Fostering Students’ Statistical Literacy Through Significant Learning Experience
https://doi.org/10.17583/redimat.2015.1332
Downloads
Abstract
A major objective of statistics education is to develop students’ statistical literacy that enables them to be educated users of data in context. Teaching statistics in today’s educational settings is not an easy feat because teachers have a huge task in keeping up with the demands of the new generation of learners. The present day students have higher expectations in terms of classroom pedagogy particularly in the use of creative and engaging methods to create a significant learning experience for them. This paper discusses how students’ statistical literacy can be fostered by creating a more integrated statistics course using the Fink’s Taxonomy of Significant Learning.
Downloads
References
Broers, N. J. (2006). Learning goals: The primacy of statistical knowledge. In Proceedings of the 7th Annual Meeting of ICOTS-7. Salvador, Brazil: ISI.
Google Scholar CrossrefBude, L. (2006). Assessing students’ understanding of statistics. In Proceedings of the 7th Annual Meeting of ICOTS-7. Salvador, Brazil: ISI.
Google Scholar CrossrefCarnell, L. J. (2008). The Effect of a Student-Designed Data Collection Project on Attitudes towards Statistics. Journal of Statistics Education, 16(1).
Google Scholar CrossrefChance, B. L., (2002). Components of statistical thinking and implications for instruction and assessment. Journal of Statistics Education, 10(3).
Google Scholar CrossrefCrowe, A., Dirks, C. & Wenderoth, M. P. (2008). Biology in bloom: implementing Bloom’s taxonomy to enhance student learning in biology. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 7(4), 368-381.
Google Scholar CrossrefFink, L. D. (2003a). A self-directed guide to designing courses for significant learning. Available:
Google Scholar Crossrefhttp://trc.virginia.edu/workshops/2004/Fink_Designing_Courses_2004.pdf
Google Scholar CrossrefFink, L. D. (2003b). Integrated Course Design.
Google Scholar CrossrefAvailable: www.theideacenter.org/sites/default/files/Idea_Paper_42.pdf
Google Scholar CrossrefFink, L. D. (2003c). What is “Significant Learning”? University of Oklahoma Significant Learning Website, Program for Instructional Innovation at the University of Oklahoma.
Google Scholar CrossrefAvailable: www.ou.edu/pii/significant/WHAT%20IS.pdf
Google Scholar CrossrefFink, L. D. (2007). The Power of Course Design to Increase Student Engagement and Learning. Peer Review, 9(1), 13-17.
Google Scholar CrossrefFranklin, C., Kader, G., Mewborn, D., Moreno, J., Peck, R., Perry, M., et al. (2005). Guidelines for Assessment and Instruction in Statistics Education (GAISE) report: A Pre-K-12 curriculum framework. Alexandria, VA: American Statistical Association.
Google Scholar CrossrefGAISE College Report (2005). Guidelines for Assessment and Instruction in Statistical Education College Report. Alexandria, VA: American Statistical Association.
Google Scholar CrossrefGal, I. (2000). Statistical Literacy: Conceptual and Instructional issues. In D. Coben, J. O’Donoghue & G.E. Fitzsimons (Eds.), Perspectives on adults learning mathematics: Research and practice (pp. 135-150). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Google Scholar CrossrefGarfield, J. B. (2002). The challenge of developing statistical reasoning. Journal of Statistics Education, 10(3).
Google Scholar CrossrefGarfield, J. B. & Ben-Zvi, D. (2007). How Students Learn Statistics Revisited: A Current Review of Research on Teaching and Learning Statistics. International Statistical Review, 75(3), 372-396.
Google Scholar CrossrefGould, R. (2010). Statistics and the modern student. International Statistical Review, 78, 297-315.
Google Scholar CrossrefHall, M. R. & Rowell, G. H. (2008). Introductory Statistics Education and the National Science Foundation. Journal of Statistics Education, 16(2).
Google Scholar CrossrefPfaff, T. P. & Weinberg, A. (2009). Do hands-on activities increase student understanding?: A case study. Journal of Statistics Education, 17(3).
Google Scholar CrossrefRumsey, D. J. (2002). Statistical literacy as a goal for introductory statistics courses. Journal of Statistics Education, 10(3).
Google Scholar CrossrefThompson, E., Luxton-Reilly, A., Whalley, J. L., Hu, M., & Robbins, P. (2008). Bloom’s Taxonomy for CS Assessment. In Proceedings of 10th Australian Computing Education Conference on Research and Practice in Software Engineering (ACE2008), 78, 155-161.
Google Scholar CrossrefWatson, J.M. (1997). Assessing statistical literacy using the media. The Assessment Challenge in Statistics Education, 107-121.
Google Scholar CrossrefWeltman, D. & Whiteside, M. (2010). Comparing the Effectiveness of Traditional and Active Learning Methods in Business Statistics: Convergence to the Mean. Journal of Statistics Education, 18(1).
Google Scholar CrossrefDownloads
Published
Almetric
Dimensions
Issue
Section
License
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication but allow anyone to share: (unload, , reprint, distribute and/or copy) and adapt (remix, transform reuse, modify,) for any proposition, even commercial, always quoting the original source.