A Systematic Review of the Current Status of Research on the Quality of Life and Well-Being of Institutionalized Older Adults in Spain
Keywords:
Abstract
The review question being considered in this article aims to study the research on quality of life and well-being of older adults residing in nursing homes in Spain, and the elements that address quality of life or its measurement in important aspects. The following databases were used: Scopus, Web of Science, ProQuest, Wiley online library, PubMed, EBSCOhost, ERIC, Emerald, and Dialnet plus. This review was reported according to the PRISMA guidelines. "Thematic Synthesis Analysis" was used to analyze the studies. Of the initial 1231 studies, a total of 18 studies, which met the eligibility inclusion and critical appraisal criteria, were analyzed. We note the lack of unicity of measurement criteria, as well as the need to generate a single scale defining the basic characteristics and essential factors that identify the quality of life. Further research and an integrated model of personalized quality of life, adapted to residents, is required.
Downloads
References
Acevedo Alcaraz, E. (2015). Calidad de vida de los mayores que viven institucionalizados en residencias para mayores: Un análisis cuantitativo. European Journal of investigation in health, psychology and education, 4(3), 225-234. https://doi.org/10.1989/ejihpe.v4i3.70
Google Scholar CrossrefAcevedo Alcaraz, E. (2016). Dependencia y calidad de vida de las personas mayores ingresadas en residencias de la Región de Murcia. Proyecto de investigación. PhD dissertation. http://hdl.handle.net/10201/48385
Google Scholar CrossrefAlkire, S., Roche, J., Santos, M., & Seth, S. (2011). Multidimensional Poverty Index: New results, Time Comparisons and Group Disparities. PNUD-HDRO.
Google Scholar CrossrefBotero Mejía, B. E., & Pico Merchán, M. E. (2007). Calidad de vida relacionada con la salud (CVRS) en adultos mayores de 60 años: Una aproximación teórica. Revista Hacia la Promoción de la Salud, 12, 11-24. https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=309126689002
Google Scholar CrossrefBurack, O. R., Weiner, A. S., Reinhardt, J. P., & Annunziato, R. A. (2012). What matters most to nursing home elders: quality of life in the nursing home. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, 13(1), 48-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamda.2010.08.002
Google Scholar CrossrefBurnette, K. (1986). Relocation and the elderly: changing perspectives. Journal of gerontological nursing, 12(10), 6-11. https://doi.org/10.3928/0098-9134-19861001-04
Google Scholar CrossrefButler, A., Hall, H., & Copnell, B. (2016). A guide to writing a qualitative systematic review protocol to enhance evidence‐based practice in nursing and health care. Worldviews on Evidence‐Based Nursing, 13(3), 241-249. https://doi.org/10.1111/wvn.12134
Google Scholar CrossrefCarcavilla González, N., García Meilán, J.J., Carro Ramos, J., Martínez Nicolás, I., & Llorente Llorente, T.E. (2021). Desarrollo de una escala de calidad de vida subjetiva en residencias de personas mayores (CVS-R). Revista Española de Salud Pública, 95.
Google Scholar CrossrefCardona-Arias, J.A., & Higuita-Gutiérrez, L. F. (2014). Aplicaciones de un instrumento diseñado por la OMS para la evaluación de la calidad de vida. Applications of a WHO-designed instrument for the quality of life evaluation. Revista Cubana de Salud Pública, 40, 175-189.
Google Scholar CrossrefConcheiro-Moscoso, P., Groba, B., & Canosa, N. (2019). Sleep Disturbances in Nursing Home Residents: Links to Quality of Life and Daily Functioning. Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute Proceedings, 21(1), 12. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2019021012
Google Scholar CrossrefConde Ruiz, J.I., & González C.I. (2021). El proceso de envejecimiento en España. Estudios sobre la Economía Española. FEDEA. 2021/07
Google Scholar CrossrefCuadros Bordal, A.D. (2013). Aproximación desde el Trabajo Social: depresión y Bienestar subjetivo en mayores institucionalizados vs no institucionalizados. Documentos de trabajo social: Revista de trabajo y acción social, 52, 109-132.
Google Scholar CrossrefDel Rocío Santana-Berlanga, N., Porcel-Gálvez, A. M., Botello-Hermosa, A., & Barrientos-Trigo, S. (2020). Instruments to measure quality of life in institutionalised older adults: systematic review. Geriatric Nursing, 41(4), 445-462. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gerinurse.2020.01.018
Google Scholar CrossrefDuan, Y., Mueller, C. A., Yu, F., Talley, K. M., & Shippee, T. P. (2021). The Relationships of Nursing Home Culture Change Practices With Resident Quality of Life and Family Satisfaction: Toward a More Nuanced Understanding. Research on Aging, 44(2), 174-185. https://doi.org/10.1177/01640275211012652
Google Scholar CrossrefFeres, J.C., & Mancero, X. (2001). El método de las necesidades básicas insatisfechas y sus aplicaciones en América Latina. Santiago de Chile: CEPAL.
Google Scholar CrossrefFlecha García, A. C. (2019). Self-Acceptance and meaning/purpose in life between senior citizens residing in nursing home. Pedagogía Social Revista Interuniversitaria, 33, 137-148. https://doi.org/10.7179/PSRI_2019.33.10
Google Scholar CrossrefGarrido-Abejar, M., Serrano-Parra, M. D., Bartolomé-Gutiérrez, R., & Martínez-Vizcaino, V. (2012). Factores asociados con calidad de vida relacionada con la salud en mayores institucionalizados: diferencias entre hombres y mujeres [Factors associated with health-related quality of life in the institutionalised elderly: differences between men and women] Enfermería Clínica, 22(1), 27-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enfcli.2011.09.006
Google Scholar CrossrefGonzález Casas, D., Ducca Cisneros, L. V., & García Román, C. (2020). La incidencia del apoyo social comunitario en la calidad de vida de personas con discapacidad. Siglo Cero, 51(3), 83-103.
Google Scholar CrossrefGrant, M.J., & Booth, A. (2009). A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Information and Libraries Journal, 26(2), 91–108. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00848.x
Google Scholar CrossrefHiggins, J.P.T., & Green, S. (2011) Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0. https://www.handbook.cochrane.org
Google Scholar CrossrefHigginson, I. & Carr, A. (2001). Measuring the quality of life: Using quality of life measures in the clinical setting. BMJ, 322, 1297-1300. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.322.7297.1297
Google Scholar CrossrefHong, Q., Pluye, P., Fabregues, S., Bartlett, G., Boardman, F., Cargo, M., Dagenais, P., Gagnon, M. P., Griffiths, F., Nicolau, B., O’Cathain, A., Rousseau, M.C., & Vedel, I. (2018). Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) Version 2018. http://mixedmethodsappraisaltoolpublic.pbworks.com/w/file/fetch/127916259/MMAT_2018_criteria-manual_2018-08-01_ENG.pdf
Google Scholar CrossrefHuesa Andrade, M. (2020). Mortalidad, calidad de vida y atención domiciliaria: diferencias entre pacientes institucionalizados y atención domiciliaria (Doctoral dissertation, Universidad de Huelva).
Google Scholar CrossrefKmet, L. M., Lee, R. C., & Cook, L. S. (2004). Standard quality assessment criteria for evaluating primary research papers from a variety of fields. Edmonton, Alberta, Canada: Alberta Heritage Foundation for Medical Research. https://www.ihe.ca/advanced-search/standard-quality-assessment-criteria-for-evaluating-primary-research-papers-from-a-variety-of-fields
Google Scholar CrossrefKohl, C., McIntosh, E. J., Unger, S., Haddaway, N. R., Kecke, S., Schiemann, J., & Wilhelm, R. (2018). Online tools supporting the conduct and reporting of systematic reviews and systematic maps: a case study on CADIMA and review of existing tools. Environmental Evidence, 7(8), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13750-018-0115-5
Google Scholar CrossrefLockwood, C., Porrit, K., Munn, Z., Rittenmeyer, L., Salmond, S., Bjerrum, M., Loveday, H., Carrier, J. & Stannard, D. (2017). Chapter 2: Systematic reviews of qualitative evidence. In E. Aromataris & Z. Munn (Eds.), Joanna Briggs Institute Reviewer’s Manual. The Johanna Briggs Institute.
Google Scholar CrossrefLucas-Carrasco, R., Laidlaw, K., & Power, M. J. (2011). Suitability of the WHOQOL-BREF and WHOQOL-OLD for Spanish older adults. Aging & mental health, 15(5), 595-604. https://doi.org/10.1080/13607863.2010.548054
Google Scholar CrossrefLuque‐Reca, O., Pulido‐Martos, M., Lopez‐Zafra, E., & Augusto‐Landa, J. M. (2015). Emotional intelligence and health‐related quality of life in institutionalised Spanish older adults. International Journal of Psychology, 50(3), 215-222. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijop.12089
Google Scholar CrossrefLluesma-Vidal, M., Ruiz-Zaldibar, C., García-Garcés, L., Izquierdo-Gonzalvo, J., & Sánchez-López, M. I. (2021). Autopercepción del estado de salud como indicador de la calidad de vida de los pacientes con deterioro cognitivo en función de su lugar de residencia: domicilio versus centro sociosanitario. Gerokomos, 32(1), 2-7. https://dx.doi.org/10.4321/s1134-928x2021000100002
Google Scholar CrossrefMartín Aranda, R. (2019). Características de la calidad de vida en residentes de una institución geriátrica. Revista INFAD de Psicología. International Journal of Developmental and Educational Psychology, 3(2), 227-240. https://doi.org/10.17060/ijodaep.2019.n2.v2.1914
Google Scholar CrossrefMeyer, R., Drewniak, D., Hovorka, T., & Schenk, L. (2019). Questioning the questionnaire: Methodological challenges in measuring subjective quality of life in nursing homes using cognitive interviewing techniques. Qualitative Health Research, 29(7), 972-986. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732318812042
Google Scholar CrossrefMoher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & PRISMA Group. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Annals of internal medicine, 151(4), 264-269. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00135
Google Scholar CrossrefPage, M.J., Mckenzie, J.E., Bossuyt, P.M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T.C., Mulrow, C.D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J.M., Akl, E.A., Brennan, S.E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J.M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M.M., Li, T., Loder, E.W., Mayo-Wilson, E., Mcdonald, S., McGuinnessm, L. A., Stewart L. A., Thomas, J., Tricco, A. C., Welch, V. A., Whiting, P., & Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372(71), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
Google Scholar CrossrefPérez-Ros, P., & Martínez-Arnau, F. M. (2020). EQ-5D-3L for assessing quality of life in older nursing home residents with cognitive impairment. Life, 10(7), 100. https://doi.org/10.3390/life10070100
Google Scholar CrossrefRiesenberg, L.A., & Justice, E.M. (2014a). Conducting a successful systematic review of the literature, part 1. Nursing, 44(4), 13–17. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.nurse.0000444728.68018.ac
Google Scholar CrossrefRiesenberg, L.A., & Justice, E. M. (2014b). Conducting a successful systematic review of the literature, part 2. Nursing, 44(6), 23-26. https://doi:10.1097/01.nurse.0000446641.02995.6a
Google Scholar CrossrefRodriguez‐Blazquez, C., Forjaz, M. J., Prieto‐Flores, M. E., Rojo‐Perez, F., Fernandez‐Mayoralas, G., & Martinez‐Martin, P. (2012). Health status and well‐being of older adults living in the community and in residential care settings: Are differences influenced by age? Aging & Mental Health, 16(7), 884-891. https://doi.org/10.1080/13607863.2012.684664
Google Scholar CrossrefRodríguez Martín, C. R., Vega Ramírez, F. A., Martínez Cortés, M. C., García Goldsmith, M.; Padilla Góngora, D., & López Liria, R. (2011). Instrumento de medición de la satisfacción en personas mayores que viven en residencias: Consulta a los expertos. International Journal of Developmental and Educational Psychology, 4(1), 179-186.
Google Scholar CrossrefRojano i Luque, X., Marsal, E. S., Cors, O. S., & Casanovas, A. S. (2021). Impacto en residencias de la atención centrada en las personas (ACP) sobre la calidad de vida, el bienestar y la capacidad de salir adelante. Estudio transversal. Revista Española de Geriatría y Gerontología, 56(1), 29-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.regg.2020.06.007
Google Scholar CrossrefStern, C., Jordan, Z., & McArthur, A. (2014). Developing the review question and inclusion criteria. AJN The American Journal of Nursing, 114(4), 53-56. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.NAJ.0000445689.67800.86
Google Scholar CrossrefSarabia Cobo, C.M. (2014). The influence of institutionalization on the perception of autonomy and quality of life in old people. Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP, 48, 1013-1019.
Google Scholar CrossrefThomas, J., & Harden, A. (2008). Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 8(45), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-8-45
Google Scholar CrossrefVan Biljon, L., Roos, V., & Botha, K. (2015). A conceptual model of quality of life for older people in residential care facilities in South Africa. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 10(3), 435-457. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11482-014-9322-6
Google Scholar CrossrefVillaverde, M.L., Fernández, L., Gracia, R., Morera, A., & Cejas, R. (2000). Salud mental en población institucionalizada mayor de 65 años en la isla de Tenerife. Revista Española de Geriatría y Gerontología, 35(5), 277-282.
Google Scholar CrossrefWorld Health Organization (1996). WHOQOL-BREF Introduction, administration, scoring and generic version of the assessment. WHO
Google Scholar CrossrefWorld Health Organization (2007). Global Age-Friendly Cities Project. https://www.who.int/ageing/projects/age_friendly_cities/en/
Google Scholar CrossrefPublished
Metrics
Almetric
Dimensions
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Antonia Rodríguez-Martínez, Yolanda María de la Fuente Robles, María del Carmen Martín Cano

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All articles are published under Creative Commons copyright (CC BY). Authors hold the copyright and retain publishing rights without restrictions, but authors allow anyone to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute, and/or copy articles as the original source is cited.