Programas, intervenciones y prácticas efectivas en prevención de drogodependencias con mujeres jóvenes.
Keywords:
Downloads
Abstract
Recientemente a nivel internacional se ha incrementado el interés en la identificación de prácticas efectivas que contemplen las necesidades particulares de las niñas o jóvenes, precisamente motivado por el abuso de sustancias tóxicas y sus “altos” contactos con Justicia juvenil y de adultos. La literatura revisada revela que en general son muy escasos los programas específicos para chicas en materia de prevención de drogodependencias. Además son también pocos los que han publicado sus resultados desagregados por sexo. Por lo que la necesidad de estudio y de evaluación son tremendamente necesarios para poder dar una respuesta adecuada a sus necesidades. Por todo ello, este artículo revisa y analiza los distintos discursos entorno a los factores de éxito y riesgo al igual que los programas específicos en prevención de drogodependencias (y residenciales) con chicas o mujeres jóvenes.ABSTRACT:Recently at the international level has been increased interest in identifying effective practices that address the particular needs of girls, motivated precisely by the Substance Abuse and "high" contacts with youth and adults Justice. The literature review reveals that in general there are very few specific programs for girls in the prevention of drug addiction. In addition are also very few who have published their results disaggregated by sex. So the need for study and evaluation are extremely necessary to provide an adequate response to their needs. Therefore, this paper reviews and analyzes the different discourses around the success and risk factors as well as the specific programs in drug prevention (and residential) with girls or young women.
Keywords: young offenders, preventive programs, residential drug addiction
Downloads
References
Adelberg, E., Currie, C. (1987) Too few to count: Canadian women in conflict with the law, en Allison Morris, with the assistance of Loraine Gelsthorpe (December 1980) Women and crime papers presents to the Crowood Round table conference, edited by Cropwood conference series, 13. University of Cambridge Institute of Criminology.
Google Scholar CrossrefAMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION, and NATIONAL BAR ASSOCIATION. (2001) “Justice by Gender: The Lack of Appropriate Prevention, Diversion and Treatment Alternatives for Girls in the Justice System”. Washington, D.C.: American Bar Association and the National Bar Association.
Google Scholar CrossrefBaskin, Deborah, Ira B. Sommers and Jefferey FAGAN (1993). ‘Females’ Initiation into Violent Street Crime.’ Justice Quarterly 10: 559–81.
Google Scholar CrossrefBelknap, J., Holsinger, K. (1998). “An overview of delinquent girls: How theory and practice failed and the need for innovative changes”. In R.T. Zaplin (Ed.), Female offenders: Critical perspectives and effective interventions. Gaithersburg, MD: Aspen Publishers.
Google Scholar CrossrefBelknap, J. (2001). The invisible woman: Gender, crime, and justice, Second Edition. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
Google Scholar CrossrefBloom, Barbara E., Owen Barbara, Elizabeth Piper Deschenes, and Jill
Google Scholar CrossrefBlake, S. M., Amaro, H., Schwartz, P. M., & Flinchbaugh, L. J. (2001). A review of substance abuse prevention interventions for young adolescent girls. Journal of Early Adolescence, 21(3), 294.
Google Scholar CrossrefBrown, L.M. (2003). Girlfighting: Betrayal and rejection among girls. New York: New York University Press.
Google Scholar CrossrefBurt, M.R; Glynn, T.J & Sowder, D.J. 1979. Psychosocial Characteristics of Drug Abusing Women. NIDA. Research Monograph. DHEW Publication Nº. ADM 80-197. Rockville, Maryland : U.S.GPO.
Google Scholar CrossrefCameron, H., and Telfer, J. (2004). “Cognitive-behavioural group work: Its application to specific offender groups”. Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 43, 47-64.
Google Scholar CrossrefCullen, F.T., & Gendreau, P. (2000). “Assessing correctional rehabilitation: Policy, practice, and prospects. In J. Horney (Ed.)”, Policies, processes, and decisions of the criminal justice system; criminal justice (Vol. 3, pp. 109-175). Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice/ NCJRS.
Google Scholar CrossrefGendreau, P. (1996). “The principles of effective intervention with offenders”. In A. Harland (Ed.), Choosing correctional options that work: Defining the demand and evaluating the supply (pp. 117-130). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Google Scholar CrossrefChesney-lind, M., Shelden, R.G. (1997). Girls, delinquency, and the juvenile justice system (2nd ed.), Belmont, CA:Wadsworth Publishing Company Community Research Associates. Juvenile Female Offenders: A Status of the States Report. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
Google Scholar CrossrefChesney-lind, M., Freitas, K. (1999).”Working with Girls: Exploring Practitioner Issues, Experiences and Feelings”. A report of the Hawaii Girls Project, 4. Manoa, HI: The Center for Youth Research, Social Science Research Institute, University of Hawaii at Manoa.
Google Scholar CrossrefChesney-lind, M. (1999) “Challenging girls’ invisibility in the juvenile court”. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 564:185–202.
Google Scholar CrossrefChesney-lind, Meda. (2000) “What to do about Girls”. Assessment to Assistance: Programs for Women in Community Corrections. Maeve McMahon (ed). Lanham, MD: American Correctional Association, pp. 139-170.
Google Scholar CrossrefChesney-Lind, Randall G. Shelden (2004). Girls, delinquency and juvenile justice.
Google Scholar CrossrefChesney–lind, Meda, Morash Merry, and Stevens Tia. (2008) “Girls’ Troubles, Girls’ Delinquency, and Gender Responsive Programming: A Review”. The Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology 41 (1):162–89.
Google Scholar CrossrefDembo, R., Williams, L., Schmeidler, J.,& Christensen, C. (1993). “Recidivism in a cohort of juvenile detainees”: A3 1/2 year follow-up. International Journal of the Addictions, 28, 631-658.
Google Scholar CrossrefGaarder, Emily, Nancy Rodriguez, and Marjorie S. Zatz. (2004). Criers, Liars, and Manipulators: Probation Officers’ Views of Girls. Justice Quarterly 21 (3):547–78.
Google Scholar CrossrefGelsthorpe, L. (1989) Sexism and the Female Offender. Cambridge Studies in Criminology. Aldershot: Gower.
Google Scholar CrossrefGreene, Peters, & Associates (1998). Guiding principles for promising female programming: An inventory of best practices. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
Google Scholar CrossrefGlynn, TH. J., H. Wallenstein (1983) Women and Drugs, NIDA Research Issues 31. Rockville, Md: National Institute on Drug Abuse, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Pearson & M. Sayers (Editors).
Google Scholar CrossrefHowell, J. (2003). Preventing and Reducing Juvenile Delinquency: A Comprehensive Framework. Thousand Oaks, Calif.: SAGE.
Google Scholar CrossrefHubbard, D.J. & Matthews, B. (2008). Reconciling the differences between the ―Gender- Responsive‖ and the ―What Works‖ literatures to improve services for girls. Crime and Delinquency, 54, 225-258.
Google Scholar CrossrefHubbard, D.J. & Pratt, T.C. (2002). A meta-analysis of the predictors of delinquency among girls. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 34, 1-13.
Google Scholar CrossrefHuizinga, David (1997). Over-Time Changes in Delinquency and Drug Use: The 1970’s to the 1990’s. Unpublished report. Washington, DC: Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
Google Scholar CrossrefKumpfer, K. L., Alvarado, R. (2003). “Family interventions for the prevention of drug abuse”. American Psychologist 58(6–7):425–432.
Google Scholar CrossrefKumpfer K L., Smith P., y Franklin Summerhays J., (2008) “AWakeup Call to the Prevention Field: Are Prevention Programs for Substance Us Effective for Girls?” Substance Use & Misuse. Utah, USA.
Google Scholar CrossrefLipsey, M.W. (1992). Juvenile delinquency treatment: A meta-analytic inquiry into the variability of effects. In T.A. Cook, H. Cooper, D.S. Cordray, H. Hartmann, L.V. Hedges, R.J. Light, T.A.
Google Scholar CrossrefLouis & E. Mosleller (EDS), Meta-analysis for explanation: A casebook (pp. 83–126). New York: Russell Sage.
Google Scholar CrossrefMalloch, M. (2004) Women, Drug Use and the Criminal Justice System in G. McIvor (Ed) Women Who Offend, Research Highlights in Social Work 44, 245-265, London: Jessica Kingsley.
Google Scholar CrossrefNATIONAL INSTITUTE ON DRUG ABUSE. (2002). Study quantifies cost-benefit of family interventions designed to prevent adolescent alcohol use. NIDA News Release. Available at www.drugabuse.gov.
Google Scholar CrossrefNATIONAL INSTITUTE ON DRUG ABUSE. Problems of Drug Dependence, 1979: Proceedings of the 41st Annual Scientific Meeting, the Committee on Problems of Drug Dependence, Inc.
Google Scholar CrossrefNIDA (1983) “Preventing Adolescent Drug Abuse: Intervention Strategies”. Monograph 47.
Google Scholar CrossrefOrte, C., y GIFES. (2005). “Los programas de prevención de drogas centrados en la
Google Scholar Crossreffamilia: una visión desde la investigación y la práctica”. Revista Proyecto (53),14-17.
Google Scholar CrossrefOrte, C., y GIFES. (2005). “Una investigació educativa sobre un programa de competència familiar”. En M. March, Anuari de l'Educació de les Illes Balears (págs.
Google Scholar Crossref-295). Palma: Fundació Guillem Cifre de Colonya.
Google Scholar CrossrefOrte, C. (1998). Sexualidad, mujer y drogodependencias. Revista Proyecto núm. 26. Junio.
Google Scholar CrossrefOrte, C., March, M.X. (2002). Mujer y drogas en España. Una revisión documental.
Google Scholar CrossrefOrte, C. (2002).Sexualidad en la mujer adicta Actas Ier Symposium Nacional sobre Adicción en la Mujer. (pp-15-26). Madrid: Ministerio de Trabajo y Asuntos Sociales y Fundación Spiral.
Google Scholar CrossrefOrte-Socias, C. y Amer-Fernández, J. (2014). Las adaptaciones culturales del Strengthening Families Program en Europa. Un ejemplo de programa de educación familiar basado en evidencia. Estudios sobre educación, 26, 175-195.
Google Scholar CrossrefRosenbaum (2002).“Improving Juvenile Justice for Females: A Statewide Assessment in California”. Crime & Delinquency 48 (4):526.
Google Scholar CrossrefRumgay, J. (1998) Crime, Punishment and the Drinking Offender. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
Google Scholar CrossrefSales, E., Sambrano, S., Springer, F. J., Turner, C. (2003). “Risk, protection, and substance use in adolescents: A multi-site model”. Journal of. Drug Education 33(1):91–105.
Google Scholar CrossrefSchinke, S.P., L. Fang, and K.C.A. Cole (2008), Substance use among early adolescent girls: Risk and protective factors. Journal of Adolescent Health, 43(2):p. 191-194.
Google Scholar CrossrefSharpe Gilly and Gelsthorpe Loraine (2009). Engendering the Agenda: Girls, Young Women and Youth Justice Youth.
Google Scholar CrossrefWorrall, A. (2001) “Girls at Risk? Reflections on Changing Attitudes to Young Women’s Offending”, Probation Journal, 48(2): 86-92.
Google Scholar CrossrefYin, R. K., Ware, A. J. (2000). Using outcome data to evaluate community drug prevention initiatives:
Google Scholar CrossrefPushing the state-of-the-art. Journal of Community Psychology 28:323–338
Google Scholar CrossrefZahn, Margaret A., Stephanie R. Hawkins, Janet Chiancone, and Ariel WHITWORTH and others (2008). The Girls Study Group—Charting the Way to Delinquency Prevention for Girls. U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
Google Scholar CrossrefDenise C. Gottfredson, AND Candace Kruttschnitt. (2008). Violence by Teenage Girls: Trends and Context: Office of Justice Programs, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, Girls Study Group.
Google Scholar CrossrefZahn, Margaret A., Jacob C. Day, Sharon F. MIHALIC, and Lisa TICHAVSKY. (2009). “Determining What Works for Girls in the Juvenile Justice System”. Crime & Delinquency 55 (2):266–93.
Google Scholar CrossrefDownloads
Published
Almetric
Dimensions
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
All articles are published under Creative Commons copyright (CC BY). Authors hold the copyright and retain publishing rights without restrictions, but authors allow anyone to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute, and/or copy articles as the original source is cited.
