“Tell Me who You Hang Out with and I'll Tell You Who You Are”: Analysis of How the Social Contacts´ Gender Predicts Self-Concept as a Socially Engaged Person and Intention of Future Social Participation Among Young People
Keywords:
Abstract
The purpose of this work was to study the effect of gender on the social influence processes that explain the young people’ social participation. A total of 962 Spanish undergraduate students completed a questionnaire assessing their likelihood of engaging in social participation in the future, their self-concept as socially engaged people, and the number of socially involved contacts in their social networks, distinguishing between male and female contacts. We found that gender homophily characterised the social networks of both women and men. Consistent with gender stereotyping, being female predicted self-concept and the intention to be civically engaged, and being male predicted the intention to be politically engaged. For both genders, the number of female contacts predicted the intention to be civically engaged only, and the number of male contacts predicted the intention to be politically engaged. Moreover, for males, having a more gender-heterogeneous social network predicted to a greater extent their self-concept as socially engaged. The findings provide new insights for targeting interventions designed to foster social participation in women and men.
Downloads
References
Ahlf, H., Horak, S., Klein, A., & Yoon, S. W. (2019). Demographic Homophily, Communication, and Trust in Intra-Organizational Business Relationships. Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing, 34(2), 474- 487. https://doi.org/10.1108/JBIM-03-2018-0093
Google Scholar CrossrefAjzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior. PrenticeHall Press.
Google Scholar CrossrefAjzen, I., & Madden, T. J. (1986). Prediction of goal-directed behavior: Attitudes, intentions, and perceived behavioral control. Journal of experimental social psychology, 22(5), 453-474.
Google Scholar CrossrefAlbanesi, C., Zani, B., & Cicognani, E. (2012). Youth civic and political participation through the lens of gender: The Italian case. Human Affairs, 22, 360-374. DOI: 10.2478/s13374-012-0030-3
Google Scholar CrossrefAlmquist, Y.B., Östberg, V., Rostila, M., Edling, C., & Rydgren, J. (2014). Friendship network characteristics and psychological well-being in late adolescence: Exploring differences by gender and gender composition. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health, 42(2), 146-154. DOI: 10.1177/1403494813510793
Google Scholar CrossrefAthenstaedt, U., Hass, E., & Schwab, S. (2004). Gender Role Self-Concept and Gender-Typed Communication Behavior in Mixed-Sex and Same-Sex Dyads. Sex Roles, 50(1/2), 37-52.
Google Scholar CrossrefBarrett, M., & Brunton-Smith, I. (2014). Political and Civic Engagement and Participation: Towards an Integrative Perspective. Journal of Civil Society, 10(1), 5-28.
Google Scholar CrossrefBennett, W. L. (2007). Civic learning in changing democracies: Challenges for citizenship and civic education. Young citizens and new media. Routledge.
Google Scholar CrossrefCharng, H., Piliavin, J., & Callero, P. (1988). Role identity and reasoned action in the prediction of repeated behavior. Social Psychology Quarterly, 51(4), 303–317.
Google Scholar CrossrefCicognani, E., Zani, B., Fournier, B., Gavray, C., & Born, B. (2012). Gender differences in youths’ political engagement and participation. The role of parents and of adolescents’ social and civic participation. Journal of Adolescence, 35(3), 561-576. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2011.10.002
Google Scholar CrossrefCicognani, E., Mazzoni, D., Albanesi, C., & Zani, B. (2015). Sense of community and empowerment among young people: Understanding pathways from civic participation to social well-being. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 26(1), 24-44.
Google Scholar CrossrefCohen J. E. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc
Google Scholar CrossrefCroson, R., & Gneezy, U. (2009). Gender differences in preferences. Journal of Economic Literature, 47 (2), 448–474.
Google Scholar CrossrefDávila, M.C., Zlobina, A., & Álvarez, G. (2020). La influencia diferencial de las redes sociales en la participación social de mujeres y varones [The differential influence of social networks on the social participation of women and men]. Redes, 31(1), 1-18.
Google Scholar CrossrefDávila, M.C., Zlobina, A., & Álvarez-Hernández, G. (2021). Young people’s social Engagement: Personal motivations and social networks. Voluntas, 33, 587-598. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-021-00355-5
Google Scholar CrossrefDe Wit, A., & Bekkers, R. (2015). Exploring Gender Differences in Charitable Giving: The Dutch Case. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 45(4), 741–761. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764015601242
Google Scholar CrossrefDe Wit, A., & Bekkers, R. (2016). Exploring Gender Differences in Charitable Giving: The Dutch Case. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 45(4), 741-761.
Google Scholar CrossrefDjupe, P.A., Sokhey, A.E., & Gilbert, C.P. (2007). Present but not accounted for? Gender Differences in Civic Resource Acquisition. Journal of Political Science, 51(4), 906–920.
Google Scholar CrossrefEagly, A.H. (1987). Sex Differences in Social Behavior: A Social-role Interpretation. Lawrence Erlbaum.
Google Scholar CrossrefEfron, B., & Tibshirani, R. (1993). An Introduction to the Bootstrap. Chapman and Hall.
Google Scholar CrossrefEnchikova, E., Neves, T., Mejias, S., Kalmus, V., Cicognani, E., & Ferreira, P.D. (2019). Civic and Political Participation of European Youth: Fair Measurement in Different Cultural and Social Contexts. Frontiers in Education, 4:10. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2019.00010
Google Scholar CrossrefFriebel, G., Lalanne, M., Richter, B. Schwardmannd, P., & Seabright, P. (2021). Gender differences in social interactions. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 186, 33–45
Google Scholar CrossrefGordon, H.R. (2008). Gendered Paths to Teenage Political Participation: Parental Power, Civic Mobility, and Youth Activism. Gender & Society, 22, 31-55.
Google Scholar CrossrefGottlieb, J. (2016). Why Might Information Exacerbate the Gender Gap in Civic Participation? Evidence from Mali. World Development, 86, 95–110.
Google Scholar CrossrefGreenfield, E.A., & Moorman, S.M. (2018). Extracurricular involvement in high school and later-life participation in voluntary associations. The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, 73(3), 482-491. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbw168
Google Scholar CrossrefHayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. Guilford Press.
Google Scholar CrossrefHoskins, B. L., & Mascherini, M. (2009). Measuring active citizenship through the development of a composite indicator. Social Indicators Research, 90(3), 459-488.
Google Scholar CrossrefINJUVE (2021). Informe juventud en España 2020 [Youth in Spain 2020 Report]. INJUVE.http://www.injuve.es/sites/default/files/adjuntos/2021/03/informe_juventud_espana_2020.pdf
Google Scholar CrossrefJackson, L.A., Hodge, C.N., & Ingram, J.M. (1994). Gender and self-concept: A reexamination of stereotypic differences and the role of gender attitudes. Sex Roles, 30, 615–630.
Google Scholar CrossrefKiesa, A., Orlowski, A. P., Levine, P., Both, D., Kirby, E. H., Lopez, M. H., & Marcelo, K. B. (2007). Millennials Talk Politics: A Study of College Student Political Engagement. Center for information and research on civic learning and engagement (CIRCLE).
Google Scholar CrossrefLee, L., Piliavin, J.A., & Call, V.R.A. (1999). Giving Time, Money, and Blood: Similarities and Differences. Social Psychology Quarterly, 62(3), 276-290.
Google Scholar CrossrefLilleker, D., Koc-Michalska, K., & Bimber, B. (2021). Women learn while men talk?: revisiting gender differences in political engagement in online environments. Information, Communication and Society, 24(14), 2037-2053.
Google Scholar CrossrefLin, A. (2013). Citizenship education in American schools and its role in developing civic engagement: a review of the research. Educational Review, 67(1), 35-63.
Google Scholar CrossrefMalin, H., Tirri, K., & Liauw, I. (2015). Adolescent moral motivations for civic engagement: Clues to the political gender gap? Journal of Moral Education, 44(1), 34-50. DOI: 10.1080/03057240.2015.1014324
Google Scholar CrossrefManganelli, S., Lucidi, F., & Alivernini, F. (2014). Adolescents’ expected civic participation: The role of civic knowledge and efficacy beliefs. Journal of Adolescence, 37, 632-64.
Google Scholar CrossrefMcAdam, D., & Paulsen, R. (1993). Specifying the relationship between social ties and activism. American Journal of Sociology, 99(3), 640- 667.
Google Scholar CrossrefMcCartly, C., Lubbers, M.L., Vacca, R., & Molina, J.L. (2019). Conducting personal network research: A practical guide. The Guilford Press.
Google Scholar CrossrefO’Toole, M., Gordon, R., & Grey, C. (2016). Beyond choice: ‘Thick’ volunteering and the case of the Royal National Lifeboat Institution. Human Relations, 69(1), 85–109.
Google Scholar CrossrefPassy, F. (2003). Social networks matter. But how? In M. Diani & D. McAdam (Eds.), Social movements and networks: Relational approaches to collective (pp.21-48). Oxford University Press. https://doi. org/10.1093/0199251789.003.0002
Google Scholar CrossrefPavlova, M.K., & Silvereisen, R.K. (2015). Supportive social contexts and intentions for civic and political participation: An application of the theory of planned behaviour. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 25, 432-446.
Google Scholar CrossrefPowazny, S., & Kauffeld, S. (2021). The role of gender in the evolution of peer networks: Individual differences in relation to the Big Five. Personality and Individual Differences, 170(15), 110447.
Google Scholar CrossrefSheeran, P., & Webb, T.L. (2016). The Intention–Behavior Gap. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 10/9, 503–518.
Google Scholar CrossrefSmith, C., Noll, J.A., & Bryant, J.B. (1999). The Effect of Social Context on Gender Self-Concept. Sex Roles, 40(5/6), 499–512.
Google Scholar CrossrefSmith, S.S. (2000). Mobilizing social resources: Race, Ethnic, and Gender Differences in Social Capital and Persisting Wage Inequalities. The Sociological Quarterly, 41(4), 509-537. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1533-8525.2000.tb00071.x
Google Scholar CrossrefSomers, M. (1992). Narrativity, narrative identity, and social action: Rethinking English working-class formation. Social Science History, 16, 591–630.
Google Scholar CrossrefSon, J., & Lin, N. (2008). Social capital and civic action: A networkbased approach. Social Science Research, 37, 330–349. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2006.12.004
Google Scholar CrossrefStefani, S., Prati, G., Tzankovaa, I., Ricci, E., Albanesi, C., & Cicognani, E. (2021). Gender Differences in Civic and Political Engagement and Participation among Italian Young People. Social Psychological Bulletin, 16(1), e3887. https://doi.org/10.32872/spb.3887
Google Scholar CrossrefTindall, D.B. (2002). Social networks, identification and participation in an environmental movement: Low-medium cost activism within the British Columbia Wilderness Preservation Movement. The Canadian Review of Sociology and Antropology, 39(4), 413-452.
Google Scholar CrossrefTseng, S., & Hsieh, Y.P. (2015). The implications of networked individualism for social participation: How mobile phone, E-mail, and IM networks afford social participation for rural residents in Taiwan. American Behavioral Scientist, 59(9), 1157-1172.
Google Scholar CrossrefVogel, D.L., Wester, S.R., Heesacker, M., & Madon, S. (2003). Confirming Gender Stereotypes: A Social Role Perspective. Sex Roles, 48(11), 519-528.
Google Scholar CrossrefWen, N., Hao, X., & George, C. (2013). Gender and political participation: News consumption, political efficacy and interpersonal communication. Asian Journal for Women’s Studies, 19(4), 124-149.
Google Scholar CrossrefPublished
Almetric
Dimensions
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 María Celeste Dávila, Anna Zlobina
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All articles are published under Creative Commons copyright (CC BY). Authors hold the copyright and retain publishing rights without restrictions, but authors allow anyone to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute, and/or copy articles as the original source is cited.
