Discourse Analysis on Nationalism Debate Reported in Indian Print Media during Feb-Mar 2016

Authors

  • Shovana Ray Defence Institute of Psychological Research, Delhi
  • Jitendra Kumar Singh Defence Institute of Psychological Research, Delhi

https://doi.org/10.17583/rimcis.2017.2899

Keywords:


Downloads

Abstract

In the age of progressing information technology, media reporting has evolved in the selection, role portrayal, articulation of the news on the basis of presentation and comprehensibility. Both print and broadcast media have reformulated news reporting pattern considering the current global market, advertising and latent political agendas. Use of particular discourse not just influences mindset; its rhetorical presentation modulates perception on an explicit level. News as a discursive tool transforms the reader’s perception on the topic. In the initial phase of 2016, Indian media extensively reported an incident at Jawaharlal Nehru University (JNU) New Delhi and its effect on the pro- and anti- national sentiments. The reporting was in the context of slogan shouting by a group of students, which was perceived to be anti-national. With due course of time, debates restructured the news into a nation-wide sensation involving various facets, such as, importance of nationalism and patriotism, credibility of the university education, involvement of students from different ideological and identity background (Dalit, Kashmiri Muslim, etc.). In this paper, broad categorisation is being made, namely as, JNU (the university, administration, faculty and its culture), the students (JNUSU president, ASFI members and AVBP members), the state (Judiciary, the ruling party and the opposition parties) and the others (media, celebrities, lawyers and citizens). The present study discusses the impact of news as discourse on the ideological position and activities of news characters (actors) as well as its contextual salience in the national politics.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

JNU Protests. Wikipedia. Retrieved from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2016_JNU_protests

Google Scholar Crossref

Aavedna. (April 15, 2016). The JNU row- igniting nationwide debate on nationalism vs. anti-nationalism. Sashwaat society of education and research. Retrieved from www.speakup@researchatsashwaat.com on 18 April, 2016.

Google Scholar Crossref

Audit Bureau of Circulation. (2016). Retrieved from http://www.auditbureau.org/files/Highest%20Circulated%20amongst%20ABC%20Member%20Publications%20(across%20languages).pdf

Google Scholar Crossref

Bell, A. (1991). The Language of News Media. Oxford: Blackwell.

Google Scholar Crossref

Bhattacharya, S. & Shakil, S. (2016, February 18). Cops fail to shield Kumar from blows. The Times of India. Retrieved from www.timesofindia.com on 23 July 2016

Google Scholar Crossref

Billig, M. (1991) Ideology and Opinions: Studies in Rhetorical Psychology. London: Sage.

Google Scholar Crossref

Boyd-Barrett, O. (1994). Language and media: a question of convergence. In David Graddol & Oliver Boyd-Barrett (eds.), Media Texts: Authors and Readers. Clevendon: Multilingual Matters Ltd. pp.22-39.

Google Scholar Crossref

Chatterjee, M. (2016. February 16). Budget session likely to feel heat of campus fire. The Times of India. Retrieved from www.timesofindia.com on 23 July 2016

Google Scholar Crossref

Chaudhuri, M. (2010). Indian media and its transformed public. Contributions to Indian Sociology. 44(1&2), 57-78.

Google Scholar Crossref

Chomsky, N. & Herman, E. S. (1988). Manufacturing Consent: The Political Economy of the Mass Media. New York: Pantheon.

Google Scholar Crossref

Condor, S. (2000). Pride and Prejudice: identity management in English people’s talk about ‘this country’. Discourse & Society. 11(2). Pp- 175–205. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/247245196 on 26 July 2016.

Google Scholar Crossref

Condor, S., Tileaga, C. & Billig, M. (2013). Political Rhetoric. In: Huddy, L., Sears, D.O. And Levy, J.S. (Eds.) Oxford Handbook of Political Psychology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, Pp. 262-300.

Google Scholar Crossref

Desai, S. (2016, February 22). An Angry Nationalism. The Times of India. Retrieved from www.timesofindia.com on 23 July 2016

Google Scholar Crossref

Druckman, D. (1994). Nationalism, Patriotism, and Group Loyalty: A Social Psychological Perspective. Mershon International Studies Review. 38(1). pp. 43-68

Google Scholar Crossref

Economic and political weekly report. (2016). We are against institutional violence: Full text of Kanhiya Kumar’s JNU speech. 51(7). Retrieved from http://www.epw.in/node/146514/pdf on 29 April, 2016.

Google Scholar Crossref

Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.

Google Scholar Crossref

Garg, A. (2016, March 1). ‘Tell-tale’ Kanhaiya video blurs: Police Say No Electronic Evidence, Only Witness Versions. The Times of India. Retrieved from www.timesofindia.com on 23 July 2016

Google Scholar Crossref

George, G. M. (2016). Rohith Vemula to Kanhaiya Kumar: It's Not Over Yet. Countercurrents.org. 20 February, 2016. Retrieved from http://www.countercurrents.org/gmg200216.htm on March 7, 2016.

Google Scholar Crossref

George, G. M. (February 20, 2016). Rise of a New Radical Dalit Discourse: Rohith, Kanhaiya & more… People’s Voice. Retrieved from http://peoplesvoice.in/2016/02/20/rise-of-a-new-radical-dalit-discourse/ on March 7, 2016

Google Scholar Crossref

George, G. M. (February 20, 2016). Rohith Vemula to Kanhaiya Kumar: It's Not Over Yet. Countercurrents.org. Retrieved from http://www.countercurrents.org/gmg200216.htm on March 7, 2016

Google Scholar Crossref

Irani invokes ‘Mother India’, seeks report. (2016, February 13). The Times of India. Retrieved from www.timesofindia.com on 23 July 2016

Google Scholar Crossref

Kanhaiya Kumar versus State Of NCT Of Delhi. W.P.(Crl) 558/2016 & Crl.M.A. Nos.3237/2016 & 3262/2016 (2nd March, 2016).

Google Scholar Crossref

Kohli-Khandekar, V. (2010). The Indian Media Business. New Delhi: SAGE Publications

Google Scholar Crossref

Kumar, M. J. (May 4, 2016). An appeal to JNU student community (university circular). Retrieved from www.jnu.ac.in/Notices/appeal-230317.pdf on 23 July, 2016.

Google Scholar Crossref

Li, J. (2009). Intertextuality and national identity: discourse of national conflicts in daily newspapers in the United States and China. Discourse & Society. 20(1). pp. 85-121

Google Scholar Crossref

Manjrekar, N. (2016). Editorial. Contemporary Education Dialogue.13(2) 167–170. Retrieved from http://ced.sagepub.com on 3 October 2016.

Google Scholar Crossref

Martelli, J. T. & Rahman, S. (March 15, 2016). Republic of JNU. Tehelka.. Retrieved from www.tehelka.com on 21 July 2016.

Google Scholar Crossref

Martelli, J. T. (2016). “Sadhus in a Secular Uniform”: Indian Marxism and the Practice of Declassing in an Elite Campus. NORIA draft article. Retrieved from jean-thomas.martelli@kcl.ac.uk on 22 June 2016

Google Scholar Crossref

Menon Malhan, S. P. (2013). The TOI story. India: HarperCollins

Google Scholar Crossref

Mooney, A. & Besty, E. (2015). Language, Society & Power: An Introduction. New York: Routledge.

Google Scholar Crossref

Netas of all hues wade in; make JNU theatre of national politics. (2016, February 14). The Times of India. Retrieved from www.timesofindia.com on 23 July 2016

Google Scholar Crossref

Our Universities are a Space of Debate “Anti-Nationalism” is a means of suppressing dissent. (2016). RGICS policy watch. February 15, 2016. 4 (25). Retrieved from info@rgics.org on 20 February 2016.

Google Scholar Crossref

Pajunen, J. (2008). Linguistic analysis of newspaper discourse I theory and practice. Masters dissertation, university of Tampere. Retrieved from http://www.uta32-kk.lib.helsinki.fi/bitstream/handle/10024/79365/gradu02875.pdf?sequence=1 on 28 June 2016

Google Scholar Crossref

Press Council of India, (2010). Norms of journalistic conduct.

Google Scholar Crossref

Press Trust of India. (February 12, 2016). Anti-India acts won't be tolerated: Rajnath Singh on JNU row. The Economic Times. Retrieved from http://goo.gl/e18H3w on April 29 2016.

Google Scholar Crossref

Press Trust of India. (February 12, 2016). Nation will not tolerate insult to mother India: Smriti Irani. The Economic Times. Retrieved from http://goo.gl/3NNPqJ on April 29 2016.

Google Scholar Crossref

Roy Choudhary, S. & Grover, S. (2016, February 19). New era for student politics. The Times of India. Retrieved from www.timesofindia.com on 23 July 2016

Google Scholar Crossref

Sirnate, V. (2016). JNU Arrest: Not Just a Crackdown, It's a War on Democracy. The Hindu Centre for politics and public policy. Retrieved from www.thehinducentre.com/multimedia/archive/02923/95_JNU_Arrest_Not_2923145a.pdf on 3 October 2016.

Google Scholar Crossref

Threats to Peaceful Student Expression. (2016). Free to Think: Report of the Scholars at Risk. Retrieved from www.scholarsatrisk.org on 3 October 2016.g Project

Google Scholar Crossref

Van Dijk, T. (1983). Discourse Analysis: Its Development and Application to the structure of news. Journal of Communication. 33(2). Pp. 20-43.

Google Scholar Crossref

Van Dijk, T. A. (1980). Macrostructures: An interdisciplinary study of global structures in discourse, interaction, and cognition. Hilisdale, Ni: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Google Scholar Crossref

Van Dijk, T. A. (1985). Introduction: Discourse Analysis in (Mass) Communication Research. In T. A. Van Dijk (ed.), Discourse and Communication. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. Retrieved from http://web.asc.upenn.edu/gerbner/Asset.aspx?assetID=1624 on 02 October 2016.

Google Scholar Crossref

Van Dijk, T. A. (1988a). News analysis. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Google Scholar Crossref

Van Dijk, T. A. (1988b). News as Discourse. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Google Scholar Crossref

Van Dijk, T. A. (1990). Social Cognition and Discourse. In H. Giles and W.P. Robinson (eds.) Handbook of Language and Social Psychology. Retrieved from www.daneprairie.com on 05 October 2016.

Google Scholar Crossref

Van Dijk, T. A. (1998). Ideology: A Multidisciplinary Approach. London: Sage

Google Scholar Crossref

Van Dijk, T. A., & Kintsch, W. (1983). Strategies of discourse comprehension. New York: Academic Press.

Google Scholar Crossref

Van Leeuwen, T. (1996). The representation of social actors. In Caldas-Coulthard & Coulthard (Eds.) Texts and practices: Reading in critical discourse analysis. London: Routledge.

Google Scholar Crossref

Varshney, A. (1993). India's National Identity, Hindu Nationalism, and the Politics of Anxiety. Daedalus, 122(3). pp. 227-261. MIT press.

Google Scholar Crossref

Wodak, R. & Ludwig, C. (1999). Challenges in a changing world: Issues in Critical Discourse Analysis (Ed.). Vienna: Passagenverlag.

Google Scholar Crossref

Wodak, R. & Meyer, M. (2009) 'Critical Discourse Analysis: history, agenda, theory, and methodology', in R. Wodak, and M. Meyer, (eds.) Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis. London: Sage (2nd revised edition).

Google Scholar Crossref

Wodak, R. & Meyer, M. (2009). Methods of critical discourse analysis. London: Sage.

Google Scholar Crossref

Wodak, R. (1989). Language, Power and Ideology. Amsterdam: Benjamins.

Google Scholar Crossref

Downloads

Published

2017-11-30

Almetric

Dimensions

How to Cite

Ray, S., & Singh, J. K. (2017). Discourse Analysis on Nationalism Debate Reported in Indian Print Media during Feb-Mar 2016. International and Multidisciplinary Journal of Social Sciences, 6(3), 251–280. https://doi.org/10.17583/rimcis.2017.2899

Issue

Section

Articles