Analysis of the Choice of Educational Pathways in the Spanish University. The Case of Palencia Campus at University of Valladolid
Keywords:
Downloads
Abstract
This paper analyzes the perception that high school students have about of the teaching of science. It is a longitudinal study is carried on at the University of Valladolid. The inquiry wants to know the reasons because the students choose degrees of experimental sciences or social sciences. This research attempts to analyze the student’s assessments on science in undergraduate education. So then, we can design the tools and skills that we help to improve their training.
Downloads
References
Referencias bibliográficas
Google Scholar CrossrefBarnes, B. (1988) The Nature of power. Cambridge: Polity.
Google Scholar CrossrefBeck, U. (2009) World at Risk. Cambridge: Polity.
Google Scholar CrossrefBeijaard, D. Meijier, P.C. y Verloop. N. (2004). Reconsidering research on teachers’ professional identity. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20, 107 – 128.
Google Scholar CrossrefCarnevale, A.P y Ban Cheach. (2013). Hard Times. Colleges Majors, Unemploymenty and Earnings. Washington DC: Georgetown Public Policy Institute.
Google Scholar CrossrefChace, J. F. (2014). Collaborative Projects Increase Student Learning Outcome performance in Nonmajors Environmental Science Course. Journal of College Science Teaching, 43, 58-63.
Google Scholar CrossrefChinn, C.A, y. Malhotra, B.A. (2002). Epistemologically authentic inquiry in schools: A theoretical framework for evaluating inquiry tasks. Science Education, 86(2), 175-218.
Google Scholar CrossrefColl, R. K y Earnes. C. (2008). Developing and understanding of Higer education science and enginnering learning communities. Research in Science and Technological education, 26(3), 245-257.
Google Scholar CrossrefDickson, L. (2010). “Race and Gender Differences in College Major Choice”. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 627: 108-124
Google Scholar CrossrefDuncan, L.L. Duncan, B. R. Burkhardt, B. L.. Benneyworth, L. M. y Tasich, C. M. (2015). Getting the Most Out of Dual-Listed Courses: Involving Undergraduate Students in Discussion Through Active Learning Techniques. Journal College Science Teaching, 45(1), 24-31.
Google Scholar CrossrefENCIENDE. (2011). Informe: Enseñanza de las Ciencias en la Didáctica escolar para edades tempranas en España. Madrid: COSCE.
Google Scholar CrossrefFensham, P.J. (1988). Developmentand dilemas in science education. London: Folder Press.
Google Scholar CrossrefFensham, P.J. (2002). Time to Change Drivers for Scientific Literacy. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 2(1), 9-24.
Google Scholar CrossrefFreeman, S. Eddya, S. McDonougha, M. Smithb, M. Okoroafora, N. Jordta, H. y Wenderotha, P. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. PNAS,111, 8410-8415.
Google Scholar CrossrefFleer, M. (2013). Affective imagination in science education: determining the emotional nature of scientific and technological learning of young children. Research in Science Education, 43(5), 2085-2106.
Google Scholar CrossrefGarcía-Carmona, A. Criado, A. M. y Cañal, P. (2014). ¿Qué educación científica se promueve para la etapa de Primaria en España? Un análisis de las prescripciones sociales del currículo vigente. Enseñanza de las Ciencias, 32(1), 139-157.
Google Scholar CrossrefGeppert, L. (1995). Educating the renaissance engineer. IEEE Spectrum, 32(9), 39–43.
Google Scholar CrossrefGil, D. y Vilches, A. (2006). Educación ciudadana y alfabetización científica: mitos y realidades. Revista iberoamericana de educación, 42, 31-53.
Google Scholar CrossrefGoyette, K.A y Mullen, A. (2006). “Who Studies the Arts and Sciences? Social Background and the Choise and Consequences of Undergraduate Field of Study”. The Journal of Higher Education. 77:497-538.
Google Scholar CrossrefHarlow, D. B. (2012). The excitement and wonder of teaching science: What preservice teachers learn from facilitating family science night centers. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 23(2),199 – 220.
Google Scholar CrossrefJackson, P. y Seiler, G. (2013). Science identity trajectories of latecomers to science in college. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 50(7), 826 – 857.
Google Scholar CrossrefJohnson Cartright, T. (2012). Science talk: Preservice teachers facilitating science learning in diverse after school environments. School Science and Mathematics, 112(6), 384 – 391.
Google Scholar CrossrefJones, M.G. y Edmonds. J. (2013). Models of elementary Science. Instructions role of science Specialist teachers. En K. Appleton (Ed.) Elementary Science Teacher Education: International Perspectives on Contemporary Issues and Practice. New York: Routledge.
Google Scholar CrossrefLindahl. R. (2008). “Shared Leadership: Can It Work in Schools?” in The Educational Forum. 72, (4): 298-307. dx.doi.org/10.1080/00131720802361894
Google Scholar CrossrefLuehmann, A. L. (2007). Identity development as a lens to science teacher preparation. Science Education, 91, 822 – 839.
Google Scholar CrossrefLloyd. G.M. (2009). School mathematics curriculum materials for teachers’ learning: future elementary teachers’ interactions with curriculum materials in a mathematics course in the United States. Mathematics Education, 41, 763–775
Google Scholar CrossrefMastropieri, M. A. Scruggs, T.E. Boon, R. y Carter. K.B. (2001). Correlates of inquiry learning in science: Constructing concepts of density and buoyancy. Remedial and Special Education, 22, 130–138.
Google Scholar CrossrefNational Research Council. (2007). Rising above the gathering storm: Energizing and employing America for a brighter economic future. Washington DC: National Academies Press.
Google Scholar CrossrefMcNeill, K. L. y Krajcik, J. (2007). Middle school students' use of appropriate and inappropriate evidence in writing scientific explanations. En M. Lovett, y Shah, P (Eds.) Thinking with data. New York: Taylor y Francis.
Google Scholar CrossrefPearson, Ch. (2009). Writing games. Cultural case studies of Academic Literary practices in High Education. New Jersey: Taylor y Francis.
Google Scholar CrossrefRappolt-Schlichtmann, G. Daley, S.G. Scott, S. Robinson, K. H. y Johnson, M. (2013). Universal design for learning and elementary school science: Exploring the efficacy, use, and perceptions of a web-based science notebook. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105, 1210- 1225.
Google Scholar CrossrefRebelo, D., Marques, L., & Costa, N. (2011). Actividades en ambientes exteriores al aula en la Educación en Ciencias: contribuciones para suoperatividad. Enseñanza de las Ciencias de la Tierra 19(1), 15-25.
Google Scholar CrossrefRose, D. H. y Meyer, A. (2006). A practical reader in Universal Design for Learning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
Google Scholar CrossrefRossi Cordero, A. y Barajas Frutos, M. (2015). Elección de estudios CTIM y desequilibrios de género. En Enseñanza de las ciencias, 33.3: 59-76.
Google Scholar CrossrefSáinz, M. y Eccles, J. (2012). Self-concept of Computer and Math Ability: Gender Implications across Time and within ICT Studies. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 80 (2), pp. 486-499. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2011.08.005.
Google Scholar CrossrefSjøberg, S. (2004). Science Education: The voice of the learners. Contribution to the Conference on Increasing Human Resources for Science and Technology in Europe. Bruselas: Unión Europea. En http://europa.eu.int/comm/research/conferences/2004/sciprof/pdf/sjoberg.pdf
Google Scholar CrossrefSjøberg. S. y Schreiner, C. (2010). The ROSE Project. An overview and key findings [Online]. Consultado el 17 de noviembre de 2016. Disponoble en: http://roseproject.no/network/countries/norway/eng/nor-Sjoberg-Schreiner-overview-2010.pdf
Google Scholar CrossrefSpektor-L. O. Kesner Baruch, Y. y Mevarech, Z. (2013). Science and Scientific Curiosity in Pre-School. The Teacher’s point of view. International Journal of Science Education, 35 (13), 2226-2253.
Google Scholar CrossrefSplitt, F. G. (2002). Environmentally smart engineering education: A brief on a paradigm in progress. Journal of Engineering Education, 91: 447–450.
Google Scholar CrossrefValero Matas, J.A. (2006). Responsabilidad social de la actividad científica. Revista Internacional de Sociología, 64(43), 219-242.
Google Scholar CrossrefVarela, M. House, R. y Wenzel. S. (2005). Beginning teachers immersed into science: Scientist and science teacher identities. Science Education, 89(3), 492 – 516.
Google Scholar CrossrefVázquez–Alonso, Á. y Manassero–Mas, M.A. (2008). El declive de las actitudes hacia la ciencia de los estudiantes: un indicador inquietante para la educación cientiífica. Revista Eureka sobre Enseñanza y Divulgación de las Ciencias, 5(3), 274-292
Google Scholar CrossrefWallace. C. y Brooks, L. (2015). Learning to Teach Elementary Science in an Experiential,
Google Scholar CrossrefInformal Context: Culture, Learning, and Identity. Science Education, 99(1), 174–198.
Google Scholar CrossrefWallace, C. S. y Eick. C. (2012). Preservice elementary teachers in service learning settings: Developing ideas about teaching, learning and science identity. The Annual Meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Indianapolis: IN
Google Scholar CrossrefWenger, E. (1998). Communities of Practice: learning, meaning and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar CrossrefDownloads
Published
Metrics
Almetric
Dimensions
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
All articles are published under Creative Commons copyright (CC BY). Authors hold the copyright and retain publishing rights without restrictions, but authors allow anyone to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute, and/or copy articles as the original source is cited.
