Buying in and Checking out: Identity Development and Meaning Making in the Practice of Mathematics Homework
Keywords:
Downloads
Abstract
This paper presents findings from an ethnographic study of the role and meaning of mathematics homework in the lives of middle school students. The study conceptualizes and examines homework as a social practice, with a focus on how students make meaning out of their experiences and the role of identity development in meaning making. Specifically, the study examines how middle school students come to value or reject mathematics homework. Case study analyses revealed two ways of characterizing students’ experiences with homework. Students who buy into homework develop aspects of their identities related to school, math and homework that support them in valuing homework. Students who check out develop aspects of their identities that support them in rejecting homework. The concepts of buying in and checking out have implications for theory development around motivation and identity and for school practices around homework.
Downloads
References
Bempechat, J. (2004). The Motivational Benefits of Homework: A Social-Cognitive Perspective. Theory Into Practice 43 (3): 189-196.
Google Scholar CrossrefBryan, T., & Nelson, C. (1994). Doing homework: perspectives of elementary and junior high school students. Journal of Learning Disabilities 27(8): 488-499.
Google Scholar CrossrefChen, C., & Stevenson, H.W. (1989). "Homework: A cross-cultural examination." Child Development 60: 551-561.
Google Scholar CrossrefCooper, H. (1989). Homework. New York, Longman.
Google Scholar CrossrefCooper, H., Lindsey, J.J., Nye, B., & Greathouse, S. (1998). Relationships among attitudes about homework, amount of homework assigned and completed, and student achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology 90(1): 70-83.
Google Scholar CrossrefCooper, H, Lindsay, JJ, & Nye, B. (2000). Homework in the home: How student, family, and parenting-style differences relate to the homework process. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 464-487.
Google Scholar CrossrefCorno, L. (1980). Individual and class level effects of parent-assisted instruction in classroom memory support strategies. Journal of Educational Psychology 72: 278–292.
Google Scholar CrossrefCorno, L., & Xu, J. (2004). Homework as the job of childhood. Theory Into Practice, 43(3): 227-233.
Google Scholar CrossrefCoutts, P. (2004) Meanings of Homework and Implications for Practice. Theory Into Practice. 43(3): 182-188
Google Scholar CrossrefCsikszentmihalyi, M., Larson, R. (1987). Validity and reliability of the experience-sampling method. Journal of Nervous & Mental Disease. Special Mental disorders in their natural settings: The application of time allocation and experience-sampling techniques in psychiatry, 175(9): 526-536
Google Scholar CrossrefDauber & Epstein (1993) Parents’ attitudes and practices of involvement in inner-city elementary and middle schools. In Chavkin, N.F. (ed.) Families and schools in a pluralistic society. New York: State University of New York Press.
Google Scholar CrossrefDelgado-Gaitan, C. (1992). School matters in the Mexican-American home: Socializing children to education. American Educational Research Journal 29(3): 495-513.
Google Scholar CrossrefDeslandes, R., & Rousseau, M. (2008). Evolution and Relation of Students’ Homework Management Strategies and their Parents’ Help in Homework During the Transition to High School. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York, March 2009.
Google Scholar CrossrefEisenhardt, K.M. (1989). Building Theories from Case Study Research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532-550
Google Scholar CrossrefElse-quest, N., Hyde, J., and Hejmadi, A. (2008). Mother and Child Emotions during Mathematics Homework. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 10: 5–35
Google Scholar CrossrefGlazer, B.G. & Strauss, A.L. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
Google Scholar CrossrefHinchey, P. (1996). Why kids say they don't do homework. The Clearing House, 69(4): 242.
Google Scholar CrossrefHoover-Dempsey, K.V, Battiato, A.C., Walker, J.M.T., Reed, R.P., DeJong, J.M., & Jones, K.P. (2001). Parental involvement in homework. Educational Psychologist, 36 (3), 195 – 209.
Google Scholar CrossrefHong, E., & Milgrim, R.A (2000). Homework: motivation and learning preferences. Westport, CT: Bergin & Garvey.
Google Scholar CrossrefLange, T, & Meaney, T. (2011). I actually started to scream: emotional and mathematical trauma from doing school mathematics homework. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 77: 35-51.
Google Scholar CrossrefLarson, R., Csikszentmihalyi, M., (1983). The experience sampling method. New Directions for Methodology of Social & Behavioral Science. 15: 41-56.
Google Scholar CrossrefLeone, C. M., & Richards, M.H. (1989). Classwork and homework in early adolescence: the ecology of achievement. Journal of youth and adolescence 18: 531-549
Google Scholar CrossrefMcDermott, R. P., Goldman, S.V., & Varenne, H. (1984). When school goes home. Teachers College Record, 85(3): 391-407.
Google Scholar CrossrefPratt, M.W., Green, D., Macvicar, J., & Bountrogianni, M. (1992). The mathematical parent: parental scaffolding, parental style, and learning outcomes in long division mathematics homework. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology. 13: 17-34.
Google Scholar CrossrefPope, D.C. (2001). Doing school: how we are creating a generation of stressed out, materialistic, and miseducated students. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Google Scholar CrossrefRobinson, V. M., & Kuin, L.M. (1999). The explanation of practice: why Chinese students copy assignments. Qualitative Studies in Education, 12(2): 193-210.
Google Scholar CrossrefShumow, L. & Miller, J.D (1991). Parents’ at-home and at-school academic involvement with young adolescents. Journal Of Early Adolescence, 21(1): 68-91.
Google Scholar CrossrefShumow, L. Schmidt, J., & Kackar, H. (2008) Adolescents’ Experience Doing Homework: Associations Among Context, Quality of Experience, and Outcomes. The School Community Journal, 18 (2).
Google Scholar CrossrefStake, R.E. (1995). The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Google Scholar CrossrefStrauss, A. (1987) Qualitative analysis for social scientists. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar CrossrefStrauss, A.L. & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Google Scholar CrossrefVarenne, H. & McDermott, R.P. (1999). The Farrells and the Kinneys at home: Literacies in action. In H. Varenne & R. McDermott, Successful Failure: The School America Builds. Westview Press.
Google Scholar CrossrefWarton, P. (2001). The forgotten voices in homework: views of students. Educational Psychologist, 36(3): 155-165.
Google Scholar CrossrefWenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar CrossrefXu, J. (2005). Purposes for Doing Homework Reported by Middle and High School Students. The Journal of Educational Research, 99 (1).
Google Scholar CrossrefXu, J. (2007). Middle-School Homework Management: More than just gender and family involvement. Educational Psychology, 27 (2).
Google Scholar CrossrefXu, J., & Corno, L. (1998). Case studies of families doing third grade homework. Teachers College Record, 100: 402-436.
Google Scholar CrossrefXu, J., & Corno, L. (2003). Family help and homework management reported by middle school students. The Elementary School Journal, 103(5): 503-536.
Google Scholar CrossrefXu, J., & Yuan, R. (2003). Doing homework: Listening to students', parents', and teachers' voices in one urban middle school community. School Community Journal. 13(2): 25-44.
Google Scholar CrossrefDownloads
Published
Metrics
Almetric
Dimensions
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
All articles are published under Creative Commons copyright (CC BY). Authors hold the copyright and retain publishing rights without restrictions, but authors allow anyone to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute, and/or copy articles as the original source is cited.
