Academic performance and other psychological, social and family factors in compulsory secondary education students in a multicultural context

This work aims to transfer research on academic achievement in compulsory secondary education (CSE) students (12-18 years) from personal factors to others of a psychosocial or sociological type, in a Spanish center with a high level of immigration, which welcome students from twenty eight nationalities whose percentage is about 60%. A second objective was to develop a brief measurement instrument to predict academic achievement, being the main dependent variable the number of suspended subjects in all three course evaluations, finding an optimal constellation of variables which may be more likely to achieve better academic achievement. 317 students of Secondary Education were part of this research in a public center of Zaragoza (Aragon-Spain) who were given anÂ  ad hoc Â  Family Settings, Psychosocial and Contextual QuestionnaireÂ  whose factorial analysis yielded three factors: Context Immigration, Family Settings and academic autobiographical history and study habits. Finally, we analyzed the differences found among students from different continents, trying to find sociocultural foundations and optimal conditions that can explain these differences. Further analysis allow us to glimpse a configuration of the most important variables that point to a hypothetical academic success in this educational field where there is great ethnic and cultural diversity.

Palabras clave: logro académico, educación secundaria obligatoria, diversidad étnica y cultural, configuraciones familiares, variables contextuales. Education,7(1) 3 he search for causal relationships between independent variables and academic performance is a complex and elusive issue as smoke that looks, smells, feels, but when you want to catch fades and you are out of hand. Although from a historical point of view, initially many empirical studies have been carried out starting from inherent to the subject endogenous independent variables, from the psychology of traits (Broc, 2015;Schuerger, 2005), or from prospects intelligence and skills based on a differential and psychometric approach (Andrés, 1996), many studies based on these approaches, which correlate certain variables with other not usually arrive generally overcome explaining about 50% of the variance of change in the dependent variables (in our case performance), from independent, so a new search for factors and variables that help explain the relationships from paradigms or more ecological approaches (Bronfenbrenner, 1979) believe necessary, cultural (Bruner, 1990;Cole, 1992Cole, , 1999 or contextual (Valsiner & Winegar, 1992;Cohen & Siegel, 1991;Lacasa, 1994), which provide new data to progress in the construction of new more comprehensive theoretical models and integrators in this line.

RISE -International Journal of Sociology of
The issue of academic performance has always figured prominently in the social and educational countryside and its relationship with certain mediating variables such as self-concept (Broc, 2000(Broc, , 2014Harter, 2012), motivation and volition (Broc, 2006(Broc, , 2012, or from more complex theoretical models (Broc, 2011(Broc, , 2017, etc., which supposedly affect it, still many factors that influence, reaching the conclusion that this relationship is multi-causal and affects different planes or levels of analysis. The number of publications on this construct is very high and we do not intend here to make any systematic review and meta-analysis studies, but to clarify the incidence of other more peripheral or secondary variables but no less important. A set of family, psychosocial and contextual variables "a priori" are considered, which can affect performance so this study be framed within a closer evolutionary paradigm to ecological perspectives and life cycle arises in this work, but also with elements of quantitative and correlational approach ( "ex post facto").
Objectives 1) Design and test the effectiveness of a measuring instrument family-T 4 Broc -Academic Performance psychosocial variables, and context in compulsory secondary education students designed "ad hoc" and reduce the dimensions by analysis of categorical principal components, or in its ordinary case.
2) Empirically detect independent variables that enter into the equation predicting academic performance, detected by analyzing categorical or linear regression, based on an analysis of previous correlation between them.
3) To analyze the impact of family and contextual on academic performance and find variables, if possible, a constellation of "best" variables to predict a greater likelihood of success in school students and families in which they appear.

Design
The design of this study is retrospective "ex post facto" because the independent and dependent variables are already given in advance and try to find or reconstruct the events back, possible causes or independent variables that have caused the response (León & Montero, 1998;Fontes de Gracia, García Garriga, Pérez-Llantada & Sarriá, 2001).

Participants
The Center where conducted this research (IES El Portillo) is located at an average, medium-low area of Zaragoza capital and is representative as a public secondary school, one of the most diverse student presents all the Autonomous community. 317 high school students participated in this study, of whose 163 were men and 154 women. The racial courses were: 1 = 79 (M = 48 and 31 W); 2nd = 88 (44 M and 44 W); 3rd = 78 (34 M and 44 W); and 4 = 72 (37 M and 35 W). The proportions do not differ significantly from each other at the .05 level.
Students grouped by Continents and sex were: Spain: 145 (76 M and 69 W); Eastern Europe: 42 (23 M and 19 W); Asia: 9 (5 M and 4 W); Central and South America: 74 (34 M and 40 W); Africa: 47 (25 M and 22 W). The number of immigrant children or children of immigrants is 175 (55.2%) and native of 142 (44.8%), not being significant difference in favor of either group (F = 3.061, p = .081). It can be said that the proportion of immigrants and natives is about the same. The number of students per course depending on the Continent is presented in Table 1.

Materials and Variables
The material used is a questionnaire Family, psychosocial and contextual settings 30 issues whose variables take different values depending on their dichotomous nature or polytomous nominal, ordinal or interval, and is presented in Annex 1. The results of a exploratory factor analysis principal component, considering all the variables, ultimately, as numerical and 6 Broc -Academic Performance categorical analysis of other major components (CATPCA) optimal scaling type being subsequently presented fairly similar results.
The dependent variable was operationalized in two ways: a) Sum of scores (quantitative, continuous, numerical interval, with a range of 11 to 110, since there are eleven subjects and the minimum score on each is one and the maximum ten); b) Number of failures, quantitative, numerical ratio, with the rank of zero-no suspense at-all eleven failures). The variable "number of failures" sheds M = 2.67 and SD = 2.99; the variable "sum of scores" an M = 51.60 and SD = 18.64, and the same variable "typified sum of scores" an M = 0.00 and SD = 1. Kolmogorov-Smirnov test for a sample applied to this variable in triple format a statistics throws 20 (Sig., p <.00) .06 (Sig., p < 0.00) and .06 (Sig., p < 0.00), respectively (correction Lilliefors in significance), adjusting to a normal curve.

Procedure
The questionnaire was designed considering contextual variables and peripheral struggling with the guardians of all courses of the ESO and modifying some items that might be somewhat confusing or unclear was designed. Subsequently, all prospective students of the Center administered at end of year (June 2015) mainly in tutorial hours. If a student / a it was not in the institute warned him and when he came to the beginning of the next course (several months later), was administered under the same conditions, in order to avoid the largest number of lost cases. The data was entered into the editor of SPSS, version 22, and proceeded to make all relevant statistical analysis. The final scores of students were obtained with the permission of the management team, the Board of teacher evaluation and reports of some students or their parents who did not consent to those who were asked in writing prior to administration discarded.

Results and Discussion
In this research we used the statistical programs Spss (version 22) and Lisrel 8.51. First they were conducted a principal component analysis of the questionnaire, both categorical (CATPCA) and regular (EFA), in order to compare the results. Three main components are hypothesized. Later regression analysis all variables were performed, and after the most important on the dependent variable sum of qualifications and number of failures. Finally, analysis of variance of each variable was conducted separately, depending on certain factors, in order to deepen and better understand these variables. As the scaling level of the variables was numerically and the results were clearer, it chose to present data from the analysis of linear main components (exploratory), although the results were quite similar to those obtained by CATPA.

Principal Components Analysis Exploratory twenty eight and twelve variables
For all variables the KMO = .76, with Bartlett test of sphericity, with a Chisquare approximation of 2824,557, and df = 378; Sig. = .00, advised a factorization, to a solution of three factors. In a second analysis for the twelve variables selected with higher factor loadings, the KMO was similar to perform a factorization (KMO = .749; Bartlett test of sphericity = 1827,589, df = 66, Sig = .00. Results obtained using variables 28 and 12 (in brackets) are shown in Table 2 (Extraction Method: Principal Component Analysis; Rotation Method: Promax with Kaiser Normalization).
One could conclude that a reduction of 28 items to 12 increases the total explained variance of 35% to 62% and that these elements can be grouped into 3 main factors: Factor Context of Immigration, with four items including continent of origin, born or not in Spain, being an immigrant or child of immigrant versus native and time in years of residence in Spain in three sections (1-6, 7-12 and 13-19 years). The second factor Family settings, that would include three items: family size, number of siblings and ordinal place that occupies at birth. The third and final factor called Academic autobiographical history and study habits, with five items that include daily hours of study, whether or not repeat a course in primary  The p-value = 0.207 (must be greater than .05) and the quotient between the Chi-square value and the degrees of freedom is less than three (1.17), and all other parameters conform to the established norm by Hooper, Coughlan and Mullen (2008), so it can be maintained that this model, in general, seems to fit quite well. A path diagram is shown in Figure 1.

Correlation Analysis
Correlations between independent variables and the dependent variable number of failures and sum of scores are presented in Table 4. With the independent variable "Sum of grades" in all academic subjects, the model is as follows:   Levene statistic = 7.48, df1 = 4, df2 = 312, Sig. = .00, ANOVA, F = 11.78 (df 4 312) p <.00. Post Hoc test (tests LSD) and Tamhane yield statistically significant differences (p <.05) from the following countries: Spain with all except Asia and the latter with all except Spain; Eastern Europe with Spain and Asia but not with America and Africa; America with Spain and Asia but not in Africa and Eastern Europe, and Africa with Spain and Asia but not in Eastern Europe and America. Three sections of variable time period is significant between the first period (1-6) years and two (7-12) and (13-19), but not between the latter two.

Analysis of Academic Performance
Academic performance ( The average number of failures by course only provides statistically significant differences between the 4th year and everyone else, but not between 1st to 3 rd taken in pairs (Post Hoc Test-LSD). This could indicate a general tendency of teachers to approve more students in order to promote and obtain the final qualification. It can be seen that the average number of failures is 1.58 in 4th year, interesting fact since obtaining the title is awarded to two subjects not overcome if it is considered that the student has achieved the minimum objectives. The latter almost double in the number of failures to students whose eat breakfast. Moreover, the percentage of immigrants who eat breakfast is 30% (95) and 37.5% (119) in the local population, and the percentage of those who do not eat breakfast every day is 25.2% (80) immigrants compared with 7.3% (23) in the locals. (Pearson Chi-Square = 31.14, df1, bilateral asymptotic significance = .00.
No statistically significant differences in the dependent variables depending on whether the parents are gone or not to work in the morning before the child to go to school can be reported, although the number of failures slightly higher in children whose parents are gone and the sum of obtained scores in the matters lower.
However, significant differences can be reported in the dependent variables depending on whether or not parents help their children in school, look on the other hand, understandable. Children who are helped by one of their parents obtained an average of failures M = 1.90, SD = 2.98, N = 77, compared with an M = 2.92, SD = 2.95, N = 240, in children whose parents they do not help them or cannot help them. (ANOVA F = 6.93, Sig. = .009).
A similar pattern is observed if the variable Father and Mother come late to work is used. Students whose parents come late to work get a greater number of failures (N = 101, M = 3.77, SD = 3.22) and a lower sum of obtained scores in the matters (M = 44.57, SD = 17.60), that students whose parents no return late at home (N = 216, M = 2.15, SD = 2.79) in number of failures, and M = 54.88 and SD = 18.23 in sum of scores obtained in matters, with F = 21.53, Sig. = .00 and F = 22.49, and Sig. = .00, respectively.
A surprising fact is the finding of no differences in study hours depending on the course, whose means are not significant between any 16 Broc -Academic Performance course of four that make up the stage. In first of secondary education (N = 79, M = 1.15, SD = .84), in 2nd (N = 88, M = 1.26, SD = .99) in 3rd (N = 78, M = 1.54, SD = 1.17) and in 4th (N = 72, M = 1.29, SD = .81), with F (ANOVA) = 2.24, df 3 31, and Sig. = .08. This indicates that students no longer study in subsequent academic years, but in all of them, the average number of hours devoted to the study is the same.
Moreover, students who study the same hours (N = 137, M = 2.24 and SD = 2.56) also obtain a lower average number of failures, versus those who do not (N = 180, M = 2.99, SD = 3.24), with an F (ANOVA) = 5.01, df 1 315, Sig. = .03, although the sum of scores does not become significant.
In the variable studying at the same times, statistically significant differences between the two groups of students reappear. Those who have become accustomed to study at the same times ( The comparison between students whose like to study and those who cannot provide a different pattern. In this case, no statistically significant differences between them are showed although students who like to study (N = 103, M = 2.24 and SD = 2.77) the number of failures is slightly less than those who do not like (N = 214, M = 2.87, SD = 3.07), and similarly in the sum of scores obtained in the matters. This may be due to the set of response or to give socially acceptable answers. Even if that is true, the problem is that many students who say they like the study, do not have and/or implement motivational and volitional actions to start and complete the process, having internal resistance as the lack of habits study, lack of tolerance to frustration, lack of effort, delay gratification and affecting the implementation of the conduct in question. This phenomenon needs further investigation and has been treated elsewhere (Broc, 2012).
However the item referred to want to stop studying does not have connotations of social desirability and not all students are able to externalize it, even though it is implicit in them, yielding more clearly the performance, on the other hand, understandable. In this case, those who wish to stop studying ( In the case of working mother, the results are significant in the average number of failures in favor of working mother, compared to those who do not (N = 220, M = 2.94, SD = 3.15) compared to that the mother does not work (N = 97, M = 2.05, SD = 2.99). Regarding the sum of scores in the matters, differences are not statistically significant.
The pattern obtained when the father is working or not working is similar but also significant in the sum of scores. In the case of working (N = 211, M = 2.26, SD = 2.81), the number of failures in the students is less than if it does not work (N = 106, M = 3.48, SD = 3.16), F = 12.19, Sig. = 0.00, being sum of scores M = 54.92, SD = 18.52, in the case of work, compared to an M = 44.99, SD = 17.12, in the case of not working, with F = 21.31, and Sig. = .00.

Number of Siblings and Family Size
The average of failures depending on the number of siblings (four sections 1, 2, 3-5 and 6-9) shows an increasing trend of failures from the 2nd brother on, but becomes significant, except between groups 2 and 3-5 brothers.

RISE -International Journal of Sociology of Education, 7(1) 19
Moreover, the average of failures in the 3rd assessment based on the ordinal place of the student between brothers or sisters (4 sections: First, N = 144, M = 2.67, SD = 2.95; 2nd N = 129, M = 2.51, SD = 3.02; 3rd N = 34, M = 3.06, SD = 2.97; and 4 or later N = 10, M = 3.40, SD = 3.44)) is increased from the third but does not significant in ANOVA, whose F = 0.510, Sig. = .68, and with a statistical test of the homogeneity of variance Levene = .28, Sig. = .84 and Robustness test of equality of means Welch = .45, Sig. = .72, so we can say that there is no difference between the means of the average number of failures of any ordinal brothers depending on the place of the student in the family.
Although the number of publications is quite extensive in this regard (Arranz, 1989;Rodrigo & Palacios, 1998), but somewhat contradictory and inconclusive, the same could be said regarding the ordinal place of the son or daughter in the family (Cusinato, 1992;Sanchez, 1983), so further research is necessary, where the studies are carried out to take into account variables not controlled in this study as the short spacing or medium in birth time regarding his brothers, sex repeated or not in the group of brothers and if there are very important brothers or sisters who have already emancipated, variable because it can mask some results because you can have many brothers or sisters but no longer live in the nuclear family, which would change the constellation thereof. What is important ultimately is that all brothers or sisters find their own role in the family, for example his space of self-identification, in order not to have to look out, and develop more ingenious and intuitive procedures to find recognition within the family. The theme of fraternal rivalry, jealousy and envy, in some cases, remains a hot topic within the current family configurations.

Conclusions
The findings of this study on the variables that affect achievement and school success versus failure at the stage of compulsory secondary education (12-16 or 18 years old) in Spain are quite clear and obvious. In this sense, it could be argued that students, in this stage, would be in general, more likely to academic success, translated into fewer number o failures or greater sum of scores obtained in the academic matters, if the following circumstances occurred: 20 Broc -Academic Performance 1) Spanish or Asian students. 2) Man or woman of any course or level.
3) With a number of not more than 2 brothers, including himself. 4) The ordinal place is the first or the second. 5) No immigrant or child of immigrant parents. 6) With a minimum period of years in Spain 7 to 12, preferably. 7) That the student live at home with their biological parents and are not separated. 8) With a size of small family members. 9) With at least one parent working, preferably the father. 10) That parents do not come late to work. 12) The student to eat breakfast every day. 13) May a parent is available to assist the son or daughter in school. 14) Students will study more than one hour a day. 15) To study about the same time and at the same times every day. 16) Students will study the weekends. 17) Have a room to study. 18) Who has not repeated a course or year in primary or secondary education.
19) The student does not want to stop studying. 20) The student is not only at home in the evenings.
This research analyzed variables considered peripheral in other studies related to more personal aspects embedded in social, family and contextual situations that provide, through the measuring instrument studied, a moderate percentage of explained variance of academic performance. It would be interesting, to increase the validity of the model in future work including general intelligence variable and others, from the work done by Gaviria (2005), Castro & Gaviria (2009), Martín et al., (2008, in which the inclusion of other variables is considered essential, as well as Enkvist's recommendations on good and bad education (Enkvist, 2011) in schools. This, perhaps provide a broader vision and accurate explanation of academic achievement in students of compulsory secondary education.