Photographs as a Research Tool in Child Studies: Some Analytical Metaphors and Choices

Authors

https://doi.org/10.17583/qre.2018.3350

Keywords:


Downloads

Abstract

This methodological paper discusses how photographs can be used in multi-layered data projects with children and families. We present photographs as a versatile low-fi digital artifact that can be used under a variety of research circumstances and critically discuss this particular visual tool in the context of the growing body of visual and multimodal research with children and families. The critical discussion draws on a series of research projects in which we have employed photographs (topics of the projects include family diversity or children's routines). The comparisons between projects highlights some of the procedural and analytical choices that are opened up when using photographs. In particular, we focus on two issues: (a) differences that emerge when materials are created by participants or are elicited by researchers, and; (b) the metaphors that are applied to interpret and work with photographs.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

David Poveda, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid

Profesor Titular, Departamento Interfacultativo de Psicología Evolutiva y de la Educación.

References

Barker, J. and Smith, F. (2012). What’s in focus? A critical discussion of photography, children and young people. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 15 (2), 91-103.

Google Scholar Crossref

Bauman, R. (1986). Story, performance, and event: Contextual studies of oral narrative. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Google Scholar Crossref

Bohnsack, R. (2008) The interpretation of pictures and the documentary method. Forum: Qualitative Social Research 9 (3). http:// nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs0803267.

Google Scholar Crossref

Bourdieu, P. (1990). Photography: A middle-brow art. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

Google Scholar Crossref

Brown, S; Reavey, P. and Brookfield, H. (2014). Spectral objects: Material links to difficult pasts for adoptive families. In P. Harvey, E. Casella, G. Evans, H. Knox, C. McLean, E. Silva, N. Thoburn and K. Woodwards (eds.), Objects and materials: A Routledge companion (pp. 173-182). London: Routledge.

Google Scholar Crossref

Bruner, J. (1986). Actual minds, possible worlds. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Bruner, J. S. (2003). Making stories: Law, literature, life. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Google Scholar Crossref

Cappello, M. (2005). Photo interviews: Eliciting data through conversations with children. Field Methods, 17 (2), 170-182.

Google Scholar Crossref

Clark, A. (2010). Young children as protagonists and the role of participatory, visual methods in engaging multiple perspectives. American Journal of Community Psychology, 46 (1-2), 115-123.

Google Scholar Crossref

Clark, A. and Moss, P. (2011). Listening to young children: The mosaic approach. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers. Clark, C. D. (1999). The auto-driven interview: A photographic viewfinder into children's experience. Visual Studies, 14(1), 39-50.

Google Scholar Crossref

Collier, J. (1957). Photography in anthropology: a report on two experiments. American Anthropologist, 59 (5), 843-859.

Google Scholar Crossref

Cook, T. and Hess, E. (2007). What the camera sees and from whose perspective: Fun methodologies for engaging children in enlightening adults. Childhood, 14 (1), 29-45. Crivello, G; Camfield, L. and Woodhead, M. (2009). How can children tell us about their wellbeing? Exploring the potential of participatory research approaches within young lives. Social Indicators Research, 90 (1), 51-72.

Google Scholar Crossref

Delgado, M. (2015). Urban youth and photovoice: Visual ethnography in action. New York: Oxford University Press. Edwards, E. (ed.) (1992). Anthropology and photography, 1860–1920. New Haven / London: Yale University Press / Royal Anthropological Institute.

Google Scholar Crossref

Epstein, I; Stevens, B; McKeever, P. and Baruchel, S. (2006). Photo elicitation interview (PEI): Using photos to elicit children's perspectives. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 5 (3), 1-11.

Google Scholar Crossref

Eskelinen, K. (2012). Children's visual art and creating through photographs. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 45, 168-177.

Google Scholar Crossref

Frekko, S; Leinaweaver, J. and Marre, D. (2015). How (not) to talk about adoption: On communicative vigilance in Spain. American Ethnologist, 42 (4), 703-719.

Google Scholar Crossref

González-Patiño, J. (2011). Rutinas de la infancia urbana mediadas por la tecnología: Un análisis visual. Papeles de Trabajo sobre Cultura, Educación y Desarrollo Humano, 7 (2), 1-16.

Google Scholar Crossref

Harper, D. (1998). An argument for visual sociology. In J. Prosser (ed.), Image-based research: A sourcebook for qualitative researchers (pp. 24-41). London: Routledge.

Google Scholar Crossref

Heydon, R; McKee, L. and Phillips, L. (2016). The affordances and constraints of visual methods in early childhood education research: Talking points from the field. Journal of Childhood Studies, 41 (3), 5-17.

Google Scholar Crossref

James, A; Jenks, C. and Prout, A. (1998). Theorizing childhood. New York: Teachers College Press.

Google Scholar Crossref

Johnson, G. (2011). A child’s right to participation: Photovoice as methodology for documenting the experiences of children living in Kenyan orphanages. Visual Anthropology Review, 27 (2), 141-161.

Google Scholar Crossref

Johnson, G; Pfister, A. and Vindrola‐Padros, C. (2012). Drawings, photos, and performances: Using visual methods with children. Visual Anthropology Review, 28 (2), 164-178.

Google Scholar Crossref

Kolb, B. (2008). Involving, sharing, analysing—Potential of the participatory photo interview. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 9 (3). http://dx.doi.org/10.17169/fqs-9.3.1155

Google Scholar Crossref

Kress, G. and Van Leeuwen, T. (2006). Reading images: The grammar of visual design (2nd edition). London: Routledge.

Google Scholar Crossref

Labov, W. (1972). Language in the inner city: Studies in the Black English vernacular. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

Google Scholar Crossref

Latham, A. (2004). Researching and writing everyday accounts of the city: an introduction to the diary-photo diary-interview method. In C. Knowles and P. Sweetman (eds.), Picturing the Social Landscape: Visual methods and the sociological imagination (pp. 117-131). Routledge: London.

Google Scholar Crossref

Mauthner, M. (1997). Methodological aspects of collecting data from children: Lessons from three research projects. Children and Society, 11 (1), 16-28.

Google Scholar Crossref

Mayall, B. (2000). The sociology of childhood in relation to children's rights. The International Journal of Children's Rights, 8 (3), 243-259.

Google Scholar Crossref

Mraz, J. (1999). Fotografía y familia. Desacatos, 2, 143-146.

Google Scholar Crossref

Mitchell, C. (2011). Doing visual research. London: Sage. Mead, M. (1995). Visual anthropology in a discipline of words. In P. Hockings (ed.), Principles of visual anthropology (pp. 3-12). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

Google Scholar Crossref

Morphy, H. and Banks, M. (Eds.). (1997). Rethinking visual anthropology. New Haven: Yale University Press.

Google Scholar Crossref

Ortiz, A; Prats, M. and Baylina, M. (2012). Métodos visuales y geografías de la infancia: dibujando el entorno cotidiano. Scripta Nova: Revista Electrónica de Geografía y Ciencias Sociales, 16 (400) . http://www.ub.edu/geocrit/sn/sn-400.htm

Google Scholar Crossref

Parkinson, D. (2001). Securing trustworthy data from an interview situation with young children: Six integrated interview strategies. Child Study Journal 31 (3), 137-155

Google Scholar Crossref

Pink, S. (2013). Doing visual ethnography. 3rd edition. London: Sage.

Google Scholar Crossref

Punch, S. (2002). Research with children: the same or different from research with adults? Childhood, 9 (3), 321-341.

Google Scholar Crossref

Rasmussen, K. (2004). Places for children–children’s places. Childhood, 11 (2), 155-173.

Google Scholar Crossref

Rose, G. (2001). Visual methodologies: an introduction to the interpretation of visual methodologies. London: Sage Stirling, E. and D. Yamada-Rice, D. (eds.), (2016). Visual methods with children and young people: Academics and visual industries in dialogue. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

Google Scholar Crossref

Thomas, N. and O’Kane, C. (1998). The ethics of participatory research with children. Children and Society, 12, 336–348. Thomson, P. (ed.) (2008). Doing visual research with children and young people. London: Routledge.

Google Scholar Crossref

Torre, D. and Murphy, J. (2015) A different lens: Changing perspectives using photo- elicitation interviews. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 23 (111), http://dx.doi.org/10.14507/epaa.v23.2051 Trost, J. (1988). Conceptualising the family. International Sociology, 3 (3), 301-308. Trost, J. (1999). Family as a set of dyads. Marriage and Family Review, 28 (3/4), 79-91.

Google Scholar Crossref

van Leeuwen, T. and Jewitt, C. (Eds.). (2001). The handbook of visual analysis. London: Sage.

Google Scholar Crossref

Wortham, S. and Reyes, A. (2015). Discourse analysis beyond the speech event. London: Routledge.

Google Scholar Crossref

Yamada-Rice, D. (2017). Using visual research methods with young children. In P. Christensen and A. James, (eds.), Research with children: Perspectives and practices, 3rd edition (pp. 71-86). London: Routledge. Young, L. and Barrett, H. (2001). Adapting visual methods: action research with Kampala street children. Area, 33 (2), 141-152.

Google Scholar Crossref

Downloads

Published

2018-06-28

Almetric

Dimensions

How to Cite

Poveda, D., Matsumoto, M., Morgade, M., & Alonso, E. (2018). Photographs as a Research Tool in Child Studies: Some Analytical Metaphors and Choices. Qualitative Research in Education, 7(2), 170–196. https://doi.org/10.17583/qre.2018.3350

Issue

Section

Articles