Photographs as a Research Tool in Child Studies: Some Analytical Metaphors and Choices
Keywords:
Downloads
Abstract
This methodological paper discusses how photographs can be used in multi-layered data projects with children and families. We present photographs as a versatile low-fi digital artifact that can be used under a variety of research circumstances and critically discuss this particular visual tool in the context of the growing body of visual and multimodal research with children and families. The critical discussion draws on a series of research projects in which we have employed photographs (topics of the projects include family diversity or children's routines). The comparisons between projects highlights some of the procedural and analytical choices that are opened up when using photographs. In particular, we focus on two issues: (a) differences that emerge when materials are created by participants or are elicited by researchers, and; (b) the metaphors that are applied to interpret and work with photographs.
Downloads
References
Barker, J. and Smith, F. (2012). What’s in focus? A critical discussion of photography, children and young people. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 15 (2), 91-103.
Google Scholar CrossrefBauman, R. (1986). Story, performance, and event: Contextual studies of oral narrative. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar CrossrefBohnsack, R. (2008) The interpretation of pictures and the documentary method. Forum: Qualitative Social Research 9 (3). http:// nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs0803267.
Google Scholar CrossrefBourdieu, P. (1990). Photography: A middle-brow art. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Google Scholar CrossrefBrown, S; Reavey, P. and Brookfield, H. (2014). Spectral objects: Material links to difficult pasts for adoptive families. In P. Harvey, E. Casella, G. Evans, H. Knox, C. McLean, E. Silva, N. Thoburn and K. Woodwards (eds.), Objects and materials: A Routledge companion (pp. 173-182). London: Routledge.
Google Scholar CrossrefBruner, J. (1986). Actual minds, possible worlds. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Bruner, J. S. (2003). Making stories: Law, literature, life. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Google Scholar CrossrefCappello, M. (2005). Photo interviews: Eliciting data through conversations with children. Field Methods, 17 (2), 170-182.
Google Scholar CrossrefClark, A. (2010). Young children as protagonists and the role of participatory, visual methods in engaging multiple perspectives. American Journal of Community Psychology, 46 (1-2), 115-123.
Google Scholar CrossrefClark, A. and Moss, P. (2011). Listening to young children: The mosaic approach. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers. Clark, C. D. (1999). The auto-driven interview: A photographic viewfinder into children's experience. Visual Studies, 14(1), 39-50.
Google Scholar CrossrefCollier, J. (1957). Photography in anthropology: a report on two experiments. American Anthropologist, 59 (5), 843-859.
Google Scholar CrossrefCook, T. and Hess, E. (2007). What the camera sees and from whose perspective: Fun methodologies for engaging children in enlightening adults. Childhood, 14 (1), 29-45. Crivello, G; Camfield, L. and Woodhead, M. (2009). How can children tell us about their wellbeing? Exploring the potential of participatory research approaches within young lives. Social Indicators Research, 90 (1), 51-72.
Google Scholar CrossrefDelgado, M. (2015). Urban youth and photovoice: Visual ethnography in action. New York: Oxford University Press. Edwards, E. (ed.) (1992). Anthropology and photography, 1860–1920. New Haven / London: Yale University Press / Royal Anthropological Institute.
Google Scholar CrossrefEpstein, I; Stevens, B; McKeever, P. and Baruchel, S. (2006). Photo elicitation interview (PEI): Using photos to elicit children's perspectives. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 5 (3), 1-11.
Google Scholar CrossrefEskelinen, K. (2012). Children's visual art and creating through photographs. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 45, 168-177.
Google Scholar CrossrefFrekko, S; Leinaweaver, J. and Marre, D. (2015). How (not) to talk about adoption: On communicative vigilance in Spain. American Ethnologist, 42 (4), 703-719.
Google Scholar CrossrefGonzález-Patiño, J. (2011). Rutinas de la infancia urbana mediadas por la tecnología: Un análisis visual. Papeles de Trabajo sobre Cultura, Educación y Desarrollo Humano, 7 (2), 1-16.
Google Scholar CrossrefHarper, D. (1998). An argument for visual sociology. In J. Prosser (ed.), Image-based research: A sourcebook for qualitative researchers (pp. 24-41). London: Routledge.
Google Scholar CrossrefHeydon, R; McKee, L. and Phillips, L. (2016). The affordances and constraints of visual methods in early childhood education research: Talking points from the field. Journal of Childhood Studies, 41 (3), 5-17.
Google Scholar CrossrefJames, A; Jenks, C. and Prout, A. (1998). Theorizing childhood. New York: Teachers College Press.
Google Scholar CrossrefJohnson, G. (2011). A child’s right to participation: Photovoice as methodology for documenting the experiences of children living in Kenyan orphanages. Visual Anthropology Review, 27 (2), 141-161.
Google Scholar CrossrefJohnson, G; Pfister, A. and Vindrola‐Padros, C. (2012). Drawings, photos, and performances: Using visual methods with children. Visual Anthropology Review, 28 (2), 164-178.
Google Scholar CrossrefKolb, B. (2008). Involving, sharing, analysing—Potential of the participatory photo interview. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 9 (3). http://dx.doi.org/10.17169/fqs-9.3.1155
Google Scholar CrossrefKress, G. and Van Leeuwen, T. (2006). Reading images: The grammar of visual design (2nd edition). London: Routledge.
Google Scholar CrossrefLabov, W. (1972). Language in the inner city: Studies in the Black English vernacular. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Google Scholar CrossrefLatham, A. (2004). Researching and writing everyday accounts of the city: an introduction to the diary-photo diary-interview method. In C. Knowles and P. Sweetman (eds.), Picturing the Social Landscape: Visual methods and the sociological imagination (pp. 117-131). Routledge: London.
Google Scholar CrossrefMauthner, M. (1997). Methodological aspects of collecting data from children: Lessons from three research projects. Children and Society, 11 (1), 16-28.
Google Scholar CrossrefMayall, B. (2000). The sociology of childhood in relation to children's rights. The International Journal of Children's Rights, 8 (3), 243-259.
Google Scholar CrossrefMraz, J. (1999). Fotografía y familia. Desacatos, 2, 143-146.
Google Scholar CrossrefMitchell, C. (2011). Doing visual research. London: Sage. Mead, M. (1995). Visual anthropology in a discipline of words. In P. Hockings (ed.), Principles of visual anthropology (pp. 3-12). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Google Scholar CrossrefMorphy, H. and Banks, M. (Eds.). (1997). Rethinking visual anthropology. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Google Scholar CrossrefOrtiz, A; Prats, M. and Baylina, M. (2012). Métodos visuales y geografías de la infancia: dibujando el entorno cotidiano. Scripta Nova: Revista Electrónica de Geografía y Ciencias Sociales, 16 (400) . http://www.ub.edu/geocrit/sn/sn-400.htm
Google Scholar CrossrefParkinson, D. (2001). Securing trustworthy data from an interview situation with young children: Six integrated interview strategies. Child Study Journal 31 (3), 137-155
Google Scholar CrossrefPink, S. (2013). Doing visual ethnography. 3rd edition. London: Sage.
Google Scholar CrossrefPunch, S. (2002). Research with children: the same or different from research with adults? Childhood, 9 (3), 321-341.
Google Scholar CrossrefRasmussen, K. (2004). Places for children–children’s places. Childhood, 11 (2), 155-173.
Google Scholar CrossrefRose, G. (2001). Visual methodologies: an introduction to the interpretation of visual methodologies. London: Sage Stirling, E. and D. Yamada-Rice, D. (eds.), (2016). Visual methods with children and young people: Academics and visual industries in dialogue. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Google Scholar CrossrefThomas, N. and O’Kane, C. (1998). The ethics of participatory research with children. Children and Society, 12, 336–348. Thomson, P. (ed.) (2008). Doing visual research with children and young people. London: Routledge.
Google Scholar CrossrefTorre, D. and Murphy, J. (2015) A different lens: Changing perspectives using photo- elicitation interviews. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 23 (111), http://dx.doi.org/10.14507/epaa.v23.2051 Trost, J. (1988). Conceptualising the family. International Sociology, 3 (3), 301-308. Trost, J. (1999). Family as a set of dyads. Marriage and Family Review, 28 (3/4), 79-91.
Google Scholar Crossrefvan Leeuwen, T. and Jewitt, C. (Eds.). (2001). The handbook of visual analysis. London: Sage.
Google Scholar CrossrefWortham, S. and Reyes, A. (2015). Discourse analysis beyond the speech event. London: Routledge.
Google Scholar CrossrefYamada-Rice, D. (2017). Using visual research methods with young children. In P. Christensen and A. James, (eds.), Research with children: Perspectives and practices, 3rd edition (pp. 71-86). London: Routledge. Young, L. and Barrett, H. (2001). Adapting visual methods: action research with Kampala street children. Area, 33 (2), 141-152.
Google Scholar CrossrefDownloads
Published
Almetric
Dimensions
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
All articles are published under Creative Commons copyright (CC BY). Authors hold the copyright and retain publishing rights without restrictions, but authors allow anyone to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute, and/or copy articles as the original source is cited.
