Quantum Masculinities: Doing Gender with Max Tegmark’s Mathematical Universe Hypothesis
Keywords:
Downloads
Abstract
In his book Our Mathematical Universe, Max Tegmark proposes a way of viewing “reality” as a multiverse of parallel universes governed by mathematics. In this article we take a few of Tegmark’s more accessible ideas and combine them with the study of masculinities to form “quantum masculinities.” Specifically, we use Tegmark’s presentation of the multiverse and the quantum state of superposition as a thinking tool for imagining not just multiple masculinities but infinite and contradictory masculinities. We then mobilize this newly proposed concept of quantum masculinities in two contexts. First, we put quantum masculinities in dialogue with Judith Butler’s theory of gender performativity to question to what degree gender performance requires an observer. Second, we explore how far quantum masculinities are reconcilable with The Five Stages of Masculinity. We conclude with some discussion about the categories of “I” and “we” in imagining the self, as well as how the study of masculinities might evolve.
Downloads
References
Boghossian, Peter, and James Lindsay. “The Conceptual Penis as a Social Construct: A Sokal-Style Hoax on Gender Studies.” Skeptic, 2017. https://www.skeptic.com/reading_room/conceptual-penis-social-contruct-sokal-style-hoax-on-gender-studies. Accessed 15 April 2018.
Google Scholar CrossrefBarad, Karen. “A Feminist Approach to Teaching Quantum Physics.” Teaching the Majority: Breaking the Gender Barrier in Science, Mathematics, and Engineering, edited by S. V. Rosser, Teachers College Press, 1995, pp. 43–75.
Google Scholar CrossrefBeasley, Chris. “Mind the gap? Masculinity Studies and Contemporary Gender/Sexuality Thinking.” Australian Feminist Studies, vol. 28, no. 75, pp. 108–124.
Google Scholar Crossref——. “Caution! Hazards Ahead: Considering the Potential Gap Between Feminist Thinking and Men/Masculinities Theory and Practice.” Journal of Sociology, vol. 51, no. 3, pp. 566–581.
Google Scholar CrossrefBridges, Tristan, and C. J Pascoe. “Hybrid Masculinities: New Directions in the Sociology of Men and Masculinities.” Sociology Compass, vol.8, no. 3, pp. 246–258.
Google Scholar CrossrefBrod, Harry. “Introduction: Themes and Theses of Men’s Studies.” The Making of Masculinities: The New Men’s Studies, edited by Harry Brod, Allen & Unwin, 1987, pp. 1–20.
Google Scholar CrossrefButler, Judith. Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity (2nd ed.), Routledge, 1999.
Google Scholar CrossrefChristiaens, Wim Alex. “The Deleuzian Concept of Structure and Quantum Mechanics.” Probing the Meaning of Quantum Mechanics: Physical, Philosophical, and Logical Perspectives, edited by Diederik Aerts, World Scientific Publishing, 2014, pp. 189–208.
Google Scholar CrossrefCrockett, Clayton. Deleuze Beyond Badiou: Ontology, Multiplicity, and Event. Columbia University Press, 2013.
Google Scholar CrossrefDeleuze, Gilles, and Félix Guattari. A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia (B. Massumi, Trans.). University of Minnesota Press, 1987.
Google Scholar CrossrefFrenkel, Edward. “Ad Infinitum: ‘Our Mathematical Universe,’ by Max Tegmark.” The New York Times, 2014. https://www.nytimes.com/2014/02/16/books/review/our-mathematical-universe-by-max-tegmark.html. Accessed 15 April 2018.
Google Scholar CrossrefGelfer, Joseph. “Will the Real Joseph Gelfer Please Stand Up: Multiple Masculinities and the Self.” NORMA: Nordic Journal for Masculinity Studies, vol. 7, no. 2, 2012, pp. 125–138.
Google Scholar Crossref——. “The Five Stages of Masculinity: A New Model for Understanding Masculinities.” Masculinities and Social Change, vol. 5, no. 3, 2016, pp 268–294.
Google Scholar Crossref——. Numen, Old Men: Contemporary Masculine Spiritualities and the Problem of Patriarchy. Routledge, 2009.
Google Scholar Crossref——. Joseph Gelfer (drjosephgelfer). “Masculinity in 2016 appears to be in simultaneous states of extremity: increased normativity, increased queerness.” 7 Mar 2016, 09:41 UTC. Tweet.
Google Scholar CrossrefGonsalves, Allison, Anna Danielsson, and Helena Pettersson. “Masculinities and Experimental Practices in Physics: The View from Three Case Studies.’ Physical Review Physics Education Research 12: 020120, 2016.
Google Scholar CrossrefGottzén, Lucas. “Is Masculinity Studies Really the ‘Odd Man Out’?” NORMA: Nordic Journal for Masculinity Studies, in press, 2018.
Google Scholar CrossrefHalberstam, Judith. Female Masculinity. Duke University Press, 1998.
Google Scholar CrossrefHarding, Sandra. The Science Question in Feminism. Open University Press, 1986.
Google Scholar CrossrefHermans, Hubert, and Harry Kempen. The Dialogical Self: Meaning as Movement. Academic Press, 1993.
Google Scholar CrossrefKeller, Evelyn Fox. Reflections on Gender and Science. Yale University Press, 1985.
Google Scholar CrossrefKrondorfer, Björn. “God’s Hinder Parts and Masculinity’s Troubled Fragmentations: Trajectories of Critical Men’s Studies in Religion.” Preprints and Working Papers of the Center for Religion and Modernity, WWU Münster, 2017, 14.
Google Scholar CrossrefMcConnell, Allen R. “The Multiple Self-Aspects Framework: Self-Concept Representation and its Implications.” Personality and Social Psychology Review, vol. 15, no. 1, 2011, pp. 3–27.
Google Scholar CrossrefP-Orridge, Genesis. Thee Psychick Bible: Thee Apocryphal Scriptures ov Genesis Breyer P-Orridge and Thee Third Mind ov Thee Temple ov Psychick Youth. Feral House, 2010.
Google Scholar CrossrefPettersson, Helena. “Making Masculinity in Plasma Physics: Machines, Labour and Experiments.” Science Studies, vol. 24, no. 1, 2011, pp. 47–65.
Google Scholar CrossrefPowis, Dick (dtpowis). “Dibs on ‘quantum masculinities.’ #buzzwords #jobmarket https://t.co/fSUuj7nQ8s”. 7 Mar 2016, 13:58 UTC. Tweet.
Google Scholar CrossrefSchiebinger, Londa. Has Feminism Changed Science? Harvard University Press, 1999.
Google Scholar CrossrefSokal, Allan. “Transgressing the Boundaries: Towards a Transformative Hermeneutics of Quantum Gravity.” Social Text, vol. 46/47, 1996, pp. 217–252.
Google Scholar CrossrefTaylor, Charles. The Ethics of Authenticity. Harvard University Press, 1991.
Google Scholar CrossrefTegmark, Max. Our Mathematical Universe: My Quest for the Ultimate Nature of Reality. Alfred A. Knopf, 2014.
Google Scholar CrossrefWoit, Peter. “Book Review: ‘Our Mathematical Universe’ by Max Tegmark.” The Wall Street Journal, 2017. https://www.wsj.com/articles/book-review-8216our-mathematical-universe8217-by-max-tegmark-1389992755. Accessed 15 April 2018.
Google Scholar CrossrefDownloads
Published
Metrics
Almetric
Dimensions
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
All articles are published under Creative Commons copyright (CC BY). Authors hold the copyright and retain publishing rights without restrictions, but authors allow anyone to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute, and/or copy articles as the original source is cited.
