Gender Equality in Vietnam Labour Law: A Critique Toward Sustainable Development
https://doi.org/10.17583/mcs.14102
Keywords:
Type:
TextAbstract
Labor law is traditionally viewed as a crucial mechanism for advancing gender equality in the workplace by providing a framework to eliminate sex-based discrimination and enhance women’s participation in the workforce. As nations strive to achieve the UN’s Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), the significance of such laws is amplified, with gender equality not only a key indicator but also an enabler for other SDGs. This study demonstrates that, despite recent reforms in Vietnam's labour law reducing barriers to female employment, pervasive gender inequality persists, fuelled by enduring employment stereotypes that often depict women as victims. To develop a sustainable workforce, Vietnam's labor laws and policies should implement strategies to dismantle these stereotypes. This research suggests transitioning from the traditional approach of female protection to involving men in domestic roles. A strategy targeting men is expected to promote gender equality in the Vietnamese workforce by altering employer perceptions of female employees' maternal roles. From the perspective of masculinity theory, the potential of paternity bonuses is significant; they can enhance women’s career opportunities by alleviating domestic burdens and broadening acceptable roles for men.
Downloads
References
Arat, Z. F. K. (2015). Feminisms, Women's Rights, and the UN: Would Achieving Gender Equality Empower Women? American Political Science Review, 109(4), 674-689. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055415000386
Google Scholar CrossrefBailey, J. (2015). Understanding contemporary fatherhood: masculine care and the patriarchal deficit. Families, Relationships and Societies, 4(1), 3-17. https://doi.org/10.1332/204674314X14036152282447
Google Scholar CrossrefBakan, D. (1966). The duality of human existence: An essay on psychology and religion. Rand McNally.
Google Scholar CrossrefBarcucci, V., Cole, W., & Gammarano, R. (2021). Gender and the labour market in Viet Nam - An analysis based on the labour force survey (ILO Brief, Issue. ILO. https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---asia/---ro-bangkok/---ilo-hanoi/documents/publication/wcms_774434.pdf
Google Scholar CrossrefBecker, A. (2023). Why would we take men? This is an OB/GYN”: Gender, hysterectomy, and the patriarchal dividend. Sociology Compass, 17(11 - Special Issue:Practicing Privilege, Subverting Stigma: Men in Women‐Dominated Spaces), e13158. https://doi.org/10.1111/soc4.13158
Google Scholar CrossrefBennhold, K. (2010). In Sweden, men can have it all. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2010/06/10/world/europe/10iht-sweden.html
Google Scholar CrossrefBertay, A. C., Dordevic, L., & Sever, C. (2020). Gender inequality and economic growth: Evidence from industry-level data (IMF Working paper, Issue. IMF. https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/WP/Issues/2020/07/03/Gender-Inequality-and-Economic-Growth-Evidence-from-Industry-Level-Data-49478
Google Scholar CrossrefBrighouse, H., & Wright, E. O. (2008). Strong gender egalitarianism. Politics & Society, 36(3), 360-372. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0032329208320566
Google Scholar CrossrefBrodin, M. S. (1987). Costs, profits, and equal employment opportunity. Notre Dame Law Review, 62(3), 318-365.
Google Scholar CrossrefBumiller, K. (2007). Victims in the shadow of the law: A critique of the model of legal protection. In I. H. López (Ed.), Race, Law and Society (1st Edition ed., pp. 105-123). Routledge. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315245423
Google Scholar CrossrefBurgess, D. J., & Borgida, E. (1999). Who women are, who women should be: Descriptive and prescriptive gender stereotyping in sex discrimination. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 5(3), 665-692.
Google Scholar CrossrefChorny, N. d. G., Raub, A., & EarleO, A. (2021). Differential eligibility for paid leave benefits in OECD countries: the impact of tenure requirements for young workers. Community, Work & Family, 24(2: The Multiple Contexts of Workers’ Wellbeing), 193-207. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13668803.2019.1688255
Google Scholar CrossrefCollier, R. (1995). Masculinity, law and the family. Routledge.
Google Scholar CrossrefCooksey, F. C. (1966). The role of law in equal employment opportunity. Boston College Law Review, 7(3), 417-430.
Google Scholar CrossrefCunningham-Parmeter, K. (2013). Men at work, fathers at home: Uncovering the masculine face of caregiver discrimination. Columbia Journal of Gender and the Law, 24(3), 253-301.
Google Scholar CrossrefCunningham-Parmeter, K. (2014). (Un)equal protection: Why gender equality depends on discrimination. Northwestern University Law Review, 109(1), 1-56.
Google Scholar CrossrefDang, M. H. (2021). The right of female workers in exercising their motherhood: A critique in Vietnam labor law. Science & Technology Development Journal – Economics - Law and Management, 5(SI2), 1-8.
Google Scholar CrossrefDoan, D. P. T., & Dang, M. H. (2023, 26 April 2023). Internalization Convenvtion 111 (1958) on discrimination on Vietnam labour law - approach in the view of feminist theory. Labor commitment in new-generation free trade agreements and the ILO's international labour standards to Vietnam, Hochiminh city.
Google Scholar CrossrefDodge, K. A., Gilroy, F. D., & Fenzel, L. M. (1995). Requisite management characteristics revisited: Two decades later. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 10(6), 253-264.
Google Scholar CrossrefDoucet, A. (2000). ‘There's a huge gulf between me as a male carer and women': Gender, domestic responsibility, and the community as an institutional arena. Community, Work & Family, 3(2), 163-184. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/713658907
Google Scholar CrossrefDoucet, A. (2012). For equality, take fathers into account. The New York Times. Retrieved 10 December 2023 from https://www.nytimes.com/roomfordebate/2011/07/05/how-can-we-get-men-to-do-more-at-home/for-gender-equality-take-fathers-into-account
Google Scholar CrossrefDuong, W. N. (2001). Gender equality and women's issues in Vietnam: The Vietnamese woman - warrior and poet. Pacific Rim Law & Policy Journal Association, 10(2), 191-326.
Google Scholar CrossrefDuvander, A.-Z., & Johansson, M. (2012). What are the effects of reforms promoting fathers’ parental leave use? Journal of European Social Policy, 22(3), 319-330. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0958928712440201
Google Scholar CrossrefEagly, A. H., Mladinic, A., & Otto, S. (1991). Are women evaluated more favorably than men? Psychology of Women Quarterly, 15(2), 203-216.
Google Scholar CrossrefElborgh-Woytek, K., Newiak, M., Kochhar, K., Fabrizio, S., Kpodar, K., Wingender, P., . . . Schwartz, G. (2013). Women, work, and the economy: Macroeconomic gains from gender equity (IMF Staff Discussion Note, Issue. https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/sdn/2013/sdn1310.pdf
Google Scholar CrossrefFelmlee, D. H. (1982). Women's job mobility processes within and between employers. American Sociological Review, 47(1), 142-151. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/2095048
Google Scholar CrossrefFigueroa, E. B., Dabetić, V., Yuste, R. P., & Saeidzadeh, Z. (2023). Gender and structural inequalities from a socio-legal perspective. In D. Vujadinović, M. Fröhlich, & T. Giegerich (Eds.), Gender-competent legal education (pp. 95-142). Springer. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-14360-1
Google Scholar CrossrefFischel, D. R., & Lazear, E. P. (1986). Comparable worth and discrimination in labor markets. University of Chicago Law Review, 53(3), 891-918. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/1599587
Google Scholar CrossrefFisher, M. J. (1948). Equal pay for equal work legislation. ILR Review, 2(1), 50-57.
Google Scholar CrossrefFiske, S. T., Bersoff, D. N., Borgida, E., Deaux, K., & Heilman, M. E. (1991). Social science research on trial: Use of sex stereotyping research in Price Waterhouse v. Hopkins. American Psychologist, 46(10), 1049-1060.
Google Scholar CrossrefFuller, S., & Cooke, L. P. (2018). Workplace variation in fatherhood wage premiums: Do formalization and performance pay matter? Work, Employment and Society, 32(4), 768-788. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/09500170187645
Google Scholar CrossrefGaines, J. (2017). Women in Male-Dominated Careers. Cornell HR Review. https://hdl.handle.net/1813/73023
Google Scholar CrossrefGoodkind, D. (1995). Rising gender inequality in Vietnam since reunification. Pacific Affairs, 68(3), 342-359. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/2761129
Google Scholar CrossrefGow, L., & Middlemiss, S. (2012). Equal pay legislation and its impact on the gender pay gap. International Journal of Discrimination and the Law, 11(4), 164-186. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1358229112440442
Google Scholar CrossrefGrant, L. (2002). Addressing women’s economic disadvantage in local economies: the limitations and benefits of partnerships. Policy & Politics, 30(1), 97-113. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1332/0305573022501593
Google Scholar CrossrefGregory, A., & Milner, S. (2011). Fathers and work‐life balance in France and the UK: policy and practice. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 31(1/2), 34-52. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/01443331111104797
Google Scholar CrossrefGrown, C., Gupta, G. R., & Kes, A. (2005). Taking action: Achieving gender equality and empowering women (1st edition (September 30, 2020) ed.). Earthscan.
Google Scholar CrossrefHaas, L., & Hwang, C. P. (2008). The impact of taking parental leave on fathers’ participation in childcare and relationships with children: Lessons from Sweden. Community, Work & Family, 11(1), 85-104. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13668800701785346
Google Scholar CrossrefHaas, L., & Hwang, C. P. (2009). Is fatherhood becoming more visible at work? Trends in corporate support for fathers taking parental leave in Sweden. Fathering: A Journal of Theory, Research, and Practice about Men as Fathers, 7(3), 303-321. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.3149/fth.0703.303
Google Scholar CrossrefHakim, C. (1996). The sexual division of labour and women's heterogeneity. The British Journal of Sociology, 47(1), 178-188.
Google Scholar CrossrefHeaton, J. (2005). Striving for substantive gender equality in family law: Selected issues. South African Journal on Human Rights, 24(4). https://hdl.handle.net/10520/EJC53194
Google Scholar CrossrefHeilman, M. E. (2001). Description and prescription: How gender stereotypes prevent women’s ascent up the organizational ladder. Journal of Social Issues, 57(4), 657-674.
Google Scholar CrossrefHeilman, M. E., & Caleo, S. (2018). Gender discrimination in the workplace. In A. J. Colella & E. B. King (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of workplace discrimination. OUP.
Google Scholar CrossrefHeymann, J., Sprague, A. R., Nandi, A., Earle, A., Batra, P., Schickedanz, A., . . . Raub, A. (2017). Paid parental leave and family wellbeing in the sustainable development era. Public Health Reviews, 38(21), 1-16. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1186/s40985-017-0067-2
Google Scholar CrossrefHolland, K. J., Rabelo, V. C., Gustafson, A. M., Seabrook, R. C., & Cortina, L. M. (2016). Sexual harassment against men: Examining the roles of feminist activism, sexuality, and organizational context. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 17(1), 17-29. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/a0039151
Google Scholar CrossrefHoltmaat, R. (2013). The CEDAW: A holistic approach to women’s equality and freedom. In A. Hellum & H. S. Aasen (Eds.), Women's Human Rights: CEDAW in International, Regional and National Law (Vol. 95-123). Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar CrossrefHolzhauer, J. D. (1986). The economic possibilities of comparable worth. The University of Chicago Law Review, 53, 919-933.
Google Scholar CrossrefHudson, H. (2005). Doing security as through humans matter: A feminist perspective on gender and the politics of Human security. Security Dialogue, 36(2), 155-174.
Google Scholar CrossrefILO. (2015). Maternity, paternity at work - Baby steps towards achieving big results. https://www.ilo.org/resource/brief/maternity-paternity-work-baby-steps-towards-achieving-big-results
Google Scholar CrossrefILO. (2016). Women at work trends 2016. ILO. https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---dgreports/---dcomm/---publ/documents/publication/wcms_457317.pdf
Google Scholar CrossrefILO. (2020, 7 March 2020). Viet Nam’s new Labour Code moves from protecting to empowering women. ILO. Retrieved 30 September 2023 from https://www.ilo.org/hanoi/Informationresources/Publicinformation/feature-articles/WCMS_737820/lang--en/index.htm
Google Scholar CrossrefILO. (2021a). Amending labour code enabled Vietnam a closer approach to international labour standards 2019 Retrieved 27/9/2023 from https://www.ilo.org/hanoi/Informationresources/Publicinformation/comments-and-analysis/WCMS_721939/lang--vi/index.htm
Google Scholar CrossrefILO. (2021b). Equality and discrimination in Vietnam. ILO. Retrieved 30/9/2023 from https://www.ilo.org/hanoi/Areasofwork/equality-and-discrimination/lang--en/index.htm#:~:text=In%20Viet%20Nam%2C%20just%20like,precarious%20working%20conditions%20than%20men.
Google Scholar CrossrefILO. (2021c). Gender and the labour market in Viet Nam - An analysis based on the labour force survey. ILO. Retrieved 07/09/2023 from https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---asia/---ro-bangkok/---ilo-hanoi/documents/publication/wcms_774434.pdf
Google Scholar CrossrefIssacharoff, S., & Rosenblum, E. (1994). Women and the workplace: Accommodating the demands of pregnancy. Columbia Law Review, 94(7), 2154-2221. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/1123173
Google Scholar CrossrefJonnergård, K., & Stafsudd, A. (2010). Performance evaluations as gender barriers in professional organizations: A study of auditing firms. Gender, Work & Organization, 17(6), 721-747. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0432.2009.00488.x
Google Scholar CrossrefKabeer, N., & Natali, L. (2013). Gender equality and economic growth: Is there a win-win? (IDS Working Papers, Issue. https://docs.euromedwomen.foundation/files/ermwf-documents/6690_3.43.genderequalityandeconomicgrowth.pdf
Google Scholar CrossrefKnodel, J., Loi, V. M., Jayakody, R., & Huy, V. T. (2005). Gender roles in the family - Change and stability in Vietnam. Asian Population Studies, 1(1), 96-92. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/17441730500125888
Google Scholar CrossrefLagarde, C. (2013). Dare the difference. Finance & Development, 50(2), 22-23.
Google Scholar CrossrefLeach, M., Mehta, L., & Prabhakaran, P. (2016). Gender equality and sustainable development: A pathways approach (For the World Survey on the Role of Women in Development 2014, Issue. U. Women. https://www.unwomen.org/sites/default/files/Headquarters/Attachments/Sections/Library/Publications/2016/DPS-Gender-equality-sustainable-development.pdf
Google Scholar CrossrefLiu, A. Y. C. (2004). Gender wage gap in Vietnam: 1993 to 1998. Journal of Comparative Economics, 32(3), 586-596. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jce.2004.04.004
Google Scholar CrossrefLocke, A. (2016). Masculinity, subjectivities, and caregiving in the British press: The case of the stay-at-home father. In E. Podnieks (Ed.), Pops in pop culture - Fatherhood, masculinity, and the new man (eds ed., pp. 195–212). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-57767-2_11
Google Scholar CrossrefLueptow, L. B., Garovich, L., & Lueptow, M. B. (1995). The persistence of gender stereotypes in the face of changing sex roles: Evidence contrary to the sociocultural model. Ethology and Sociobiology, 16, 509-530.
Google Scholar CrossrefLyonette, C. (2013). The sexual division of labour. In W. C. Evans M (Ed.), Gender: the key concepts (pp. 198–203). Routledge.
Google Scholar CrossrefMacKinnon, C. A. (1991). Reflections on Sex Equality under Law. The Yale Law Journal, 100(5), 1281-1328. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/796693
Google Scholar CrossrefMalhotra, A., Schulte, J., Patel, P., & Petesch, P. (2009). Innovation for women's empowerment and gender equality (International Center for Research on Women, Issue)
Google Scholar CrossrefMcCrudden, C. (1993). The effectiveness of European equality law: National mechanisms for enforcing gender equality law in the light of European requirements. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 13(3), 320-367. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/13.3.320
Google Scholar CrossrefMcLean, C. (1996). The Politics of Men’s Pain. In C. Mclean (Ed.), Men's Ways Of Being (1st ed., pp. 1-30). Routledge. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429493461
Google Scholar CrossrefMcPhail, B. A. (2008). Re-gendering the social work curriculum: New realities and complexities. Journal of Social Work Education, 44(2), 33-52. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5175/JSWE.2008.200600148
Google Scholar CrossrefMezzapelle, J. L., & Reiman, A.-K. (2022). How do people perceive sexual harassment targeting transgender women, lesbians, and straight cisgender women? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 28(3), 644-660. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/xap0000361
Google Scholar CrossrefMorgan, M. I. (2009). Equity or Equality for Women? Understanding CEDAW's Equality Principles. Alabama Law Scholarly Commons.
Google Scholar CrossrefMuguruza, C. C. (2007). Human security as a policy framework: Critics and challenges.
Google Scholar CrossrefMừng, B. T. (2021). Biện pháp thúc đẩy bình đẳng giới trong lĩnh vực lao động - Góc nhìn từ thực tiễn thực hiện pháp luật Tạp Chí Dân Chủ và Pháp Luật, 5(350), 8-14.
Google Scholar CrossrefNeuhold, B., & Weiss-Gänger, A. (2010). Gender equality and empowerment of women: Policy document. Vienna, Austrian: Austrian Development Agency
Google Scholar CrossrefNewell, S. (1993). The superwoman syndrome: Gender differences in attitudes towards equal opportunities at work and towards domestic responsibilities at home. Work, Employment and Society, 7(2), 275-289. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/09500170937200
Google Scholar CrossrefNielsen, K. J., Hansen, C. D., Bloksgaard, L., Christensen, A.-D., Jensen, S. Q., & Kyed, M. (2015). The impact of masculiity on safety oversights, safety priority and safety violations in two male-dominated occupations. Safety Science, 76, 82-89. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2015.02.021
Google Scholar CrossrefO'Brien, M. (2009). Fathers, parental leave policies, and infant quality of life: International perspectives and policy impact. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 624(1), 190-213. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716209334349
Google Scholar CrossrefOrifici, A. (2019). The promotion of gender equality at work in Australia through law and policy: A work in progress. Japan Labor Issues, 3(17), 79-88.
Google Scholar CrossrefPadrón, T. G., Kovačević, L., & Moreno, M. I. R. (2023). Labour law and gender. In D. Vujadinović, M. Fröhlich, & T. Giegerich (Eds.), Gender-competent legal education (pp. 583-630). Springer.
Google Scholar CrossrefParker, K., & Wang, W. (2013). Modern parenthood - Roles of moms and dads converge as they balance work and family. P. R. Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/social-trends/wp-content/uploads/sites/3/2013/03/FINAL_modern_parenthood_03-2013.pdf
Google Scholar CrossrefPhượng, H. T. H., & Huyền, N. T. M. (2022). Pháp luật lao động Thụy Điển về bình đẳng giới và một số bài học kinh nghiệm cho Việt Nam. Tạp Chí Luật Học, 4, 82-96.
Google Scholar CrossrefPhương, P. T. (2021). Lao động nữ và vấn đề bình đẳng giới trong Bộ luật Lao động 2019 Trường đại học Luật Hà Nội].
Google Scholar CrossrefPrentice, D. A., & Carranza, E. (2002). What women and men should be, shouldn't be, are allowed to be, and don't have to be: The contents of prescriptive gender stereotypes. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 26(4), 269-281. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-6402.t01-1-00066
Google Scholar CrossrefPryzgoda, J., & Chrisler, J. C. (2000). Definitions of gender and sex: The subtleties of meaning. Sex Roles, 43, 553-569.
Google Scholar CrossrefRachlinski, J. J. (2006). Bottom-up versus top-down lawmaking. The University of Chicago Law Review, 73(3), 933-964.
Google Scholar CrossrefRamos, Barriga, M., Oguzhan, & Lindstrøm, C. (2022). Female labour force: Participation and the care economy in Asia and the Pacific (Social Development Policy Papers, Issue. ESCAP. https://repository.unescap.org/bitstream/handle/20.500.12870/5164/ESCAP-2022-PB-Female-labour-force-participation-care-economy-Asia-Pacific.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y#page=2.13
Google Scholar CrossrefRehel, E. M. (2014). When dad stays home too: Paternity leave, gender, and parenting. Gender & Society, 28(1), 110-132. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243213503900
Google Scholar CrossrefRossin-Slater, M. (2017). Maternity and family leave policy (23069). (NBER working paper series, Issue. N. B. o. E. Research. https://www.nber.org/system/files/working_papers/w23069/w23069.pdf
Google Scholar CrossrefRudman, L. A., & Phelan, J. E. (2008). Backlash effects for disconfirming gender stereotypes in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 28, 61-79. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2008.04.003
Google Scholar CrossrefSaksena, A. (2007). CEDAW: Mandate for substantive equality. Indian Journal of Gender Studies, 14(3), 481-498.
Google Scholar CrossrefSarfaraz, L., Faghih, N., & Majd, A. A. (2014). The relationship between women entrepreneurship and gender equality. Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research, 2(6), 1-11.
Google Scholar CrossrefSchuler, S. R., Anh, H. T., Ha, V. S., Minh, T. H., Mai, B. T. T., & Thien, P. V. (2006). Constructions of gender in Vietnam: In pursuit of the ‘Three Criteria’. Culture, Health & Sexuality, 8(5), 383-394. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13691050600858924
Google Scholar CrossrefShanthosh, J. (2023). Effective laws to achieve equality for women. Retrieved 30 September 2023 from https://sdg-action.org/effective-laws-to-achieve-equality-for-women/
Google Scholar CrossrefSimpson, R. (2004). Masculinity at work: The experiences of men in female dominated occupations. Work, Employment and Society, 18(2), 349-368. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/09500172004042773
Google Scholar CrossrefSnell, M. (1979). The equal pay and sex discrimination acts: Their impact in the workplace. Feminist Review, 1(1), 37-57.
Google Scholar CrossrefSNV. (2017). Challenges & opportunities for women’s economic empowerment in agriculture. SNV. Retrieved 23 September 2023 from https://www.snv.org/update/challenges-opportunities-womens-economic-empowerment-agriculture
Google Scholar CrossrefSocial Committee. (2019). Gender issues in labour laws 2019. Vietnam General Assembly Retrieved 30 September 2023 from https://quochoi.vn/uybanvecacvandexahoi/lapphap/Pages/home.aspx?ItemID=1362
Google Scholar CrossrefStevens, C. (2010). Are women the key to sustainable development? Sustainable Development Insights, 3, 1-8. https://www.bu.edu/pardee/files/2010/04/UNsdkp003fsingle.pdf
Google Scholar CrossrefStockdale, M. S., Visio, M., & Batra, L. (1999). The sexual harassment of men: Evidence for a broader theory of sexual harassment and sex discrimination. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 5(3), 630-664. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8971.5.3.630
Google Scholar CrossrefSweet-Cushman, J. (2022). Legislative vs. Executive political offices: How gender stereotypes can disadvantage women in either office. Political Behavior, 44, 411-434.
Google Scholar CrossrefTerborg, J. R. (1977). Women in management: A research review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 62(6), 647-664.
Google Scholar CrossrefThủy, N. T. B. (2019). Bình đẳng giới trong lĩnh vực lao động, việc làm của người dân tộc thiểu số ở Việt Nam. Tạp chí Nghiên cứu Dân tộc, 8(4), 9-17.
Google Scholar CrossrefTran, L., & Walter, P. (2014). Ecotourism, gender and development in northern Vietnam. Annals of Tourism Research, 44, 116-130. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2013.09.005
Google Scholar CrossrefUN. (1987). Our common future (UN, Ed.). Oxford University Press. https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/5987our-common-future.pdf
Google Scholar CrossrefUN. (2022). The 17 Goal. Retrieved 20/04/2023 from https://sdgs.un.org/goals
Google Scholar CrossrefUN Women. (2014). World survey on the role of women in development 2014: Gender equality and sustainable development. U. Nations. https://www.unwomen.org/en/digital-library/publications/2014/10/world-survey-2014
Google Scholar CrossrefUN Women. (2021). Tổng quan về bình đẳng giới ở Việt Nam 2021 (CGEP). https://vietnam.un.org/vi/153151-t%E1%BB%95ng-quan-v%E1%BB%81-b%C3%ACnh-%C4%91%E1%BA%B3ng-gi%E1%BB%9Bi-%E1%BB%9F-vi%E1%BB%87t-nam-n%C4%83m-2021
Google Scholar CrossrefUNFPA. (2005). Frequently asked questions about gender equality. UNFPA. Retrieved 30 September 2023 from https://www.unfpa.org/resources/frequently-asked-questions-about-gender-equality
Google Scholar CrossrefVaganay, A., Canónico, E., & Courtin, E. (2016). Challenges of work-life balance faced by working families. E. Commission. https://www.lse.ac.uk/business/consulting/assets/documents/Challenges-of-work-life-balance-faced-by-working-families.pdf
Google Scholar CrossrefVietnamnews. (2022, 18 March 2022). Gender equality in the workplace: double burden still holds women back. Vietnamnews. Retrieved 10 May 2024 from https://vietnamnews.vn/society/1165615/gender-equality-in-the-workplace-double-burden-still-holds-women-back.html
Google Scholar CrossrefVojdik, V. K. (2005). Beyond stereotyping in equal protection doctrine: reframing the exclusion of women from combat. Alabama Law Review, 57(2), 303-349.
Google Scholar CrossrefWerner, J. (2009). Gender, household and state in post-revolutionary vietnam. Routledge.
Google Scholar CrossrefWright, M. J. (1979). Reproductive hazards and "protective" discrimination. Feminist Studies, 5(2), 302-309. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/3177596
Google Scholar CrossrefPublished
Metrics
Almetric
Dimensions
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Hoang Minh Dang
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All articles are published under Creative Commons copyright (CC BY). Authors hold the copyright and retain publishing rights without restrictions, but authors allow anyone to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute, and/or copy articles as the original source is cited.