Equality Policies and Intersections of Gender and Sexuality: the Role of Academic Research
https://doi.org/10.17583/generos.8087
Keywords:
Downloads
Abstract
Gender inequalities are a reality in economic, political and social participation. The lives of women and men, either cisgender or transgender, are deeply affected by gender inequalities. The identity-based approach to equality policies do not consider the interconnections and interdependence of diverse identity categories, and the acknowledgment that it is not possible to explain inequalities through a single framework. Sexual orientation equality policies often fail to take gender inequalities into account. Academic research has the potential to contribute to clarify the concepts underlying equality policies and to promote an intersectional approach. In terms of equality policies this means, for instance, to formulate policies that take into account groups at the different intersections of inequalities and the way that they are affected by the policies in question. This work aims to explore the contribution of the Portuguese research community to sexual orientation equality policies in Portugal. It will analyze in what extent the academic research in Portugal contributes to question identity-based politics and to advance an intersectional approach to sexual orientation equality policies. It will focus on and critically analyze equality policies in Portugal, and scientific and scholarly publications, namely journal articles, conference papers, theses, and dissertations of the Portuguese academia.Downloads
References
Alonso A., Bustelo M., Forest M., Lombardo, E. (2012) Institutionalizing Intersectionality in Southern Europe: Italy, Spain, and Portugal. In: Krizsan A., Skjeie H., Squires, J. (Eds) Institutionalizing Intersectionality. Gender and Politics series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137031068_6
Google Scholar CrossrefBoon, B. (2017). Bibliographic research. In M. Allen (Ed.), The sage encyclopedia of communication research methods (Vol. 1, pp. 93-94). SAGE Publications, Inc, DOI:10.4135/9781483381411.n37
Google Scholar CrossrefBrowne, I., & Misra, J. (2003). The Intersection of Gender and Race in the Labor Market. Annual Review of Sociology, 29 (1), 487–513. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.29.010202.100016
Google Scholar CrossrefCollins, H. P. (2008). Black Feminist Thought: Knowledge, Consciousness, and the Politics of Empowerment (Routledge Classics) (1st Ed.). Routledge.
Google Scholar CrossrefCouncil of Ministers. (1997, March 24). Resolution of the Council of Ministers 49/1997, 1997–03-24. Diário da República Eletrónico. https://data.dre.pt/web/guest/pesquisa/-/search/526583/details/maximized
Google Scholar CrossrefCouncil of Ministers. (2003, November 25). Resolution of the Council of Ministers 184/2003, 2003–11-25. Diário da República Eletrónico. https://data.dre.pt/web/guest/pesquisa/-/search/437013/details/maximized
Google Scholar CrossrefCouncil of Ministers. (2007, June 22). Resolution of the Council of Ministers 82/2007, 2007–06-22. Diário da República Eletrónico. https://data.dre.pt/web/guest/pesquisa/-/search/638880/details/maximized
Google Scholar CrossrefCouncil of Ministers. (2011, January 18). Resolution of the Council of Ministers 5/2011, 2011–01-18. Diário da República Eletrónico. https://data.dre.pt/web/guest/pesquisa/-/search/280896/details/maximized
Google Scholar CrossrefCouncil of Ministers. (2013, December 31). Resolution of the Council of Ministers 103/2013, 2013–12-31. Diário da República Eletrónico. https://data.dre.pt/web/guest/pesquisa/-/search/483891/details/maximized
Google Scholar CrossrefCouncil of Ministers. (2018, May 21). Resolution of the Council of Ministers 61/2018, 2018–05-21. Diário da República Eletrónico. https://data.dre.pt/web/guest/pesquisa/-/search/115360036/details/maximized
Google Scholar CrossrefCrenshaw, K. (1989). Demarginalizing the Intersection of Race and Sex: A Black Feminist Critique of Antidiscrimination Doctrine, Feminist Theory and Antiracist Policies. University of Chicago Legal Forum, no. 1 (1989), 139-167.
Google Scholar CrossrefCruells, M., & Coll-Planas, G. (2013). Challenging equality policies: The emerging LGBT perspective. European Journal of Women’s Studies, 20 (2), 122–137.
Google Scholar Crossrefhttps://doi.org/10.1177/1350506812460630
Google Scholar CrossrefEuropean Commission. (2020a). Union of Equality: Gender Equality Strategy 2020-2025. Brussels: European Commission.
Google Scholar CrossrefEuropean Commission. (2020b). Union of Equality: LGBTIQ Equality Strategy 2020-2025. Brussels: European Commission.
Google Scholar CrossrefEuropean Institute for Gender Equality (EIGE). (2018). Intersectionality. https://eige.europa.eu/thesaurus/terms/1263
Google Scholar CrossrefEuropean Institute for Gender Equality (EIGE). (2020). Gender Equality Index 2020. https://doi.org/10.2839/076536
Google Scholar CrossrefEuropean Institute for Gender Equality (EIGE). (2021). The Covid-19 pandemic and intimate partner violence against women in the EU. https://eige.europa.eu/printpdf/publications/covid-19-pandemic-and-intimate-partner-violence-against-women-eu
Google Scholar CrossrefEuropean Union Agency for Fundamental Rights. (2020). A long way to go for LGBTI equality. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
Google Scholar CrossrefFerree, M. M. (2009). Inequality, Intersectionality and the Politics of Discourse: Framing Feminist Alliances. In E. Lombardo, P. Meier, & M. Verloo (Eds.), The Discursive Politics of Gender Equality: Stretching, Bending and Policy-Making (pp. 84–101). Routledge.
Google Scholar CrossrefFerreira, E. (2019). Women’s, gender and feminist studies in Portugal: researchers’ resilience vs institutional resistance. Gender, Place & Culture, 26 (7–9), 1223–1232. https://doi.org/10.1080/0966369x.2018.1553867
Google Scholar CrossrefHancock, A.-M. (2007). When Multiplication Doesn’t Equal Quick Addition: Examining Intersectionality as a Research Paradigm. Perspectives on Politics, 5 (01), 63–79. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1537592707070065
Google Scholar CrossrefLombardo, E., & Agustín, L. R. (2011). Framing Gender Intersections in the European Union: What Implications for the Quality of Intersectionality in Policies? Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society, 19 (4), 482–512. https://doi.org/10.1093/sp/jxr001
Google Scholar CrossrefLombardo, E., & Bustelo, M. (2012). Political Approaches to Inequalities in Southern Europe: A Comparative Analysis of Italy, Portugal, and Spain. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society, 19 (4), 572–595. https://doi.org/10.1093/sp/jxs019
Google Scholar CrossrefMcCall, L. (2005). The Complexity of Intersectionality. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 30 (3), 1771–1800. https://doi.org/10.1086/426800
Google Scholar CrossrefMediterranean Institute of Gender Studies. (2004). Intersectionality: A Tool for Gender and Economic Justice. Women’s Rights and Economic Change, 9, August 2004.
Google Scholar CrossrefNogueira, C., & Oliveira, J. M. (Orgs.) (2010). Estudo sobre a discriminação em função da orientação sexual e da identidade de género. Lisboa: Comissão para a Cidadania e a Igualdade de Género.
Google Scholar CrossrefOrtenblad, A., Marling, R., & Vasiljevic, S. (2018). Gender Equality in a Global Perspective (Routledge Advances in Management and Business Studies) (1st Ed.). Routledge.
Google Scholar CrossrefProfeta, P. (2020). Gender Equality and Public Policy: Measuring Progress in Europe. Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar CrossrefRiggs, D. (2007). Recognizing race in LGBT psychology: privilege, power and complicity. In V. Clarke & E. Peel (Eds.), Out in psychology: lesbian, gay, bisexual, trans and queer perspectives (pp. 59–76). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470713099.ch4
Google Scholar CrossrefSigle-Rushton, W. (2013). Intersectionality. In Evans Maryand, Carolyn Williams (Eds.) Gender: The Key Concepts. Routledge key guides. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
Google Scholar CrossrefSquires, J. (2008). Intersecting Inequalities: Reflecting on the Subjects and Objects of Equality. The Political Quarterly, 79 (1), 53–61. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-923x.2008.00902.x
Google Scholar CrossrefTorres, A. C., Sant’Ana, H., & Maciel, D. (2015). Estudos de género numa perspectiva interdisciplinar. editora Mundos Sociais.
Google Scholar CrossrefWinker, G., & Degele, N. (2011). Intersectionality as multi-level analysis: Dealing with social inequality. European Journal of Women’s Studies, 18 (1), 51–66. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350506810386084
Google Scholar CrossrefYuval-Davis, N. (2006). Intersectionality and Feminist Politics. European Journal of Women’s Studies, 13 (3), 193–209. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350506806065752
Google Scholar CrossrefDownloads
Published
Almetric
Dimensions
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Eduarda Ferreira
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All articles are published under Creative Commons copyright (CC BY). Authors hold the copyright and retain publishing rights without restrictions, but authors allow anyone to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute, and/or copy articles as the original source is cited.