Graduate Students’ Construction of Researcher Identities Explored Through Discourse Analysis
https://doi.org/10.17583/qre.2016.1473
Keywords:
Downloads
Abstract
While many research methods courses challenge students to make sense of their own researcher identities as they relate to research paradigms and perspectives, there is a lack of research that examines how students actually go about constructing theses identities, particularly at the level of discourse. In this study, we attended to graduate students’ talk in an introductory research methods course, taking note of how students used particular discursive resources to construct a research identity in online classroom discussions. We analyzed 93 discussion posts students were asked to make in response to a discussion board prompt after completing assigned readings related to research paradigms and researcher identity. We identified two discursive patterns through our analysis: 1) minimizing knowledge, and 2) justifying paradigmatic orientations. Our findings highlight how being asked to talk about one’s research identity is a potentially fragile task, as evidenced by disclaimers of ‘knowing’, and one that evokes justifications and connections to students’ everyday lives. We highlight implications for the teaching of research methodology, particularly qualitative methods courses.
Downloads
References
Agee, J., & Smith, S. (2011). Online discussions in a doctoral research methods course: “Like a text by many authors.” Studies in Continuing Education, 33(3), 301-319. doi: 10.1080/0158037X.2010.515574
Google Scholar CrossrefAntaki, C., Billing, M., Edwards, D., & Potter, J. (2003). Discourse analysis means doing analysis: A critique of six analytic shortcomings. Discourse Analysis Online, 1.
Google Scholar CrossrefAttenborough, F. (2011). I don't f*** ing care! Marginalia and the (textual) negotiation of an academic identity by university students.” Discourse & Communication, 5(2), 99-121. doi: 10.1177/1750481310395447
Google Scholar CrossrefAuthor (2014).
Google Scholar CrossrefAuthor (2013).
Google Scholar CrossrefAuthor (2011).
Google Scholar CrossrefBall, C., & Pelco, L. (2006). Teaching research methods to undergraduate psychology students using an active cooperative learning approach. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 17(2), 147-154.
Google Scholar CrossrefBarnes, B., Palmary, I., & Durrheim, K. (2001). The denial of racism the role of humor, personal experience, and self-censorship. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 20(3), 321-338. doi: 10.1177/0261927X01020003003
Google Scholar CrossrefBenwell, B., & Stokoe, E. (2002). Constructing discussion tasks in university tutorials: Shifting dynamics and identities. Discourse Studies, 4(4), 429-453. doi: 10.1177/14614456020040040201
Google Scholar CrossrefBenwell, B., & Stokoe, E. (2005). University students resisting academic identity. In K. Richards & P. Seedhouse (Eds.), Applying Conversation Analysis (pp. 124-139). New York, NY: Palgrave, Macmillan.
Google Scholar CrossrefBenwell, B., & Stokoe, E. (2010). Discourse and Identity. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Google Scholar CrossrefBentz, V., & Shapiro, J. (1998). Mindful Inquiry in Social Research. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Google Scholar CrossrefBerger, P., & Luckmann, T. (1966). The Social Construction of Reality. New York: Anchor Books.
Google Scholar CrossrefCarranza Marquez, A. (2010). Testimonies in the British and Spanish Parliaments: A contrastive study on domestic/gender violence.” Journal of Pragmatics, 42(8), 2172-2180. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2010.01.022
Google Scholar CrossrefCoryell, J., Wagner, S., Clark, M. C., & Stuessy, C. (2011). Becoming real: Adult student impressions of developing an educational researcher identity. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 37(3), 367-383. doi: 10.1080/0309877X.2011.645456
Google Scholar CrossrefCromdal, J., Tholander, M. & Aronsson, K. (2007). ”Doing Reluctance”: Managing Delivery of Assessments in Peer Evaluation. In A Hepburn and S Wiggins (Eds.), Discursive Research in Practice (pp. 203-223). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar CrossrefDaniels, J., & Brooker, J. (2014). Student identity development in higher education: Implications for graduate attributes and work-readiness. Educational Research, 56(1), 65-76. doi: 10.1080/00131881.2013.874157
Google Scholar CrossrefDelahunty, J. (2012). "Who am I?": Exploring identity in online discussion forums. International Journal of Educational Research, 53, 407-420. doi: 10.1016/j.ijer.2012.05.005
Google Scholar CrossrefEarly, M. (2014). A synthesis of the literature on research methods education. Teaching in Higher Education, 19(3), 242-253. doi: 10.1080/13562517.2013.860105
Google Scholar CrossrefEdwards, D. (1997). Discourse and Cognition. London: Sage.
Google Scholar CrossrefEdwards, D., &Potter, J. (1992). Discursive Psychology. London: Sage.
Google Scholar CrossrefEdwards, D., & Potter, J. (1993). Language and causation: A discursive action model of description and attribution. Psychological Review, 100(1), 23- 41. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.100.1.23
Google Scholar CrossrefGavin, J., Rodham, K., & Poyer, H. (2008). The presentation of “Pro-Anorexia” in online group interactions. Qualitative Health Research, 18(3): 325-333. doi: 10.1177/1049732307311640
Google Scholar CrossrefGoffman, E. (1967). Interaction Ritual: Essays on Face-to-Face Behavior. New York:
Google Scholar CrossrefAnchor Books.
Google Scholar CrossrefHardcastle, D., & Bisman, C. (2003). Innovations in teaching social work research. Social Work Education, 22(1), 31-43. doi: 10.1080/02615470309131
Google Scholar CrossrefHatch, A. (2002). Doing Qualitative Research in Education Settings. Albany, N.Y.: State University of New York Press.
Google Scholar CrossrefHepburn, A., & Wiggins, S. (2005). Developments in discursive psychology. Discourse & Society, 16, 595–601.
Google Scholar CrossrefHorne, J., & Wiggins, S. (2009). Doing being “On the Edge”: Managing the dilemma of being authentically suicidal in an online forum. Sociology of Health & Illness, 31(2),170-184. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9566.2008.01130.x
Google Scholar CrossrefKrauss, S. (2005). Research paradigms and meaning making: A primer. The Qualitative Report, 10(4), 758-770.
Google Scholar CrossrefLather, P. (2006). Paradigm proliferation as a good thing to think with: Teaching research in education as a wild profusion. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 19(1), 35-57. doi: 10.1080/09518390500450144
Google Scholar CrossrefMetz, M. (2001). Intellectual border crossing in graduate education: A report from the field. Educational Researcher, 30(5), 1-7. doi: 10.3102/0013189X030005012
Google Scholar CrossrefMurakami-Ramalho, E., Militello, M., & Piert, J.. (2008). The wanderer, the chameleon, and the warrior: Experiences of doctoral students of color developing a research identity in educational administration. Qualitative Inquiry, 14(5), 806-834. doi: 10.1177/1077800408318309
Google Scholar CrossrefMurakami-Ramalho, E., Militello, M., & Piert, J. (2013). A view from within: How doctoral students in educational administration develop research knowledge and identity. Studies in Higher Education, 38(2), 256-271. doi: 10.1080/03075079.2011.578738
Google Scholar CrossrefPotter, J. (2002). Discourse analysis and discursive psychology. In H. Cooper (Ed.), APA handbook of Research Methods in Psychology: Vol. 2. Quantitative, Qualitative, Neuropsychological, and Biological (pp. 111–130). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association Press.
Google Scholar CrossrefPotter, J. (2004). Discourse analysis. In M. A. Hardy & A. Bryman (Eds.), Handbook of Data Analysis (pp. 607-624). London: Sage.
Google Scholar CrossrefPotter, J., & Wetherell, M. (1987). Discourse and Social Psychology: Beyond Attitudes and Behaviour. Los Angeles: Sage.
Google Scholar CrossrefSacks, H. (1992). Lectures on Conversation. Oxford: Blackwell.
Google Scholar CrossrefSavin-Baden, M., & Major, C. H. (2013). Qualitative Research: The Essential Guide to Theory and Practice. New York: Routledge.
Google Scholar CrossrefVarga, M. A., & Paulus, T. (2014). Grieving online: Newcomers’ constructions of grief in an online support group. Death Studies, 38, 443-449.
Google Scholar CrossrefWood, L., & Kroger, R. (2000). Doing Discourse Analysis: Methods for Studying Action in Talk and Text: Sage.
Google Scholar CrossrefDownloads
Published
Almetric
Dimensions
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
All articles are published under Creative Commons copyright (CC BY). Authors hold the copyright and retain publishing rights without restrictions, but authors allow anyone to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute, and/or copy articles as the original source is cited.