Factors Affecting Trust in Female and Male School Leaders
https://doi.org/10.17583/ijelm.9811
Palabras clave:
Descargas
Resumen
Esta investigación tiene como objetivo determinar los factores que afectan la confianza de los docentes en los líderes masculinos y femeninos. El estudio empleó un diseño de investigación cualitativo. Los datos fueron recolectados con la técnica de la entrevista. Al respecto, se entrevistó a 20 docentes. Los participantes se determinaron con el método de muestreo intencional. Los datos fueron analizados con el método de análisis inductivo. Los resultados revelaron que los docentes participantes confían en diferentes comportamientos o características de sus líderes masculinos o femeninos. En general, los docentes confían más en sus lideresas por su comportamiento objetivo, idealista, dedicado, y también por su personalidad maternal, sensible y compasiva. Por otro lado, los docentes confían en sus líderes masculinos ya que son comunicadores justos, confiables, francos, competentes, más racionales y fuertes. Si bien se cree que los líderes masculinos toman la iniciativa e implementan las leyes y reglamentos de manera más estricta, las administradoras están más interesadas en la profesión administrativa, se comportan meticulosamente y trabajan con devoción. Se recomienda que los administradores escolares creen un clima de objetividad y confianza en la escuela.
Descargas
Referencias
Balyer, A. (2017). Trust in school principals: Teachers’ opinions. Journal of Education and Learning, 6(2), 317–325.
Google Scholar CrossrefBabcock, C. L. (1991). A comparison of male and female elementary school principals' perceived instructional leadership behavior. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertations. Western Michigan University.
Google Scholar CrossrefBalcı, A. (2015). Sosyal bilimlerde araştırma. Pegem Yayınevi
Google Scholar CrossrefBerkovich, I. (2018). Effects of principal-teacher gender similarity on teacher’s trust and organizational commitment. Sex Roles, 78, 561–572. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-017-0814-3
Google Scholar CrossrefBogdan, R., & Biklen, S., (2007). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theory and practice. Allyn and Bacon.
Google Scholar CrossrefBurns, J. M. (1978). Leadership. Harper and Row Publishers.
Google Scholar CrossrefBüyüköztürk, Ş., Kılıç Çakmak, E., Akgün, Ö.E., Karadeniz, Ş., & Demirel, F. (2014). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri (17. Baskı). Pegem Yayınları
Google Scholar CrossrefCreswell, J. W. (2017). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage Publishing.
Google Scholar CrossrefDaly, A.J., & Chrispeels, J. (2008). A Question of trust: Predictive conditions for adaptive and technical leadership in educational contexts. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 7(1), 30-63.
Google Scholar CrossrefDenzin, N.K., & Lincoln, Y.S. (2005). The sage handbook of qualitative research, 3rd Edition. Sage.
Google Scholar CrossrefEckman, E. (2004). Does gender make a difference? Voices of male and female high school
Google Scholar CrossrefPrincipals, Planning and Changing, 35(3/4), 192-208.
Google Scholar CrossrefEnis, C.D., & McCauley, M.T. (2002). Creating urban classroom communities worthy of trust. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 34(2), 149-172.
Google Scholar CrossrefEren, E. (2008). Yönetim ve Organizasyon (Çağdaş ve Küresel Yaklaşımlar). Beta Yayıncılık.
Google Scholar CrossrefGlaser, B.G. (1992). Basics of grounded theory analysis. Sociology Press.
Google Scholar CrossrefHoy, W. K., & Tschannen-Moran, M. (2003). The conceptualization and measurement of faculty trust in schools. Wayne K. Hoy & Cecil Miskel (Ed.). Studies in leading and organizing schools (pp. 181–207).
Google Scholar CrossrefHoy,W.K., Tarter, C, J., & Witkoskie, L. (1992). Faculty trust in colleagues: Linking the Principal with school effectiveness. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 26(1), 38-45.
Google Scholar CrossrefJacobs, T. O., & Jacques, E. (1990). Military executive leadership. In Gal, R.; Manglesdorf, A. D. (Editors): Handbook of Military Psychology, John Wiley & Sons.
Google Scholar CrossrefKarasar, N. (2007). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri (17. baskı). Nobel Yayıncılık.
Google Scholar CrossrefKümbetoğlu, B (2005) Sosyolojide ve Antropolojide Niteliksel Yöntem ve Araştırma, Bağlam Yayınları.
Google Scholar CrossrefLandis, E. A., Hill, D., & Harvey, M.R. (2014). A synthesis of leadership theories and styles. Journal of Management Policy and Practice, 15(2), 97-100.
Google Scholar CrossrefLouis, K.S. (2007). Trust and improvement in schools. Journal of Education Change, 8(2), 1-24.
Google Scholar CrossrefMarshall, C., & Rossman, G.B. (2006). Designing qualitative research (4 th ed.). Sage.
Google Scholar CrossrefMayring, P. (2000). Qualitative content analysis. Forum: Online Journal Qualitative Social Research, 1(2), 1-10.
Google Scholar CrossrefMendis, B.A.K.M., & Silva, S. D.A.C. (2017). Male vs female leaders: Analysis of transformational, transactional & laissez-faire women leadership styles. European Journal of Business and Management, 9(9), 19-26.
Google Scholar CrossrefMertz, N., & McNeely, S. (1998). Women on the job: A study of female high school principals. Educational Administration Quarterly, 34(2), 196-222.
Google Scholar CrossrefMcAllister, D. J. (1995). Affect- and cognition-based trust as foundations for interpersonal cooperation in organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 24-59.
Google Scholar CrossrefMcMillan, R.B., Meyer, M., & Northfield, S. (2004). Trust and its role in principal succession: A preliminary examination of a continuum of trust. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 3(4), 275-294.
Google Scholar CrossrefMiles, M.B., & Huberman, M.A. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: A Sourcebook of New Methods. Sage.
Google Scholar CrossrefOsburn, D., & Gocial, T. M. (2020). Trust in administrators among community college faculty members, Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 44, 10-12, 899-913. https://doi.org/10.1080/10668926.2019.1666064
Google Scholar CrossrefOUP (2021). Leader. In Oxford English Dictionary. Retrieved March 30, 2021, from https://www.oxfordlearnersdictionaries.com/definition/english/leader?q=leaders
Google Scholar CrossrefPeleg, S. (2012). The role of leadership in the education system. Education Journal, 1(1), 5–8.
Google Scholar CrossrefPunch, K. F. (2005). Introduction to social research-quantitative and qualitative and approaches, Sage
Google Scholar CrossrefRauch. C. F., & Behling, O. (1984). Functionalism: Basis for an Alternate Approach to the Study of Leadership. In J. G. Hunt, D: M: Hosking, C. A., Schriesheim ve R: Stewart (Eds.), Leaders and Managers: International Perspectives on Managerial Behavior and Leadership. Pergamon Press.
Google Scholar CrossrefSalihu, M.J. (2019). A conceptual analysis of the leadership theories and proposed leadership framework in higher education. Asian Journal of Education and Social Studies, 5(4), 1-6.
Google Scholar CrossrefTschannen-Moran, M. (2001). Collaboration and the need for trust. Journal of Educational Administration, 39, 308-331.
Google Scholar CrossrefTschannen, M. M. (2003). Fostering organizational citizenship: Transformational leadership and trust. W K. Hoy & C. G. Miskel, (Ed.) Studies in Leading and Organizing School (s.157-179). Information Age Publishing.
Google Scholar CrossrefWhitener, E.M., Brodt, S. E., Korsgaard, M. A., & Werner, J. M. (1998). Managers as initiators of trust: An exchange relationship framework for understanding managerial trustworhy behavior, Academy of Management Review, 23(2), 513.
Google Scholar CrossrefYang, J. ve Mossholder, W.K. (2004). Decoupling task and relationship conflict: the role of intragroup emotional processing. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25, 589–605.
Google Scholar CrossrefYıldırım, A., & Şimşek, H. (2011). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri. (8. bs.). Seçkin Yayınevi.
Google Scholar CrossrefYukl, G. (2006). Leadership in organizations (6th ed.). Pearson Education.
Google Scholar CrossrefZeinabadia, H.,& Rastegarpour, H. (2010). Factors affecting teacher trust in principal: testing the effect of transformational leadership and procedural justice. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 5, 1004–1008.
Google Scholar CrossrefDescargas
Publicado
Almetric
Dimensions
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2022 Kenan Özcan; Aydin Balyer; Fikret Fırat
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.
Todos los artículos se publican bajo copyright Creative Commons (CC BY). Los autores poseen los derechos de autor y conservan los derechos de publicación sin restricciones, pero los autores permiten que cualquiera descargue, reutilice, reimprima, modifique, distribuya y/o copie los artículos siempre que se cite la fuente original.