Graduate Students’ Construction of Researcher Identities Explored Through Discourse Analysis

Authors

https://doi.org/10.17583/qre.2016.1473

Keywords:


Downloads

Abstract

While many research methods courses challenge students to make sense of their own researcher identities as they relate to research paradigms and perspectives, there is a lack of research that examines how students actually go about constructing theses identities, particularly at the level of discourse. In this study, we attended to graduate students’ talk in an introductory research methods course, taking note of how students used particular discursive resources to construct a research identity in online classroom discussions. We analyzed 93 discussion posts students were asked to make in response to a discussion board prompt after completing assigned readings related to research paradigms and researcher identity. We identified two discursive patterns through our analysis: 1) minimizing knowledge, and 2) justifying paradigmatic orientations. Our findings highlight how being asked to talk about one’s research identity is a potentially fragile task, as evidenced by disclaimers of ‘knowing’, and one that evokes justifications and connections to students’ everyday lives. We highlight implications for the teaching of research methodology, particularly qualitative methods courses.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

C. Amelia Davis, Georgia Southern University

Assistant Professor

Department of Curriculum, Foundations & Reading

College of Education

 

Jessica N. Lester, Indiana University

Assistant Professor of Inquiry Methodology

Department of Counseling & Educational Psychology

Indiana University

References

Agee, J., & Smith, S. (2011). Online discussions in a doctoral research methods course: “Like a text by many authors.” Studies in Continuing Education, 33(3), 301-319. doi: 10.1080/0158037X.2010.515574

Google Scholar Crossref

Antaki, C., Billing, M., Edwards, D., & Potter, J. (2003). Discourse analysis means doing analysis: A critique of six analytic shortcomings. Discourse Analysis Online, 1.

Google Scholar Crossref

Attenborough, F. (2011). I don't f*** ing care! Marginalia and the (textual) negotiation of an academic identity by university students.” Discourse & Communication, 5(2), 99-121. doi: 10.1177/1750481310395447

Google Scholar Crossref

Author (2014).

Google Scholar Crossref

Author (2013).

Google Scholar Crossref

Author (2011).

Google Scholar Crossref

Ball, C., & Pelco, L. (2006). Teaching research methods to undergraduate psychology students using an active cooperative learning approach. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 17(2), 147-154.

Google Scholar Crossref

Barnes, B., Palmary, I., & Durrheim, K. (2001). The denial of racism the role of humor, personal experience, and self-censorship. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 20(3), 321-338. doi: 10.1177/0261927X01020003003

Google Scholar Crossref

Benwell, B., & Stokoe, E. (2002). Constructing discussion tasks in university tutorials: Shifting dynamics and identities. Discourse Studies, 4(4), 429-453. doi: 10.1177/14614456020040040201

Google Scholar Crossref

Benwell, B., & Stokoe, E. (2005). University students resisting academic identity. In K. Richards & P. Seedhouse (Eds.), Applying Conversation Analysis (pp. 124-139). New York, NY: Palgrave, Macmillan.

Google Scholar Crossref

Benwell, B., & Stokoe, E. (2010). Discourse and Identity. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

Google Scholar Crossref

Bentz, V., & Shapiro, J. (1998). Mindful Inquiry in Social Research. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Google Scholar Crossref

Berger, P., & Luckmann, T. (1966). The Social Construction of Reality. New York: Anchor Books.

Google Scholar Crossref

Carranza Marquez, A. (2010). Testimonies in the British and Spanish Parliaments: A contrastive study on domestic/gender violence.” Journal of Pragmatics, 42(8), 2172-2180. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2010.01.022

Google Scholar Crossref

Coryell, J., Wagner, S., Clark, M. C., & Stuessy, C. (2011). Becoming real: Adult student impressions of developing an educational researcher identity. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 37(3), 367-383. doi: 10.1080/0309877X.2011.645456

Google Scholar Crossref

Cromdal, J., Tholander, M. & Aronsson, K. (2007). ”Doing Reluctance”: Managing Delivery of Assessments in Peer Evaluation. In A Hepburn and S Wiggins (Eds.), Discursive Research in Practice (pp. 203-223). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Google Scholar Crossref

Daniels, J., & Brooker, J. (2014). Student identity development in higher education: Implications for graduate attributes and work-readiness. Educational Research, 56(1), 65-76. doi: 10.1080/00131881.2013.874157

Google Scholar Crossref

Delahunty, J. (2012). "Who am I?": Exploring identity in online discussion forums. International Journal of Educational Research, 53, 407-420. doi: 10.1016/j.ijer.2012.05.005

Google Scholar Crossref

Early, M. (2014). A synthesis of the literature on research methods education. Teaching in Higher Education, 19(3), 242-253. doi: 10.1080/13562517.2013.860105

Google Scholar Crossref

Edwards, D. (1997). Discourse and Cognition. London: Sage.

Google Scholar Crossref

Edwards, D., &Potter, J. (1992). Discursive Psychology. London: Sage.

Google Scholar Crossref

Edwards, D., & Potter, J. (1993). Language and causation: A discursive action model of description and attribution. Psychological Review, 100(1), 23- 41. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.100.1.23

Google Scholar Crossref

Gavin, J., Rodham, K., & Poyer, H. (2008). The presentation of “Pro-Anorexia” in online group interactions. Qualitative Health Research, 18(3): 325-333. doi: 10.1177/1049732307311640

Google Scholar Crossref

Goffman, E. (1967). Interaction Ritual: Essays on Face-to-Face Behavior. New York:

Google Scholar Crossref

Anchor Books.

Google Scholar Crossref

Hardcastle, D., & Bisman, C. (2003). Innovations in teaching social work research. Social Work Education, 22(1), 31-43. doi: 10.1080/02615470309131

Google Scholar Crossref

Hatch, A. (2002). Doing Qualitative Research in Education Settings. Albany, N.Y.: State University of New York Press.

Google Scholar Crossref

Hepburn, A., & Wiggins, S. (2005). Developments in discursive psychology. Discourse & Society, 16, 595–601.

Google Scholar Crossref

Horne, J., & Wiggins, S. (2009). Doing being “On the Edge”: Managing the dilemma of being authentically suicidal in an online forum. Sociology of Health & Illness, 31(2),170-184. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9566.2008.01130.x

Google Scholar Crossref

Krauss, S. (2005). Research paradigms and meaning making: A primer. The Qualitative Report, 10(4), 758-770.

Google Scholar Crossref

Lather, P. (2006). Paradigm proliferation as a good thing to think with: Teaching research in education as a wild profusion. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 19(1), 35-57. doi: 10.1080/09518390500450144

Google Scholar Crossref

Metz, M. (2001). Intellectual border crossing in graduate education: A report from the field. Educational Researcher, 30(5), 1-7. doi: 10.3102/0013189X030005012

Google Scholar Crossref

Murakami-Ramalho, E., Militello, M., & Piert, J.. (2008). The wanderer, the chameleon, and the warrior: Experiences of doctoral students of color developing a research identity in educational administration. Qualitative Inquiry, 14(5), 806-834. doi: 10.1177/1077800408318309

Google Scholar Crossref

Murakami-Ramalho, E., Militello, M., & Piert, J. (2013). A view from within: How doctoral students in educational administration develop research knowledge and identity. Studies in Higher Education, 38(2), 256-271. doi: 10.1080/03075079.2011.578738

Google Scholar Crossref

Potter, J. (2002). Discourse analysis and discursive psychology. In H. Cooper (Ed.), APA handbook of Research Methods in Psychology: Vol. 2. Quantitative, Qualitative, Neuropsychological, and Biological (pp. 111–130). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association Press.

Google Scholar Crossref

Potter, J. (2004). Discourse analysis. In M. A. Hardy & A. Bryman (Eds.), Handbook of Data Analysis (pp. 607-624). London: Sage.

Google Scholar Crossref

Potter, J., & Wetherell, M. (1987). Discourse and Social Psychology: Beyond Attitudes and Behaviour. Los Angeles: Sage.

Google Scholar Crossref

Sacks, H. (1992). Lectures on Conversation. Oxford: Blackwell.

Google Scholar Crossref

Savin-Baden, M., & Major, C. H. (2013). Qualitative Research: The Essential Guide to Theory and Practice. New York: Routledge.

Google Scholar Crossref

Varga, M. A., & Paulus, T. (2014). Grieving online: Newcomers’ constructions of grief in an online support group. Death Studies, 38, 443-449.

Google Scholar Crossref

Wood, L., & Kroger, R. (2000). Doing Discourse Analysis: Methods for Studying Action in Talk and Text: Sage.

Google Scholar Crossref

Downloads

Published

2016-02-28

Almetric

Dimensions

How to Cite

Davis, C. A., & Lester, J. N. (2016). Graduate Students’ Construction of Researcher Identities Explored Through Discourse Analysis. Qualitative Research in Education, 5(1), 49–76. https://doi.org/10.17583/qre.2016.1473

Issue

Section

Articles