Trans-disciplinary Research: An Academic-Practitioner Partnership Effort on Investigating the Relationship between the Cooperative Model and Sustainability
https://doi.org/10.17583/rimcis.2015.1384
Keywords:
Downloads
Abstract
This article details novel research methodology developed through a researcher-practitioner partnership and employed in a three-phase research effort that explored relationships between the co-operative model and sustainable development. Firstly, a basic understanding of the characteristics of the co-operative model was established using the co-operative principles as a framework, and their complementarity to sustainable development was examined by comparing them with sustainability theory, principles and best practices (defined through seminal journal articles on the topic). Secondly, relationships between sustainability theory and the ideas and operations of currently functioning co-operatives were investigated, namely, whether co-operatives had integrated sustainability into their organizations. Thirdly, an integrated analysis that examined the relationship between co-operatives, the co-operative principles and sustainability concepts was conducted, and output from this work was used to build a visualization (referred to as the ‘Co-operative Star’), specifically designed to communicate a synthesis of research findings to diverse audiences. This study specifically focused on co-operatives and sustainability; however, the analytical techniques developed and employed have applications for other research involving comparisons between concepts and large bodies of literature, and it is particularly useful for comparing theoretical works (such as academic literature) with texts that discuss operations and practices (such as website and reports).
Downloads
References
Bell, L. A. (2007). Theoretical foundations for social justice education. In Adams, M., Bell, L. A., & Griffin, P. (Eds.), Teaching for diversity and social justice (pp. 1-14). New York: Routledge.
Google Scholar CrossrefBerkes, F. (2004). Rethinking community-based conservation. Conservation Biology, 18(3), 621–630.
Google Scholar CrossrefBhowmick, T. (2006). Building an exploratory visual analysis tool for qualitative researchers. Proceedings of AutoCarto, Vancouver, WA. Retrieved from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.66.503
Google Scholar Crossref[REMOVED FOR PURPOSES OF THE REVIEW PROCESS]
Google Scholar Crossref[REMOVED FOR PURPOSES OF THE REVIEW PROCESS]
Google Scholar CrossrefDempsey, N., Bramley, G., Power, S., and Brown, C. (2011). The social dimension of sustainable development: Defining urban social sustainability. Sustainable Development, 19(5), 289-300.
Google Scholar CrossrefDerr, J. B. (2013). The co-operative movement of Brazil and South Africa. Sustainable Development, 1(2013), 1-14.
Google Scholar CrossrefDietz, T., Ostrom, E., and Stern, P.C. (2003). The struggle to govern the commons. Science, 302, 1907–1912.
Google Scholar CrossrefFairbairn, B. (1994). The meaning of Rochdale: The Rochdale pioneers and the co-operative principles. Centre for the Study of Co-operatives, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada.
Google Scholar CrossrefGreenhalgh, T., and Taylor, R. (1997). How to read a paper: Papers that go beyond numbers (qualitative research). British Medical Journal, 315, 740–743.
Google Scholar CrossrefGunningham, N., Kagan, R. A., and Thornton, D. (2004). Social license and environmental protection: Why businesses go beyond compliance. Law & Social Inquiry, 29(2), 307-341.
Google Scholar CrossrefInternational Co-operative Alliance (ICA).(n.d.) 7 co-operative principles. Retrieved August 12, 2013, from http://usa2012.coop/about-co-ops/7-co-operative-principles
Google Scholar CrossrefJantsch, E. (1972). Towards interdisciplinarity and transdisciplinarity in education and innovation. Interdisciplinarity: Problems of teaching and research in universities, 97–121.
Google Scholar CrossrefKeim, D. A., Mansmann, F., Schneidewind, J., Thomas, J., and Ziegler, H. (2008). Visual analytics: Scope and challenges (pp. 76-90). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
Google Scholar CrossrefKlein, J. T. (2004). Prospects for transdisciplinarity. Futures, 36(4), 515-526.
Google Scholar CrossrefNilsson, J. (1996). The nature of co-operative values and principles. Annals of public and co-operative economics, 67(4), 633-653.
Google Scholar CrossrefRammel, C., and van den Bergh, J. C. (2003). Evolutionary policies for sustainable development: adaptive flexibility and risk minimising. Ecological Economics, 47(2), 121-133.
Google Scholar CrossrefRammel, C., Stagl, S., and Wilfing, H. (2007) Managing complex adaptive systems – A co-evolutionary perspective on natural resource management. Ecological Economics, 63, 9–21.
Google Scholar CrossrefRedclift, M. (1993). Sustainable development: needs, values, rights. Environmental Values, 2(1), 3-20.
Google Scholar CrossrefRobinson, J. and Tinker, J. (1997). Reconciling ecological, economic and social imperatives: a new conceptual framework. In T. Schrecker (Ed.). Surviving Globalism: Social and Environmental Dimensions. London: Macmillan.
Google Scholar CrossrefRussell, A. W., Wickson, F., and Carew, A. L. (2008). Transdisciplinarity: Context, contradictions and capacity. Futures, 40(5), 460-472.
Google Scholar CrossrefSmith, S., International Co-operative Alliance, Co-operative College, and International Labour Office. (2004). Promoting Co-operatives: A Guide to ILO Recommendation 193. Manchester: Co-operative College.
Google Scholar CrossrefStutz, J. (2010). The three-front war: pursuing sustainability in a world shaped by explosive growth. Sustainability: Science, Practice, & Policy, 6(2), 49-59.
Google Scholar CrossrefVos, R. O. (2007). Defining sustainability: a conceptual orientation. Journal of Chemical Technology and Biotechnology, 82(4), 334-339.
Google Scholar CrossrefWelsh, E. (2002). Dealing with data: Using NVivo in the qualitative data analysis process. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 3(2). Retrieved from http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/865
Google Scholar CrossrefWickson, F., Carew, A. L., and Russell, A. W. (2006). Transdisciplinary research: Characteristics, quandaries and quality. Futures, 38(9), 1046-1059.
Google Scholar CrossrefWilk, R. (1998). Emulation, imitation, and global consumerism. Organization & Environment, 11(3), 314-333.
Google Scholar CrossrefDownloads
Published
Almetric
Dimensions
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
All articles are published under Creative Commons copyright (CC BY). Authors hold the copyright and retain publishing rights without restrictions, but authors allow anyone to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute, and/or copy articles as the original source is cited.