Classics and Canon in Secondary Education: Exploring the Thinking of 30 Literature Teachers in Spain
Keywords:
Abstract
The controversy surrounding the canon since the 1970s, as well as the multicultural nature of contemporary societies, has led to the emergence of several studies, both empirical and based on teachers' beliefs, which analyse how the reading of the classics fits into this new plural context. However, there are no such approaches in Spain from the teachers' perspective. To address this issue, a qualitative case study is presented based on interviews with 30 secondary school teachers. Data were analysed thematically and coded with NVivo 12 software, resulting in the identification of four main categories: teacher beliefs about their relationship with the classics, knowledge, beliefs about the sociocultural factor, and teaching practices and strategies. The findings reveal that teachers think it is important to read the classics, but they also argue that they must be approached in ways that engage students in interpreting them.
Downloads
References
Antonsich, M. (2009). National identities in the age of globalisation: The case of Western Europe. National Identities, 11(3), 281-299. https://doi.org/10.1080/14608940903081085
Google Scholar CrossrefAthanases, S. Z., & Sanchez, S. L. (2020). ‘A Caesar for our time’: Toward empathy and perspective-taking in new teachers’ drama practices in diverse classrooms. Research in Drama Education, 25(2), 236–255. https://doi.org/10.1080/13569783.2020.1730170
Google Scholar CrossrefBenton, P. (2000). The conveyor belt curriculum? Poetry teaching in the teaching secondary school II. Oxford review of education, 26(1), 81-93. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/030549800103872
Google Scholar CrossrefBishop, R. S. (1990). Mirrors, windows and sliding glass doors. Perspectives, 6(3), ix-xi.
Google Scholar CrossrefBloom, H. (1995). The Western canon: The books and school of the ages. Papermac.
Google Scholar CrossrefBokiev, D., & Ismail, L. (2021). Malaysian ESL Teachers’ Beliefs and Practices Regarding the Use of Music and Songs in Second Language Teaching. The Qualitative Report, 26(5), 1497-1521. https://doi.org/ 10.46743/2160-3715/2021.4350
Google Scholar CrossrefBourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: A social critique of the judgement of taste. Routledge.
Google Scholar CrossrefCalvino, I. (1999). Why to read the classics?. Pantheon.
Google Scholar CrossrefCreswell, J. W. (2015). Revisiting mixed methods and advancing scientific practices. In S. Hesse-Biber, & R. B. Johnson (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of multimethod and mixed methods re- search inquiry (pp. 57–71). Oxford University Press. https://doi. org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199933624.013.39
Google Scholar CrossrefDyches, J. (2018). Critical Canon Pedagogy: Applying disciplinary inquiry to cultivate canonical critical consciousness. Harvard Educational Review, 88(4), 538–564. https://doi.org/10.17763/1943-5045-88.4.538
Google Scholar CrossrefEaglestone, R. (1999). Doing English. Routledge.
Google Scholar CrossrefEliot, T. S. (1957). On poetry and poets. Faber & Faber.
Google Scholar CrossrefElliott, V. (2018). Thinking about the coding process in qualitative data analysis. The Qualitative report, 23(11). https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2018.3560
Google Scholar CrossrefElliott, V., & Olive, S. (2021). Secondary Shakespeare in the UK: What gets taught and why?. English in Education, 55(2), 102–115. https://doi.org/10.1080/04250494.2019.1690952
Google Scholar CrossrefElliott, V., & Olive, S. (2023). Secondary Shakespeare in the UK: Pedagogies and Practice, Changing English, 30(4), 402-413. https://doi.org/10.1080/1358684X.2023.2233077
Google Scholar CrossrefEven-Zohar, I. (1997). Factors and dependencies in Culture: a revised outline for polysystem culture research. Canadian review of comparative literature, 24(1), 15-34. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2167808
Google Scholar CrossrefGadamer, H.G. (1989). Truth and method. Continuum.
Google Scholar CrossrefGeertz, C. (1973). The interpretation of cultures. Basic Books.
Google Scholar CrossrefGibbs, G. (2012). Analyzing Qualitative Data. Sage publications.
Google Scholar CrossrefGlaser B. G., & Strauss A. (1967). Discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Aldine Transaction. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006199-196807000-00014
Google Scholar CrossrefGoodwyn, A. (2020). Newbolt to Now: an Interpretation of the History of the School Subject of English in England. Changing English, 28(2), 223-240. https://doi.org/10.1080/1358684X.2020.1756743
Google Scholar CrossrefHarris, WC. (1991). Canonicity. Publications of the Modern Language Association of America, 106(1), 110-121. https://doi.org/10.2307/462827
Google Scholar CrossrefHarvey, M., Deuel, A., & Marlatt, R. (2020). “To be, or not to be”: Modernizing Shakespeare with multimodal learning stations. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 63(5), 559-568. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaal.1023
Google Scholar CrossrefHernández-Heras, L., Tabernero-Sala, R., & Muela-Bermejo, D. (2024). Beliefs, representations and knowledge of expert teachers in reading the classics in Secondary Education. Ocnos, 23(2). https://doi.org/10.18239/ocnos_2024.23.2.445
Google Scholar CrossrefIser, W. (1980). The act of reading: A theory of aesthetic response. John Hopkins University Press.
Google Scholar CrossrefJauss, H.R. (1982). Aesthetic experience and literary hermeneutics. University of Minnesota Press.
Google Scholar CrossrefKvale, S. (1996). Interviews Views: an introduction to qualitative research Interviewing. Sage publications.
Google Scholar CrossrefLluch, G. (2014). Jóvenes y adolescentes hablan de lectura en la red [Young people and teenagers talk about reading on the net]. Ocnos, 11, 7-20. https://doi.org/10.18239/ocnos_2014.11.01
Google Scholar CrossrefLópez Rodríguez, R. M., & Núñez Delgado, M. P. (2023). Literary education from the paradigm of teacher thinking: contributions from a collective case study in secondary school. Álabe, 27. https://doi.org/10.25115/alabe27.8626
Google Scholar CrossrefMatruglio, E., & Vale, E. (2019). Transformation of text in the English classroom: does ‘context’ really matter?. Literacy, 53(3), 117–124. https://doi.org/10.1111/lit.12167
Google Scholar CrossrefMignolo, W. (1991). Canons A(nd)Cross-Cultural Boundaries (Or, Whose Canon are We Talking about?). Poetics today, 21(1). https://doi.org/10.2307/1772980
Google Scholar CrossrefMunita, F. (2013). Beliefs and knowledge of prospective teachers (readers and non-readers) around literary education . Ocnos, 9, 69-87. https://doi.org/10.18239/ocnos_2013.09.04
Google Scholar CrossrefMyren-Svelstad, P. E., & Grüters, R. (2022). Justifications for teaching literature: A survey study among teachers of Norwegian L1. L1-Educational Studies in Language and Literature, 22, 1-26. https://doi.org/10.21248/l1esll.2022.22.1.494
Google Scholar CrossrefRezaul, M., & Hussain, A. (2021). Teaching of Shakespeare in the secondary classes of indian shools. Tesol. Internacional Journal, 16(4), 196-210.
Google Scholar CrossrefRosenblatt, L. (1938). Literature as Exploration. Appleton & Company.
Google Scholar CrossrefSandelowski, M. (2001). Real qualitative researchers do not count: The use of numbers in qualitative research. Research in nursing & health, 24(3), 230-240. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.1025
Google Scholar CrossrefSanjuán, M. (2013). De la experiencia de la lectura a la educación literaria análisis de los componentes emocionales de la lectura literaria en la infancia y la adolescencia (tesis doctoral). Universidad de Zaragoza.
Google Scholar CrossrefSchutz, P., Hong, J., & Francis, D. (2020). Teachers’ goals, beliefs, emotions, and identity development. In Investigating Complexities in the Profession. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429456008
Google Scholar CrossrefShoemaker, B. (2013). Research for the classroom: to read or not to read: five approaches to teaching Shakespeare. English Journal, 102(4), 111-114. https://doi.org/10.58680/ej201323347
Google Scholar CrossrefSteiner, G. (1978). On difficulty. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 36(3), 263- 276.https://doi.org/10.2307/425888
Google Scholar CrossrefSteiss, J. (2020). Dismantling Winning Stories: Lessons from Applying Critical Literature Pedagogy to The Odyssey. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 63(4), 433-441. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaal.1012
Google Scholar CrossrefSullá, E. (1998). El canon literario. Arco Libros.
Google Scholar CrossrefToffler,A. (1980). The third wave: The classic study of tomorrow. Bantam.
Google Scholar CrossrefWang, S. Rubie-Davies, C., y Meisel, K. (2018). A systematic review of the teacher expectation literature over the past 30 year. Educational Research and Evaluation, 24(3-5), 124-179. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803611.2018.1548798
Google Scholar CrossrefWood, A. B. (2017). Pre-twentieth century literature in the Year 9 classroom: Student responses to different teaching approaches. English in Education, 51(3), 308–326. https://doi.org/10.1111/eie.12155
Google Scholar CrossrefYang, A. (2022). Young Adult and Canonical Literature Instruction in the High School Classroom: Assessing Students’ Reading Interest. Alpenglow: Binghamton University Undergraduate Journal of Research and Creative Activity, 8(1).. https://doi.org/10.22191/BUUJ/8/1/6
Google Scholar CrossrefPublished
Metrics
Almetric
Dimensions
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Lucía Hernández-Heras, Rosa Tabernero-Sala , Diana Muela-Bermejo
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All articles are published under Creative Commons copyright (CC BY). Authors hold the copyright and retain publishing rights without restrictions, but authors allow anyone to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute, and/or copy articles as the original source is cited.
.
