Mpox 1b: Upstanders for Science in Western and Chinese Social Media
Keywords:
Type:
TextAbstract
At the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, scientific literature published research about the presence of hoaxes and evidence in diverse social media, with a huge scientific and social impact. The main results showed that while in Western social media like X there was more false information and less scientific evidence than in the Chinese platform Weibo, but scientific evidence was more retweeted than hoaxes. This research allowed the identification of social activists for science in the social media, who multiplied their impact when scientists provided them with evidence. Mpox clade 1b outbreak, which has now been declared a global public health emergency by WHO, requires a fast reaction from science, already taking place. This article analyzes information disseminated in X and Weibo about mpox. 3089 messages published between 12 and 16 of August 2024 have been analyzed. The results show that while hoaxes around mpox are prevalent in social media, posts containing scientific evidence do receive more interaction. Such findings contribute to the understanding of the health crisis and underscore the need for health authorities to join efforts with citizens to co-create evidence-based communication strategies.
Downloads
References
Baumel, K., Hamlett, M., Wheeler, B., Hall, D., Randall, A. K., & Mickelson, K. (2021). Living through COVID-19: Social distancing, computer-mediated communication, and well-being in sexual minority and heterosexual adults. Journal of Homosexuality, 68(4), 673–691. https://doi.org/10.1080/00918369.2020.1868190
Google Scholar CrossrefBeck-Gernsheim, E., Butler, J., & Puigvert, L. (2003). Women & Social Transformation. P. Lang. https://philpapers.org/rec/BECWS
Google Scholar CrossrefComeau, N., Abdelnour, A., & Ashack, K. (2023). 42223 Assessing public interest in monkeypox via social media platforms: Google Trends, YouTube, and TikTok. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, 89(3), AB123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2023.07.494
Google Scholar CrossrefConnell, R. (2012). Masculinity research and global change. Masculinities & Social Change, 1(1), 4–18. https://doi.org/10.4471/mcs.2012.01
Google Scholar CrossrefCooper, L. N., Radunsky, A. P., Hanna, J. J., Most, Z. M., Perl, T. M., Lehmann, C. U., & Medford, R. J. (2023). Analyzing an emerging pandemic on Twitter: Monkeypox. Open Forum Infectious Diseases, 10(4), ofad142. https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofad142
Google Scholar CrossrefDirectorate-General for Justice and Consumers. (2023). Progress Report of the LGBTIQ Equality Strategy 2020 2025. European Commission. https://commission.europa.eu/system/files/2023-04/JUST_LGBTIQ%20Strategy_Progress%20Report_FINAL_WEB.pdf
Google Scholar CrossrefEngebretsen, M. (2023). Communicating health advice on social media: A multimodal case study. MedieKultur Journal of Media and Communication Research, 39(74), 164–184. https://doi.org/10.7146/mk.v39i74.134085
Google Scholar CrossrefEuropean Commission, Directorate-General for Research and Innovation, Flecha, R., Radauer, A., & Besselaar, P. (2018). Monitoring the impact of EU Framework Programmes – Expert report. European Commission. Directorate-General for Research and Innovation. https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2777/518781
Google Scholar CrossrefEuropean Commission, Directorate-General for Research and Innovation, Horizon Europe guidance on gender equality plans, Publications Office of the European Union, 2021, https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2777/876509
Google Scholar CrossrefFECYT. (2022). Hacia una comunicación inclusiva de la ciencia: Reflexiones y acciones de éxito. FECYT. https://www.fecyt.es/es/publicacion/hacia-una-comunicacion-inclusiva-de-la-ciencia-reflexiones-y-acciones-de-exito
Google Scholar CrossrefFlecha, A., García, R., & Rudd, R. (2011). Using health literacy in school to overcome inequalities. European Journal of Education, 46(2), 209–218. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-3435.2011.01476.x
Google Scholar CrossrefFlecha, R. (2022). The dialogic society. Hipatia Press. https://hipatiapress.com/index/en/2022/12/04/the-dialogic-society-2/
Google Scholar CrossrefFreeman, J. (2018). LGBTQ scientists are still left out. Nature, 559, 27–28. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-018-05587-y
Google Scholar CrossrefGim, H. (2023). How do people tweet about gay and bisexual people surrounding the 2022 monkeypox outbreak? An NLP-based text analysis of tweets in the U.S. Communication Research Reports: CRR, 40(5), 238–249. https://doi.org/10.1080/08824096.2023.2263351
Google Scholar CrossrefLeón, B., Martínez-Costa, M.-P., Salaverría, R., & López-Goñi, I. (2022). Health and science-related disinformation on COVID-19: A content analysis of hoaxes identified by fact-checkers in Spain. PloS One, 17(4), e0265995. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0265995
Google Scholar CrossrefOla, O., & Sedig, K. (2020). Understanding discussions of health issues on Twitter: A visual analytic study. Online Journal of Public Health Informatics, 12(1), e2. https://doi.org/10.5210/ojphi.v12i1.10321
Google Scholar CrossrefPulido Rodriguez, C. M., Ovseiko, P., Font Palomar, M., Kumpulainen, K., & Ramis, M. (2021). Capturing emerging realities in citizen engagement in science in social media: A Social Media Analytics protocol for the Allinteract study. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 20, 16094069211050163. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069211050163
Google Scholar CrossrefPulido Rodríguez, C., Villarejo Carballido, B., Redondo-Sama, G., Guo, M., Ramis, M., & Flecha, R. (2020). False news around COVID-19 circulated less on Sina Weibo than on Twitter. How to overcome false information? International and Multidisciplinary Journal of Social Sciences, 9(2), 107–128. https://hipatiapress.com/hpjournals/index.php/rimcis/article/view/5386/3070
Google Scholar CrossrefPulido, C. M., & Flecha, R. (2017, January 1). Social Media Analytics. Internet Archive. https://archive.org/details/socialmedianalytics
Google Scholar CrossrefPulido, C. M., Redondo-Sama, G., Sordé-Martí, T., & Flecha, R. (2018). Social impact in social media: A new method to evaluate the social impact of research. PloS One, 13(8), e0203117. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0203117
Google Scholar CrossrefPulido, C. M., Ruiz-Eugenio, L., Redondo-Sama, G., & Villarejo-Carballido, B. (2020a). A new application of Social Impact in Social Media for overcoming fake news in health. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(7). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17072430
Google Scholar CrossrefPulido, C. M., Villarejo-Carballido, B., Redondo-Sama, G., & Gómez, A. (2020b). COVID-19 infodemic: More retweets for science-based information on coronavirus than for false information. International Sociology: Journal of the International Sociological Association, 35(4), 377–392. https://doi.org/10.1177/0268580920914755
Google Scholar CrossrefQuan, M., & Zhang, C. (2024). Does disseminating scientific information on social media promote public health during the COVID‐19 pandemic? Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24893
Google Scholar CrossrefRios, O., Gairal-Casado, R., Villarejo-Carballido, B., & Burgues-Freitas, A. (2023). The role of social networks to counteract stigmatization toward gay and bisexual men regarding monkeypox. Qualitative Research in Education, 12(3), 225–235. https://doi.org/10.17583/qre.13379
Google Scholar CrossrefSachs, J. D., Karim, S. S. A., Aknin, L., Allen, J., Brosbøl, K., Colombo, F., Barron, G. C., Espinosa, M. F., Gaspar, V., Gaviria, A., Haines, A., Hotez, P. J., Koundouri, P., Bascuñán, F. L., Lee, J.-K., Pate, M. A., Ramos, G., Reddy, K. S., Serageldin, I., … Michie, S. (2022). The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic. The Lancet, 400(10359), 1224–1280. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(22)01585-9
Google Scholar CrossrefStatista Research Department. (2024). Biggest social media platforms by users 2024. Statista. https://www.statista.com/statistics/272014/global-social-networks-ranked-by-number-of-users/
Google Scholar CrossrefTasnim, S., Hossain, M. M., & Mazumder, H. (2020). Impact of rumors and misinformation on COVID-19 in social media. Journal of Preventive Medicine and Public Health = Yebang Uihakhoe Chi, 53(3), 171–174. https://doi.org/10.3961/jpmph.20.094
Google Scholar CrossrefThe Lancet (editorial). (2024). Mpox: the need for a coordinated international response. The Lancet. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(24)01708-2
Google Scholar CrossrefWHO. (2024, August 14). WHO Director-General declares mpox outbreak a public health emergency of international concern. World Health Organization (WHO). https://www.who.int/news/item/14-08-2024-who-director-general-declares-mpox-outbreak-a-public-health-emergency-of-international-concern
Google Scholar CrossrefZeeman, L., Sherriff, N., Browne, K., McGlynn, N., Mirandola, M., Gios, L., Davis, R., Sanchez-Lambert, J., Aujean, S., Pinto, N., Farinella, F., Donisi, V., Niedźwiedzka-Stadnik, M., Rosińska, M., Pierson, A., Amaddeo, F., & Health4LGBTI Network. (2019). A review of lesbian, gay, bisexual, trans and intersex (LGBTI) health and healthcare inequalities. European Journal of Public Health, 29(5), 974–980. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/cky226
Google Scholar CrossrefPublished
Metrics
Almetric
Dimensions
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Garazi Álvarez-Guerrero, Mengna Guo, Lidia Bordanoba-Gallego; Elisabeth Torras-Gómez; Garazi Lopez de Aguileta, Mar Joanpere, Cristina Pulido, Ane López de Aguileta; Sandra Racionero-Plaza, Lidia Puigvert, Marta Soler-Gallart, Ramon Flecha

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All articles are published under Creative Commons copyright (CC BY). Authors hold the copyright and retain publishing rights without restrictions, but authors allow anyone to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute, and/or copy articles as the original source is cited.