Fostering Students’ Statistical Literacy Through Significant Learning Experience

Authors

  • Saras Krishnan INTI International University

https://doi.org/10.17583/redimat.2015.1332

Downloads

Abstract

A major objective of statistics education is to develop students’ statistical literacy that enables them to be educated users of data in context. Teaching statistics in today’s educational settings is not an easy feat because teachers have a huge task in keeping up with the demands of the new generation of learners. The present day students have higher expectations in terms of classroom pedagogy particularly in the use of creative and engaging methods to create a significant learning experience for them. This paper discusses how students’ statistical literacy can be fostered by creating a more integrated statistics course using the Fink’s Taxonomy of Significant Learning.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Saras Krishnan, INTI International University

Senior Lecturer of Mathematics,

Faculty of Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics

References

Broers, N. J. (2006). Learning goals: The primacy of statistical knowledge. In Proceedings of the 7th Annual Meeting of ICOTS-7. Salvador, Brazil: ISI.

Google Scholar Crossref

Bude, L. (2006). Assessing students’ understanding of statistics. In Proceedings of the 7th Annual Meeting of ICOTS-7. Salvador, Brazil: ISI.

Google Scholar Crossref

Carnell, L. J. (2008). The Effect of a Student-Designed Data Collection Project on Attitudes towards Statistics. Journal of Statistics Education, 16(1).

Google Scholar Crossref

Chance, B. L., (2002). Components of statistical thinking and implications for instruction and assessment. Journal of Statistics Education, 10(3).

Google Scholar Crossref

Crowe, A., Dirks, C. & Wenderoth, M. P. (2008). Biology in bloom: implementing Bloom’s taxonomy to enhance student learning in biology. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 7(4), 368-381.

Google Scholar Crossref

Fink, L. D. (2003a). A self-directed guide to designing courses for significant learning. Available:

Google Scholar Crossref

http://trc.virginia.edu/workshops/2004/Fink_Designing_Courses_2004.pdf

Google Scholar Crossref

Fink, L. D. (2003b). Integrated Course Design.

Google Scholar Crossref

Available: www.theideacenter.org/sites/default/files/Idea_Paper_42.pdf

Google Scholar Crossref

Fink, L. D. (2003c). What is “Significant Learning”? University of Oklahoma Significant Learning Website, Program for Instructional Innovation at the University of Oklahoma.

Google Scholar Crossref

Available: www.ou.edu/pii/significant/WHAT%20IS.pdf

Google Scholar Crossref

Fink, L. D. (2007). The Power of Course Design to Increase Student Engagement and Learning. Peer Review, 9(1), 13-17.

Google Scholar Crossref

Franklin, C., Kader, G., Mewborn, D., Moreno, J., Peck, R., Perry, M., et al. (2005). Guidelines for Assessment and Instruction in Statistics Education (GAISE) report: A Pre-K-12 curriculum framework. Alexandria, VA: American Statistical Association.

Google Scholar Crossref

GAISE College Report (2005). Guidelines for Assessment and Instruction in Statistical Education College Report. Alexandria, VA: American Statistical Association.

Google Scholar Crossref

Gal, I. (2000). Statistical Literacy: Conceptual and Instructional issues. In D. Coben, J. O’Donoghue & G.E. Fitzsimons (Eds.), Perspectives on adults learning mathematics: Research and practice (pp. 135-150). Dordrecht: Kluwer.

Google Scholar Crossref

Garfield, J. B. (2002). The challenge of developing statistical reasoning. Journal of Statistics Education, 10(3).

Google Scholar Crossref

Garfield, J. B. & Ben-Zvi, D. (2007). How Students Learn Statistics Revisited: A Current Review of Research on Teaching and Learning Statistics. International Statistical Review, 75(3), 372-396.

Google Scholar Crossref

Gould, R. (2010). Statistics and the modern student. International Statistical Review, 78, 297-315.

Google Scholar Crossref

Hall, M. R. & Rowell, G. H. (2008). Introductory Statistics Education and the National Science Foundation. Journal of Statistics Education, 16(2).

Google Scholar Crossref

Pfaff, T. P. & Weinberg, A. (2009). Do hands-on activities increase student understanding?: A case study. Journal of Statistics Education, 17(3).

Google Scholar Crossref

Rumsey, D. J. (2002). Statistical literacy as a goal for introductory statistics courses. Journal of Statistics Education, 10(3).

Google Scholar Crossref

Thompson, E., Luxton-Reilly, A., Whalley, J. L., Hu, M., & Robbins, P. (2008). Bloom’s Taxonomy for CS Assessment. In Proceedings of 10th Australian Computing Education Conference on Research and Practice in Software Engineering (ACE2008), 78, 155-161.

Google Scholar Crossref

Watson, J.M. (1997). Assessing statistical literacy using the media. The Assessment Challenge in Statistics Education, 107-121.

Google Scholar Crossref

Weltman, D. & Whiteside, M. (2010). Comparing the Effectiveness of Traditional and Active Learning Methods in Business Statistics: Convergence to the Mean. Journal of Statistics Education, 18(1).

Google Scholar Crossref

Downloads

Published

2015-10-24

Almetric

Dimensions

Issue

Section

Articles