Politics, Law & Complexity: The Case of the Academic Policies in the European Union

Authors

https://doi.org/10.17583/rimcis.2016.1904

Keywords:


Downloads

Abstract

The theoretical goal of this paper is the development of the connection between politics and law within the model of the complex system especially in the perspective of Niklas Luhmann, in a viewpoint linked with the economic analysis of law. The aim is to describe the differences that truly make the difference in the setting problem of policy or legal decisions more formalized by the subject with their values instead of in a system. Therefore, the vision of Joseph A. Schumpeter about the politics as a kind of market, a sub-kind market where votes are sold and bought it is very important and strategic as a bridge between the macro-systemic and the economic analysis of law becomes even more positive, artificial and global: the more is the scenario, the weaker is the function of the human subject in the decisional process, this also provides a report of the changes in the very idea of citizen in global scenarios, which is the Hypercitizenship.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Audretsch D (2007). The Enterpreneurial Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Google Scholar Crossref

Barash, D. P. (2007). Natural Selections: Selfish Altruists, Honest Liars, and Other Realities of Evolution. New york: Bellevue Literary Press.

Google Scholar Crossref

Beck, U. (2006). Cosmopolitan Vision. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.

Google Scholar Crossref

Broch H. (2011), The Sleepwalkers, Vintage Books, New York

Google Scholar Crossref

Canetti, E. (1984). Crowds and Power, Farrar, New York: Straus & Giruox.

Google Scholar Crossref

Dawkins, R. (1976). Il gene egoista. Milan: Mondadori.

Google Scholar Crossref

Dennett, D.C. (2004). Freedom Evolves. London: Penguin.

Google Scholar Crossref

Donati, P. (1993). La cittadinanza societaria. Rome-Bari: Laterza.

Google Scholar Crossref

Fernandez Llebrez, F. (2013). Teoria Politica y Accion Ciudadana, in I. Wences (Ed) Tomando en serio la teoría política. Madrid: Centro de Estudios Politicos y Constitucionales.

Google Scholar Crossref

Ferone E ( 2013), Regole e comunicazione del capitalismo accademico , Loffredo , Napoli

Google Scholar Crossref

Flecha Garcia, R., Gomez, J., & Plugvert, L. (2014). Teoria Sociologica Contemporánea., Barcelona- Buenos Aires- Madrid: Paidon, 9th edition.

Google Scholar Crossref

Galgano, F. (2005). La globalizzazione nello specchio del diritto. Bologna: Il Mulino.

Google Scholar Crossref

Giner, S. (2010). El futuro del capitalismo. Barcelona: Peninsula.

Google Scholar Crossref

Goudsblom, J. (1994). Fire and Civilization. London: Penguin.

Google Scholar Crossref

Laszlo, E. (2007). Science and the Akashic Field: An Integral Theory of Everything. Rochester Vermont: Inner Traditions.

Google Scholar Crossref

Laszlo, E. (2008a). Il pericolo e l’opportunità. Rome: Aracne.

Google Scholar Crossref

Laszlo, E. (2008b). Worldshift. Milan: Franco Angeli.

Google Scholar Crossref

Loet Leydesdorff, (2001) A Sociological Theory of Communication, universal Publishers, New York

Google Scholar Crossref

Loet Leydesdorff- Andrea Pitasi (2004) , The Triple Helix of University–Government–Industry Relations, In: Riegler, A. (ed.) Radical Constructivism Paper Collection. Available: http://www.univie.ac.at/constructivism/papers/ Vienna

Google Scholar Crossref

Loet Leydesdorff- Mark William Johnson , (2015) Beer’s Viable System Model and

Google Scholar Crossref

Luhmann’s Communication Theory:

Google Scholar Crossref

‘Organizations’ from the Perspective of

Google Scholar Crossref

Meta-Games, Systems Research and Behavioral Science

Google Scholar Crossref

Systems Research and Behavioral Science. 32, 266–282 Published online 3 December 2013 in Wiley Online Library

Google Scholar Crossref

(wileyonlinelibrary.com) DOI: 10.1002/sres.2222

Google Scholar Crossref

Luhmann, N. (1989) Ecological Communication. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Google Scholar Crossref

Luhmann, N. (1990). Essays on self Reference. New York: Columbia University Press.

Google Scholar Crossref

Luhmann, N. (1996). Social Systems. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

Google Scholar Crossref

Luhmann, N. (1997). Die Gesellschaft der Gesellschaft. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag.

Google Scholar Crossref

Luhmann, N. (2010). Soziologische Aufklaerung. Opladen: WestdeutscherVerlag.

Google Scholar Crossref

Luhmann, N. (2012-13). Theory of Society. Stanford: Standford University Press, 2 voll.

Google Scholar Crossref

Normann, R. (2001). Reframing Business: When the Map Changes the Landscape. England: Wiley.

Google Scholar Crossref

Nowotny, H. (2008). Insatiable Curiosity-Innovation in a Fragile Future. USA and London, UK: Cambri­dge.

Google Scholar Crossref

Nowotny, H., Testa, G. (2009). Die glaesenen Gene. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag.

Google Scholar Crossref

Ortega y Gasset, J. (1963) Man and People. New York: Norton.

Google Scholar Crossref

Ovejero Lucas, F. (2011). Contra Ccromagnon, 2, voll, Montesinos, Barcelona 2011

Google Scholar Crossref

Ovejero Lucas, F., (2013a). Teoria y practica en la teoría política. in I. Wences (Ed) Tomando en serio la teoría política. Madrid: Centro de Estudios Politicos y Constitucionales.

Google Scholar Crossref

Ovejero Lucas, F. (2013b). ¿Idiotas o Ciudadanos?. Barcelona: Montesinos.

Google Scholar Crossref

Paolone, G., & Pitasi, A. (2013) Comparing Systemic Business Paradigms: Chance, Complexity, Communication and Evolutionary Strategies, Saarbruecken: Lambert Academic Publishing.

Google Scholar Crossref

Pearce, F. (2010) the On Coming Population Crash. Boston: Beacon Press.

Google Scholar Crossref

Pitasi, A. (2010). WCSA Declaration of Bologna, Dec. 4th 2010. Nuova Atlantide. 2010/1. Aracne, pp. 11-13 ISBN 978-88-548-3181-0.

Google Scholar Crossref

Pitasi, A.(2011). The Hyperhuman World: Legal Systems and Social Complexity. Saarbrücken : LAP LAMBERT Academic Publishing.

Google Scholar Crossref

Pitasi A. (2012a). Systemic Shifts in Sociology. In G. Mancini, A. Pitasi, (Eds.) Systemic Shifts in Sociology. Saarbruecken: Lambert Academic Publishing.

Google Scholar Crossref

Pitasi A (2012b). The Hypercitizenship Challenge to Methodological Nationalism. REDES – Revista Eletrônica Direito e Sociedade. Centro Universitário La Salle UniLasalle.

Google Scholar Crossref

Pitasi, A. (2012c). WCSA as an Hypercitizenship Lab, Nuova Atlantide, 2012/3, 25 – 29 ISSN: 2037-7304-12003 ISBN: 978–88–548–5761-2.

Google Scholar Crossref

Pitasi A. (2012d) “Hypercitizenship and the Management of Genetic Diversity: Sociology of Law and the Key Systemic Bifurcation Between the Ring Singularity and the Neofeudal Age”, World Futures Journal, vol. 68, pag 314-331, New York: Taylor & Francis. ISSN: 0260-4027 print / 1556-1844 online.

Google Scholar Crossref

Pitasi, A.(2012e) Epilogue: The Fourth Paradigm Redesigning Evolutionary Complex Systems Of Organizational Communication. In G. Mancini, R. Angrisani, (Eds.) Mapping Systemic Knowledge. Saarbrücken: LAP LAMBERT Academic Publishing.

Google Scholar Crossref

Pitasi A. (2012f). What is sociology for?. World Futures Journal, vol.68, pag 221-224, ISSN: 0260-4027 print / 1556-1844 online DOI: 10.1080/02604027.2012.679444.

Google Scholar Crossref

Pitasi, A. (2013). Hypercitizenship and the Evolution of a Global Identity. Journal of Sociological Research, ISSN 1948-5468, vol. 4, No.2.

Google Scholar Crossref

Pitasi, A. (2014a). Designing hypercitizenship methodologically. Revista de Direito Econômico e Socioambiental, v.5, n.1, 2014. ISSN 2179-345X.

Google Scholar Crossref

Pitasi, A. (2014b). Communicating Intangible Value. The Case of Contemporary Art. Arts and Social Sciences Journal, Volume 5, Issue 2, 100075 ISSN:2151-6200.

Google Scholar Crossref

Pitasi, A. (2014b). The metaconvergence spiral rethinking sociological working styles systemically. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, Vol.4, N.9, ISSN: 2222-6990.

Google Scholar Crossref

Pitasi, A. (2014c). A systemic sociological theorem of global evolution. Revista de Direito Econômico e Socioambiental ISSN 2179-345X. doi: 10.7213/rev.dir.econ.socioambienta.04.001.AO05.

Google Scholar Crossref

Pitasi, A. (2014d) The Sociological Semantics of Complex Systems. Journal of Sociological Research, ISSN 1948-5468 2014, Vol. 5, No.1 - 203 www.macrothink.org/jsr.

Google Scholar Crossref

Pitasi, A. (2014e) “System”. in M. Ruzzeddu (Ed.) Keywords of Systemic Vision. Saarbruecken: Lambert Academic Publishing, ISBN 978-3-659-52781-4.

Google Scholar Crossref

Pitasi, A., & Ferone, E. (2008). Il tempo zero del Desiderio. Milan: McGraw Hill.

Google Scholar Crossref

Pitasi A, The metaconvergent spiral: Rethinking sociological Working Styles Systemically (2014f ) International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences Vol. 4, No. 9 ISSN: 2222-6990 160 www.hrmars.com

Google Scholar Crossref

Pitasi, A., & Mancini, G. (2012). Systemic Shifts in Sociology: Essays on world order model design. Saarbruecken: Lambert Academic Publishing.

Google Scholar Crossref

Posner, R. (1998). El Analisis economico de el derecho, Aijusco: Fondo de cultura economica.

Google Scholar Crossref

Sasaki, M., Goldstone, J.A., Zimmermann, E., & Sanderson, S.K. (Eds.) (2014). Concise Encyclopaedia of Comparative Sociology. Leiden- Boston: Brill.

Google Scholar Crossref

Shakevell, S. (2004) Foundations of Economic Analysis of Law. Cambridge Massachussets- London UK: The Belknap Press.

Google Scholar Crossref

van Schendelen, R. (2013) The art of lobbying the EU. Amsterdam University Press, fourth edition.

Google Scholar Crossref

Williamson, O. (1991). L’organizzazione Economica. Imprese, mercati e controllo politico. Bologna: Il Mulino.

Google Scholar Crossref

Wilson, E.O. (2000). Sociobiology-the New Synthesis 25th anniversary edition. Cambridge Mass: The B 23.

Google Scholar Crossref

Downloads

Published

2016-11-30

Almetric

Dimensions

How to Cite

Pitasi, A. (2016). Politics, Law & Complexity: The Case of the Academic Policies in the European Union. International and Multidisciplinary Journal of Social Sciences, 5(3), 208–227. https://doi.org/10.17583/rimcis.2016.1904

Issue

Section

Articles