Worked Example Mid-Semester Intervention in College Algebra
English
Keywords:
Downloads
Abstract
The enrollment in lower-level mathematics courses has been on the increase in the last decade. It has been estimated that the DFW rate may rise to the level of 50% in courses that can be classified as college algebra. Numerous interventions have been utilized for college algebra and other mathematics classes to help students, including supplemental instruction, peer-led team learning, group learning, flipped classrooms, and integrating technology. In this study, we offered a half-semester course that implemented worked example worksheets, which were used in a previous full-semester intervention, to help students with the college algebra material. Results showed that the thirty students who participated in the worked example pass/fail mid-semester class significantly outperformed the college algebra students who did not participate in the intervention on total points in the course, quizzes, and tests 3 and 4. In addition, participants earned a significantly higher course GPA, attended significantly more regular class lectures, and earned a higher final exam score. Finally, we analysed the qualitative data to develop five themes about the worked examples and intervention. We conclude that the mid-semester intervention is a good just-in-time mechanism to implement after the semester has started to help students succeed in the class.
Downloads
References
Alexander, M. P. (1993). The effective use of computers and graphing calculators in college algebra (Doctoral dissertation, Georgia State University). Dissertation Abstracts International, 54/06, 2080.
Google Scholar CrossrefBusiness-Higher Education Forum. (2005). A commitment to America's future: Responding to the crisis in mathematics & science education. ERIC Clearinghouse. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED503712.pdf
Google Scholar CrossrefCampbell, C. M., & Mislevy, J. L. (2012). Student perceptions matter: Early
Google Scholar Crossrefsigns of undergraduate student retention/attrition. Journal of College
Google Scholar CrossrefStudent Retention: Research, Theory and Practice, 14(4), 467-493.
Google Scholar Crossrefhttps://doi.org/10.2190/CS.14.4.c
Google Scholar CrossrefCentra, J. A., & Gaubatz, N. B. (2000). Student perceptions of learning and instructional effectiveness in college courses. Higher Education Assessment Program. Retrieved at https://www.ets.org/Media/Products/perceptions.pdf
Google Scholar CrossrefChi, M., Bassok, M., Lewis, M., Reimann, P., & Glaser, R. (1989). Self-
Google Scholar Crossrefexplanations: How students’ study and use examples in learning to solve
Google Scholar Crossrefproblems. Cognitive Science. 13, 145-182.
Google Scholar Crossrefhttps://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog1302_1
Google Scholar CrossrefCrawford, K., Gordon, S., Nicholas, J., & Prosser, M. (1994). Conceptions
Google Scholar Crossrefof mathematics and how it is learned: The perspectives of students
Google Scholar Crossrefentering university. Learning and Instruction, 4, 331-345.
Google Scholar Crossrefhttps://doi.org/10.1016/0959-4752(94)90005-1
Google Scholar CrossrefEvan, A., Gray, T., & Olchefske, J. (2006). The gateway to student success in mathematics and science. Washingon, DC: American Institutes for Research. https://www.air.org/resource/report/gateway-student-success-mathematics-and-science.
Google Scholar CrossrefHaver, W., Small, D., Ellington, A., Edwards, B., Kays, V. M., Haddock, J., & Kimball, R. (2007). College algebra. In V. J. Katz (Ed.), Algebra: Gateway to a technological future, 33-40. Washington, DC: Mathematical Association of America. https://www.maa.org/sites/default/files/pdf/algebra-report/Algebra-Gateway-Tech-Future.pdf
Google Scholar CrossrefJackson, M. J., & Prosser, M. (1989). Less lecturing, more learning. Studies in Higher Education, 14, 55-68. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075078912331377612
Google Scholar CrossrefKoon, J., & Murray, H. G. (1995). Using multiple outcomes to validate student ratings of overall teacher effectiveness. Journal of Higher Education, 66(1), 61- 81. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.1995.11774757
Google Scholar CrossrefLizzio, A., Wilson, K., & Simons, R. (2002). University students’ perceptions of the learning environment and academic outcomes: Implications for theory and practice, Studies in Higher Education, 27(1), 27-52. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070120099359
Google Scholar CrossrefMarzano, R.J, & Pickering, D.J. (1997). What is dimensions of learning: Training Manual. Retrieved online at http://www.ascd.org/ASCD/pdf/siteASCD/publications/books/Dimensionsof-Learning-Trainers-Manual-2nd-edition.pdf.
Google Scholar CrossrefMerriam-Webster. (n.d.). Perception. In LearnersDictionary.com dictionary. Retrieved April 24, 2021, from ld.m-w.com/dictionary/perception
Google Scholar CrossrefOvermyer, G. R. (2014). The flipped classroom model for college algebra: Effects on student achievement. Doctoral dissertation. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global (ProQuest document ID: 1615100148).
Google Scholar CrossrefStruyven, K., Dochy, F., & Janssens, S. (2003). Students’ perceptions about
Google Scholar Crossrefnew modes of assessment: a review. In: Segers, M., Dochy, F.,
Google Scholar CrossrefCascallar, E.(Eds.). Optimising new modes of assessment: In search for
Google Scholar Crossrefqualities and standards. Boston: Kluwer Academic.
Google Scholar Crossrefhttps://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-48125-1_8
Google Scholar CrossrefSweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on
Google Scholar Crossreflearning. Cognitive science, 12(2), 257-285.
Google Scholar Crossrefhttps://doi.org/10.1016/0364-0213(88)90023-7
Google Scholar CrossrefSweller, J., & Cooper, G. (1985). The use of worked examples as a
Google Scholar Crossrefsubstitute for problem solving in learning algebra. Cognition and
Google Scholar CrossrefInstruction. 2(1), 59 – 89. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci0201_3
Google Scholar CrossrefSweller, J., & Owen, E. (1989). Should problem solving be used as a
Google Scholar Crossreflearning device in mathematics? Journal for Research in Mathematics
Google Scholar CrossrefEducation. 20(3), 322 – 328. https://doi.org/10.2307/749520
Google Scholar CrossrefTrigwell, K., Hazel, E., & Prosser, M. (1996). Perceptions of the learning environment and approaches to learning university science at the topic level. Proceedings HERDSA Conference, Perth, Western Australia, 8-12 July. http://www.herdsa.org.au/confs/1996/trigwell2.html
Google Scholar CrossrefWard, M., & Sweller, J. (1990) Structuring effective worked examples.
Google Scholar CrossrefCognitive and Instruction. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., 7(1), pp.
Google Scholar Crossref– 39. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci0701_1
Google Scholar CrossrefZhu, X. and Simon, H. (1987). Learning Mathematics From Examples and by Doing. Cognition and Instruction. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. 4(3), pp. 137-166. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci0403_1
Google Scholar CrossrefDownloads
Published
Almetric
Dimensions
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 David Miller, Matthew Schraeder
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication but allow anyone to share: (unload, , reprint, distribute and/or copy) and adapt (remix, transform reuse, modify,) for any proposition, even commercial, always quoting the original source.
