The Impact of Early Algebra: Results from a Longitudinal Intervention

Authors

  • Barbara M Brizuela Tufts University
  • Mara V Martinez University of Illinois-Chicago
  • Gabrielle A Cayton-Hodges Educational Testing Service

https://doi.org/10.4471/redimat.2013.28

Downloads

Abstract

In this paper, we provide evidence of the impact of early algebra (EA) over time. We document this impact in the following ways: (a) by showing the performance over time of an experimental group of 15 children on an algebra assessment, from 3rd to 5th grade; and (b) by showing how the performance on an algebra assessment of children from an experimental group differs from the performance of a group of comparison students from their same elementary school who did not receive EA instruction from 3rd to 5th grade. We compared students’ scores through comparisons of means, correspondence factorial analyses, and hierarchical analyses. Our results highlight the positive impact of an early access to algebra, indicating that this early access is associated, when we compare 3rd graders to 5th graders, with increased scores on items that involve inequalities and graphs. When comparing experimental to comparison-group students we find increased scores on items that involve variables, functional relations, intra-mathematical contexts, tables, and algebraic expressions. The study adds to a body of literature that has been arguing for EA as well as a need to thread algebra throughout the mathematics curriculum, starting in the earliest grades.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Barbara M Brizuela, Tufts University

Department of Education

Associate Professor

Mara V Martinez, University of Illinois-Chicago

Mathematics, Statistics, and Computer Science Department

Assistant Professor

References

Bednarz, N., Kieran, C., & Lee, L. (1996). Approaches to algebra: Perspectives for research and teaching. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Google Scholar Crossref

Bednarz, N., & Janvier, B. (1996). Emergence and development of algebra as a problem-solving tool: continuities and discontinuities with arithmetic. In N. Bednarz, C. Kieran & L. Lee (Eds.), Approaches to algebra : perspectives for research and teaching (pp. 115-136). Dordrecht ; Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Google Scholar Crossref

Bednarz, N. (2001). A problem-solving approach to algebra: accounting for the reasonings and notations developed by students. In H. Chick, K. Stacey & J. Vincent (Eds.), The future of the teaching and learning of algebra (12th ICMI Study). Melbourne, Australia: Springer.

Google Scholar Crossref

Bodanskii, F. (1991). The formation of an algebraic method of problem solving in primary school children. In Davydov, V. (Ed.), Survey of applied Soviet research in school mathematics education, the University of Chicago, Soviet studies in mathematics education, Psychological abilities of primary school children in learning mathematics (vol. 6, pp. 275-338). Reston, VA, NCTM.

Google Scholar Crossref

Booth, L. R. (1984). Algebra: Children's strategies and errors. Windsor, UK.: NFER-Nelson.

Google Scholar Crossref

Brenner, M. E. & Moschkovich, J. N. (Eds.). (2002). Everyday and Academic Mathematics in the Classroom. Monographs of the Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 11.

Google Scholar Crossref

Brizuela, B. M., & Earnest, D. (2008). Multiple notational systems and algebraic understandings: The case of the "best deal" problem. In J. Kaput, D. Carraher, & M. Blanton (Eds.), Algebra in the Early Grades (pp. 273-301). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum and Associates.

Google Scholar Crossref

Bruer, J. T. (1993). Schools for thought: A science of learning in the classroom. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Google Scholar Crossref

Carpenter, T. P., Franke, M. L., & Levi, L. (2003). Thinking mathematically: Integrating arithmetic and algebra in elementary school. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann

Google Scholar Crossref

Carraher, D. W., & Schliemann, A. D. (2007). Early algebra and algebraic reasoning. In F. K. Lester (Ed.), Second Handbook of Research on Mathematics Teaching and Learning (vol. 2, pp. 669-705). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.

Google Scholar Crossref

Carraher, D. W., Schliemann, A. D. & Schwartz, J. (2008). Early algebra is not the same as algebra early. In J. Kaput. D. Carraher, & M. Blanton (Eds.), Algebra in the Early Grades (pp. 235-272). Mahwah, NJ, Erlbaum.

Google Scholar Crossref

Carraher, T.N., Carraher, D.W. & Schliemann, A.D. (1985). Mathematics in the streets and in schools. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 3, 21-29.

Google Scholar Crossref

Chazan, D., & Yerushalmy, M. (2003). On appreciating the cognitive complexity of school algebra: Research on algebra learning and directions of curricular change. In J. Kilpatrick, G. W. Martin, & D. Schifter (Eds.), A research companion to the principles and standards for school mathematics (pp. 123–135). Reston, Virginia: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

Google Scholar Crossref

Chevallard, Y. (1989). Le passage de l’arithm´etique a l’alg´ebrique dans l’enseignement des math´ematiques au coll`ege [The passage from the arithmetical to the algebraic in the teaching of high school mathematics]. Petit X, 19, 43–72.

Google Scholar Crossref

Davis, R. (1967). Exploration in Mathematics: A Text for Teachers. Palo Alto, Reading, MA, London, Don Mills, Ontario: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.

Google Scholar Crossref

Davis, R. (1971-72). Observing children's mathematical behavior as a foundation for curriculum planning. The Journal of Children's Mathematical Behavior, 1(1), 7- 59.

Google Scholar Crossref

Davis, R. (1985). ICME-5 Report: Algebraic thinking in the early grades. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 4(2), 195-208.

Google Scholar Crossref

Davis, R. (1989). Theoretical considerations: Research studies in how humans think about algebra. In S. Wagner & C. Kieran (Eds.), Research Issues in the Learning and Teaching of Algebra (vol. 4, pp. 266-274). Reston, VA: The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics/Erlbaum.

Google Scholar Crossref

Davydov, V. (Ed.) (1991). Survey of applied Soviet research in school mathematics education, The University of Chicago, Psychological abilities of primary school children in learning mathematics (vol. 6). Reston, VA, NCTM. (Original work published 1969.)

Google Scholar Crossref

Demana, F., & Leitzel, J. (1988). Establishing fundamental concepts through numerical problem solving. In A. F. Coxford & A. P. Shulte (Eds.), The ideas of algebra, K-12: 1988 yearbook (pp. 61-69). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

Google Scholar Crossref

diSessa, A., Hammer, D., Sherin, B., & Kolpakowski, T. (1991). Inventing graphing: Meta-representational expertise in children. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 10(2), 117-160.

Google Scholar Crossref

Dubinsky, E., & Harel, G. (1992). The concept of function: Aspects of epistemology and pedagogy. Washington, DC: Mathematical Association of America.

Google Scholar Crossref

Fujii, T., & Stephens, M. (2001). Fostering an understanding of algebraic generalization through numerical expressions: the role of quasi-variable. In Chick, H., Stacey, K., Vincent, J. and Vincent, J. (Eds), Proceedings of the 12th Study Conference of the International Commission on Mathematical Instruction (ICMI): The future of the teaching and learning of algebra, (vol. 1, pp. 258-264). Melbourne, Australia, Department of Science and Mathematics Education, The University of Melbourne.

Google Scholar Crossref

Goldin, G. (1998). Representational systems, learning, and problem solving in mathematics. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 17(2), 137-165.

Google Scholar Crossref

Goldenberg, E. P., & Shteingold, N. (2008). Early algebra: The math workshop perspective. In J. Kaput. D. W. Carraher, & M. Blanton (Eds.), Algebra in the Early Grades (pp. 449-477). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Google Scholar Crossref

Hall, R. (1990). Making mathematics on paper: Constructing representations of stories about related linear functions (Technical Report No. 90-17). University of California, Irvine.

Google Scholar Crossref

Hall, R., Kibler, D., Wenger, E., & Truxaw, C. (1989). Exploring the episodic structure of algebra story problem solving. Cognition and Instruction, 6(3), 223-283.

Google Scholar Crossref

Izsák, A. (2004). Students' coordination of knowledge when learning to model physical situations. Cognition and Instruction, 22(1), 81-128.

Google Scholar Crossref

Kaput, J. (1991). Notations and representations as mediators of constructive processes. In E. von Glasersfeld (Ed.), Radical constructivism in mathematics education (pp. 53-74). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Google Scholar Crossref

Kaput, J. (1998). Transforming algebra from an engine of inequity to an engine of mathematical power by ‘algebrafying’ the K-12 Curriculum. Sponsored by the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics and Mathematical Sciences Education Board Center for Science, Mathematics and Engineering Education, National Research Council. The nature and role of algebra in the K-14 curriculum (pp. 25-26). Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

Google Scholar Crossref

Kieran, C. (1981). Concepts associated with the equality symbol. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 12, 317-326.

Google Scholar Crossref

Kieran, C. (1989). The early learning of algebra: A structural perspective. In S. Wagner & C. Kieran (Eds.), Research Issues in the Learning and Teaching of Algebra (Vol. 4, pp. 33-56). Reston, VA: The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics/Erlbaum.

Google Scholar Crossref

Kobayashi, M. (1988). New ideas of teaching mathematics in Japan. Tokyo: Chuo University Press.

Google Scholar Crossref

Lebart, L., Morineau, A., & Piron, M. (1995). Statistique multidimensionnelle [Multidimensional statistics]. Paris: Dunod.

Google Scholar Crossref

MacGregor, M. (1996). Curricular aspects of arithmetic and alegbra. In J. Gimenez, R. Lins & B. Gomez (Eds.), Arithmetic and Algebra Education: Searching for the future (pp. 50-54). Tarragona, Spain: Universitat Rovira i Virgili.

Google Scholar Crossref

Martinez, M. V., & Brizuela, B. M. (2006). A third grader’s way of thinking about linear function tables. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 25(4), 285-298.

Google Scholar Crossref

Meira, L. (1995). The microevolution of mathematical representations in children’s activities. Cognition and Instruction, 13(2), 269-313.

Google Scholar Crossref

Moss, J., Beatty, R., McNab, S. L., & Eisenband, J. (2006). The potential of geometric sequences to foster young students’ ability to generalize in mathematics. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco.

Google Scholar Crossref

Nunes, T., Schliemann, A.D., & Carraher, D.W. (1993). Mathematics in the Streets and in Schools. Cambridge, U.K: Cambridge University Press.

Google Scholar Crossref

Pearson Scott Foresman. (1998). Investigations in Number, Data, and Space. Glenview, Ill., Author.

Google Scholar Crossref

Radford, L., Bardini, C., & Sabena, C. (2007). Perceiving the general: the multisemiotic dimension of students' algebraic activity. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 38(5), 507-530.

Google Scholar Crossref

Sadovsky, P. (2005). Enseñar matemática hoy: Miradas, sentidos y desafíos [Teaching mathematics today: Perspectives, meanings, and challenges]. Buenos Aires: Libros del Zorzal.

Google Scholar Crossref

Saporta, G. (1990). Analyse des donnees et statistiques. Editions Technip.

Google Scholar Crossref

Scheuer, N., de la Cruz, M., Pozo, J. I., Huarte, M. F., & Sola, G. (2006). The mind is not a black box: Children's ideas about the writing process. Learning and Instruction, 16(1), 72-85.

Google Scholar Crossref

Schliemann, A. D., Carraher, D., & Brizuela, B. M. (2007). Bringing Out the Algebraic Character of Arithmetic: From Children’s Ideas to Classroom Practice. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum and Associates.

Google Scholar Crossref

Schliemann, A. D., Carraher, D. W., & Brizuela, B. M. (2012). Algebra in Elementary School. In Coulange, L., Drouhard, J.-P., Dorier, J.-L., Robert, A. (Eds.) Recherches en Didactique des Mathématiques, Numéro spécial hors-série, Enseignement de l'algèbre élémentaire: bilan et perspectives (pp. 103-118). Grenoble: La Pensée Sauvage.

Google Scholar Crossref

Schwartz, J. (1996). Can technology help us make the mathematics curriculum intellectually stimulating and socially responsible? Paper presented at the eighth ICME meeting.

Google Scholar Crossref

Smith, J. & Thompson, P. (2008). Quantitative Reasoning and the Development of Algebraic Reasoning. In J. Kaput. D. Carraher, & M. Blanton (Eds.), Algebra in the Early Grades (pp. 95-132). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Google Scholar Crossref

Usiskin, Z. (1988). Conceptions of school algebra and uses of variables. In A. F. Coxford & A. P. Shulte (Eds.), The ideas of algebra: K-12 (pp. 8-19). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

Google Scholar Crossref

Vergnaud, G. (1982). A classification of cognitive tasks and operations of thought involved in addition and subtraction problems. In T. P. Carpenter, J. M. Moser, & T. A. Romberg (Eds.), Addition and subtraction: A cognitive perspective. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Google Scholar Crossref

Vergnaud, G. (1985). L'enfant, la mathématique et la réalité : problèmes de l'enseignement des mathématiques áa l'école élémentaire (3e éd. ed.). Berne ; New York: P. Lang.

Google Scholar Crossref

Vergnaud, G. (1988). Multiplicative structures. In J. Hiebert &M. Behr (Eds.), Number concepts and operations in the middle grades (pp. 141–161). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Google Scholar Crossref

Vergnaud, G. (1994). Multiplicative conceptual field: What and why? In G. Harel & J. Confrey (Eds.), The development of multiplicative reasoning in the learning of mathematics (pp. 41–59). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

Google Scholar Crossref

Verschaffel, L., Greer, B., & De Corte, E. (2002). Everyday knowledge and mathematical modeling of school word problems. In K. Gravemeijer, R. Lehrer, B. van Oers, & L. Verschaffel (Eds.), Symbolizing, modeling and tool use in mathematics education (pp. 257-276). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Google Scholar Crossref

Wagner, S. (1981). Conservation of equation and function under transformations of variable. . Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 12, 107-118.

Google Scholar Crossref

Zhang, J. (1997). The nature of external representations in problem solving. Cognitive science, 21(2), 179-217.

Google Scholar Crossref

Zhang, J., & Norman, D. A. (1994). Representations in distributed cognitive tasks. Cognitive Science, 18, 87-122.

Google Scholar Crossref

Zhang, J., & Norman, D. A. (1995). A representational analysis of numeration systems. Cognition, 57, 271-295.

Google Scholar Crossref

Downloads

Published

2013-06-24

Almetric

Dimensions

Issue

Section

Articles