Mathematics Makes you Feel Attractive. Empowering New Alternative Masculinities in the Context of Mathematics Classrooms
https://doi.org/10.17583/mcs.2020.4698
Keywords:
Downloads
Abstract
This article studies the relationship between masculinity construction in school and mathematics learning in boys. In this article, we introduce the variables of social interaction and the differentiation between the language of ethics and the language of desire to analyze the aspects related to mathematics learning in schoolboys. The methodology used is a literature review, paying particular attention to the techniques used in the literature and using categorization that emerged during the review to select and analyze the texts. We found several issues that seem to condition mathematics learning in boys that have to do with gender and specific identity construction, namely the dominant traditional masculinities. Moreover, this process is enhanced by the social attraction towards violence processes. However, the literature also contains elements that respond to a different model of masculinity that can be successful in mathematics learning and attractive at the same time, which is related to the New Alternative Masculinities model. We conclude with some recommendations to support this new and attractive model and to rethink research in mathematics achievement in children in the future.Downloads
References
Alrø, H., Skovsmose, O., & Valero, P. (2003). Communication, conflict and mathematics education in the multicultural classroom. In M. A. Mariotti (Ed.), European Research in Mathematics Education III: Proceedings of the Third Conference of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education (Vol. 3, pp. 1–6). Bellaria (Italy): University of Pisa and ERME.
Google Scholar CrossrefAsch, S. E. (1951). Effects of group pressure upon the modification and distortion of judgments. In H. Guetzhow (Ed.), Groups, leadership, and men (pp. 295–303). Pittsburgh, PA: Carnegie Press.
Google Scholar CrossrefAubert, A., Molina, S., Schubert, T., & Vidu, A. (2017). Learning and inclusivity via Interactive Groups in early childhood education and care in the Hope school, Spain. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 13, 90–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2017.03.002
Google Scholar CrossrefBakker, A., Smit, J., & Wegerif, R. (2015). Scaffolding and dialogic teaching in mathematics education: Introduction and review. ZDM, 47(7), 1047–1065. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-015-0738-8
Google Scholar CrossrefBall, D. L., & Bass, H. (2003). A Research Companion to Principles and Standards for School Mathematics. In J. Kilpatrick, G. Martin, & D. Schifter (Eds.), A research companion to principles and standards for school mathematics (pp. 27–44). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Google Scholar CrossrefBasch, C. E. (2011). Aggression and violence and the achievement gap among urban minority youth. Journal of School Health, 81(10), 619–625. doi: 10.1111/j.1746-1561.2011.00636.x
Google Scholar CrossrefBernstein, B. (2004). The structuring of pedagogic discourse. London: Routledge.
Google Scholar CrossrefBishop, A. (2013). Mathematics education and culture. New York: Springer.
Google Scholar CrossrefBourdieu, P. (1986). Habitus, code et codification. Actes de La Recherche En Sciences Sociales, 64(1), 40–44.
Google Scholar CrossrefBourdieu, P. (1997). Capital cultural, escuela y espacio social. Madrid: Siglo XXI.
Google Scholar CrossrefBourdieu, P. (2013). Distinction: A social critique of the judgement of taste. New York: Routledge.
Google Scholar CrossrefBowles, S., & Gintis, H. (2003). Schooling in capitalist America twenty-five years later. Sociological Forum, 18(2), 343–348.
Google Scholar CrossrefBrahier, D. J. (2016). Teaching secondary and middle school mathematics. New York: Routledge.
Google Scholar CrossrefCalcagni, E., & Lago, L. (2018). The three domains for dialogue: A framework for analysing dialogic approaches to teaching and learning. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 18, 1–12. doi: 10.1016/j.lcsi.2018.03.001
Google Scholar CrossrefCaprara, G. V., Kanacri, B. P. L., Gerbino, M., Zuffiano, A., Alessandri, G., Vecchio, G., … Bridglall, B. (2014). Positive effects of promoting prosocial behavior in early adolescence: Evidence from a school-based intervention. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 38(4), 386–396. doi: 10.1177/0165025414531464
Google Scholar CrossrefCarpenter, T. P., & Lehrer, R. (1999). Teaching and learning mathematics with understanding. In E. Fennema & T. A. Romberg (Eds.), Mathematics classrooms that promote understanding (pp. 19–32). New York: Routledge.
Google Scholar CrossrefCarraher, T. N., Carraher, D. W., & Schliemann, A. D. (1985). Mathematics in the streets and in schools. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 3(1), 21–29. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-835X.1985.tb00951.x
Google Scholar CrossrefCastro, M., & Mara, L. C. (2014). The social nature of attractiveness: how to shift attraction from the dominant traditional to alternative masculinities. International and Multidisciplinary Journal of Social Sciences, 3(2), 182–206. doi: 10.4471/rimcis.2014.36
Google Scholar CrossrefChronaki, A., & Pechtelidis, Y. (2012). “ Being Good” at Maths: Fabricating Gender Subjectivity. REDIMAT-Journal of Research in Mathematics Education, 1(3), 246–277. doi: 10.4471/redimat.2012.14
Google Scholar CrossrefClarke, D., Keitel, C., & Shimizu, Y. (2006). Mathematics classrooms in twelve countries: The insider’s perspective. Rotterdam - Taipei: Sense publishers.
Google Scholar CrossrefCoben, D., Colwell, D., Macrae, S., Boaler, J., Brown, M., & Rhodes, V. (2003). Adult numeracy: Review of research and related literature. National Research and Development Centre for adult literacy and numeracy London.
Google Scholar CrossrefCole, M. (1988). Contradictions in the educational theory of Gintis and Bowles. In M. Cole (Ed.), Bowles and Gintis Revisited. Correspondence and contradiction in educational theory (pp. 16–32). New York: Routledge.
Google Scholar Crossrefd’Ambrosio, U. (1985). Ethnomathematics and its place in the history and pedagogy of mathematics. For the Learning of Mathematics, 5(1), 44–48.
Google Scholar Crossrefd’Ambrósio, U. (2006). Ethnomathematics: Link between traditions and modernity. Rotterdam - Taipei: Sense publishers.
Google Scholar CrossrefDe Abreu, G. (2000). Relationships between macro and micro socio-cultural contexts: Implications for the study of interactions in the mathematics classroom. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 41(1), 1–29. doi: 10.1023/A:1003875728720
Google Scholar CrossrefDenzin, N. K. (2016). Critical Qualitative Inquiry. Qualitative Inquiry, 23(1), 8–16. doi: 10.1177/1077800416681864
Google Scholar CrossrefDíez-Palomar, J. (2016). Men, Masculinities and Teaching in Early Childhood Education. Masculinities & Social Change, 5(3), 321–322. doi: 10.17583/mcs.2016.2351
Google Scholar CrossrefDíez-Palomar, J., & Cabré, J. (2015). Using dialogic talk to teach mathematics: The case of interactive groups. ZDM, 47(7), 1299–1312. doi: 10.1007/s11858-015-0728-x
Google Scholar CrossrefDíez-Palomar, J., Capllonch, M., & Aiello, E. (2014). Analyzing Male Attractiveness Models From a Communicative Approach: Socialization, Attraction, and Gender-Based Violence. Qualitative Inquiry, 20(7), 844–849. doi: 10.1177/1077800414537205
Google Scholar CrossrefEpstein, D. (1998). Real boys don’t work:“underachievement’, masculinity. In D. Epstein, J. Elwood, V. Hey, & J. Maw, (Eds.), Failing Boys? Issues in gender and achievement. Buckingham: Open University.
Google Scholar CrossrefErlwanger, S. H. (1973). Benny’s conception of rules and answers in IPI mathematics. Journal of Children’s Mathematical Behavior, 1(2), 7–26.
Google Scholar CrossrefEspelage, D. L., Hong, J. S., Rao, M. A., & Low, S. (2013). Associations between peer victimization and academic performance. Theory into Practice, 52(4), 233–240. doi: 10.1080/00405841.2013.829724
Google Scholar CrossrefFennema, Elizabeth, & Sherman, J. A. (1976). Fennema-Sherman mathematics attitudes scales: Instruments designed to measure attitudes toward the learning of mathematics by females and males. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 7(5), 324–326. doi: 10.2307/748467
Google Scholar CrossrefFigueiredo, H. R. S., & de Lourdes Batista, I. (2018). Mathematics History and Cognitive Values on a Didactic Sequence: Teaching Trigonometry. Journal of Research in Mathematics Education, 7(3), 311–332. doi: 10.17583/redimat.2018.2727
Google Scholar CrossrefFlecha, R. (2014). Successful educational actions for inclusion and social cohesion in Europe. Cham: Springer.
Google Scholar CrossrefFlecha, R., Puigvert, L., & Rios, O. (2013). The New Alternative Masculinities and the overcoming of gender violence. International and Multidisciplinary Journal of Social Sciences, 2(1), 88–113. doi: 10.4471/rimcis.2013.14
Google Scholar CrossrefFoster, V., Kimmel, M., & Skelton, C. (2001). What about the boys? An overview of the debates. In W. Martino & B. Meyenn (Eds.), What about the Boys? Issues of Masculinity in Schools (pp. 1–23). Buckingham: Open University Press.
Google Scholar CrossrefFry, D., Fang, X., Elliott, S., Casey, T., Zheng, X., Li, J., … McCluskey, G. (2018). The relationships between violence in childhood and educational outcomes: a global systematic review and meta-analysis. Child Abuse & Neglect, 75, 6–28.doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2017.06.021
Google Scholar CrossrefGarandeau, C. F., Ahn, H.-J., & Rodkin, P. C. (2011). The social status of aggressive students across contexts: The role of classroom status hierarchy, academic achievement, and grade. Developmental Psychology, 47(6), 1699.doi: 10.1037/a0025271
Google Scholar CrossrefGarcía-Carrión, R. (2015). What the dialogic literary gatherings did for me: The personal narrative of an 11-year-old boy in a rural community in England. Qualitative Inquiry, 21(10), 913–919. doi: 10.1177/1077800415614305
Google Scholar CrossrefGee, J. P. (2004). An introduction to discourse analysis: Theory and method. New York: Routledge.
Google Scholar CrossrefGelfer, J., & Organ, J. (2018). Quantum Masculinities: Doing Gender with Max Tegmark’s Mathematical Universe Hypothesis. Masculinities & Social Change, 7(3), 213–229. doi: 10.17583/mcs.2018.3470
Google Scholar CrossrefGlaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (2017). Discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New York: Routledge.
Google Scholar CrossrefGómez, A., & Jiménez, J. M. (2018). Radical Love: Remembering Freire, Joe, and Pato. International Review of Qualitative Research, 11(1), 6–10. doi: 10.1525/irqr.2018.11.1.6
Google Scholar CrossrefGomez, A., Padros, M., Rios-Gonzalez, O., Catalin-Mara, L., & Pukepuke, T. (2019). Reaching Social Impact through the Communicative Methodology. Researching With Rather than On Vulnerable Populations: the Roma Case. Frontiers in Education, 4(9), 1–8. doi: 10.3389/feduc.2019.00009
Google Scholar CrossrefGómez, A., Puigvert, L., & Flecha, R. (2011). Critical communicative methodology: Informing real social transformation through research. Qualitative Inquiry, 17(3), 235–245. doi: 10.1177/1077800410397802
Google Scholar CrossrefGómez, A. (2019). Science With and for Society Through Qualitative Inquiry. Qualitative Inquiry, online first. doi: 10.1177/1077800419863006
Google Scholar CrossrefGómez, J. (2004). El amor en la sociedad del riesgo: una tentativa educativa. Barcelona: El Roure.
Google Scholar CrossrefGrootenboer, P., & Zevenbergen, R. (2007). Identity and mathematics: Towards a theory of agency in coming to learn mathematics. In J. Watson & K. Beswick (Eds.), Proceedings of the 30th annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia (pp. 335–344). Perth: MERGA.
Google Scholar CrossrefGuinjoan, M., Fortuny, J. M., & Gutiérrez, Á. (2015). Análisis del comportamiento de alumnos expertos resolutores de problemas en el contexto del concurso matemático Pruebas Canguro. Enseñanza de Las Ciencias, 33(1), 29–46. doi: 10.5565/rev/ensciencias.1438
Google Scholar CrossrefHabermas, J. (1984). The Theory of Communicative Action. Reason and the Rationalization of Society. Boston, MA.: Beacon Press.
Google Scholar CrossrefHart, C. (2018). Doing a Literature Review: Releasing the Research Imagination. New York: Sage.
Google Scholar CrossrefHejazi, E., Lavasani, M. G., Amani, H., & Was, C. A. (2012). Academic Identity Status, Goal Orientation, and Academic Achievement among High School Students. Journal of Research in Education, 22(1), 291–320.
Google Scholar CrossrefHiebert, J., & Carpenter, T. P. (1992). Learning and teaching with understanding. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 65–97). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Google Scholar CrossrefHoogland, K., Díez-Palomar, J., & Vliegenthart, M. (2018). Towards a common european numeracy framework for adults. In B. Kelly, D. Kaye, G. Griffiths, D. Dalby, J. Evans, & J. Stacey (Eds.), Boundaries and bridges: Adults learning mathematics in a fractured world. Proceedings of the 25th Adults Learning Mathematics international conference - A research forum (pp. 64–67). London: ALM.
Google Scholar CrossrefHyde, J. S., Fennema, E., & Lamon, S. J. (1990). Gender differences in mathematics performance: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 107(2), 139. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.139
Google Scholar CrossrefJenner, B., Flick, U., von Kardoff, E., & Steinke, I. (2004). A companion to qualitative research. New York: Sage.
Google Scholar CrossrefJurdak, M., Vithal, R., De Freitas, E., Gates, P., & Kollosche, D. (2016). Social and political dimensions of mathematics education: Current thinking. Cham: Springer.
Google Scholar CrossrefJuvonen, J., Graham, S., & Schuster, M. A. (2003). Bullying among young adolescents: The strong, the weak, and the troubled. Pediatrics, 112(6), 1231–1237.
Google Scholar CrossrefKazak, S., Wegerif, R., & Fujita, T. (2015). The importance of dialogic processes to conceptual development in mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 90(2), 105–120. doi: 10.1007/s10649-015-9618-y
Google Scholar CrossrefKnuth, E., & Peressini, D. (2001). Unpacking the nature of discourse in mathematics classrooms. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 6(5), 320.
Google Scholar CrossrefKochenderfer, B. J., & Ladd, G. W. (1996). Peer victimization: Cause or consequence of school maladjustment? Child Development, 67(4), 1305–1317. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.1996.tb01797.x
Google Scholar CrossrefLerman, S. (2001). Cultural, discursive psychology: A sociocultural approach to studying the teaching and learning of mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 46(1–3), 87–113. doi: 10.1023/A:1014031004832
Google Scholar CrossrefLerman, S. (2006). Socio-cultural research in PME. In A. Gutiérrez & P. Boero (Eds.), Handbook of research on the psychology of mathematics education (pp. 347–366). Rotterdam - Taipei: Brill Sense.
Google Scholar CrossrefLiljedahl, P., Santos-Triguero, M., Malaspina, U., & Bruder, R. (2016). Problem solving in mathematics education. In Problem Solving in Mathematics Education (pp. 1–39). Cham: Springer.
Google Scholar CrossrefLingard, B., & Douglas, P. (1999). Men engaging feminisms pro-feminism, backlashes and schooling. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Google Scholar CrossrefMalecki, C. K., & Elliot, S. N. (2002). Children’s social behaviors as predictors of academic achievement: A longitudinal analysis. School Psychology Quarterly, 17(1), 1. doi: 10.1521/scpq.17.1.1.19902
Google Scholar CrossrefMartino, Wayne, & Meyenn, B. (2001). What about the boys?: Issues of masculinity in schools. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Google Scholar CrossrefMcGrath, H., & Noble, T. (2010). Supporting positive pupil relationships: Research to practice. Educational and Child Psychology, 27(1), 79.
Google Scholar CrossrefMcIntosh, K., Bennett, J. L., & Price, K. (2011). Evaluation of social and academic effects of school-wide positive behaviour support in a Canadian school district. Exceptionality Education International, 21(1), 46–60.
Google Scholar CrossrefMead, G. H. (1934). Mind, self and society. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Google Scholar CrossrefMercer, N., & Howe, C. (2012). Explaining the dialogic processes of teaching and learning: The value and potential of sociocultural theory. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 1(1), 12–21. doi: 10.1016/j.lcsi.2012.03.001
Google Scholar CrossrefMiedzian, M. (2002). Boys will be boys: Breaking the link between masculinity and violence. New York: Lantern Books.
Google Scholar CrossrefMorales, H., & DiNapoli, J. (2018). Latinx Bilingual Students’ Perseverance on a Mathematical Task: A Rehumanizing Perspective. Journal of Research in Mathematics Education, 7(3), 226–250. doi: 10.17583/redimat.2018.3274
Google Scholar CrossrefMoreau, M.-P., Mendick, H., & Epstein, D. (2009). Constructions of mathematical masculinities in popular culture. In E. Watson (Ed.), Pimps, wimps, studs, thugs and gentlemen: Essays on media images of masculinity (pp. 141–156). Jefferson, NC: McFarland Publishers Jefferson, NC.
Google Scholar CrossrefMoscovici, S. (1976). Social influence and social change. New York: Academic Press.
Google Scholar CrossrefMoscovici, S. (1980). Toward a theory of conversion behavior. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 209–239). New York: Academic Press.
Google Scholar CrossrefMoscovici, S. (1984). The phenomenon of social representations. In R. M. Farr & S. Moscovici (Eds.), Social representations (pp. 3–69). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar CrossrefNordin, A. K., & Björklund Boistrup, L. (2018). A framework for identifying mathematical arguments as supported claims created in day-to-day classroom interactions. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 51, 15–27. doi: 10.1016/j.jmathb.2018.06.005
Google Scholar CrossrefNunes, T. (1999). Mathematics learning as the socialization of the mind. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 6(1), 33–52. doi: 10.1080/10749039909524712
Google Scholar CrossrefPenner, A. M., & Paret, M. (2008). Gender differences in mathematics achievement: Exploring the early grades and the extremes. Social Science Research, 37(1), 239–253. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2007.06.012
Google Scholar CrossrefPiñeiro, J. L., Castro, E., & Castro-Rodríguez, E. (2016). Conocimiento profesional para la enseñanza de la resolución de problemas en primaria: una perspectiva curricular. In A. Berciano, C. Fernandez, T. Fernandez, J. Gonzalez, P. Hernandez, A. Jimenez, … M. Sanchez (Eds.), Investigación en Educación Matemática XX (pp. 427–436). Malaga: Universidad de Málaga.
Google Scholar CrossrefPuigvert, L. (2014). Preventive socialization of gender violence: Moving forward using the communicative methodology of research. Qualitative Inquiry, 20(7), 839–843. doi: 10.1177/1077800414537221
Google Scholar CrossrefPuigvert, L., Gelsthorpe, L., Soler-Gallart, M., & Flecha, R. (2019). Girls’ perceptions of boys with violent attitudes and behaviours, and of sexual attraction. Palgrave Communications, 5(1), 56. doi: 10.1057/s41599-019-0262-5
Google Scholar CrossrefRacionero, S., & Padrós, M. (2010). The dialogic turn in educational psychology. Revista de Psicodidáctica/Journal of Psychodidactics, 15(2), 143–163.
Google Scholar CrossrefRadford, L. (1997). On psychology, historical epistemology and the teaching of mathematics: Towards a socio-cultural history of mathematics. For the Learning of Mathematics, 17, 26–33.
Google Scholar CrossrefRedondo, G. (2016). Dialogic leadership and new alternative masculinities: Emerging synergies for social transformation. Masculinities & Social Change, 5(1), 70–91. doi: 10.17583/mcs.2016.1929
Google Scholar CrossrefReilly, D., Neumann, D. L., & Andrews, G. (2019). Investigating gender differences in mathematics and science: Results from the 2011 Trends in Mathematics and Science Survey. Research in Science Education, 49(1), 25–50. doi: 10.1007/s11165-017-9630-6
Google Scholar CrossrefRodríguez-Navarro, H., Ríos-González, O., Racionero, S., & Macías, F. (2014). New methodological insights into communicative acts that promote new alternative masculinities. Qualitative Inquiry, 20(7), 870–875. doi: 10.1177/1077800414537209
Google Scholar CrossrefSaxe, G. B., & Guberman, S. R. (1998). Studying mathematics learning in collective activity. Learning and Instruction, 8(6), 489–501. doi: 10.1016/S0959-4752(98)00037-1
Google Scholar CrossrefSchoenfeld, A. H. (2016). Learning to think mathematically: Problem solving, metacognition, and sense making in mathematics (Reprint). Journal of Education, 196(2), 1–38. doi: 10.1177/002205741619600202
Google Scholar CrossrefSchwartz, D., & Gorman, A. H. (2003). Community violence exposure and children’s academic functioning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(1), 163. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.95.1.163
Google Scholar CrossrefSeckel, M. J., & Font, V. (2020). Competencia reflexiva en formadores del profesorado de matemática. Magis, Revista Internacional de Investigación en Educación, 12(25), 127–144. doi: 10.11144/Javeriana.m12-25.crfp
Google Scholar CrossrefShulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14. doi: 10.3102/0013189X015002004
Google Scholar CrossrefSierksma, J., Spaltman, M., & Lansu, T. A. M. (2019). Children tell more prosocial lies in favor of in-group than out-group peers. Developmental Psychology, 55(7), 1428–1439. doi: 10.1037/dev0000721
Google Scholar CrossrefSierra, J. E., & Martín-Alonso, D. (2019). Relaciones intergeneracionales y construcción de las masculinidades. Pensando con “Gran Torino” y “Million Dollar Baby.” Multidisciplinary Journal of Gender Studies, 8(2), 160–179. doi: 10.17583/generos.2019.4313
Google Scholar CrossrefSoler, M. (2008). Impacto de los actos comunicativos y nuevas masculinidades [Impact of communicative acts and new masculinities](RTD Project). Madrid.
Google Scholar CrossrefStylianides, A. J., & Stylianides, G. J. (2007). Learning mathematics with understanding: A critical consideration of the learning principle in the principles and standards for school mathematics. The Mathematics Enthusiast, 4(1), 103–114.
Google Scholar CrossrefSutton, J., & Keogh, E. (2000). Social competition in school: Relationships with bullying, Machiavellianism and personality. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 70(3), 443–456. doi: 10.1348/000709900158227
Google Scholar CrossrefSwain, J. (2004). The resources and strategies that 10–11‐year‐old boys use to construct masculinities in the school setting. British Educational Research Journal, 30(1), 167–185. doi: 10.1080/01411920310001630017
Google Scholar CrossrefValero, P. (2004). Socio-political perspectives on mathematics education. In B. Atweh (Ed.), Researching the socio-political dimensions of mathematics education (pp. 5–23). Cham: Springer.
Google Scholar CrossrefValls, R., Puigvert, L., & Duque, E. (2008). Gender violence among teenagers: Socialization and prevention. Violence against Women, 14(7), 759–785. doi: 10.1177/1077801208320365
Google Scholar CrossrefVillardón-Gallego, L., García-Carrión, R., Yáñez-Marquina, L., & Estévez, A. (2018). Impact of the interactive learning environments in children’s prosocial behavior. Sustainability (Switzerland), 10(2138), 1–12. doi: 10.3390/su10072138
Google Scholar CrossrefVillarejo-Carballido, B., Pulido, C. M., de Botton, L., & Serradell, O. (2019). Dialogic model of prevention and resolution of conflicts: Evidence of the success of cyberbullying prevention in a primary school in Catalonia. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(6), 918. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16060918
Google Scholar CrossrefVithal, R. (2003). Teachers andstreet children’: On becoming a teacher of mathematics. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 6(2), 165–183. doi: 10.1023/A:1023960111901
Google Scholar CrossrefVithal, R., & Valero, P. (2003). Researching mathematics education in situations of social and political conflict. In A. Bishop, M. Clements, C. Keitel, J. Kilpatrick, & K.-S. Leung (Eds.), Second international handbook of mathematics education (pp. 545–591). New York: Springer.
Google Scholar CrossrefVoigt, J. (2013). Negotiation of mathematical meaning in classroom processes: Social interaction and learning mathematics. In L. P. Steffe, P. Nesher, P. Cobb, B. Sriraman, & B. Greer (Eds.), Theories of mathematical learning (pp. 33–62). New York: Routledge.
Google Scholar CrossrefWas, C. A., Al-Harthy, I., Stack-Oden, M., & Isaacson, R. M. (2009). Academic identity status and the relationship to achievement goal orientation. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 7(2), 627–652.
Google Scholar CrossrefWatson, E. (2010). Pimps, wimps, studs, thugs and gentlemen: Essays on media images of masculinity. Jefferson, NC: McFarland & Company, Inc., Publishers.
Google Scholar CrossrefWegerif, R. (2011). Towards a dialogic theory of how children learn to think. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 6(3), 179–190. doi: 10.1016/j.tsc.2011.08.002
Google Scholar CrossrefWillis, P. (1977). Learning to labour: How working class kids get working class jobs. New York: Routledge.
Google Scholar CrossrefYoungblade, L. M., Theokas, C., Schulenberg, J., Curry, L., Huang, I.-C., & Novak, M. (2007). Risk and promotive factors in families, schools, and communities: A contextual model of positive youth development in adolescence. Pediatrics, 119(Supplement 1), S47–S53.
Google Scholar CrossrefDownloads
Published
Almetric
Dimensions
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
All articles are published under Creative Commons copyright (CC BY). Authors hold the copyright and retain publishing rights without restrictions, but authors allow anyone to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute, and/or copy articles as the original source is cited.
Most read articles by the same author(s)
- Liviu Catalin Mara, Alternative Masculinities for a Changing World , Masculinities & Social Change: Vol. 4 No. 2 (2015): June
- Liviu Catalin Mara, Los Españoles y la Sexualidad en el Siglo XXI , Masculinities & Social Change: Vol. 3 No. 3 (2014): October