Toward Gender Justice: Confronting Stratification and Unequal Power
Keywords:
Downloads
Abstract
This paper advances a theory of gender justice, defined as equality of outcomes in three domains: capabilities, livelihoods, and empowerment/agency. A pivotal requirement is that women and men must be equally distributed along axes of well-being, with their respective distributions possessing equal means and dispersions. An understanding of gender stratification lies behind this proposal, whereby males benefit materially from a system of gender-divided work and responsibilities. This hierarchical system, buttressed by gender ideology, norms, and stereotypes, is disturbed as we approach gender equality in outcomes, especially of livelihoods. The latter induces greater female bargaining power which, coupled with the effect of social role incongruency on norms and stereotypes, serves to leverage change. Macroeconomic policy can support the shift to greater economic power for women by creating the conditions for class equality that is compatible with sustained economic growth.
Downloads
References
Allport, G. (1954) The Nature of Prejudice, Perseus Press, Cambridge, MA.
Google Scholar CrossrefAppiah, K.A. (2006) Cosmopolitanism: Ethics in a World of Strangers, W.W. Norton and Company, New York and London
Google Scholar CrossrefBadgett, M., Lee, V., & Folbre, N. (1999) ‘Assigning care: gender norms and economic outcomes’, International Labour Review, 138(3), pp. 311-326.
Google Scholar CrossrefBarro, R., & Lee, J.W., (2000) ‘International data on educational attainment: updates and implications’, CID Working Paper No. 42.
Google Scholar CrossrefBeaman, L., Chattopadhyay, R., Duflo, E., Pande, R., & Topalova, P. (2008) ‘Powerful women: does exposure reduce prejudice?’, NBER Working Paper No. 14198.
Google Scholar CrossrefBecker, G. (1981) A Treatise on the Family, Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA.
Google Scholar CrossrefBergmann, B. (1996) In Defense of Affirmative Action, Basic Books, New York.
Google Scholar CrossrefBlecker, R., & Seguino, S. (2002) ‘Macroeconomic effects of reducing gender wage inequality in an export-oriented, semi-industrialized economy’, Review of Development Economics, 6(1), pp. 103-119.
Google Scholar CrossrefBlumberg, R.L. (1984) ‘A general theory of gender stratification’, Sociological Theory, 2, pp. 23-101.
Google Scholar CrossrefBlumberg, R. L. (2004) ‘Extending Lenski's schema to hold up both halves of the sky: a theory-guided way of conceptualizing agrarian societies that illuminates a puzzle about gender stratification’, Sociological Theory, 22(2), pp. 278-291.
Google Scholar CrossrefBlumer, H. (1958) ‘Race prejudice as a sense of group position’, The Pacific Sociological Review, 1(1), pp. 3-7.
Google Scholar CrossrefBoserup, E. (1970) Women’s Role in Economic Development, George Allen & Unwin, London.
Google Scholar CrossrefBraunstein, E. (2008) ‘The feminist political economy of the rent-seeking society: an investigation of gender inequality and economic growth’, Journal of Economic Issues: 42(4), pp. 959-979.
Google Scholar CrossrefChafetz, J. S. (1989) ‘Gender equality: toward a theory of change’ in Wallace, R. (Ed), Feminism and Sociological Theory, Newbury Park.
Google Scholar CrossrefChant, S. (2000) ‘Men in crisis?: reflections on masculinities, work, and family in northwest Costa Rica’ European Journal of Development Research, 12(2), pp. 199-218.
Google Scholar CrossrefCoase, R. (1937) ‘The nature of the firm’, Economica, 4(16), pp. 386-405.
Google Scholar CrossrefCox, O. (1948) Caste, Class, and Race: A Study in Social Dynamics, Doubleday & Company, New York.
Google Scholar CrossrefDarity, W., Jr. (2005) ‘Stratification economics: the role of intergroup inequality’, Journal of Economics and Finance, 29(2), pp. 144-153.
Google Scholar Crossrefde Soysa, I., & Jűtting, J. (2007) ‘Informal institutions and development: think local, act global?’,in Jűtting, J., Dreschsler, D., Bartsch, S., & de Soysa, E. (Eds.), Informal Institutions: How Social Norms Help or Hinder Development, OECD Development Centre, Paris, France.
Google Scholar CrossrefGoogle Scholar Crossref
Diekman, A., Goodfriend, W., & Goodwin, S. (2004) ‘Dynamic stereotypes of power: perceived change and stability in gender hierarchies’, Sex Roles, 50(3/4), pp. 202-214.
Google Scholar CrossrefDiekman, A., Eagly, A., Mladinic, A., & Ferreira, M.C. (2005) ‘Dynamic stereotypes about women and men in Latin America and the United States’, Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 36(2), pp. 209-226.
Google Scholar CrossrefDijkstra, A. G. (2002) ‘Revising the UNDP’s GDI and GEM: towards an alternative’, Social Indicators Research, 57, pp. 301-338.
Google Scholar CrossrefDutt, A., & Ros, J. (2007) ‘Aggregate demand shocks and economic growth’, Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 18, pp. 75-99.
Google Scholar CrossrefEagly, A., & Diekman, A. (2005) ‘What is the problem? Prejudice as an attitude-in-context problem’ in Dovidio, J., Glick, P., & Rudman, L. (Eds.), On the Nature of Prejudice: Fifty Years After Allport, Blackwell Publishing, Malden, MA.
Google Scholar CrossrefFolbre, N. (1994) Who Pays for the Kids?, Routledge, London and New York.
Google Scholar CrossrefFriedl, E. (1975) Women and Men: An Anthropologist’s View, Holt, Reinhart, & Winston, New York.
Google Scholar CrossrefGrown, C. (2008) ‘Indicators and indices of gender inequality: what do they measure and what do they miss?’, in Buvinic, M., Morrison, A., Ofosu-Amaah, A. W., and Sjoblom, M. (Eds.), World Bank, Washington, DC.
Google Scholar CrossrefGrown, C., Gupta, G.R., & Khan, Z. (2003) ‘Promises to keep: achieving gender equality and the empowerment of women’, Background paper for the UN Millennium Project Task Force on Primary Education and Gender Equality, ICRW (International Center for Research on Women), Washington, D.C.
Google Scholar CrossrefHill, A.M., & King, E. (1995) ‘Women’s education and economic well-being’, Feminist Economics, 1(2), pp. 21-46.
Google Scholar CrossrefHuber, J. (1990) ‘Macro-micro links in gender stratification’, American Sociological Review, 55, pp. 1-10.
Google Scholar CrossrefIversen, T., & Rosenbluth, F. (2008) ‘Work and power: the connection between female labor force participation and female political representation’, Annual Review of Political Science, 11, pp. 479-495.
Google Scholar CrossrefIversen, T., & Rosenbluth, F. (2005) ‘Gender socialization: how bargaining power shapes social norms and political attitudes’, Working Paper 2008-0064, Weatherhead Center for International Affairs, Harvard University.
Google Scholar CrossrefJütting, J., & Morrisson, C. (2005) ‘Changing social institutions to improve the status of women in developing countries’, Policy Brief No. 27, OECD.
Google Scholar CrossrefKabeer, N. (2000) The Power to Choose: Bangladeshi Women and Labour Market Conditions in London and Dhaka, Verso, London and New York.
Google Scholar CrossrefKlasen, S. (2002) ‘Low schooling for girls, slower growth for all? Cross-country evidence on the effect of gender inequality in education on economic development’, World Bank Economic Review, 16(3), pp. 345-373.
Google Scholar CrossrefKnowles, S., Lorgelly, P., & Owen, P.D. (2002) ‘Are educational gender gaps a brake on economic development? Some cross-country empirical evidence’, Oxford Economic Papers, 54(1), pp. 118-149.
Google Scholar CrossrefKroska, A., & Elman, C. (2006) ‘Change in attitudes about employed mothers: exposure, interests, and gender ideology discrepancies’ Paper presented at annual meeting of the American Sociology Association, Montréal, Quebec.
Google Scholar CrossrefMorrisson, C., & Jütting, J. (2005) ‘Women’s discrimination in developing countries: a new data set for better policies’, World Development, 33(7), pp. 1065-1081.
Google Scholar CrossrefNussbaum, M. (2003) ‘Capabilities as fundamental entitlements: Sen and social justice’, Feminist Economics, 9(2/3), pp. 33-59.
Google Scholar CrossrefPhillips, A. (2004) ‘Defending equality of outcome’, Journal of Political Philosophy, 12(1), pp. 1-10.
Google Scholar CrossrefPurkayasta, D. (1999) ‘Patriarchal monopoly and economic development’, Feminist Economics, 5(2), pp. 61-78.
Google Scholar CrossrefRidgeway, C., & Correll, S. (2004) ‘Unpacking the gender system: a theoretical perspective on gender beliefs and social relations’, Gender & Society, 18(4), pp. 510-531.
Google Scholar CrossrefRobeyns, I. (2003) ‘Sen’s capability approach and gender inequality: selecting relevant capabilities’, Feminist Economics, 9(2/3), pp. 61-92.
Google Scholar CrossrefRobeyns, I. (2007) ‘When will society be gender just?’ in Brown, J. (Ed.), The Future of Gender, pp. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
Google Scholar CrossrefRoemer, J. (1998) Equality of Opportunity, Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA.
Google Scholar CrossrefSeguino, S. (2010). ‘Gender, distribution, and balance of payments constrained growth in developing countries’, Review of Political Economy, 22(3), pp. 373–404.
Google Scholar CrossrefSeguino, S, (2007a) ‘Plus ça change?: evidence on global trends in gender norms and stereotypes’, Feminist Economics, 13(2), pp. 1-28.
Google Scholar CrossrefSeguino, S. (2007b) ‘The great equalizer?: globalization effects on gender equity in well-being in Latin America and the Caribbean’, in Shaikh, A. (Ed.), Globalization and the Myth of Free Trade, Routledge.
Google Scholar CrossrefSeguino, S. (2006) ‘The threads that bind: race and gender stratification and the macroeconomics of inequality’, Working Paper, University of Vermont, Department of Economics.
Google Scholar CrossrefSeguino, S. (2002) ‘Gender, quality of life, and growth in Asia 1970 to 1990’, The Pacific Review, 15(2), pp. 245-277.
Google Scholar CrossrefSeguino, S. (2000) ‘Accounting for gender in Asian economic growth’, Feminist Economics, 6(3), pp. 22-58.
Google Scholar CrossrefSen, A. (1999) Development as Freedom, Knopf Publishers, New York.
Google Scholar CrossrefSen, G. (2007) ‘Informal institutions and gender equality’ in Jütting, E., Dreschsler, D., Bartsch, S., & de Soysa, I. (Eds.), Informal Institutions: How Social Norms Help or Hinder Development, OECD Development Centre, Paris, France.
Google Scholar CrossrefUnited Nations Millennium Project. (2005) ‘Taking action: achieving gender equality and empowering women', Report prepared by the Taskforce on Education and Gender Equality, Earthscan, London and Virginia..
Google Scholar CrossrefWorld Bank. (2001) Engendering Development through Gender Equality in Rights, Resources and Voice, Oxford University Press, New York.
Google Scholar Crossref
Downloads
Published
Almetric
Dimensions
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
All articles are published under Creative Commons copyright (CC BY). Authors hold the copyright and retain publishing rights without restrictions, but authors allow anyone to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute, and/or copy articles as the original source is cited.
