Predictive effects of temperament on motivation
Keywords:
Downloads
Abstract
Although temperament and motivation both reflect individual differences in what is perceived as rewarding or threatening, and what is to be approached and what avoided, respectively, we know rather little about how they are connected in educational settings. In this study, we examined how different aspects of temperament (reward and punishment sensitivities) predict the goals students seek to achieve in relation to learning and performance. In Study 1, four dimensions describing students’ temperament (sensitivity to punishment, intraindividual reward sensitivity, interindividual reward sensitivity, and positive expressiveness) were uncovered, and in Study 2, these were used to predict students’ achievement goal orientations (mastery-intrinsic, mastery-extrinsic, performance-approach, performance-avoidance, and avoidance). The results of exploratory structural equation modeling revealed significant predictions on all achievement goal orientations. In line with theoretical assumptions, sensitivity to punishment was predictive of performance orientations, intraindividual reward sensitivity of mastery orientations, and interindividual reward sensitivity of performance- and avoidance orientations. Positive expressiveness only had weak negative effects on performance orientations. The findings suggest that the goals and outcomes students seek to attain in an educational context are partly dictated by their sensitivity to different environmental cues and the kinds of affective and behavioral responses these typically incite.
Downloads
References
Archer, J. (1994). Achievement goals as a measure of motivation in university students. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 19(4), 430– 446. doi:10.1006/ceps.1994.1031
Google Scholar CrossrefBarron, K. E., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2003). Revisiting the benefits of performance-approach goals in the college classroom: Exploring the role of goals in advanced college courses. International Journal of Educational Research, 39(4), 357–374. doi:10.1016/j.ijer.2004.06.004
Google Scholar CrossrefBjørnebekk, G. (2007). Reinforcement sensitivity theory and major motivational and self-regulatory processes in children. Personality and Individual Differences, 43(8), 1908–1990. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2007.06.010
Google Scholar CrossrefBjørnebekk, G. & Diseth, Å. (2010). Approach and avoidance temperaments and achievement goals among children. Personality and Individual Differences, 49(8), 938– 943. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2010.07.034
Google Scholar CrossrefCarver, C. S., & White, T. L. (1994). Behavioral inhibition, behavioral activation, and affective responses to impending reward and punishment: The BIS/BAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(2), 319–333. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.67.2.319
Google Scholar CrossrefCaseras, X., Àvila, C., & Torrubia, R. (2003). The measurement of individual differences in behavioural inhibition and behavioural activation systems: a comparison of personality scales. Personality and Individual Differences, 34(6), 999–1013. doi:10.1016/S0191-8869(02)00084-3
Google Scholar CrossrefCloninger, C. R., Svarkic, D. M., & Przybeck, T. R. (1993). A psychobiological model of temperament and character. Archives of General Psychiatry, 50(12), 975–990. doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1993.01820240059008
Google Scholar CrossrefColder, C. R. & O’Connor, R. M. (2004). Gray’s reinforcement sensitivity model and child psychopathology: laboratory and questionnaire assessment of the BAS and BIS. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 32(4), 435–451. DOI: 10.1023/B:JACP.0000030296.54122.b6
Google Scholar CrossrefColder, C. R., Trucco, E. M., Lopez, H. I., Hawk Jr., L. W., Read, J. P., Lengua, L. J., … & Eiden, R. D. (2011). Revised reinforcement sensitivity theory and laboratory assessment of BIS and BAS in children. Journal of Research in Personality, 45(2), 198–207. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2011.01.005
Google Scholar CrossrefCorr, P. J. (2002). JA Gray's reinforcement sensitivity theory: Tests of the joint subsystems hypothesis of anxiety and impulsivity. Personality and Individual Differences, 33(4), 511–532. doi:10.1016/S0191-8869(01)00170-2
Google Scholar CrossrefCorr, P. J. (2008). Reinforcement sensitivity theory (RST): introduction. In P. J. Corr (Ed.), The Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory of Personality. New York, NY, US: Cambridge University Press. 1–43.
Google Scholar CrossrefCorr, P. J., & Cooper, A. J. (2016, February 4). The Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory of Personality Questionnaire (RST-PQ): Development and validation. Psychological Assessment. Advance online publication. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/pas0000273
Google Scholar CrossrefCorr, P. J. & McNaughton, N. (2008). Reinforcement sensitivity theory and personality. In P. J. Corr (Ed.), The Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory of Personality. New York, NY, US: Cambridge University Press. 155–187.
Google Scholar CrossrefElliot, A. J., & Covington, M. V. (2001). Approach and avoidance motivation. Educational Psychology Review, 13(2), 73–92. DOI 10.1023/A:1009009018235
Google Scholar CrossrefElliot, A. J. & McGregor, H. A. (2001). A 2 x 2 achievement goal framework. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(3), 501–519. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.80.3.501
Google Scholar CrossrefElliot, A. J. & Thrash, T. M. (2002). Approach–avoidance motivation in personality: Approach and avoidance temperaments and goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(5), 804–818. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.82.5.804
Google Scholar CrossrefElliot, A. J. & Thrash, T. M. (2010). Approach and avoidance temperament as basic dimensions of personality. Journal of Personality, 78(3), 865–906. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2010.00636.x
Google Scholar CrossrefFuentes-Claramonte, P., Ávila, C., Rodríguez-Pujadas, A., Costumero, V., Ventura-Campos, N., Bustamante, J. C., … & Barrós-Loscertales, A. (2016). Characterizing individual differences in reward sensitivity from the brain networks involved in response inhibition. Neuroimage, 124, 287–299. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.08.067
Google Scholar CrossrefGrant, H., & Dweck, C. S. (2003). Clarifying achievement goals and their impact. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(3), 541–553. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.85.3.541
Google Scholar CrossrefGray, J. A., & McNaughton, N. (2003). The Neuropsychology of Anxiety. An Enquiry into the Functions of the Septo-Hippocampal System (2nd ed.). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar CrossrefHarackiewicz, J. M., Barron, K. E., Tauer, J. M., & Elliot, A. J. (2002). Predicting success in college: A longitudinal study of achievement goals and ability measures as predictors of interest and performance from freshman year through graduation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(3), 562–575. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.94.3.562
Google Scholar CrossrefHarackiewicz, J. M., Durik, A. M., Barron, K. E., Linnenbrink-Garcia, L., & Tauer, J. M. (2008). The role of achievement goals in the development of interest: Reciprocal relations between achievement goals, interest, and performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(1), 105–122. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.100.1.105
Google Scholar CrossrefHulleman, C. S., Schrager, S. M., Bodmann, S. M., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2010). A meta-analytical review of achievement goal measures: Different labels for the same constructs or different constructs with similar labels? Psychological Bulletin, 136(3), 442–449. DOI: 10.1037/a00118947
Google Scholar CrossrefHu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. DOI: 10.1080/10705519909540118
Google Scholar CrossrefKaplan, A., & Maehr, M. L. (1999). Achievement goals and student well-being. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 24(4), 330–358. doi:10.1006/ceps.1999.0993
Google Scholar CrossrefKaplan, A., & Maehr, M. L. (2007). The contributions and prospects of goal orientation theory. Educational Psychological Review, 19(2), 141–184. DOI: 10.1007/s10648-006-9012-5
Google Scholar CrossrefKingsbury, A., Coplan, R. J., Weeks, M., & Rose-Krasnor, L. (2013). Covering all the BAS’s: A closer look at the links between BIS, BAS, and socio-emotional functioning in childhood. Personality and Individual Differences, 55(5), 521–526. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2013.04.021
Google Scholar CrossrefMardaga, S., & Hansenne, M. (2007). Relationships between Cloninger’s biosocial model of personality and the behavioral inhibition/approach systems (BIS/BAS). Personality and Individual Differences, 42(4), 715–722. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2006.08.013
Google Scholar CrossrefMarsh, H. W., Morin, A. J. S., Parker, P. D., and Kaur, G. (2014). Exploratory Structural Equation Modeling: An integration of the best features of exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. Annual Clinical Review of Psychology, 10, 85–110. doi: 10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-032813-153700
Google Scholar CrossrefMuthén, L. K. & Muthén, B. (1998-2015). Mplus User’s Guide. Seventh Edition. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
Google Scholar CrossrefNicholls, J. G. (1989). The Competitive Ethos and Democratic Education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Google Scholar CrossrefNicholls, J. G., Patashnick, M. & Nolen, S. B. (1985). Adolescents' theories of education. Journal of Educational Psychology, 77(6), 683–692. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.77.6.683
Google Scholar CrossrefNiemivirta, M. (2002). Motivation and performance in context: The influence of goal orientations and instructional setting on situational appraisals and task performance. Psychologia, 45(4), 250–270. DOI: 10.2117/psysoc.2002.250
Google Scholar CrossrefPulkka, A., & Niemivirta, M. (2013). Adult students’ achievement goal orientations and evaluations of the learning environment: a person-centred longitudinal analysis. Educational Research and Evaluation: An International Journal on Theory and Practice 19(4), 297–322. DOI:10.1080/13803611.2013.767741
Google Scholar CrossrefRenninger, K. A., & Hidi, S. (2011). Revisiting the conceptualization, measurement, and generation of interest. Educational Psychologist, 46(3), 168–184. DOI: 10.1080/00461520.2011.587723
Google Scholar CrossrefRothbart, M. K. (2007). Temperament, development, and personality. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16(4), 207–212. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8721.2007.00505.x
Google Scholar CrossrefSideridis, G. D., & Kaplan, A. (2011). Achievement goals and persistence across tasks: The roles of failure and success. The Journal of Experimental Education, 79(4), 429–451.DOI: 10.1080/00220973.2010.539634
Google Scholar CrossrefSilvia, P. J., & Sanders, C. E. (2010). Why are smart people curious? Fluid intelligence, openness to experience, and interest. Learning and Individual Differences, 20(3), 242–245. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2010.01.006
Google Scholar CrossrefSteinmayr, R. & Spinath, B. (2009). The importance of motivation as a predictor of school achievement. Learning and Individual Differences, 19(1), 80–90. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2008.05.004
Google Scholar CrossrefTapola, A., Jaakkola, T., & Niemivirta, M. (2014). The influence of achievement goal orientations and task concreteness on situational interest. The Journal of Experimental Education, 82(4), 455–479. DOI: 10.1080/00220973.2013.813370
Google Scholar CrossrefTapola, A., & Niemivirta, M. (2008). The role of achievement goal orientations in students’ perceptions of and preferences for classroom environment. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 78(2), 291–312. DOI: 10.1348/000709907X205272
Google Scholar CrossrefTorrubia, R., Ávila, C., Moltó, J. & Caseras, X. (2001). The sensitivity to punishment and sensitivity to reward questionnaire (SPSRQ) as a measure of Gray’s anxiety and impulsivity dimensions. Personality and Individual Differences, 31(4), 837–862. doi:10.1016/S0191-8869(00)00183-5
Google Scholar CrossrefTuominen-Soini, H., Salmela-Aro, K., & Niemivirta, M. (2008). Achievement goal orientations and subjective well-being: A person-centred analysis. Learning and Instruction, 18(3), 251–266. DOI: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.05.003
Google Scholar CrossrefTuominen-Soini, H., Salmela-Aro, K. & Niemivirta, M. (2012). Achievement goal orientations and academic well-being across the transition to upper secondary education. Learning and Individual Differences, 22(3), 290–305. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2012.01.002
Google Scholar Crossrefvan Beek, I., Kranenburg, I. C., Taris, T. W., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2013). BIS- and BAS-activation and study outcomes: A mediation study. Personality and Individual Differences, 55(5), 474–479. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2013.04.013
Google Scholar CrossrefDownloads
Published
Almetric
Dimensions
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
All articles are published under Creative Commons copyright (CC BY). Authors hold the copyright and retain publishing rights without restrictions, but authors allow anyone to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute, and/or copy articles as the original source is cited.
