Portrayals of Caring Masculinities in Fiction Film: The Male Caregiver in Still Mine, Intouchables and Nebraska.
Keywords:
Downloads
Abstract
This article analyzes the male caregiving characters Driss in Intouchables (2011), Craig in Still Mine (2012) and David in Nebraska (2013) in terms of hegemonic masculinity and its variations (Connell 1990; Connell and Messerschmidt 2005). Caregiving is a complex social situation normally assumed within kinship relationships, and traditionally attributed to women. We briefly review feminist analysis of caregiving since the 1970s (Fine and Glendinning 2005), and use critical studies on men and masculinities to show that the uptaking of caring tasks by men would and is contributing to equality between women and men (Elliott 2015).
We have looked at the portrayal of the male caregivers in these films, and if and how they challenge hegemonic masculinity in terms of positive experiences. Our findings show that despite the tension men experience between giving in to and challenging patriarchal privilege of a care-free life, strategies such as humour, complicity, outdoor action and a general concern for the dignity of the care-receiver can be identified as some of these features of (imagined) caring masculinities and open new spaces for defining care as a gender neutral activity.
Downloads
References
Agirre, K. (2012). ‘Whenever a man takes you to lunch around here’: Tracing post-feminist sensibility in Mad Men. Catalan Journal of Communication and Cultural Studies, 4,155-70.
Google Scholar CrossrefBerger, A. & Yerxa, R. (Producers), & Payne, A. (Director). (2013). Nebraska [Motion Picture]. Madrid: Vértigo.
Google Scholar CrossrefBeynon, J. (2002). Masculinities and Culture. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Google Scholar CrossrefCarrigan, T. R., Connell, R. W. & Lee J. (1985). Toward a new sociology of masculinity. Theory and Society, 14, 551-604.
Google Scholar CrossrefConnell, R. W. (1987). Gender and Power: Society, the Person and Sexual Politics. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Google Scholar CrossrefConnell, R. W. (1990). An Iron Man: The Body and some contradictions of Hegemonic Masculinity. In M. A. Messner & D. F. Sabo (Eds.), Sport, Men and the Gender Order (pp. 83-95). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
Google Scholar CrossrefConnell, R. W. (1996). Teaching the Boys: New Research on Masculinity, and Gender Strategies for Schools. Teachers College Record, 98, 206-35.
Google Scholar CrossrefConnell, R. W. & Messerschmidt J. W. (2005). Hegemonic Masculinity: Rethinking the Concept. Gender & Society, 19, 829-59.
Google Scholar CrossrefComas d’Argemir, D. (2016). Hombres cuidadores: Barreras de género y modelos emergentes. Psicoperspectivas, 15,10-22.
Google Scholar CrossrefCoston, B. M. & Kimmel, M. (2012). Seeing Privilege Where It Isn’t. Marginalized Masculinities and the Intersectionality of Privilege. Journal of Social Issues, 68, 97-111.
Google Scholar CrossrefDonaldson, M. (1993). What Is Hegemonic Masculinity?. Theory and Society, 22, 643-57.
Google Scholar CrossrefDuval N., Zeitoun L. & Zenou, Y. (Producers), & Nakache, O. & Toledano, E. (Directors). (2011). Intouchables [Motion Picture]. France: Gaumont/TF1 Video.
Google Scholar CrossrefEdwards, T. (2003). Sex, booze and fags: masculinity, style and men’s magazines. The Sociological Review, 51,132-46.
Google Scholar CrossrefElliott, K. (2015). Caring Masculinities: Theorizing an Emerging Concept. Men and Masculinities, 19, 1-20.
Google Scholar CrossrefFine, M. & Glendinning, C. (2005). Dependence, Independence or Inter-dependence?? Revisiting the concepts of ‘Care’ and ‘Dependency’. Ageing & Society, 25, 601-22.
Google Scholar CrossrefGill, R. (2003). Power and the production of subjects: a genealogy of the New Man and the New Lad. The Sociological Review, 51, 34-56.
Google Scholar CrossrefGill, R. (2008). Empowerment/Sexism: Figuring Female sexual Agency in Contemporary Advertising. Feminism and Psychology, 18, 35-60.
Google Scholar CrossrefHanke, R. (1998). Theorizing Masculinity With/In the Media. Communication Theory, 8, 183-201.
Google Scholar CrossrefHanlon, N. (2012). Masculinities, care and equality: identity and nurture in men’s lives. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Google Scholar CrossrefHealey, M. (1994). The mark of a man. Critical Quarterly, 36,86-93. Held, V. (2006). The Ethics of Care. Personal, Political and Global. New York: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar Crossrefhooks, b. (2004a). The Will to Change: Men, Masculinity and Love. New York: Atria Books.
Google Scholar Crossrefhooks, b. (2004b). We real cool. Black men and masculinity. New York: Routledge.
Google Scholar CrossrefKimmel, M. S. (1993). Invisible Masculinity. Society, 30, 28-35.
Google Scholar CrossrefKittay, E. F. (1999). Love’s Labor: Essays on Women, Equality, and Dependency. New York: Routledge.
Google Scholar CrossrefKittay, E. F. (2011). The Ethics of Care, Dependence and Disability. Ratio Juris , 24, 49-58.
Google Scholar CrossrefMaher, J., Wright, J., & Tanner, C. (2013). Responsibility and Resistance. Women Negotiating the Nourishment of Children. Families, Relationships and Societies, 2, 193-209.
Google Scholar CrossrefColero, J., Federgreen, A., Deverell, T. & McGowan, M. & McGowan, M. (Director). Still Mine [Motion Picture]. (2012). Los Angeles: 20th. Century Fox Home Entertainment.
Google Scholar CrossrefGoogle Scholar Crossref
Seidler, V. (2006). Young Men and Masculinities: Global Cultures and Intimate Lives. London: Zed Books.
Google Scholar CrossrefTronto, J. C. (1993). Moral Boundaries. A Political Argument for an Ethic of Care. New York: Routledge.
Google Scholar CrossrefDownloads
Published
Metrics
Almetric
Dimensions
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
All articles are published under Creative Commons copyright (CC BY). Authors hold the copyright and retain publishing rights without restrictions, but authors allow anyone to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute, and/or copy articles as the original source is cited.
