation of new readability formulas (Automate Readability Index, Fog Count and Flesh Reading Ease Formula) for Navy enlisted personnel. Research Report 8-75, Millington,TN: Naval Technical Training, U.S. Naval Air Station, Memphis, TN.
Google Scholar CrossrefMcNeil, J. (1987). Reading comprehension: New direction for classroom practice. Blenview, IL: Foresman, and Company.
Google Scholar CrossrefNorris, R. (2008). Ready for FCE. Macmillan: Macmillan Publisher
Google Scholar CrossrefNunan, D. (1987). The teacher as curriculum developer. Adelaide: National Curriculum Resource Centre.
Google Scholar CrossrefPiaget, J. (1926). The child’s conception of the world. New York: Harcourt, Brace.
Google Scholar CrossrefRashidi, N, & Ghaedsharafi, Sh. (2015). An investigation into the culture and social actors
Google Scholar Crossrefrepresentation in Summit series ELT textbooks within Van Leeuwen's 1996 framework.
Google Scholar CrossrefSAGE Open, 1-10.
Google Scholar CrossrefRichards, J. C. (2001). The role of textbooks in a language program. Retrieved from http://www.professorjackrichards.com/pdfs/role-of-textbooks.
Google Scholar CrossrefRoohani, A., & Tanbakooei, N. (2012). Evaluating Passages 1 and First Certificate Textbooks: A Discourse Perspective. Research in Applied Linguistics, 3(2), 82-106.
Google Scholar CrossrefSheldon, L. E. (1988). Evaluating ELT textbooks and materials. ELT journal, 42(4), 237-246.
Google Scholar CrossrefPoplin, M. S. (1988). Holistic /constructivist principles of the teaching /learning process: Implications for the field of learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 21,401-416.
Google Scholar CrossrefRumelhart D E (1975). Notes on a schema for stories. In D. G. Bobrow & A. Collins (eds.) Representation and understanding, (pp. 211-236). New York: Academic Press.
Google Scholar CrossrefSemino E (1997). Language and world creation in poems and other texts. London: Longman.
Google Scholar CrossrefStockwell P (2006), Schema theory: Stylistic applications. In K., (2nd Eds.) Encyclopedia of language and linguistics, (pp. 8- 13). Oxford: Elsevier.
Google Scholar CrossrefTanenhaus, M. K., Spivey-Knowlton, M., Eberhard, K., & Sedivy, J. (1995). Integration of visual and linguistic information during spoken language comprehension. Science, 268, 1632–1634.
Google Scholar CrossrefTaylor, B., Harris, L. A., & Pearson, P. D. (1988). Reading difficulties: Instruction and Assessment. New York: McGraw-Hill Publishing company.
Google Scholar CrossrefTucker, C. A. (1975). Evaluating beginning textbooks. English Teaching Forum, 13, 355-361.
Google Scholar CrossrefTomlinson, B., Dat, B., Masuhara, H., & Rubdy, R. (2001). ELT courses for adults. ELT Journal, 55(1), 80-101.
Google Scholar CrossrefToms, C. (2004). General English coursebooks and their place in an ESAP programme, Asian EFL Journal, 6(1), Retrieved from http://asian-efl-journal.com/journal-2004/.
Google Scholar CrossrefTsagari, D. (2011). Washback of a high-stakes English exam on teachers’ perceptions and practices.
Google Scholar CrossrefUr, P. (1996). A course in language teaching: Practice and theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar Crossrefvan Leeuwen, T. (1996). The representation of social actors in discourse. In C. R. Caldas-Coulthard, & M. Coulthard, (Eds.), Texts and practices: Readings in critical discourse analysis. London: Routledge, 32-70.
Google Scholar CrossrefVidakovic, I., Elliott, M., & Sladden, J. (2015). Revising FCE and CAE reading tests. Researchers Note, 62, 8-14.
Google Scholar CrossrefWade, S. E. (1990). Using think alouds to assess comprehension. The Reading Teacher, 43(7), 442-451.
Google Scholar CrossrefZeronis, R., & Geranpayeh, A. (2015). Continuity and innovation: Updating FCE and CAE. Researchers Note, 62, 3-5.
Google Scholar CrossrefDownloads
Published
Almetric
Dimensions
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
All articles are published under Creative Commons copyright (CC BY). Authors hold the copyright and retain publishing rights without restrictions, but authors allow anyone to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute, and/or copy articles as the original source is cited.
