Conformity to Masculine Norms and Intellectual Engagement
Keywords:
Downloads
Abstract
Research on the relationship between masculinity and intellectual engagement may be helpful in exploring the current challenges of male students in academic settings. Although the traditional male role in Western societies has often included notions of winning, competitiveness, and achievement, there is a growing research literature that documents male struggles with achievement, particularly in academic, intellectual, and occupational domains (Morris, 2011; Rosin, 2010; Sax, 2008a, b). In this study, the relationships between conformity to masculine norms and intellectual engagement were explored in a sample of diverse men in the United States. It was predicted that men who more strongly conformed to masculine norms would demonstrate lower intellectual engagement. As predicted, conformity to masculine norms was significantly predictive of lower intellectual engagement on three of the five constructs measured (Openness to Experience, Intellectual Complexity, and Love of Learning). Conformity to masculine norms was not a significant predictor of Need for Cognition or Curiosity.Downloads
References
Addis, M. E., & Mahalik, J. R. (2003). Men, masculinity, and the contexts of help seeking. American Psychologist, 58(1), 5-14. doi: 10.1037/0003- 066x.58.1.5
Google Scholar CrossrefBarrick, M., & Mount, M. (1991). The big five personality dimensions and job performance: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 44 (1), 1-26.
Google Scholar CrossrefBuhrmester, M., Kwang, T., & Gosling, S.D. (2011). Amazon's mechanical turk: A new source of inexpensive yet high-quality data? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6, 3-5.
Google Scholar CrossrefCacioppo, J.T., Petty, R.E., Feinstein, J.A., Jarvis, W.B.G. (1996). Dispositional differences in cognitive motivation: The life and times of individuals varying in Need for Cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 197-253.
Google Scholar CrossrefHeath Marrs – Masculinity and intellectual engagement
Google Scholar CrossrefCosta, P.T., Jr., & McCrae, R.R. (1992). Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
Google Scholar CrossrefCosta, P.T., Jr., Terracciano, A., & McCrae, R.R. (2001). Gender differences in personality traits across cultures: Robust and surprising findings. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 322-331. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.81.2.322
Google Scholar CrossrefDiPrete, T. A., & Buchmann, C. (2006). Gender-specific trends in the value of education and the emerging gender gap in college completion. Demography, 43(1), 1-24.
Google Scholar CrossrefFeingold, A. (1994). Gender differences in personality: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 429-456.
Google Scholar CrossrefGoldberg, L.R., Johnson, J.A., Eber, H.W., Hogan, R., Ashton, M.C., Cloninger, C.R., & Gough, H.C. (2006). The International Personality Item Pool and the future of public-domain personality measures. Journal of Research in Personality, 40, 84-96.
Google Scholar CrossrefGough, H.G., & Bradley, P. (1996). CPI manual (3rd Ed.). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
Google Scholar CrossrefJackson C., & Dempster, S. (2009). 'I sat back on my computer ... with a bottle of whiskey next to me': constructing 'cool' masculinity through 'effortless' achievement in secondary and higher education. Journal of Gender Studies, 18, 341-356.
Google Scholar CrossrefKahn, J.S., Brett, B.L., & Holmes, J.R. (2011). Concerns with men's academic motivation in higher education: An exploratory investigation of the role of masculinity. The Journal of Men's Studies, 19, 65-82.
Google Scholar CrossrefKinnear, P.R., & Gray, C.D. (2004). SPSS 12 made simple. New York: Psychology Press.
Google Scholar CrossrefLusher, D. (2011). Masculinity, educational achievement, and social status: A social network analysis. Gender and Education, 23, 655-675.
Google Scholar CrossrefMcCrae, R. R. & John, O. P. (2001). Big Five factors and facets and the prediction of behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81 (3), 524-539.
Google Scholar CrossrefMahalik, J.R., Locke, B.D., Ludlow, L.H., Diemer, M.A., Scott, R.P., Gottfried, M., & Freitas, G. (2003). Development of the Conformity to Masculine Norms Inventory. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 4, 3- 25.
Google Scholar CrossrefMCS – Masculinities and Social Change, 2(3) 243
Google Scholar CrossrefMarrs, H., & Sigler, E.A. (2012). Male academic performance in college: The possible role of study strategies. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 13, 227-241. doi: 10.1037/a0022247
Google Scholar CrossrefMorris, E.W. (2008). “Rednecks,” “rutters,” and 'rithmetic: Social class, masculinity, and schooling in a rural context. Gender & Society, 22, 728-751.
Google Scholar CrossrefMorris, E.W. (2011). Bridging the gap: 'Doing gender', 'hegemonic masculinity', and the educational troubles of boys. Sociology Compass, 5, 92-103.
Google Scholar CrossrefPaunonen, S.V., & Jackson, D.N. (1996). The Jackson Personality Inventory and the Five-Factor Model of Personality. Journal of Research in Personality, 30, 42-59.
Google Scholar CrossrefParent, M.C., & Moradi, B. (2009). Confirmatory factor analysis of the Conformity to Masculine Norms Inventory and development of the Conformity to Masculine Norms Inventory – 46. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 10, 175-189.
Google Scholar CrossrefPeterson, C., & Seligman, M.E.P. (2004). Character Strengths and Virtues: A Handbook and Classification. New York: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar CrossrefPoropat, A.E. (2009). A meta-analysis of the five-factor model of personality and academic performance. Psychological Bulletin, 135, 322-338. Rosin, H. (2010, July/August). The end of men. The Atlantic. Retrieved
Google Scholar CrossrefFebruary 3, 2011 from
Google Scholar Crossrefhttp://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2010/07/the-end-of-
Google Scholar Crossrefmen/8135/.
Google Scholar CrossrefSax, L. (2008a, September 26). Her college experience is not his. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 55(5), A32-A33.
Google Scholar CrossrefSax, L. (2008b). The gender gap in college: Maximizing the developmental potential of women and men. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Google Scholar CrossrefSpence, J.T., Helmrich, R., & Stapp, J. (1974). The Personal Attributes Questionnaire: A measure of sex-role stereotypes and masculinity- femininity. JSAS Catalogue of Selected Documents in Psychology, 4, 43.
Google Scholar CrossrefVon Stumm, S., Hell, B., & Chamorro-Premuzic, T. (2011). The hungry mind: Intellectual curiosity is the third pillar of academic performance. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6, 574-588.
Google Scholar CrossrefWeaver-Hightower, M.B. (2003). The “boy turn” in research on gender and education. Review of Educational Research, 73, 471-498.
Google Scholar CrossrefDownloads
Published
Almetric
Dimensions
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
All articles are published under Creative Commons copyright (CC BY). Authors hold the copyright and retain publishing rights without restrictions, but authors allow anyone to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute, and/or copy articles as the original source is cited.
