Misconceptions of Upper-Secondary School Students on Doing Behavioral Sciences Research
Keywords:
Downloads
Abstract
With its long tradition, research on misconceptions helps to understand how concepts are learned and how learning in the disciplines can be supported. Up to now, research on misconceptions has focused on natural sciences, while research on misconceptions in behavioral sciences is scarce, not to say absent. In this study an attempt was made to reveal upper secondary school students’ misconceptions on doing research in behavioral sciences. The starting point for the study were research proposals of upper secondary school students. As part of a larger study, students were asked to write a research proposal in maximum two pages. A two-steps approach was adopted in the analysis of these research proposals. First, using a codebook containing both deductive and inductive codes, two-pagers were analyzed in order to identify ‘errors’. In a second step, an interpretative analysis aimed at inferring potential misconceptions underlying these errors. The study can be considered as a starting point for research on misconceptions in behavioral sciences which is currently missing in the field.
Downloads
Metrics
References
Billiet, J. & Waege, H. (2010). Een samenleving onderzocht. In Methoden van sociaal-wetenschappelijk onderzoek. De Boeck.
Google Scholar Crossrefde Jong, T., & van Joolingen, W. R. (1998). Scientific discovery learning with computer simulations of conceptual domains. Review of Educational Research, 68(2), pp. 179-201. https://doi.org/10.2307/1170753
Google Scholar CrossrefEarley, M. A. (2014). A synthesis of the literature on research methods education. Teaching in Higher Education, 19(3), pp. 242–253. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2013.860105
Google Scholar CrossrefFischer, F., Kollar, I., Ufer, S., Sodian, B., Hussmann, H., Pekrun, R., Neuhaus, B., Dorner, B., Pankofer, S., Fischer, M., Strijbos, J. W., Heene, M., & Eberle, J. (2014). Scientific reasoning and argumentation: Advancing an interdisciplinary research agenda in education. Frontline Learning Research, 2(3), pp. 28-45. https://doi.org/10.14786/flr.v2i2.96
Google Scholar CrossrefHammer, D. (1996). More than misconceptions: Multiple perspectives on student knowledge and reasoning, and an appropriate role for education research. American Journal of Physics, 64(10), pp. 1316-1325. http://dx.doi.org/10.1119/1.18376.
Google Scholar CrossrefKumandaş, B., Ateskan, A., & Lane, J. (2019). Misconceptions in biology: a meta-synthesis study of research, 2000-2014. Journal of Biological Education, 53(4), pp. 350-364. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2018.1490798
Google Scholar CrossrefLeonard, M. J., Kalinowski, S. T., & Andrews, T. C. (2014). Misconceptions yesterday, today and tomorrow. CBE Life Sciences Education, 13(2), 179-186. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.13-12-0244
Google Scholar CrossrefMaddens, L., Depaepe, F., Janssen, R., Raes, A., & Elen, J. (2019). Evaluating the Leuven Research Skills Test for 11th and 12th grade. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 38(4), pp. 445-459. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2020.1715204
Google Scholar CrossrefMaddens, L., Depaepe, F., Raes, A., & Elen, J. (2020). The Instructional Design of a 4C/ID-Inspired Learning Environment for Upper Secondary School Students’ Research Skills. International Journal of Designs for Learning, 11 (3), 126-147. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734282918825040
Google Scholar CrossrefMeyer, J. H. F., Shanahan, M. P., & Laugksch, R. C. (2005). Students' conceptions of research. I: A qualitative and quantitative analysis. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 49(3), pp. 225-244. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313830500109535
Google Scholar CrossrefMeyer, J. H. F., Shanahan, M. P., & Laugksch, R. C. (2007). Students' conceptions of research. II: An exploration of contrasting patterns of variation. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 51(4), pp. 415-433. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313830500109535
Google Scholar CrossrefSchmidt, H., Spaaij, G., & de Grave, W. (1988). Opsporen van misconcepties bij middelbare scholieren. Tijdschrift voor Onderwijsresearch, 13(3), pp. 129-140. hdl.handle.net/1765/2728
Google Scholar CrossrefVolpe, R.J., McConaughy, S.H., Hintze, J.M. (2009). Generalizability of classroom behavior problem and on-task scores from the Direct Observation Form. School Psychology Review, 38, pp. 382-401. https://doi.org/10.1080/02796015.2009.12087822
Google Scholar CrossrefVosniadou, S. (1994). Capturing and modeling the process of conceptual change. Learning and Instruction, 4(1), 45-69. https://doi.org/10.1016/0959-4752(94)90018-3
Google Scholar CrossrefVosniadou, S. (2019). The development of students’ understanding of science. Frontiers in Education, 4(32), pp. 1-6. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2019.00032
Google Scholar CrossrefVosniadou, S. (2020).Students’ Misconceptions and Science Education. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Education. Retrieved 8 Feb. 2022, from https://oxfordre.com/education/view/10.1093/acrefore/9780190264093.001.0001/acrefore-9780190264093-e-965 .
Google Scholar CrossrefWoolley, J. S., Deal, A. M., Green, J., Hathenbruck, F., Kurtz, S. A., Park, T. K. H., Pollock, S. V., Transtrum, M. B., & Jensen, J. L. (2018). Undergraduate students demonstrate common false scientific reasoning strategies. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 27, pp. 101-113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2017.12.004
Google Scholar CrossrefDownloads
Published
Almetric
Dimensions
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Jan Elen, Yousra Piro, Britt Wevers, Louise Maddens, Annelies Raes

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The opinions and contents of the manuscript published in IJEP are under exclusive responsibility of the author(s). Therefore, authors are responsible for obtaining copyright permission for reproducing the material published in other publications.
All articles are published under Creative Commons copyright (CC BY). Authors hold the copyright and retain publishing rights without restrictions, but authors allow anyone to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute, and/or copy articles as the original source is cited.